I changed my mapping test to use the overload .VerifyTheMappings(TEntity first), and suddenly my test just passes. I haven't used that overload before, and since I'm not really sure how it works, I'm worried I'm getting a false positive.
I'm surprised mainly because I didn't think I was using auto mapping, and I haven't even mapped up the entire entity yet. So now I'm wondering:
Does this test pass because It should, or because it doesn't really test anything?
Update: After further investigating I've found that as long as I map the ID, everything works. Is this how it's supposed to be? What does .VerifyTheMappings(TEntity first) really test?
My code:
Configuration
Fluently.Configure()
.Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008.DefaultSchema("dbo")
.ConnectionString(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["Nitro_Empty"].ConnectionString))
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<UserMap>());
The entity:
public class InspectionObject : IEntity<int>
{
public virtual int ID { get; set; }
public virtual Project Project { get; set; }
public virtual InspectionObjectType Type { get; set; }
public virtual User CreatedByUser { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime Created { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime LastUpdated { get; set; }
public virtual User LastUpdatedByUser { get; set; }
public virtual string Littera { get; set; }
public virtual string Owner { get; set; }
public virtual string Address { get; set; }
public virtual string Caretaker { get; set; }
public virtual string Remarks { get; set; }
public virtual float PlacementX { get; set; }
public virtual float PlacementY { get; set; }
public virtual float PlacementZ { get; set; }
}
The map:
public class InspectionObjectMap : ClassMap<InspectionObject>
{
public InspectionObjectMap()
{
Id(i => i.ID).Not.Nullable();
}
}
The test:
[Test]
public void IspectionObject_MappingsAreOK()
{
var dtenow = DateTime.Now;
dtenow = new DateTime(dtenow.Ticks - (dtenow.Ticks % TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond), dtenow.Kind);
var io = new InspectionObject
{
ID = 1,
Project = Data.Project,
Type = Data.InspectionObjectTypeVilla,
CreatedByUser = Data.Consultant,
Created = dtenow,
LastUpdatedByUser = Data.UserConsultant1,
LastUpdated = dtenow.AddHours(1),
Littera = "15",
Owner = "Fastighetsägare",
Address = "Adress",
Caretaker = "Fastighetsskötare",
Remarks = "Anteckningar",
PlacementX = 1F,
PlacementY = 2F,
PlacementZ = 3F
};
var session = IoC.Resolve<ISession>();
new PersistenceSpecification<InspectionObject>.VerifyTheMappings(io);
}
(yes, I have some export/drop schema in my SetUp and TearDown routines as well, but it's all standard. It's just a little too deeply nested into the testing framework built around this application for me to want to dig out the relevant pieces, since it's not doing anything fancy, just in fancy places...)
I've found that as long as I map the
ID, everything works. Is this how it's
supposed to be? What does
.VerifyTheMappings(TEntity first)
really test?
You can easily see how the test works by looking at it's source
All VerifyTheMappings appears to be testing is whether it can commit and load your object (as such it only needs to have an ID mapped). If you want to test anything other than whether you can save or load an ID, you have to get some values into the allProperties List in that object. This is commonly done with the CheckProperty or CheckReference calls. VerifyTheMappings(T first) doesn't do anything special to populate allProperties automatically. The documentation provides the following example of correct use:
public void CanCorrectlyMapEmployee()
{
new PersistenceSpecification<Employee>(session, new CustomEqualityComparer())
.CheckProperty(c => c.Id, 1)
.CheckProperty(c => c.FirstName, "John")
.CheckProperty(c => c.LastName, "Doe")
.CheckReference(c => c.Store, new Store() {Name = "MyStore"})
.VerifyTheMappings();
}
Related
Im trying to create a persistent sqllite db (creation tables once you install the app, deletion of db when you uninstall app)
I have a issue that I cant save my sub objects for example
public class ObjectInstanceResponseModel : GenericResponseModel
{
public ObservableCollection<ObjectInstanceData> ObjectInstances { get; set; }
}
public class ObjectInstanceData : GenericResponseModel
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("idObjectinstance")]
public int IdObjectInstance { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("objectclass_idObjectclass")]
public int ObjectClassIdObjectClass { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("objectclassname")]
public string ObjectClassName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("visibilitylevel")]
public int VisibilityLevel { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("showname")]
public bool ShowName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("showicon")]
public bool ShowIcon { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("creationtime")]
public DateTimeOffset CreationTime { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("users_idUsers")]
public int UsersIdUsers { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("isfavorite")]
public bool? IsFavorite { get; set; }
[OneToMany("ObjectInstanceDataStrings")]
[JsonProperty("strings")]
public List<String> Strings { get; set; }
}
public class String
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
[JsonProperty("idObjectparameterstring")]
public int? IdObjectParameterString { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(ObjectInstanceData))]
public int ObjectInstanceDataStrings { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("stringvalue")]
public string StringValue { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("objectparameterset_idObjectparameterset")]
public int? ObjectParameterSetIdObjectParameterSet { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("showinballon")]
public bool? ShowInBallon { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("idClassparameter")]
public int IdClassParameter { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("classparametername")]
public string ClassParameterName { get; set; }
}
So, my class String is always empty, although there are some rows in the table that I created Strings..
