Unit testing Raven and ASP.NET Membership - asp.net

I'm starting a web app that will be using asp.net membership services (with a sql server backend) to look after users and RavenDb for everything else.
I'm new to unit testing and would appreciate it if I can run past you what I've got so far with one example method.
This is HelixManager
public class HelixManager:IDisposable
{
private readonly IMembershipProvider _membership;
private readonly IRepository _repos;
public HelixManager()
{
_membership = new AspNetMembershipProvider();
_repos = new RavenRepository();
}
public HelixManager(IMembershipProvider membershipProvider, IRepository repos)
{
_membership = membershipProvider;
_repos = repos;
}
public User CreateAdmin(User newUser, string password)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(newUser.Email)) throw new ArgumentException("Email must be supplied");
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(password)) throw new ArgumentException("Password must be supplied");
var memberId = _membership.CreateUser(newUser, password);
if (memberId != null)
{
_membership.AddToRole(newUser, "Admin");
newUser.Type = UserType.Admin;
newUser.MemberId = memberId;
_repos.Store<User>(newUser);
}
return newUser;
}
This is IMembershipProvider
public interface IMembershipProvider
{
string CreateUser(User newUser, string password);
void AddToRole(User user, string rolename);
}
and the implementation AspNetMembershipProvider
public class AspNetMembershipProvider : IMembershipProvider
{
public string CreateUser(User newUser, string password)
{
MembershipCreateStatus status;
MembershipUser memUser = System.Web.Security.Membership.CreateUser(newUser.Email, password, newUser.Email, "", "", true, out status);
return memUser.ProviderUserKey.ToString();
}
public void AddToRole(User user, string role)
{
Roles.AddUserToRole(user.Email, role);
}
}
This is IRepository
public interface IRepository
{
T Store<T>(T item);
}
and it's implementation
public class RavenRepository : IRepository
{
private readonly DocumentStore _store;
public RavenRepository()
{
_store = new DocumentStore { DefaultDatabase = "Helix", Url = "http://localhost:8080" };
_store.Initialize();
}
public T Store<T>(T item)
{
using (var session = _store.OpenSession())
{
session.Store(item);
session.SaveChanges();
}
return item;
}
}
In my test project, I have created fake implementations of both of these:
FakeMembershipProvider:
class FakeMembershipProvider : IMembershipProvider
{
public string CreateUser(User newUser, string password)
{
CreatedUser = true;
return newUser.Email == "email#example.com" ? Guid.NewGuid().ToString() : null;
}
public void AddToRole(User user, string rolename)
{
AddedToRole = true;
}
public bool AddedToRole;
public bool CreatedUser;
}
and FakeRepository:
public class FakeRepository : IRepository
{
public T Store<T>(T item)
{
StoreCalled = true;
return item;
}
public bool StoreCalled;
}
The tests are then approx as follows:
public class UserManagementTests
{
private readonly HelixManager _hm;
private readonly IMembershipProvider _fakeMembershipProvider;
private readonly IRepository _fakeRepository;
public UserManagementTests()
{
_fakeMembershipProvider = new FakeMembershipProvider();
_fakeRepository = new FakeRepository();
_hm = new HelixManager(_fakeMembershipProvider, _fakeRepository);
}
[TestMethod]
public void CreateAdminReturnsValidAdminUser()
{
var newUser = new User
{
AvatarName = "fred",
Email = "email#example.com",
Forename = "Fred",
Surname = "Jones"
};
_hm.CreateAdmin(newUser, "password");
Assert.IsNotNull(newUser.MemberId);
Assert.AreEqual(UserType.Admin, newUser.Type);
}
What am I asking is before I get any further down this line, is this the right way to be going about this? Or are there better ways of doing this?
I also plan to have an IntegrationTests project that will use a real db and a real RavenDb instance to test end to end.
Cheers,
Dave

I see nothing wrong with that approach. You could go the route of using a Mocking tool (Rhino Mocks, Moq, NSubstitute) to create your fakes instead of doing it by hand, but that is really a matter of personal preference and your personal comfort-level with the tools.
Your test is clearly structured, asserting based on state (which is a good thing), and your not trying to test too many things at once, which is a common mistake (even for those of us who have been doing this for a while).
If you haven't seen it yet, I can highly recommend Roy Osherove's Art of Unit Testing, which has a lot of very good information about unit testing, including things like keeping tests clean, how to deal with less-testable areas of code, etc.
I say keep truckin' :)

