I have a some images that I need to line up without any gaps. I can get them fine in jsFiddle, see http://jsfiddle.net/QZLSf/2/
But on the actual SharePoint site the images have a gap between them, kind of like http://jsfiddle.net/QZLSf/1/
I have checked with FireBug and the images, and links, have all the properties they should have, but I can't get rid of that gap.
What could I be missing?
EDIT: I know that the second link has footerlinks defined as a class, but I was just using that to illustrate the problem I'm having. That's not what my actual code is.
EDIT: EDIT: Ok guys there seems to be a misunderstanding as to what I am asking here. I know HOW to get the required result, just that it isn't working on the SharePoint site. I just need advice on what might be wrong as everything that should work isn't working.
Remove the whitespace/line breaks between images.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/QZLSf/12/
Just posted this solution elsewhere and think it's the same thing.. is your Sharepoint implementation putting the <img> elements on separate lines in the HTML?
In your fiddle you have them all on one line.. if that's the difference then I'm afraid it's natural behaviour for inline elements (space between words).. there are hacks out there that involve HTML comments or removing the spacing or splitting the img tags, but if you can't have (or don't want) an HTML workaround - then something like this should work
CSS:
div {word-spacing: -4px; background: #eee; border: 1px solid #000; width: 600px;}
div p {word-spacing: 0;}
HTML
<div>
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x50/dad/fff" alt="my mini thing" />
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x50/000/fff" alt="my mini thing" />
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x50/dad/fff" alt="my mini thing" />
<img src="http://dummyimage.com/150x50/000/fff" alt="my mini thing" />
<p>the div containing these images and text has it's word-spacing set to -4px which removes the default whitespace</p>
<p>but then you want some text with normal spacing reset the word-spacing to 0 on the <p> elements, which is the default</p>
</div>
this is your code:
#footerlinks a, #footerlinks img{
but footerlinks is class not an id, so use this:
.footerlinks a, .footerlinks img{
ways to skin cats...
http://jsfiddle.net/eCSYt/45/
Update for bazmegakapa:
Sorry assumed the code was pretty easy to follow and I just presented it as an alternative way to approach it..
The gaps were caused by the white space in the HTML formatting - which is significant. By setting the font-size to 1px (actually 0 would be better if it is supported xbrowser) the white space is too small to render. In a real page you may also need to zero the line-height as well.
I used text-align to centre the text just to show an alternative method... and it has the advantage that you don't need to know the total width of the images
That's just the way it is. You have to set the margin-left to -4px
.footerlinks img {
margin-left: -4px;
}
.footerlinks img:first-child {
margin-left: 0px;
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/QZLSf/11/
EDIT: This solution is more correct. I fixed the margin on the first child.
Related
I've always liked the <hr> tag as a design divider because it's a concise empty tag and you can use CSS to design it with a theme. I like it better than border-bottom because you can set the width to be smaller than the content above it i.e. 25% of the container width.
I almost feel like there should be an empty tag that serves as an anchor point for css design.
I know I can do this with any tag with CSS:
<div class=divider></div>
works just fine but it's not as concise as <hr>
So to me <hr> seems like the best choice on the surface.
Then I read the HTML5 semantic meaning of <hr> which says it is a thematic break. (That seems a little arbitrary) is a title a different theme than it's content? What about semantic cases where I want to have a featured title for a post with a nice box over an image with the title on top and a divider and the sub-title under it?
I want my content to make sense for syndication and I want it to look good if it's opened in an alternate css liked reader on safari which again seems to say <hr> isn't a good choice.
Should I use <span class=divider></span> that seems wasteful.
I have also considered <svg> or <br> but to me <br> seems like an empty line and possible also semantically like a pause like a comma in a sentence.
What's the best way to have a horizontal divider semantically when the primary reason is design preference and not a thematic break?
I think out of your suggestions I would just go ahead and use the separate custom div <div class="box-divider"></div> it's really not that wasteful if it's an integral part of your structure and gives you the max flexibility in terms of what your divider will look like and positioning. You can honestly do the same to an <hr> tag if you customize it's css you can make it look however you want.
A lot of users have commented about using psuedo elements on the element that needs a divider which is a fine suggestion.
.box {
position: relative;
}
.box:after {
content: '';
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 2px;
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
background-color: green;
}
If it's as simple as a border line you can just use border-bottom: 1px solid black; for example to the element itself and forgo the need for a separate element all together. Add some padding-bottom to control the positioning.
All in all if it's a tricky/custom divider that you need I would just go for the separate div divider or pseudo elements.