Am I need a lazy loading for this?
I implemented sqllite through depedency service in my app.cs like this:
public partial class App : Application
{
public static SQLiteConnection DatabaseConnection { get; set; }
public App()
{
InitializeComponent();
DatabaseConnection = DependencyService.Get<IConnection>().GetConnection();
CreateTables();
}
private void CreateTables()
{
DatabaseConnection.CreateTable<ObjectInstanceData>();
DatabaseConnection.CreateTable<Models.Objects.String>();
}
protected override void OnStart()
{
}
protected override void OnSleep()
{
}
protected override void OnResume()
{
}
}
So, basically the logic should be when no internet, work with sql lite (keep local changes), and when internet come back upload that changes that kept in db, and erase data from tables.
You noticed that Im using response model for api.
So, Im calling from my FavoriteObjectViewModel this:
var response = await ApiServiceProvider.GetObjectInstances(null, true);
and in the ApiServiceProvider:
public static async Task<ObjectInstanceResponseModel> GetObjectInstances(string queryString = null, bool? onlyFavorites = null)
{
HttpResponseMessage response;
response = await apiClient.GetAsync(objectInstancesEndpoint);
var resultContent = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
var result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<ObservableCollection<ObjectInstanceData>>(resultContent);
objectInstanceResponse.ObjectInstances = result;
//after each api call I need to update db
//delete previous data, and add fresh data from api
App.DatabaseConnection.DeleteAll<ObjectInstanceData>();
foreach (var item in result)
{
App.DatabaseConnection.Insert(item);
if (item.Strings != null && item.Strings.Count > 0)
App.DatabaseConnection.InsertAll(item.Strings);
}
//I only get the data for ObjectInstanceData, Strings model is empty!
var objectsResponseDb = App.DatabaseConnection.GetAllWithChildren<ObjectInstanceData>();
objectInstanceResponse.Succeeded = true;
return objectInstanceResponse;
}
So, my questions are:
If I create tables each time in App.cs is that mean, that I not store data, when user quit application, and re-enter again?
Why is the model Strings empty? When I invoke var strings = App.DatabaseConnection.GetAllWithChildren<Models.Objects.String>(); I can see that there is data?
What is the best approach for doing offline "logging"? maybe there is a some better nuget for sqllite?
I don't know much about persistent databases but one thing I can tell you for sure:you're approach is wrong.
You should create a separate class for the database's logic like creating tables and instantiating the connection along with other methods for manipulating data.
In the App class you can create a static resource of the database class which you can call it and make use of the methods in it.
I'm not very good with explaining but here it is a very basic example of how it should look:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/get-started/tutorials/local-database/?tutorial-step=2&tabs=vswin.
Good day, a really newbie developer here.