Your tests are look absolutely fine to me. Right approach (mocks) right way (AAA).
Go ahead :)

My problem is actually with this:
I'm starting a web app that will be
using asp.net membership services
(with a sql server backend) to look
after users and RavenDb for everything
else.
Why are you doing this?
It would be easier to make everything in RavenDB, and your unit testing issue would be as simple as new EmbeddableDocumentStore { RunInMemory = true }

Related

The optimal way to decouple business logic from controller

The rule is that controllers shouldn't have business logic, instead they should delegate it to the services. But when we do that, we can't handle all possible cases and return appropriate HTTP response.
Let's look at an example. Let's say that we are building some kind of a social network, and we need to create an endpoint for rating (liking or disliking) a post.
First let's take a look at an example where we delegate the logic to the service, this is our controller action:
public IActionResult Rate(long postId, RatingType ratingType)
{
var user = GetCurrentUser();
PostRating newPostRating = _postsService.Rate(postId, ratingType, user);
return Created(newPostRating);
}
Do you see a problem in this? What if there is no post with the given id, how would we return a not found response? What if user has no permissions to rate a post, how would we return a forbidden response?
PostsService.Rate can only return a new PostRating, but what about other cases? Well, we could throw an exception, we would need to create a lot of custom exception, so that we can map them to the appropriate HTTP responses. I don't like to use exceptions for this, I think there is a better way to do handle these cases instead of exceptions. Because I think that cases when post doesn't exist and when user has no permissions aren't exceptional at all, they're just normal cases just like rating a post successfully.
What I propose, is handling that logic in a controller instead. Because in my opinion, that should be a controllers responsibility anyway, to check all of the permissions before commiting an action. So this is how I would do it:
public IActionResult Rate(long postId, RatingType ratingType)
{
var user = GetCurrentUser();
var post = _postsRepository.GetByIdWithRatings(postId);
if (post == null)
return NotFound();
if (!_permissionService.CanRate(user, post))
return Forbidden();
PostRating newPostRating = new PostRating
{
Post = post,
Author = user,
Type = ratingType
};
_postRatingsRepository.Save(newPostRating);
return Created(newPostRating);
}
This is the way it should be done in my opinion but I bet that someone would say that this is too much logic for the controller, or that you shouldn't use a repository in it.
If you don't like using a repository in controller than where instead would you put a method that gets or saves posts? In service? So there would be PostsService.GetByIdWithRatings and PostsService.Save that would do nothing else but just call PostsRepository.GetByIdWithRatings and PostsRepository.Save. This so unnecessary and only causes boilerplate code.
Update:
Maybe someone will say to check the permissions using PostsService and then call PostsService.Rate. This is bad because it involves more unnecessary trips to database. For an example, it would probably be something like this:
public IActionResult Rate(long postId, RatingType ratingType)
{
var user = GetCurrentUser();
if(_postsService.Exists(postId))
return NotFound();
if(!_postsService.CanUserRate(user, postId))
return Forbidden();
PostRating newPostRating = _postsService.Rate(postId, ratingType, user);
return Created(newPostRating);
}
Do I even need to explain any further why this is bad?
There's a number of ways to handle this, but the closest thing to a "best practice" method is probably using a result class. For example, if your service method creates a rating and then returns that rating it created, you instead return an object that encapsulates the rating along with other relevant information, such as success status, error messages, if any etc.
public class RateResult
{
public bool Succeeded { get; internal set; }
public PostRating PostRating { get; internal set; }
public string[] Errors { get; internal set; }
}
Then, your controller code would become something like:
public IActionResult Rate(long postId, RatingType ratingType)
{
var user = GetCurrentUser();
var result = _postsService.Rate(postId, ratingType, user);
if (result.Succeeded)
{
return Created(result.PostRating);
}
else
{
// handle errors
}
}
What I did (just now) is created new class ApiResult
public class ApiResult
{
public int StatusCode { get; private set; } = 200;
public string RouteName { get; private set; }
public object RouteValues { get; private set; }
public object Content { get; private set; }
public void Ok(object content = null)
{
this.StatusCode = 200;
this.Content = content;
}
public void Created(string routeName, object routeValues, object content)
{
this.StatusCode = 201;
this.RouteName = routeName;
this.RouteValues = routeValues;
this.Content = content;
}
public void BadRequest(object content = null)
{
this.StatusCode = 400;
this.Content = content;
}
public void NotFound(object content = null)
{
this.StatusCode = 404;
this.Content = content;
}
public void InternalServerError(object content = null)
{
this.StatusCode = 500;
this.Content = content;
}
}
And a controller base class with a single method TranslateApiResult
public abstract class CommonControllerBase : ControllerBase
{
protected IActionResult TranslateApiResult(ApiResult result)
{
if (result.StatusCode == 201)
{
return CreatedAtAction(result.RouteName, result.RouteValues, result.Content);
}
else
{
return StatusCode(result.StatusCode, result.Content);
}
}
}
And now in controller I do:
[ApiController]
[Route("[controller]/[action]")]
public class MyController : CommonControllerBase
{
private readonly IMyApiServcie _service;
public MyController (
IMyApiServcie service)
{
_service = service;
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetData()
{
return TranslateApiResult(await _service.GetData());
}
}
In your services you inject repositories and other dependencies:
public class MyApiServcie : IMyApiServcie
{
public async Task<ApiResult> GetData()
{
var result = new ApiResult();
// do something here
result.Ok("success");
return result;
}
}
Now, the reason for Api prefix before the Service is that this service is not meant to be the final service containing all logic.
At this point I would split the business logic into different domains so the services (or facades) would end up without Api prefix in them just to differentiate between i.e. CarService. Preferably these services will not know of anything related to API responses, statuses etc. It's up to you how implement it, though.

