VB.NET: Use Class Name as Expression - asp.net

I'm not sure if this is possible but I would like to associate a class name reference to a shared member method / property / variable. Consider:
Public Class UserParameters
Public Shared Reference As Object
Public Shared Function GetReference() As Object
Return Reference
End Function
End Class
In another part of the program I would like to simply call UserParameters and have it return Reference either by aliasing GetReference or the variable directly.
I am trying to emulate the Application, Request, or Session variable:
Session(0) = Session.Item(0)
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

You can't return an instance member from a static method directly (the static method can't access instance members because it isn't instantiated with the rest of the class, only one copy of a static method exists).
If you need to setup a class in such a way that you can return an instance from a static method you would need to do something similar to the following:
Public Class SampleClass
Private Sub New()
'Do something here
End Sub
Public Shared Function GetSample() As SampleClass
Dim SampleClass As SampleClass
SampleClass = New SampleClass
SampleClass.Sample = "Test"
Return SampleClass
End Function
Private _SampleString As String
Public Property Sample As String
Get
Return _SampleString
End Get
Private Set(ByVal value As String)
_SampleString = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class SampleClass2
Public Sub New()
'Here you can access the sample class in the manner you expect
Dim Sample As SampleClass = SampleClass.GetSample
'This would output "Test"
Debug.Fail(Sample.Sample)
End Sub
End Class
This method is used in various places in the CLR. Such as the System.Net.WebRequest class. where it is instantiated in this manner in usage:
' Create a request for the URL.
Dim request As WebRequest = WebRequest.Create("http://www.contoso.com/default.html")

Related

Create a dataContract in separe file problem

Hi I need to create a class for return the data in WCF service. I followed the web at 5 simple steps to create your first RESTful service. However I get the error for . I searched the web and add the System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContractSerializer, Would someone tell me what should do. I am using VS2015 as the tool to build it. Thanks.
Imports System.Runtime.Serialization
Imports System.Collections.Generic
Imports System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContractSerializer
<DataContract>
Public Class Locations
<DataMember>
Public Property LocationName As String
<DataMember>
Public Property LocationID As Integer
End Class
Could you please share the error details with me?
As you know, we usually use the datacontract to transmit the complex data type which could be recognized by the client-side and server-side. so that the data could be serialized and transmitted normally between different platforms.
For the restful web service in WCF, we need to use the Webhttpbinding build the data channel and add the Webhttpbehavior to the service endpoint.
I have made a demo, wish it is useful to you.
Server-side.
Imports System.Runtime.Serialization
Imports System.ServiceModel
Imports System.ServiceModel.Description
Imports System.ServiceModel.Web
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim uri As New Uri("http://localhost:900")
Dim binding As New WebHttpBinding()
binding.CrossDomainScriptAccessEnabled = True
binding.Security.Mode = WebHttpSecurityMode.TransportCredentialOnly
binding.Security.Transport.ClientCredentialType = HttpClientCredentialType.None
Using sh As New ServiceHost(GetType(MyService), uri)
Dim se As ServiceEndpoint = sh.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IService), binding, uri)
se.EndpointBehaviors.Add(New WebHttpBehavior())
sh.Open()
Console.WriteLine("Service is ready")
Console.ReadLine()
sh.Close()
End Using
End Sub
<ServiceContract([Namespace]:="mydomain")>
Public Interface IService
<OperationContract>
<WebGet(ResponseFormat:=WebMessageFormat.Json)>
Function SayHello() As List(Of Product)
End Interface
Public Class MyService
Implements IService
Public Function SayHello() As List(Of Product) Implements IService.SayHello
Dim result = New List(Of Product)() From {
New Product With {
.Id = 1,
.Name = "Apple"
},
New Product With {
.Id = 2,
.Name = "Pear"
}
}
Return result
End Function
End Class
<DataContract([Namespace]:="mydomain")>
Public Class Product
<DataMember>
Public Property Id() As Integer
<DataMember>
Public Property Name() As String
End Class
End Module
Client.
$(function(){
$.ajax({
type:"GET",
url:"http://10.157.18.188:900/sayhello",
dataType:"jsonp",
success:function(d){
$.each(d,function(i,o){
console.log(o.Id);
console.log(o.Name);
})
}
})
})
Result.
Here is an official sample
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/wcf/feature-details/how-to-create-a-basic-wcf-web-http-service

