I know it's easy enough to wrap text around images by floating the image right or left & then putting your text after it, but what I am wanting to do is wrap other elements around it as well, such as div's.
I tried to set my div to inline & this worked fine, however once I added other divs inside that div it still looked fine, but when looking at it in Firebug the little blue line that shows the element you are hovering over in the code extended over the image as well & when I attempted to add padding to the container div it didn't work & you could see that was because the padding was added right at the end.
I ended up getting it to look ok but adding padding to the image, however it still doesn't seem the right way to go about it seeing as Firebug doesn't like it & I am worried about compatibility issues.
Here is an image of what I am trying to do.. the gray area is where I want the text/elements to wrap & the brown is the image.
Here is some example code: (This example is the not wrapping version)
<div class="main">
<img src="../images/work/example.png" width="275" height="233" class="screenshot" alt="Example" />
<div class="details">
<div class="about">
<div class="title">
About:
</div>
<div class="info">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</div>
<!-- Info Ends -->
</div>
<!-- About Ends -->
</div>
<!-- Details Ends -->
<div class="contentClear"></div>
</div>
<!-- Main Ends -->
Example CSS:
#content .wrapper .left .main {
padding-top: 20px;
width: 550px;
}
#content .wrapper .left .main .screenshot {
float: right;
border: 1px solid #c0c0c0;
width: 275px;
}
#content .wrapper .left .main .details {
width: 263px;
padding-right: 10px;
}
#content .wrapper .left .main .details .title {
color: #0F5688;
font-size: 1.8em;
font-family: arial;
font-weight: bold;
}
#content .wrapper .left .main .details .info {
margin-top: 6px;
font-size: 1.3em;
font-family: Arial;
color: #636363;
line-height: 1.6;
}
Here is an image showing the issue FireBug has with it (from the JSFiddle example), as I say it looks fine on the browser, but seeing as the firebug bar extends all the way over the image I was worried that may cause problems..
Yes, the correct way to move something to one side and have stuff wrap around it is to float the element.
In the example below (simplified from your code), adding padding to the floated image works just fine.
CSS:
.main .screenshot {
float: right;
border: 1px solid #c0c0c0;
padding: 5px;
}
.main .title{
font-size: 140%;
}
HTML:
<div class="main">
<img src="img/png" width="150" height="117" class="screenshot" alt="Example" />
<div class="details">
<div class="about">
<div class="title">About:</div>
<div class="info">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo jsFiddle
Related
I would like to have an element superimposed on an image, which should responsively adjust to the element's dimensions.
In the example below, the goal is to have img completely surround the sibling element. Right now, it only partially covers it:
section {
position: relative;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
div {
padding: 30px;
margin: 30px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
background: red;
opacity: 50%;
}
<section>
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/1000x100">
<div>
Content Goes here
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</p>
</div>
</section>
I tried adding background-image to section, but that doesn't seem to work either. Right now my only option is to use media queries and manually adjust the height of img, but I was curious if there is a cleaner approach.
You could set the image as a background of the section. Please note, that I removed the position absolute of the div element so the section can growth with that element. You can play around with the different background options till you get your desired result.
section {
position: relative;
background-image: url("https://via.placeholder.com/1000x100");
background-position: center;
background-size: 100% 100%;
padding: 15px; /* optional padding */
}
div {
padding: 30px;
top: 0;
background: red;
opacity: 50%;
}
<section>
<div>
Content Goes here
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</p>
</div>
</section>
Why not use transform on the div?
section {
position: relative;
}
img {
width: 100%;
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
}
div {
padding: 30px;
margin: 0 30px;
top: 0;
background: red;
opacity: 50%;
position: relative;
transform: translateY(-25px);
}
<section>
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/1000x100">
<div>
Content Goes here
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</p>
</div>
</section>
may be you can do it in this way, i feel like usually child element work or inherit the properties of the parent. even in the case of relative and absolute parent child relation, child element stays with the parent even though wherever the parent goes/moves
so, if you want a background image to be superimposed on some element, first of all, may be you have to set the parent element/background image's properties properly and then keep your content inside. if your content is overflowing/larger than background you might have to adjust it manually ( like you said, with media queries ) or you can try in this way.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Document</title>
<style>
.image-back {
padding: 30px;
margin: 30px;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
background-image: url('https://via.placeholder.com/1000x100');
}
.content {
background-color: red;
opacity: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<header>
<div class="image-back">
<div class="content">
<p>Content Goes here</p>
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</header>
</body>
</html>
here in this case, try to get an image that can contain the size of inner element and its border+padding+etc. and have a look at how it behaves with different screen resolutions.