How do I test response data using nUnit?

Django has a very handy test client/dummy web browser that one can use in test cases to verify the correctness of HTTP responses (e.g., status codes, context/model data). It does not require you to have the web server running, as it deals directly with the framework to simulate the calls.
I'd really love an nUnit (or similar) equivalent that we can slip right into our test suites. We're working in MVC3 and 4, and want to check things like successful 301 redirects, that model validation is correct, and that ViewModel data is correct in the views.
What's the best solution for this?
ViewModel Data should be easy to check with the following:
public T GetViewModelFromResult<T>(ActionResult result) where T : class
{
Assert.IsInstanceOf<ViewResult>(result);
var model = ((ViewResult)result).Model;
Assert.IsInstanceOf<T>(model);
return model as T;
}
[Test]
public void TheModelHasTheOrder()
{
var controller = new MyController();
var result = controller.MyActionMethod();
var model = GetViewModelFromResult<MyModel>();
Assert.That(model, Is.SameAs(???));
}
As for the model validation, if you are using the out of the box .net property attributes like [Required] etc, you can be pretty sure they will work fine, and won't need testing.
To explicitly test the [Required] etc attributes on your object you will have extract the built in .net validation into another class. Then use that class in your controllers to validate your objects, instead of the Model.IsValid property on your controller.
The model validator class:
public class ModelValidator : IModelValidator
{
public bool IsValid(object entity)
{
return Validate(entity, new List<ValidationResult>());
}
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate(object entity)
{
var validationResults = new List<ValidationResult>();
Validate(entity, validationResults);
return validationResults;
}
private static bool Validate(object entity, ICollection<ValidationResult> validationResults)
{
if (entity != null)
{
var validationContext = new ValidationContext(entity, null, null);
return Validator.TryValidateObject(entity, validationContext, validationResults);
}
return false;
}
}
This could be verifiable in unit tests with the following:
public class MySampleEntity
{
[Required]
public string X { get; set; }
[Required]
public int Y { get; set; }
}
[TestFixture]
public class ModelValidatorTests
{
[Test]
public void GivenThePropertiesArePopulatedTheModelIsValid()
{
// arrange
var _validator = new ModelValidator();
var _entity = new MySampleEntity { X = "ABC", Y = 50 };
// act
var _result = _validator.IsValid(_entity);
// assert
Assert.That(_result, Is.True);
}
}