How can I align the bottom of an inline block (call it 'IB') with the bottom of the text - excluding descenders like that on 'g' - in a parent element (call it 'PE')? This should be in a way which generalises whatever the size of the text - I don't want to hardcode size-specific pixel values.
Here is an example of the HTML I'd use, with the classes I'd need CSS for:
<div class="pe">
Parent text line
<span class="ib" style="display: inline-block;">
- and child text line
</span>
</div>
And here's what I'd like it to look like:
OP updated saying: "Thanks, but I've edited the question to clarify I don't want to hardcode size-specific pixel values."
In that case, I'm afraid there isn't a solution that will automatically fix different lines with different text sizes. The other solution I provided isn't even perfect across all of the browsers with some combinations of font sizes, because Chrome/Opera round inexact values differently than Firefox/IE, so even with my solution, you'd need to use some browser-specific css. The only thing similar to an universal solution would be setting vertical-align: middle; but I wouldn't trust that to work consistently.
You can add below css to ib. And change the bottom margin to control alignment.
.ib{
display: inline-block;
font-size: 10px;
vertical-align: bottom;
margin:0 0 1px 0;
}
#Rorok_89 I know i am adding one more line of css but its justa way to do it in a different way. Your answer is perfect.
This seems to have worked for me: http://jsfiddle.net/Rorok_89/Z8TWH/
.ib{
display: inline-block;
font-size: 10px;
vertical-align: 1px;
}
a little css problem that i cannot quite find on SO - although I assume it has been asked before, apologies.
So, here is the html:
<html>
<body style="color:white">
<div class="a" style="width: 70%; background: blue;"><p>helloes helloes helloes</p></div>
<div class="b" style="width: 70%; background: pink;"><p>talk talk talk</p></div>
<div class="a" style="width: 70%; background: blue;"><p>yay! yay! yay!</p></div>
</body>
</html>
lovely.
If i open this in ff, i get three vertically stacked divs - but with space in between them! This is not what i wanted! Drama-rama!
ie renders this as i'd expect, which raises some alarm bells.
ie is 9, ff is 11
cheers,
andrew!
UPDATE a lot of mentioning the "p" tag - why/how is the p tag affecting anything? Isn't it wrapped by the div, and the div has the background color applied? Shouldn't, in fact, the div just be internally bigger, but with no space between adjacent divs?
UPDATE:
So i tried this html instead:
<html style="margin:0px; padding:0px;">
which didn't fix the issue, and also this:
<body style="color: white; margin:0px; padding:0px;">
which also didn't fix the issue - shouldn't the css be inherited by the "p" tag in both cases? Interestingly, i also examined the resultant css with firebug, and the p tags all have a margin and padding of 0...
ideas?
UPDATE: a lot of responses asking me to set padding to 0. This doesn't work. Any more answers stating that and i'll down vote 'em.
UPDATE: the question is really specific about using inline css. I don't actually care for inline css myself, but why is everybody providing css stylesheets for their answer?
UPDATE: somebody mentioned -webkit, and while i'm not using a google chrome at all, it is an interesting idea. I cannot see any ff related extra css that might be causing this problem, anybody have any ideas?
I tried it with Chrome and saw the same behavior. After looking at the underlying CSS (F12), Chrome is applying the following two lines to the <p> tag:
-webkit-margin-before: 1em;
-webkit-margin-after: 1em;
If I add the following to the css the blank lines go away:
-webkit-margin-before: 0px;
-webkit-margin-after: 0px;
Hope that helps!
Basically the P tags are by default taking margin. Add css
p{margin:0px; padding:0px;}
This is because of the auto-generated margin of a <p> element.
Firefox (and others) do this differently than IE.
You can "reset" this simply by doing a p{margin: 0} in your css.
You can do the same for all elements at once (which I recommend) by simply adding * { margin: 0; padding: 0;} in your css.
Small tip: Install a browser extension to inspect the behavior of your elements such as Firebug.
Your <p> tags have vertical margins. Vertical margins in CSS collapse, so that child margins can sometimes apply to parents. See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins
I resolved this be specifying a CSS 'line-height' I just set it to the same as the font size and then I got consistent DIV spacing across all browsers.
In code we got from a "psd2html"-service, I see a lot of spans surrounding the contents of div-tags.
I know the difference between spans and divs, but I cant figure out why the code looks like this:
<div class="forgot-password">
<span>Forgot password?</span>
</div>
...
<div>
<span>Sign in</span>
</div>
Instead of just:
<div class="forgot-password">
Forgot password?
</div>
...
<div>
Sign in
</div>
I'm guessing its either some kind of cross-browser fix, or perhaps to "prepare" for the future if we want to put more stuff into the divs?