I have 3 divs inside a div. When I float them left, they line up side by side. I want to position them for example 500px from top using nth-child in CSS, but then they position themselves on top of each-other. How can solve this problem?
.wrapper{
content:"";
display:block;
clear:both;
}
.sevice p{
margin: 10px 0;
text-align: center;
}
.service{
float: left;
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0.7);
width: 26%;
margin: 1%;
padding: 1%;
height: 200px;
position: absolute;
}
.service:nth-child(1){
top: 500px;
}
.service:nth-child(2){
top: 500px;
}
.service:nth-child(3){
top: 500px;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
</div>
I think I understand what you are saying. You would like them to be positioned side by side, each with the same top value. Floating will position them side by side automatically (if there is room), but if you want to do that with absolute positioning, you need to set both the top and the left values of each element. If you don't set the left value, your elements will all be set all the way to the left. I've revised the snippet below to give an example (and clean up a couple of things).
The general rule is that when you use absolute positioning, you have to specify the x,y coordinates of one of the corners of the element, relative to the analogous corner of its container. To do that, you can use either top or bottom, along with either right or left. So, top and left will position the top left corner of your element relative to the top left corner of the container, bottom and left will do the same with the two bottom left corners, and so on.
If you don't specify, then the values will all be zero, and your element will be in the top left corner of your container. In your case, you didn't specify left or right, so all three elements were positioned at left: 0. In other words, they were all on top of each other as you observed.
/* Don't need any of this
.wrapper{
content:"";
display:block;
clear:both;
}
*/
.service p { /* You had ".sevice p," which is why you didn't get centering */
/* margin: 10px 0;
Don't really need margin with absolute positioning, just change top/left
values to make adjustments to position */
text-align: center;
}
.service {
/* float: left; don't need this any more */
top: 500px; /* put this here if it's the same for all of them */
background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);
width: 26%;
margin: 1%;
padding: 1%;
height: 200px;
position: absolute;
}
.service:nth-child(1) {
left: 0px;
/* here */
}
.service:nth-child(2) {
left: 27%;
/* here */
}
.service:nth-child(3) {
left: 54%;
/* and here */
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
<div class="service">
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
</p>
</div>
</div>
I'm struggling with styling a simple ordered list to look this:
The HTML must be standard html like:
<ol>
<li>asdf asdf</li>
<li>asdfasdfasdf</li>
<li>asdfasdf</li>
<li>asdf...</li>
</ol>
I've tried a bunch of different ways with list-style-position: inside, text-indent, etc... but I can't seem to make it perfect. I need to have the number inside the background color and the text lined up correctly when wrapping. And also would like some space between the number and the text. Is it even possible?
This should do it, the idea is displaying the counter as absolute positioned pseudo content.
JsFiddle Example
ol {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
ol li {
counter-increment: step-counter;
background: lightgreen;
padding: 20px 20px 20px 50px;
margin-bottom: 8px;
position: relative;
}
ol li:before {
content: counter(step-counter) ".";
position: absolute;
left: 20px;
}
<ol>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
</ol>
You have to style it like this:
Css:
ol{
list-style-position: inside;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
li{
margin:0 0 5px;
border:2px solid white;
background:yellow;
padding:20px;
width:500px;
height:30px;
}
html:
<ol>
<li>asdf asdf</li>
<li>asdfasdfasdf</li>
<li>asdfasdf</li>
<li>asdf...</li>
</ol>
http://jsfiddle.net/u4rqyo4L/3/
Update: this problem has found a very satisfactory solution, but in production side effects popped up which I describe in this thread.
So, I'm using a custom counter in my OLs to get numbering like "1 - 1.1 - 1.1.1"
Works fine.
But when I do this, the indentation of the LI is wrong. The text aligns with the left edge of the number, not with the right edge (like standard OLs do).
Edit: To get the numbers layouted the way I want, I had to mess with the standard paddings/margins of the OL.
Now the text aligns with the left edge of the number, not with the right edge (like standard OLs do).
I've tried numerous things, but somehow I can't seem to control the left edge of the LI content.
Also, this feature apparently isn't used terribly often, so web searches didn't yield any hints :-(
Does anybody have an idea what I've been missing?