VB.NET hide a property member

I am currently working on the return class. The problem is I want to show the certain member only when some of the condition meet. Below is my code. I only want to show ResponseMsg member when the ResponseCode is 99 otherwise it will be hidden.
Public Class LoginResponse
Public Property TerminalID As String
Public Property ReaderID As String
Public Property TransRef As String
Public Property TransDateTime As String
Public Property Timeout As Integer
Public Property ResponseCode As String
Public Property ResponseMsg As String
Public Property Cryptogram As String
End Class
You can't that I know of. But you can do something like this:
Public Property ResponseMsg
Get
If ResponseCode <> SomeCodeValue
Return _responseCode
Else
Return Nothing
End if
End Get
End Property
You might want to think about making a specialized class.
Let's say you have your basic LoginResponse
Public Class LoginResponse
Public Property TerminalID As String
Public Property ReaderID As String
Public Property TransRef As String
Public Property TransDateTime As String
Public Property Timeout As Integer
Public Property ResponseCode As String
' Note: no ResponseMsg here
Public Property Cryptogram As String
End Class
Then you'd have an extended response class inheriting your basic LoginResponse:
Public Class LoginResponseEx : Inherits LoginResponse
Public Property ResponseMsg As String
End Class
Then where ever you create those LoginResponse objects, you just create one of the apropriate.
Let's say you have a GetResponse() procedure like:
Public Function GetResponse() As LoginResponse
Dim result As LoginResponse = Nothing
Dim code As Integer = GetSomeCode()
' ... get the other properties
' Say you have a const or something with the appropriate code: SPECIAL_CODE
If code = SPECIAL_CODE Then
Dim msg As String = GetSomeMessage()
result = New LoginResponseEx(..., code, msg, ...) ' have a special Response
Else
result = New LoginResponse(..., code, ...) ' have a normal Response
End If
Return result
End Function
Finally when checking the response you just check whether you have a special value in ResponseCode and cast the object respectivly.
'...
Dim resp as LoginResponse = GetResponse()
If resp.ResponseCode = SPECIAL_CODE Then
Dim respx as LoginResponseEx = CType(resp, LoginResponseEx)
Console.WriteLine("ResponseMessage was: " & respx.ResponseMsg
Else
Console.WriteLine("No ResponseMessage")
End If
'...
This way you have your basic LoginResponse with the ResponseMsg hidden in the special class ResponseLoginEx
Note when you do this you should think about how you implement virtual classes. e.g. the fields might have to be declared as Protected instead of Private, though i'm sure you'll do fine.
This also works with Serializable classes, of course.