VS2008 Crystal Reports Database Connection from Web.config

I have an ASP.NET application I'm developing. In it is a CR report. When I first wrote the report, I had it hard coded to point to my development server (using MSSQL with Windows integrated login). So, when I moved my app to the production server, it of course failed.
I have been searching for an answer on how to connect it to DB listed in the Web.config, but haven't had any luck.
I saw one suggestion that I create a dataset in my project and tie in to that, but now it seems I can't use a parameter to filter the records.
I did see one other suggestion on how you can change the DB source on the fly, but that was designed for those who want to change the DB in mid session, rather than dependent on the machine, and seemed overkill.
Does anyone have a nice simple solution? I have been working on this problem for way too long and feel that I'm about to shoot my computer (that will teach it a lesson). :-(
public static class ReportDocumentExtensions
{
public static void SetConnectionInfo(this ReportDocument report, ReportContextArgs context)
{
SetConnectionInfo(report, context.UserId, context.Password, context.ServerName, context.DatabaseName);
}
public static void SetConnectionInfo(this ReportDocument report, string userId, string password, string serverName, string databaseName)
{
foreach (Table oTable in report.Database.Tables)
{
TableLogOnInfo oInfo = oTable.LogOnInfo;
ConnectionInfo oConnection = oTable.LogOnInfo.ConnectionInfo;
oConnection.UserID = userId;
oConnection.Password = password;
oConnection.ServerName = serverName;
oConnection.DatabaseName = databaseName;
oTable.ApplyLogOnInfo(oInfo);
}
}
}
public class ReportContextArgs
{
private string _userId;
private string _password;
private string _serverName;
private string _databaseName;
public string ServerName
{
get { return _serverName; }
set { _serverName = value; }
}
public string UserId
{
get { return _userId; }
set { _userId = value; }
}
public string Password
{
get { return _password; }
set { _password = value; }
}
public string DatabaseName
{
get { return _databaseName; }
set { _databaseName = value; }
}
}

Unit test controller - membership error

I want to create a Unit test for the following controller but it got fail in the Membership class:
public class AccountController:BaseController
{
public IFormsAuthenticationService FormsService { get; set; }
public IMembershipService MembershipService { get; set; }
protected override void Initialize(RequestContext requestContext)
{
if(FormsService == null) { FormsService = new FormsAuthenticationService(); }
if(MembershipService == null) { MembershipService = new AccountMembershipService(); }
base.Initialize(requestContext);
}
public ActionResult LogOn()
{
return View("LogOn");
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult LogOnFromUser(LappLogonModel model, string returnUrl)
{
if(ModelState.IsValid)
{
string UserName = Membership.GetUserNameByEmail(model.Email);
if(MembershipService.ValidateUser(model.Email, model.Password))
{
FormsService.SignIn(UserName, true);
var service = new AuthenticateServicePack();
service.Authenticate(model.Email, model.Password);
return RedirectToAction("Home");
}
}
ModelState.AddModelError("", "The user name or password provided is incorrect.");
return View("LogOn", model);
}
}
Unit test code:
[TestClass]
public class AccountControllerTest
{
[TestMethod]
public void LogOnPostTest()
{
var mockRequest = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
var target = new AccountController_Accessor();
target.Initialize(mockRequest);
var model = new LogonModel() { UserName = "test", Password = "1234" };
string returnUrl = string.Empty;
ActionResult expected = null;
ActionResult actual = target.LogOn(model, returnUrl);
if (actual == null)
Assert.Fail("should have redirected");
}
}
When I googled, I got the following code but I don't know how to pass the membership to the accountcontroller
var httpContext = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
var httpRequest = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
httpContext.Stub(x => x.Request).Return(httpRequest);
httpRequest.Stub(x => x.HttpMethod).Return("POST");
//create a mock MembershipProvider & set expectation
var membershipProvider = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
membershipProvider.Expect(x => x.ValidateUser(username, password)).Return(false);
//create a stub IFormsAuthentication
var formsAuth = MockRepository.GenerateStub();
/*But what to do here???{...............
........................................
........................................}*/
controller.LogOnFromUser(model, returnUrl);
Please help me to get this code working.
It appears as though you are using concrete instances of the IMembershipServive and IFormsAuthenticationService because you are using the Accessor to initialize them. When you use concrete classes you are not really testing this class in isolation, which explains the problems you are seeing.
What you really want to do is test the logic of the controller, not the functionalities of the other services.
Fortunately, it's an easy fix because the MembershipService and FormsService are public members of the controller and can be replaced with mock implementations.
// moq syntax:
var membershipMock = new Mock<IMembershipService>();
var formsMock = new Mock<IFormsAuthenticationService>();
target.FormsService = formsMock.Object;
target.MembershipService = membershipService.Object;
Now you can test several scenarios for your controller:
What happens when the MembershipService doesn't find the user?
The password is invalid?
The user and password is is valid?
Note that your AuthenticationServicePack is also going to cause problems if it has additional services or dependencies. You might want to consider moving that to a property of the controller or if it needs to be a single instance per authentication, consider using a factory or other service to encapsuate this logic.