Edit:
Here is the CSS for the forgot-password part:
div.forgot-password
{
float: left;
width: 145px;
height: 22px;
margin-left: 3px;
}
div.forgot-password span
{
display: block;
float: left;
padding-top: 3px;
padding-left: 0px;
}
div.forgot-password span a
{
color: #C5C5C5;
text-decoration: none;
}
Although plain text can be "naked" in a div, some consider it good practice to wrap text content with an inline tag such as a span. This means you can separate out inline styles from block styling. With respect to your psd2html service, what you are seeing is an artefact of the conversion algorithm. Any algo is only going to have a finite set of rules. In this case I am guessing there is a rule like "wrap text in a span", and a rule like "wrap links in an a". In your example above, all your text content is a link, so you are seeing
<span><a..>text content</a></span>
From an HTML perspective, in this case the outer span is unnecessary. However it doesn't do any harm, and for styling purposes - unless you want to change the css - you need to keep them in.
To me it looks like overly complicated code. It would make sense if the code was:
<div class="forgot-password">
<span> some text </span> Forgot password?
</div>
So that you can discriminate text and links in CSS or jQuery.
Here we should look at the CSS to see what is done, but my first impression is that the span's could be removed since they add no semantic nor operational meaning.
To me, span has always been a way of quickly formatting text in a css compliant way. So I would suppose that they add spans to prepare for further formatting, but as no formatting is given, they don't apply any stylesheets, thus the span is "empty".
I'd say that these spans could as well be removed. They don't hurt in that case, but they don't have any use here.
It looks like these are buttons being marked up here, so it might be used for the Sliding Doors technique, so you can have two background images, so that if the content grows, you'll still have nice corners. It's probably just something they do on all things which look like buttons, but they might not use it to its full potential everywhere.
I am writing a footer div that displays info from the database. The footer has a different background color than the rest of the page, and will have a height that depends on how much content the database throws to it. When I generate the content with php and call for a border around the footer div, the content appears and is, let's say, 400px high, but the div border appears as a 1px high rectangle at the top of the div.
How do I get the height to auto-fit the content?
<div id="footer">
<?php
$an_array=array();
$tasks=mysql_query("select stuff from the db");
while($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($tasks)){
extract($taskrow);
$an_array[]=$task;
}
$an_array=array_chunk($an_array,4);
foreach($an_array as $dtkey=>$dtval){
echo "<dl>";
foreach($dtval as $dtvkey=>$dtvval){
echo "<dt>".$dtvval."</dt>";
}
echo "</dl>";
}
?>
</div>
This is what I get. The area below the red border should be filled with a color.
border image http://www.kevtrout.com/tortus/div.png
By popular demand, here is the css:
#footer{
border-top: 10px solid #d8d8d8;
background:#5b5b5b;
/*overflow:auto;*///Added this after seeing your answers, it worked
}
dl.tr{
width: 255px;
height:160px;
background: #5b5b5b;
margin:0px;
float:left;
padding: 10px;
}
dt.tr{
font-weight: normal;
font-size: 14px;
color: #d8d8d8;
line-height: 28px;
}
edit: I am using firefox on a mac
Check your footer CSS... if you have overflow set to anything but auto/scroll, then the DIV won't grow.
If not try using something other than DL/DT since DT's are inline elements, they won't push your div to fit content.*
e.g. just try using a DIV instead, if the footer grows, you have your answer.
(note: I revised order of suggestions)
*(I realize spec-wise, that this Shouldn't be an issue, but there wasn't an indication of which browsers this was occuring in, thus I would not be at all surprised if IE was rendering differently than expected for example)
Without seeing the CSS, my guess would be that your <dl>s are floated to get them side-by-side. The containing <div> then won't expand to contain them. If this is the case adding a clear:both; before the final </div> should fix it, like this:
<div style='clear:both;'></div>
The browser doesn't care if your content is generated by PHP or comes from a static HTML file.
The issue will most likely be in your CSS. Either the content you put in the footer has positioning properties (like float:left or position:absolute) that place them "outside" the div or the div has a fixed size and/or overflow properties set.
I'd suggest posting your CSS file here or (if it's too large) put it up somewhere where we can take a look. The finished HTML (you could just save a static copy of the output if your system isn't online yet) wouldn't hurt either.
By the way, your use of the <dl> element is wrong: you are missing the <dd> element. Items in the definition list always consist of one definition term and one or more definitions (which, in your code, are missing).
Also, rather than using <div style='clear:both;'></div> as suggested by Steve, I'd suggest explicitly stating the height of your <dt> elements. This way, the floats don't have to be cleared.