Inherit a class to remove a property and change method logic

The following class is used in an ASP.NET application to read currencies from a database result set and add them up (e.g. show totals in US Dollars plus show totals in GB Pounds). It works in the following manner:
Read currency ID value
If currency ID exists already, increase the total for that currency
If currency ID does not exist, add it to the list with its value
Next
It works well using the CurrencyID property as the differentiator between each unique currency. However, it has now become apparent that IsoCurrencySymbol is also unique for each currency by default, and so CurrencyID is not actually needed.
So... I was wondering if it would be possible to inherit from this class and remove any reference to CurrencyID, therefore making the CompareTo method use IsoCurrencySymbol instead.
The trick is to leave the existing class as it is used extensively, but introduce a modified version without CurrencyID being needed. Is this possible to do please?
<Serializable()> _
Public Class CurrencyCounter
<Serializable()> _
Private Class CurrencyType
Implements IComparable
Public IsoCurrencySymbol As String
Public CurrencySymbol As String
Public CurrencyID As Int16
Public Amount As Decimal
Public Function CompareTo(obj As Object) As Integer Implements System.IComparable.CompareTo
If Not TypeOf (obj) Is CurrencyType Then
Throw New ArgumentException("Object is not a currency type")
Else
Dim c2 As CurrencyType = CType(obj, CurrencyType)
Return Me.CurrencyID.CompareTo(c2.CurrencyID)
End If
End Function
End Class
Private _Currencies As List(Of CurrencyType)
Public Sub New()
_Currencies = New List(Of CurrencyType)
End Sub
Private Sub AddStructToList(CurrencyID As Integer, IsoCurrencySymbol As String, CurrencySymbol As String, Amount As Decimal)
If IsoCurrencySymbol <> String.Empty AndAlso Amount > 0 Then
Dim s As New CurrencyType
s.CurrencyID = CurrencyID
s.IsoCurrencySymbol = IsoCurrencySymbol
s.CurrencySymbol = CurrencySymbol
s.Amount = Amount
_Currencies.Add(s)
End If
End Sub
Public Sub Add(CurrencyID As Integer, IsoCurrencySymbol As String, CurrencySymbol As String, Amount As Decimal)
Dim ct As CurrencyType = _Currencies.Find(Function(obj) obj.CurrencyID = CurrencyID)
If ct IsNot Nothing Then
ct.Amount += Amount
Else
AddStructToList(CurrencyID, IsoCurrencySymbol, CurrencySymbol, Amount)
End If
End Sub
Public Sub Clear()
_Currencies.Clear()
End Sub
Public Function Count() As Integer
Return _Currencies.Count
End Function
Public Function RenderTotals() As String
' ...
End Function
End Class
No, you cannot do that. The whole point of inheritance it to ensure that all derived classes, if nothing else, at least share the same public interface as their base class. If you are removing a property, then it doesn't share the same interface and is therefore incompatible and not a candidate for inheritance.
If you can't say that the derived class is a type of the base class, then you can't use inheritance. For instance, I can say that an automobile is a type of vehicle, therefore, if I had an automobile class, I could have it inherit from a vehicle class. I can't however say that an insect is a type of vehicle. Therefore, even if they share most things in common, I can't have an insect class inherit from a vehicle class.
The reason for this limitation is because inheritance allows you to treat an object as if it were the base type (via type casting). For instance:
Public Sub AddPassengerToVehicle(v As Vehicle)
v.Passengers.Add(New Passenger())
End Sub
' ...
Dim auto As New Automobile()
Dim bug As New Insect()
AddPassengerToVehicle(auto) ' Works because an automobile is a type vehicle (inherits from vehicle)
AddPassengerToVehicle(bug) ' Can't possibly work (nor should it)
So, if you are in a situation where you need to have a derived class that removes/hides one of the members of its base class, you are headed in the wrong direction. In a case like that, you would need to create a whole new class which just happens to have a very similar interface, but has no direct relationship with the first class, for instance:
Public Class Vehicle
Public Property Passengers As List(Of Passenger)
Public Property MaxSpeed As Integer
Public Function SpeedIsTooFast(speed) As Boolean
Return (speed > MaxSpeed)
End Function
End Class
Public Class Insect
Public Property MaxSpeed As Integer
Public Function SpeedIsTooFast(speed) As Boolean
Return (speed > MaxSpeed)
End Function
End Class
If you want to share functionality, such as the logic in the SpeedIsTooFast method in the above example, then there are a couple different ways to do that. This first would be to make wrapper methods which simply make calls to the other class, for instance:
Public Class Insect
Private _vehicle As New Vehicle()
Public Property MaxSpeed() As Integer
Get
Return _vehicle.MaxSpeed
End Get
Set(value As Integer)
_vehicle.MaxSpeed = value
End Set
End Property
Public Function SpeedIsTooFast(speed) As Boolean
Return _vehicle.SpeedIsTooFast(speed)
End Function
End Class
If you do it this way, it would be best to have both classes implement the same common interface so that you can use them interchangeably when necessary, for instance:
Public Interface ISelfPoweredMovingThing
Property MaxSpeed As Integer
Function SpeedIsTooFast(speed As Integer) As Boolean
End Interface
Another option would be to break out the common functionality into a third class and then use that class as the base for the other two, for instance:
Public Class SelfPoweredMovingThing
Public Property MaxSpeed As Integer
Public Function SpeedIsTooFast(speed) As Boolean
Return (speed > MaxSpeed)
End Function
End Class
Public Class Vehicle
Inherits SelfPoweredMovingThing
Public Property Passengers As List(Of Passenger)
End Class
Public Class Insect
Inherits SelfPoweredMovingThing
' Anything else specific only to insects...
End Class