Mocking HttpSessionState in ASP.net for nunit testing

I've see n a lot of discussions surrounding HttpSessionState and asp.net MVC.
I'm trying to write tests for an asp.net application and wondering if it's possible to mock the HttpSessionState and if so, how?
I'm currently using Rhino Mocks and Nunit
Gilbert,
Maybe I'm too late for you. I'm using MSpec, but I think the concepts are similar. I needed to mock several components of the HttpContext in the controllers under test.
I started with these following classes to mock up the necessary (for my purposes) components in the HttpContextBase. I overrode only the necessary pieces inside the classes. Your needs will vary as to the mocks you need in the controller. It's fairly easy to add mocks as needed once you understand the pattern.
public class MockHttpContext : HttpContextBase
{
private readonly HttpRequestBase _request = new MockHttpRequest();
private readonly HttpServerUtilityBase _server = new MockHttpServerUtilityBase();
private HttpSessionStateBase _session = new MockHttpSession();
public override HttpRequestBase Request
{
get { return _request; }
}
public override HttpServerUtilityBase Server
{
get { return _server; }
}
public override HttpSessionStateBase Session
{
get { return _session; }
}
}
public class MockHttpRequest : HttpRequestBase
{
private Uri _url = new Uri("http://www.mockrequest.moc/Controller/Action");
public override Uri Url
{
get { return _url; }
}
}
public class MockHttpServerUtilityBase : HttpServerUtilityBase
{
public override string UrlEncode(string s)
{
//return base.UrlEncode(s);
return s; // Not doing anything (this is just a Mock)
}
}
public class MockHttpSession : HttpSessionStateBase
{
// Started with sample http://stackoverflow.com/questions/524457/how-do-you-mock-the-session-object-collection-using-moq
// from http://stackoverflow.com/users/81730/ronnblack
System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, object> _sessionStorage = new System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string,object>();
public override object this[string name]
{
get { return _sessionStorage[name]; }
set { _sessionStorage[name] = value; }
}
public override void Add(string name, object value)
{
_sessionStorage[name] = value;
}
}
Here is how I setup the Controller Context to use the mocks (MSpec). This is setup for the actual tests on the contoller (the tests derive from this class)
public abstract class BlahBlahControllerContext
{
protected static BlahBlahController controller;
Establish context = () =>
{
controller = new BlahBlahController();
controller.ControllerContext = new ControllerContext()
{
Controller = controller,
RequestContext = new RequestContext(new MockHttpContext(), new RouteData()),
};
};
}
To further illustrate here is a test (Specification in MSpec world) that uses the mock session:
[Subject("ACCOUNT: Retrieve Password")]
public class retrieve_password_displays_retrieve_password2_page_on_success : BlahBlahControllerContext
{
static ActionResult result;
static RetrievePasswordModel model;
Establish context = () =>
{
model = new RetrievePasswordModel()
{
UserName = "Mike"
};
};
Because of = () =>
{
result = controller.RetrievePassword(model);
};
It should_return_a_RedirectToRouteResult = () =>
{
result.is_a_redirect_to_route_and().action_name().ShouldEqual("RetrievePassword2");
};
It session_should_contain_UN_value = () =>
{
controller.HttpContext.Session["UN"].ShouldEqual("Mike");
};
It session_should_contain_PQ_value = () =>
{
controller.HttpContext.Session["PQ"].ShouldEqual("Question");
};
}
I realize this doesn't use Rhino Mocks. I hope it illustrates the principles and readers can adopt it to their specific tools and methods.
If you need to instantiate exactly HttpSessionState for legacy code tests, you can leverage FormatterServices mechanism to get uninitialized object. To get it working it is needed to set private _container field though, like in internal constructor
Example:
var state = (HttpSessionState) System.Runtime.Serialization
.FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(typeof(HttpSessionState));
var containerFld = typeof(HttpSessionState).GetField(
"_container", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