Below, you find both the CSS and the HTML, and I have put a test case into this cssdesk: http://cssdesk.com/EzPBG
CSS:
ol.wrong {
margin-left: 0;
padding-left: 20px;
counter-reset: counter_level1;
list-style: none outside none;
display: block;
line-height: 18px;
width: 500px;
}
ol.wrong li {
position: relative;
list-style: none;
margin-right:20px;
}
ol.wrong li:before {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
content: counter(counter_level1) ". ";
counter-increment: counter_level1;
font-weight: bold;
width: 20px;
}
ol.wrong ol {
counter-reset: counter_level2;
}
ol.wrong ol li {
margin-right:0px;
}
ol.wrong ol li:before {
width: 40px;
margin-left: 20px;
content: counter(counter_level1, decimal) "." counter(counter_level2, decimal) ". ";
counter-increment: counter_level2;
}
HTML
<ol class="wrong">
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
<ol>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
<ol>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.</li>
</ol>
Here is one approach:
ol.wrong {
margin-left: 0;
padding-left: 20px;
counter-reset: counter_level1;
list-style: none outside none;
display: block;
line-height: 18px;
width: 500px;
}
ol.wrong li {
position: relative;
list-style: none;
margin-right:20px;
padding-left: 20px; /* create some space for the counter label */
outline: 1px dotted blue;
}
ol.wrong li:before {
display: inline-block; /* block would also work */
position: absolute; /* move this out of the way of the text*/
left: 0; /* move the counter labe into the space from the padding */
content: counter(counter_level1) ". ";
counter-increment: counter_level1;
font-weight: bold;
width: 20px;
}
and you can check the code at: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/wsmnJ/
The pseudo-element trick is quite useful, and a good choice in this application.
Start by adding some padding to the left for ol.wrong li, this will create some white space for placing your label.
In your pseudo-element styling, ol.wrong li:before, use position: absolute to remove the label out of the way of the text and position it left: 0. The display type can be either block or inline-block.
You then follow suit for the inner, nested ol.
Just created padding to the left equal in width to the width that you need for your counter/label element.
I agree with Marc Audet, interesting CSS, however by dispensing with HTML's natural way to deal with nested lists you've created your own little world to contend with. As far as I understand it there are three possible ways to deal with this:
Firstly, go back to the standard native way to deal with nested lists as you have with your "standard indentation" list.
Secondly, add something like this to the pseudo-element...
ol.wrong li:before {
float:left;
height:80px;
}
...The floating of the pseudo-element kicks the rest of the LI to the right, however setting the height to a fixed value isn't very flexible unless you can guarantee that all LIs will be the same height (alternatively you can set several heights and choose whichever suits each particular LI... again, though, rather clunky).
Finally, taking the above idea and adding some javascript to deal with changing the height of the pseudo-element on the fly... if this is even possible.
Daniela, I'd think the simple solution is to use positive and negative positioning. the LI is moved to the right (+20px) whereas the counter is moved to the left (-20px). I think it's easier to check this fiddle:
http://fiddle.jshell.net/Gbf6u/
I'm hoping someone can help me with collapsible div tags.
What I want to do is to create a list with multiple collapsible 2-column sections. The sections are designed with div tags and embedded into a list.
My code so far works in IE, but not in Firefox or Chrome. In the latter two, the list items move to the right when a 2-column sample is expanded.
The code below reproduces the problem. If you open it in Mozilla or Chrome and click on the [ ] in the first sample item, the bullet item for the sample below will move to the right.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<script src="jquery-1.4.4.js"></script>
<style type="text/css">
div.sample {
position:relative;
left:0px;
}
div.item {
position:relative;
display:none;
width:600px;
left:10px;
text-align:justify;
}
div.ltcol{
float:left;
width:45%;
}
div.rtcol{
float:right;
width:45%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul>
<li><div id="sample1" class="sample">Sample [ ]
<div id="verbiage1" class="item">
<div id="source" class="ltcol">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</div>
<div id="target" class="rtcol">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</div>
</div></div></li>
<li><div id="sample2" class="sample">Sample [ ]
<div id="verbiage2" class="item">
<div id="source" class="ltcol">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</div>
<div id="target" class="rtcol">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
</div>
</div></div></li>
<script>
//Quick and dirty javascript to get it up and running.
alldivs=['verbiage1','verbiage2'];
function showone(name) {
divname="#".concat(name);
for (var i in alldivs){
if ("#".concat(alldivs[i])==divname){
$(("#".concat(alldivs[i]))).toggle(200);
}
else{
$(("#".concat(alldivs[i]))).hide(200);
}
}
return true;
};
</script>
</body>
</html>
Any help is appreciated.
If I'm understanding your problem correctly you need to clear your verbiage div's. See this fiddle for reference: http://jsfiddle.net/Ujw5b/
.clearfix:after {
content: ".";
display: block;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
line-height: 0;
height: 0;
}
.clearfix {
display: inline-block;
}
html[xmlns] .clearfix {
display: block;
}
* html .clearfix {
height: 1%;
overflow: visible;
}