class modules in asp.net file system website

I have a class module in my App_code folder.
Private _connection As MySqlConnection
Private _connStr As String
Public Function Connect(dbName As String) As Boolean
Try
_connStr = "Database=" & dbName & ";" & _
"Data Source=192.16.0.1;" & _
"User Id=user;Password=pass"
_connection = New MySqlConnection(_connStr)
_connection.Open()
_connection.Close()
Return True
Catch ex As Exception
_connection = Nothing
Return False
End Try
Return False
End Function
I usually program in webform apps. Why can't I access this function from my aspx code behind pages? I added the import statement for the class. If i make that function shared I cant have those private variables.
I call the function in my aspx lik so;
If Connect(dbName) then....
That gets me an error "non shared member requires an object reference"
You need to add the keyword "Shared" to the method signature, like so:
Private Shared _connection As MySqlConnection
Private Shared _connStr As String
Public Shared Function Connect(dbName As String) As Boolean
This is because otherwise you have instance class members, not static members. The compiler error message is quite self-explanatory.
if you look at this example works:
Public Shared Function example123(ByVal USER As Integer, ByVal Section As String, ByVal ACTION As String) As Boolean
you assign a function shared so you can see it from outside the class
I hope you work

VB.Net Initialising a class using System.Reflection and System.Type to create a session based singleton extension method

I have had several occasions recently to access a specific class several times over a relatively small time frame.
So I've been storing the value of the class in Session and trying to access it on page load, if it's not available creating a new instance and storing that in session.
So instead of constantly replicating the same code for different classes on different pages I'm trying to create an extension method to do this for me.
I want to use it like this
Dim objName as MyClass
objName.SessionSingleton()
So far this is what I have for my extension method:
<Extension()> _
Public Sub SessionSingleton(ByRef ClassObject As Object)
Dim objType As Type = ClassObject.GetType
Dim sessionName As String = objType.FullName
If TypeOf HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) Is objType And HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) <> "" Then
ClassObject = HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName)
Else
Dim singleton As Object = New objType???????
HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) = singleton
ClassObject = singleton
End If
End Sub
I'm stuck on what to do when I make my new instance of my class (it would have to have a New() sub)
I'm not sure where to go from here... or even if this is the best way to do it.
I figured it out and am posting my code for reference. While digging thru pages about Class/Object Factories (thanks RBarry) I found several references to Activator.CreateInstance() in the System.Reflection Class I came up with this.
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Imports System.Reflection
Public Module enviornmentUtilities
<Extension()> _
Public Function SessionSinglton(ByVal objType As Type) As Object
Dim sessionName As String = objType.FullName.ToString
If Not HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) Is Nothing Then
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Write(HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName).ToString)
Return HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName)
Else
Dim ss = Activator.CreateInstance(objType)
HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) = ss
Return ss
End If
End Function
End Module
This will let you create a session based singleton from any class that does not require parameters in the new method (which isn't required for this to work)
To test I made a simple Class:
Public Class HasNew
Public FreshInstance As Boolean = True
Public Sub New()
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Warn("This Class has a new method")
End Sub
Public Sub CheckFreshness()
If FreshInstance Then
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Warn("Fresh HasNew Instance")
FreshInstance = False
Else
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Warn("NotFresh HasNew Instance")
End If
End Sub
Public Shared Function type() As Type
Return GetType(HasNew)
End Function
Public Shared Function SessionSinglton() As HasNew
Return GetType(HasNew).SessionSinglton
End Function
End Class
You'll notice the two Public Shared Methods type() and SessionSinglton which calls the above extension method.
With those two functions added we have three ways to initiate the Session Singlton demonstrated here:
Dim HN As HasNew
HN = HasNew.SessionSinglton
HN.CheckFreshness()
HN = HasNew.type.SessionSinglton
HN.CheckFreshness()
HN = GetType(HasNew).SessionSinglton
HN.CheckFreshness()
The Trace Output for this file is as follows:
This Class has a new method
Fresh HasNew Instance
NotFresh HasNew Instance
NotFresh HasNew Instance
The classes new() method is accessed on the first call to the SessionSinglton method and subsequent calls reflect that the instance is in fact being pulled from memory.
I hope this helps someone else in the future.
If you used generics you could just do New T(). Also your SessionSingleton returns "object" type, requiring casting. I did not test this but it should work.
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Imports System.Reflection
Public Module enviornmentUtilities
<Extension()> _
Public Function SessionSinglton(Of T As {Class, New})(ByVal obj As T) As T
Dim sessionName As String = obj.GetType.Name
If Not HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) Is Nothing Then
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Write(HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName).ToString)
Return HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName)
Else
Dim ss = New T()
HttpContext.Current.Session(sessionName) = ss
Return ss
End If
End Function
End Module

Resources