var itemCollection = new SessionStateItemCollection();
itemCollection["element"] = 1;
containerFld.SetValue(
state,
new HttpSessionStateContainer(
"1",
itemCollection,
new HttpStaticObjectsCollection(),
900,
true,
HttpCookieMode.UseCookies,
SessionStateMode.InProc,
false
)
);
look at the HttpSessionStateBase and HttpSessionStateWrapper classes in System.Web.Abstractions. HttpSessionStateBase is the abstract class from which HttpSessionState inherits, and HttpSessionStateWrapper is used to wrap a sealed class in an abstract class, which you can then mock in your tests.
A lot of the System.Web classes are sealed (for example, HttpSessionState), so it's a real pain to test your code when you have methods and classes that interact with them. One pattern I like to use to get around this looks like the following:
public void DoSomething(HttpSessionState state)
{
// take this HttpSeassionState and create an abstract HttpSessionStateBase
// instance
DoSomething(new HttpSessionStateWrapper(state));
}
internal void DoSomething(HttpSessionStateBase state)
{
// my actual logic for working with the session state
}
The public method is difficult to test, because HttpSessionState is sealed, and you can't mock it. However, the internal method operates on an HttpSessionStateBase instance, which you can mock. Note that I've marked it as internal because I don't want the outside world to be able to access that method. However, I do want my tests to be able to access that, so I'll modify my AssemblyInfo.cs to include something like this:
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("Vendor.Utilities.Tests")]
Finally, my test for this would look something like this:
[Test]
public void Test_DoSomething()
{
HttpSessionStateBase state = MockRepository.PartialMock<HttpSessionStateBase>();
state.Expect(s => ...);
MyClass.DoSomething(state);
state.VerifyAllExpectations();
}
Hope that helps. Good luck!
This is what I made up based on others contribution...
public class MockWebContext
{
public Mock<RequestContext> RoutingRequestContext { get; private set; }
public Mock<HttpContextBase> Http { get; private set; }
public Mock<HttpServerUtilityBase> Server { get; private set; }
public Mock<HttpResponseBase> Response { get; private set; }
public Mock<HttpRequestBase> Request { get; private set; }
public Mock<HttpSessionStateBase> Session { get; private set; }
public Mock<ActionExecutingContext> ActionExecuting { get; private set; }
public HttpCookieCollection Cookies { get; private set; }
private IDictionary items;
public MockWebContext()
{
RoutingRequestContext = new Mock<RequestContext>(MockBehavior.Loose);
ActionExecuting = new Mock<ActionExecutingContext>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Http = new Mock<HttpContextBase>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Server = new Mock<HttpServerUtilityBase>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Response = new Mock<HttpResponseBase>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Request = new Mock<HttpRequestBase>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Session = new Mock<HttpSessionStateBase>(MockBehavior.Loose);
Cookies = new HttpCookieCollection();
items = new Dictionary<string, object>();
RoutingRequestContext.SetupGet(c => c.HttpContext).Returns(Http.Object);
ActionExecuting.SetupGet(c => c.HttpContext).Returns(Http.Object);
Http.SetupGet(c => c.Request).Returns(Request.Object);
Http.SetupGet(c => c.Response).Returns(Response.Object);
Http.SetupGet(c => c.Server).Returns(Server.Object);
Http.SetupGet(c => c.Session).Returns(Session.Object);
Http.SetupGet(c => c.Items).Returns(items);
Request.Setup(c => c.Cookies).Returns(Cookies);
Request.Setup(c => c.RequestContext).Returns(RoutingRequestContext.Object);
Response.Setup(c => c.Cookies).Returns(Cookies);
Session.Setup(c =>
c.Add(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>())
).Callback((string key, object value)=> items.Add(key, value));
Session.Setup(c =>
c.Remove(It.IsAny<string>())
).Callback((string key) => items.Remove(key));
Session.Setup(c =>
c.Clear()
).Callback(() => items.Clear());
Session.Setup(c =>
c[It.IsAny<string>()]
).Returns((string key)=> items[key]);
}
}
Check out the MvcContrib project.

Resources