I Have a form and it have a entity of "QueueNumber" Can someone show me how to code so that when ever i save my form it generates automatically QueueNumber + the Prefix, btw my prefix entity is in another class
public class Queue
{
public int QueueId { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
public string QueueNumber
public int ServiceId { get; set; }
public Service Service { get; set; }
}
-
public class Service
{
public int ServiceId { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Service Name")]
public string ServiceName { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Service Letter")]
public string ServiceLetter { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Status")]
public bool? Status { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Assigned Location")]
public int? LocationId { get; set; }
public virtual Location Location { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Customer> Customer { get; set; }
}
Outcome in database :
1. A001
2. A002
3. A003
i just want to be able to generate a queue number automatically and when i save in data base its like A= Service Letter and 001=QueueNumber. Thankyou
If the QueueNumber needs to be persisted to the table, then I would set it up as a calculated column so that the database can manage computing it and updating it if the underlying fields change.
If it is just something that you want to represent in the UI then I would recommend having the view model calculate this.
The entity can calculate something like this with a [NotMapped] attribute. For example:
public class Queue
{
public int QueueId { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
[NotMapped]
public string QueueNumber
{
get { return string.Format("{0}{1:000}", Service?.ServiceLetter ?? "?", QueueId);
}
[ForeignKey("Service")]
public int ServiceId { get; set; }
public Service Service { get; set; }
}
The problem with this approach is that to be able to rely on your Queue to reveal a QueueNumber, the Queue must eager load the Service, or you enable lazy loading and risk that performance hit vs. having Service == #null and getting an exception or invalid QueueNumber result. In the above example, if the Service isn't eager loaded you will get back something like "?001".
I prefer to use ViewModels for a number of reasons including performance, security, and handling conditions like this more cleanly.
For example, given a QueueViewModel as such:
[Serializable]
public sealed class QueueViewModel
{
public int QueueId{ get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string ServiceName { get; set; }
public string ServiceLetter { get; set; }
public string QueueNumber
{
return string.Format("{0}{1:000}", ServiceLetter, QueueId);
}
}
Then when reading the data, we don't pass Entities to the view, we pass our view model...
var viewModel = context.Queues
.Where(x => x.QueueId == queueId)
.Select(x => new QueueViewModel
{
QueueId = x.QueueId,
Name = x.Name,
ServiceName = x.Service.Name,
ServiceLetter = x.Service.ServiceLetter
}).Single();
return viewModel;
The benefits of this approach:
We don't have to worry about eager/lazy loading. The query fetches everything needed, and our view model can compute anything needed from the data loaded. (Queries can compute values as well if you like, but be wary of limitations in that the query has to be able to go to SQL, so no user functions, etc.)
Performance is improved since the query only returns the data needed rather than entire entity graphs, and no rish of lazy load hits.
Security is improved, we expose no more data to the client than is expected/needed, and we don't open the door for "lazy" updates where entities are attached to a context and saved without proper validation.
Probably a simple question, but there is something I can't get my head around.
My structure Bundle -> BundleMembers -> InsuranceTypes
When I retrieve a single record form BundleMembers, and I include Bundle. EF6 automatically includes all BundleMembers in the Bundle
Example:
public async Task<List<BundleMember>> GetBundleMembers(string userId, bool includeBundle, bool includeInsuranceTypes)
{
var bundleMembers = db.BundleMembers.Where(m => string.Equals(m.UserId, userId, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase));
if (includeBundle)
{
bundleMembers = bundleMembers.Include(o => o.Bundle);
}
if (includeInsuranceTypes)
{
bundleMembers = bundleMembers.Include(m => m.BundleMemberInsuranceType);
}
return await bundleMembers.ToListAsync();
}
I call the function like this:
GetBundleMembers(_userManager.GetUserId(User), true, false)
Do I have to access the data from Bundle, to avoid this?
EDIT 1:
My data model looks like this:
public class Bundle
{
public int BundleId { get; set; }
public State State { get; set; }
public ICollection<BundleMember> Members { get; set; }
public ICollection<InviteLink> InviteLinks { get; set; }
public string BundleName { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string ImagePath { get; set; }
}
public enum State
{
NotApproved,
Approved,
Disabled,
Rejected
}
public class BundleMember
{
public ApplicationUser User { get; set; }
public string UserId { get; set; }
public int BundleMemberId { get; set; }
public int BundleId { get; set; }
public Bundle Bundle { get; set; }
public bool Admin { get; set; }
public int Price { get; set; }
public int Coverage { get; set; }
public ICollection<BundleMemberInsuranceType> BundleMemberInsuranceType { get; set; }
}
I did not include BundleMemberInsuranceType and InviteLink as they are working fine.
