I need to make a div be visible (for use of it's background) even though it will not contain anything, but not push other elements down.
My layout looks like this:
/----------------a--------------------\
|-------------------------------------|
|________________b____________________|
The one labeled a needs to be visible but it will contain nothing. This is so the background image can make box b look like it has some gloss on the top, and box b will contain the text. However, the text in box b needs to start at the top of box a, not underneath it, which is the default behaviour.
So box a needs to act like it doesn't exist as far as layout goes, but needs to act like it exists for the purposes of background image.
To deomonstrate, this is what it looks like now, the default way:
/-------------------------------------\
|-------------------------------------|
| there is some text here |
|_______and more text down here_______|
but I want it to be
/-------------------------------------\
|-------there is some text here-------|
|_______and more text down here_______|
CSS:
#box {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
width: 300px;
margin: 100px;
}
#boxa {
position: absolute;
z-index: -1;
top: -20px;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 50px;
background: #0f0;
}
#boxb {
background: #eee;
height: 200px;
}
HTML:
<div id="box">
<div id="boxa"></div>
<div id="boxb">text goes here</div>
<div>
I think you need to set the original stacking context on a wrapper so both boxes are in the same contest, then you can put box a in box b and negative z-index box a
updated: you don't need to put box in box b once they're both in the same staking context
See working example: here & updated to show boxes don't need to be nested : here
Setting a top and left value combined with position:absolute should remove it from the document flow.
Add this to the style for that div
position:absolute;
<div style="Position:Absolute; Z-Index: (HIGH Number to appear ON TOP, Low number to be concealed) >
</div>
Either set the background on b (simple, don't know why you wouldn't), or absolutely position a inside b.
Edit: or, as clairesuzy says, put a after b, in the same container.
See below. You can change the width / height to match the size of your background image.
http://jsfiddle.net/DhS3D/4/
HTML...
<div id="b">
<div id="a"></div>
This is some text.
</div>
CSS...
#a {
position: absolute;
z-index: -1;
width: 100%;
height: 30px;
background-color: #ccc;
}
#b {
position: absolute;
z-index: -2;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
background-color: #999;
}
try using position absolute or relative depending on what it is
Related
I'm essentially displaying a banner image on a page. At the base of that image is an overlay (the abs. pos. div) with a semi-transparent background image to make a "see through" effect. Everything is positioned properly and working fine except the overlay at a width of 100% expands outside of my container div. I've tried setting the overflow to hidden of the container div but that does not seem to work. My parent container has a position relative as well. This is responsive so the overlay with need to shrink and expand to the image width. Here's my code:
.hero-img-wrap {
position: relative;
margin-top: 35px;
padding-left: 15px;
padding-right: 15px;
}
.hero-img-wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.hero-img-wrap .trans-overlay {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
z-index: 9;
height: 19px;
background-image: url('../images/semi_transparent_white.png');
width: 100%;
}
<div class="hero-img-wrap">
<img src="images/banner_image.jpg" alt="">
<div class="trans-overlay"></div>
</div>
I could pull this off with JQuery but I'd like to avoid that. For what it might be worth - this code is within a Bootstrap 3 column.
Since you've defined the height, why not a negative value
position: relative;
top: -19px;
Just a thought, heres a fiddle for ya
http://jsfiddle.net/g11yggap/
Try
Width:inherit;
On overlay div
What would i put in the css to have one div ontop of another div (both squares are 10x10) and have another column with a div that is 10x20?
Let me rephrase that so its a little simpler, i want one big square that's 20x20. On the left half of that shape, it needs two 10x10 squares, one ontop of the other. On the right side, i need a div that is 10x20.
Please help need this for a class
You can use css's position property to absolutely position elements to set top and left coordinates. You'll also need to use the height and width properties to size the boxes.
Maybe something like this?
<div id="bigBox">
<div class="leftBox"></div>
<div class="leftBox"></div>
<div id="rightbox">
</div>
<style>
#bigBox { position: relative; width: 20px; height: 20px;}
.leftBox {position: absolute; left: 0; height: 10px; width: 10px; }
.rightBox {position: absolute; right: 0; width: 10px; height: 20px;}
</style>
Hey guys I simply cannot get this to work.
I have some content that is centred on the page using the margin: auto; "trick".
In this content I have an image. I need to make a color bar coming under the image continuing out to the sides of the browser. On the right side I need it to look like its coming up onto the image.
I have made this picture to try an graphically show what I mean: image
As you can see the bar runs from the left to the right side of the browser. The centred image is just placed on top of it and then an image positioned on the top of the image. But I haven't been able to get this working. Any one who would give it a go?
I tried positioning the bar relative and z-index low. This worked but the bar keep jumping around in IE 7-8-9. Centring the image wasn't easy either and placing that smaller image on top was even harder. It wouldn't follow the browser if you resized it. The problem here is that the user have to be able to upload a new picture so I cant just make a static image.