Relevant part of ApplicationDbContext:
public DbSet<Bundle> Bundles { get; set; }
public DbSet<BundleMember> BundleMembers { get; set; }
As suggested in comments:
The described behavior is actually expected. Since includeBundle is set to true, both Bundles and referenced BundleMembers are in the context, and relationship fixup will set all navigation properties according to the FK relationships.
Obviously, this works both from BundleMembers to Bundles and from Bundles to BundleMembers since .Include does nothing more than create the SQL statements to load the related entries into the context as well and relationship fixup will do the rest.
To have the Bundles not have BundleMembers, you'll have to load them without the BundleMembers in the context and set the navigation properties yourself (EF will always set both direct and inverse navigation properties). In order to do this, there are two main ways:
Either load your bundles in a fresh context without the previous loaded BundleMembers (best practice is to load them into memory since EF navigation properties are loaded due to eager loading; you could have entries attached to two contexts and an exception will be thrown) or
Detach your BundleMembers from the context before loading the Bundles into it.
Using Web API and OData, I have a service which exposes Data Transfer Objects instead of the Entity Framework entities.
I use AutoMapper to transform the EF Entities into their DTO counter parts using ProjectTo():
public class SalesOrdersController : ODataController
{
private DbContext _DbContext;
public SalesOrdersController(DbContext context)
{
_DbContext = context;
}
[EnableQuery]
public IQueryable<SalesOrderDto> Get(ODataQueryOptions<SalesOrderDto> queryOptions)
{
return _DbContext.SalesOrders.ProjectTo<SalesOrderDto>(AutoMapperConfig.Config);
}
[EnableQuery]
public IQueryable<SalesOrderDto> Get([FromODataUri] string key, ODataQueryOptions<SalesOrderDto> queryOptions)
{
return _DbContext.SalesOrders.Where(so => so.SalesOrderNumber == key)
.ProjectTo<SalesOrderDto>(AutoMapperConfig.Config);
}
}
AutoMapper (V4.2.1) is configured as follows, note the ExplicitExpansion() which prevents serialisation auto expanding navigation properties when they are not requested:
cfg.CreateMap<SalesOrderHeader, SalesOrderDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.SalesOrderLines, opt => opt.ExplicitExpansion());
cfg.CreateMap<SalesOrderLine, SalesOrderLineDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.MasterStockRecord, opt => opt.ExplicitExpansion())
.ForMember(dest => dest.SalesOrderHeader, opt => opt.ExplicitExpansion());
ExplicitExpansion() then creates a new problem where the following request throws an error:
/odatademo/SalesOrders('123456')?$expand=SalesOrderLines
The query specified in the URI is not valid. The specified type member 'SalesOrderLines' is not supported in LINQ to Entities
The navigation property SalesOrderLines is unknown to EF so this error is pretty much what I expected to happen. The question is, how do I handle this type of request?
The ProjectTo() method does have an overload that allows me to pass in an array of properties that require expansion, I found & modified the extension method ToNavigationPropertyArray to try and parse the request into a string array:
[EnableQuery]
public IQueryable<SalesOrderDto> Get([FromODataUri] string key, ODataQueryOptions<SalesOrderDto> queryOptions)
{
return _DbContext.SalesOrders.Where(so => so.SalesOrderNumber == key)
.ProjectTo<SalesOrderDto>(AutoMapperConfig.Config, null, queryOptions.ToNavigationPropertyArray());
}
public static string[] ToNavigationPropertyArray(this ODataQueryOptions source)
{
if (source == null) { return new string[]{}; }
var expandProperties = string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(source.SelectExpand?.RawExpand) ? new List<string>().ToArray() : source.SelectExpand.RawExpand.Split(',');
for (var expandIndex = 0; expandIndex < expandProperties.Length; expandIndex++)
{
// Need to transform the odata syntax for expanding properties to something EF will understand:
// OData may pass something in this form: "SalesOrderLines($expand=MasterStockRecord)";
// But EF wants it like this: "SalesOrderLines.MasterStockRecord";
expandProperties[expandIndex] = expandProperties[expandIndex].Replace(" ", "");
expandProperties[expandIndex] = expandProperties[expandIndex].Replace("($expand=", ".");
expandProperties[expandIndex] = expandProperties[expandIndex].Replace(")", "");
}
var selectProperties = source.SelectExpand == null || string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(source.SelectExpand.RawSelect) ? new List<string>().ToArray() : source.SelectExpand.RawSelect.Split(',');
//Now do the same for Select (incomplete)
var propertiesToExpand = expandProperties.Union(selectProperties).ToArray();
return propertiesToExpand;
}
This works for expand, so now I can handle a request like the following:
/odatademo/SalesOrders('123456')?$expand=SalesOrderLines
or a more complicated request like:
/odatademo/SalesOrders('123456')?$expand=SalesOrderLines($expand=MasterStockRecord)
However, more complicated request that try to combine $select with $expand will fail:
/odatademo/SalesOrders('123456')?$expand=SalesOrderLines($select=OrderQuantity)
Sequence contains no elements
So, the question is: am I approaching this the right way?
It feels very smelly that I would have to write something to parse and transform the ODataQueryOptions into something EF can understand.
It seems this is a rather popular topic:
odata-expand-dtos-and-entity-framework
how-to-specify-the-shape-of-results-with-webapi2-odata-with-expand
web-api-queryable-how-to-apply-automapper
how-do-i-map-an-odata-query-against-a-dto-to-another-entity
While most of these suggest using ProjectTo, none seem to address serialisation auto expanding properties, or how to handle expansion if ExplictExpansion has been configured.
Classes and Config below:
Entity Framework (V6.1.3) entities:
public class SalesOrderHeader
{
public string SalesOrderNumber { get; set; }
public string Alpha { get; set; }
public string Customer { get; set; }
public string Status { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<SalesOrderLine> SalesOrderLines { get; set; }
}
public class SalesOrderLine
{
public string SalesOrderNumber { get; set; }
public string OrderLineNumber { get; set; }
public string Product { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public decimal OrderQuantity { get; set; }
public virtual SalesOrderHeader SalesOrderHeader { get; set; }
public virtual MasterStockRecord MasterStockRecord { get; set; }
}
public class MasterStockRecord
{
public string ProductCode { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public decimal Quantity { get; set; }
}
OData (V6.13.0) Data Transfer Objects:
public class SalesOrderDto
{
[Key]
public string SalesOrderNumber { get; set; }
public string Customer { get; set; }
public string Status { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<SalesOrderLineDto> SalesOrderLines { get; set; }
}
public class SalesOrderLineDto
{
[Key]
[ForeignKey("SalesOrderHeader")]
public string SalesOrderNumber { get; set; }
[Key]
public string OrderLineNumber { get; set; }
public string LineType { get; set; }
public string Product { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public decimal OrderQuantity { get; set; }
public virtual SalesOrderDto SalesOrderHeader { get; set; }
public virtual StockDto MasterStockRecord { get; set; }
}
public class StockDto
{
[Key]
public string StockCode { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public decimal Quantity { get; set; }
}
OData Config:
var builder = new ODataConventionModelBuilder();
builder.EntitySet<StockDto>("Stock");
builder.EntitySet<SalesOrderDto>("SalesOrders");
builder.EntitySet<SalesOrderLineDto>("SalesOrderLines");
I have created an Automapper explicit navigation expansion utility function that should work with N-deph expands. Posting it here since it might help someone.
public List<string> ProcessExpands(IEnumerable<SelectItem> items, string parentNavPath="")
{
var expandedPropsList = new List<String>();
if (items == null) return expandedPropsList;
foreach (var selectItem in items)
{
if (selectItem is ExpandedNavigationSelectItem)
{
var expandItem = selectItem as ExpandedNavigationSelectItem;
var navProperty = expandItem.PathToNavigationProperty?.FirstSegment?.Identifier;
expandedPropsList.Add($"{parentNavPath}{navProperty}");
//go recursively to subproperties
var subExpandList = ProcessExpands(expandItem?.SelectAndExpand?.SelectedItems, $"{parentNavPath}{navProperty}.");
expandedPropsList = expandedPropsList.Concat(subExpandList).ToList();
}
}
return expandedPropsList;
}
You can call it with :
var navExp = ProcessExpands(options?.SelectExpand?.SelectExpandClause?.SelectedItems)
it will return a list with ["Parent" ,"Parent.Child"]
I never really managed to work this one out. The ToNavigationPropertyArray() extension method helps a little, but does not handle infinite depth navigation.