Please help I am really lost here
EDIT:
Tried the example below but when I run the site in IE 7-8-9 I have different results. link
I have made a jsFiddle which should work in Chrome and IE7-9: http://jsfiddle.net/7gaE9/
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="bar1"></div>
<img src="http://placekitten.com/200/300"/>
<div id="bar2"></div>
</div>
CSS
#container{
width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: red;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
}
#bar1{
background-color: blue;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
right: 0;
z-index: 1;
height: 30px;
width: 40%;
}
#bar2{
background-color: blue;
top: 50%;
left: 0;
z-index: 3;
height: 30px;
width: 40%;
position: absolute;
}
img{
text-align: center;
z-index: 2;
position: relative;
}
The key here is that the container is positioned relative, thus enabling absolute positioning of the child elements in relation to their parent. Use z-index to control how the elements are stacked.
A method I use for centering anything with css is:
.yourclass {
width:500px;
position:absolute;
margin-left:50%;
left:-250px;
}
'left' must be have of your width and then make it negative.
To date I have not experienced any problems with this.
im trying to make a facebook like blue bar.
So, i noticed they make a blue bar with width 100%, and make a new div under it which selects half of the div like this(the light blue part is the new div)
So, then the text or link i put under the new div is alligned just like i want it.
How can i achieve this?
My HTML
<div class="topBar" >
<div class="bar_frame">
fuuu
</div>
</div>
And here is my CSS
.topBar {
background: #3b5998;
top: 0;
height: 36px;
width: 100%;
background-position: center;
position: fixed;
}
.bar_frame{
/* The new div code must go here but i dont know how to do this */
}
This will work. I'm assuming you just need to center a fixed-width div in its parent element? This is exactly how Facebook does it in your example, and this is how it is done in many cases:
.bar_frame{
width: 981px;
margin: 0px auto;
}
Demo fiddle
I've found a lot of similar questions, and tried out several solutions (including some of the so-called "holy grail" CSS layouts), but they don't quite do what I need.
I have a containing div (a CSS containing block) with id right. Inside it on the left side, I want a fixed-width div (a splitter bar, but it doesn't matter what it's being used for; id splitpane); on the right, filling the rest of the space, another div (id right-box below).
I've tried making the two inner divs display: inline-block (with vertical-align: top), setting the left one to width: 3px, but then there's no way to set the right to have width 100% - 3px. I've also tried using the float: left/margin-left: -100%/margin-left: 3px trick, but it has the same problem: the 100% plus the 3px overflows the parent containing block and causes a scroll bar to pop up. (Of course, it's not the scroll bar per se that's the problem; I could use overflow: hidden to remove it, but then content on the right would be truncated.)
Currently I'm using width: 99.5% for the right div, but that's a terrible hack (and is subject to overflow depending on screen width). It looks a bit like this:
<div id="right"><div id="splitpane"></div><div id="right-box">
...
</div></div>
With CSS as follows (float version, but the inline-block version is similar):
#right {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
height: 100%;
width: 85%; /* this is part of a larger div */
}
#right-box {
width: 99.5%; /* stupid hack; actually want 100% - 3px for splitter */
height: 100%;
}
#splitpane {
float: left;
width: 3px;
height: 100%;
background: white;
border-left: solid gray 1px;
border-right: solid gray 1px;
cursor: e-resize;
}
Is it even possible to do this? This is for an internal app., so solutions only need to work in Firefox 3 (if they are specific to FF3, though, preferably it's because the solution is standards-compliant but other browsers aren't, not because it's using Firefox-only code).
DIVs are the wrong element type for this since they don't "talk" to each other. You can achieve this easily with a table:
<table style="width:200px">
<tr>
<td id="splitpane" style="width: 3px">...</td>
<td id="rightBox" style="width: 100%">...</td>
<tr>
</table>
The 100% will make the rightBox as wide as possible but within the limits of the table.
This is possible. Because block level elements automatically expand to take up any remaining horizontal space, you can utilise a block level element next to an uncleared floated element with your desired width.
<style type="text/css">
div {
height: 100px;
}
#container {
width: 100%;
}
#left {
background: #FF0;
}
#splitpane {
position: relative;
float: right;
background: #000;
width: 3px;
}
</style>
<div id="container">
<div id="splitpane"></div>
<div id="left"></div>
</div>
See http://jsfiddle.net/georeith/W4YMD/1/
why you didn't use margin-left (since it was float layout) on right box?
so no need to create a splitter div...
#right{
width:200px; /*specify some width*/
}
#rightbox{
float:left;
margin-left: 3px; /*replace the splitter*/
/*margin: 0 3px; /*use this to give left & right splitter*/ */
}
yeah something like that, i hate empty div, it's not semantic and it's like putting a splitter on the "old" table way
If the div #right-box is only going to contain non-floated content it might be an idea to just put the content inside #right instead and let it wrap around the floated #splitpane.