The real solution is to create Actions or Functions to allow clients to request data requiring a more complicated query.
The other alternative is to make multiple smaller/simple calls then aggregate the data on the client, but this isn't really ideal.
When you want to mark something for explicit expansion in AutoMapper, you need to also opt-back-in when calling ProjectTo<>().
// map
cfg.CreateMap<SalesOrderHeader, SalesOrderDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.SalesOrderLines, opt => opt.ExplicitExpansion());
// updated controller
[EnableQuery]
public IQueryable<SalesOrderDto> Get()
{
return _dbContext.SalesOrders
.ProjectTo<SalesOrderDto>(
AutoMapperConfig.Config,
so => so.SalesOrderLines,
// ... additional opt-ins
);
}
While the AutoMapper wiki does state this, the example is perhaps a little misleading by not including the paired ExplicitExpansion() call.
To control which members are expanded during projection, set ExplicitExpansion in the configuration and then pass in the members you want to explicitly expand:
According to given project id(this id is coming to action as a parameter), I want to find this project and this project's issues and then I want to find some issues which has the "bug" type using linq queries in my MVC asp.net web application. But when I try below code in my action in ProjectController, I take this error: Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collection.Generic.List<System.Collections.Generic.List<MVCTest1.Models.Issue>>'to 'System.Collections.Generic.List<MVCTest1.Models.Issue>' and
List<Issue> issueList = (from i in db.Projects where i.projectID == projectId select i.Issues).ToList();
List<Issue> bugList = (from bug in issueList where bug. ) --> I cannot reach properties of bug issue
Here my project Model:
public class Project
{
public int projectID { get; set; }
public string projectName { get; set; }
public string descriptionProject { get; set; }
public Project parentProject { get; set; }
public string identifier { get; set; }
public DateTime date { get; set; }
public List<Project> subProjects { get; set; }
public virtual List<Issue> Issues { get; set; }
}
and my Issue Model:
public class Issue
{
public int issueID { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
public string subject { get; set; }
public IssueStatus? status { get; set; }
public Issue parentTask { get; set; }
public DateTime startDate { get; set; }
public DateTime dueDate { get; set; }
public int done { get; set; }
public IssuePriority? priority { get; set; }
public IssueType? type { get; set; }
public virtual List<User> Users { get; set; }
}
finally my enum:
public enum IssueType
{
Bug = 0,
Feature = 1,
Support = 2,
Operation = 3
}
Thanks in advance.
// edit 2
var project = db.Projects.Single(p => p.projectID == projectId);
var issues = project.Issues;
var bugIssues = from bug in issues where bug.type == 0 select bug;
return PartialView(bugIssues);
When I write this I got this error :
The model item passed into the dictionary is of type 'System.Linq.Enumerable+WhereListIterator1[MVCTest1.Models.Issue]', but this dictionary requires a model item of type 'System.Collections.Generic.List1[MVCTest1.Models.Issue]'.
The problem is that your Issues property is already a List<Issue>. I suspect you want something like:
// TODO: Fix property naming...
var project = db.Projects.Single(p => p.projectId == projectId);
var issues = project.Issues;
Now issues will be a List<Issue> rather than a List<List<Issue>>.
EDIT: For the next problem, you've got an IEnumerable<Issue> but you're expecting a List<Issue>, so you need to call ToList() at that point. For example:
var project = db.Projects.Single(p => p.projectId == projectId);
return PartialView(project.Issues.Where(b => b.type == 0).ToList());
The problem is in the expected model of the MVC view, it expects a System.Collections.Generic.List<T>, but you gave a System.Linq.Enumerable.
Try do this.
return PartialView(bugIssues.ToList());