R automatic names modification - r

I stumbled upon this weird behavior in R:
> a = 5
> names(a) <- "bar"
> b = c(foo = a)
> names(b)
[1] "foo.bar"
Why do the names get concatenated/stacked?
I found this c(a=b) syntax in a script, but I couldn't find documentation about it. Is there any documentation for that?

Why do the names get
concatenated/stacked?
Because it preserves all the name information that was present before the concatenation. If you don't like it, use unname.
I found this c(a=b) syntax in a
script, but I couldn't find
documentation about it. Is there any
documentation for that?
Some of the examples on the ?c page demonstrate c(name = value) behaviour, but there isn't much more to it than that. You might also want to look at ?names.

It might also be instructive to see what happens if a is a vector; in this case if foo=a just redefined the name, all elements of the vector would end up with the same name. Instead, as in the following example, the four elements end up with unique names, which can be nice.
> a <- c(A=1, B=2)
> b <- c(A=3, B=4)
> c(a=a, b=b)
a.A a.B b.A b.B
1 2 3 4

Related

How can one make visible the difference in the outputs of quote() and substitute()?

As applied to the same R code or objects, quote and substitute typically return different objects. How can one make this difference apparent?
is.identical <- function(X){
out <- identical(quote(X), substitute(X))
out
}
> tmc <- function(X){
out <- list(typ = typeof(X), mod = mode(X), cls = class(X))
out
}
> df1 <- data.frame(a = 1, b = 2)
Here the printed output of quote and substitute are the same.
> quote(df1)
df1
> substitute(df1)
df1
And the structure of the two are the same.
> str(quote(df1))
symbol df1
> str(substitute(df1))
symbol df1
And the type, mode and class are all the same.
> tmc(quote(df1))
$typ
[1] "symbol"
$mod
[1] "name"
$cls
[1] "name"
> tmc(substitute(df1))
$typ
[1] "symbol"
$mod
[1] "name"
$cls
[1] "name"
And yet, the outputs are not the same.
> is.identical(df1)
[1] FALSE
Note that this question shows some inputs that cause the two functions to display different outputs. However, the outputs are different even when they appear the same, and are the same by most of the usual tests, as shown by the output of is.identical() above. What is this invisible difference, and how can I make it appear?
note on the tags: I am guessing that the Common LISP quote and the R quote are similar
The reason is that the behavior of substitute() is different based on where you call it, or more precisely, what you are calling it on.
Understanding what will happen requires a very careful parsing of the (subtle) documentation for substitute(), specifically:
Substitution takes place by examining each component of the parse tree
as follows: If it is not a bound symbol in env, it is unchanged. If it
is a promise object, i.e., a formal argument to a function or
explicitly created using delayedAssign(), the expression slot of the
promise replaces the symbol. If it is an ordinary variable, its value
is substituted, unless env is .GlobalEnv in which case the symbol is
left unchanged.
So there are essentially three options.
In this case:
> df1 <- data.frame(a = 1, b = 2)
> identical(quote(df1),substitute(df1))
[1] TRUE
df1 is an "ordinary variable", but it is called in .GlobalEnv, since env argument defaults to the current evaluation environment. Hence we're in the very last case where the symbol, df1, is left unchanged and so it identical to the result of quote(df1).
In the context of the function:
is.identical <- function(X){
out <- identical(quote(X), substitute(X))
out
}
The important distinction is that now we're calling these functions on X, not df1. For most R users, this is a silly, trivial distinction, but when playing with subtle tools like substitute it becomes important. X is a formal argument of a function, so that implies we're in a different case of the documented behavior.
Specifically, it says that now "the expression slot of the promise replaces the symbol". We can see what this means if we debug() the function and examine the objects in the context of the function environment:
> debugonce(is.identical)
> is.identical(X = df1)
debugging in: is.identical(X = df1)
debug at #1: {
out <- identical(quote(X), substitute(X))
out
}
Browse[2]>
debug at #2: out <- identical(quote(X), substitute(X))
Browse[2]> str(quote(X))
symbol X
Browse[2]> str(substitute(X))
symbol df1
Browse[2]> Q
Now we can see that what happened is precisely what the documentation said would happen (Ha! So obvious! ;) )
X is a formal argument, or a promise, which according to R is not the same thing as df1. For most people writing functions, they are effectively the same, but the internal implementation disagrees. X is a promise object, and substitute replaces the symbol X with the one that it "points to", namely df1. This is what the docs mean by the "expression slot of the promise"; that's what R sees when in the X = df1 part of the function call.
To round things out, try to guess what will happen in this case:
is.identical <- function(X){
out <- identical(quote(A), substitute(A))
out
}
is.identical(X = df1)
(Hint: now A is not a "bound symbol in the environment".)
A final example illustrating more directly the final case in the docs with the confusing exception:
#Ordinary variable, but in .GlobalEnv
> a <- 2
> substitute(a)
a
#Ordinary variable, but NOT in .GlobalEnv
> e <- new.env()
> e$a <- 2
> substitute(a,env = e)
[1] 2

Alternative to assign function in r

I am using the following code in a loop, I am just replicating the part which I am facing the problem in. The entire code is extremely long and I have removed parts which are running fine in between these lines. This is just to explain the problem:
for (j in 1:2)
{
assign(paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"),unique_id)
for (i in 1:2)
{
assign(paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"),
merge(eval(as.symbol(paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"))),
eval(as.symbol(paste("sd_1",i,sep="_"))),all.x = TRUE))
}
}
The problem that I am facing is that instead of assign in the second step, I want to use (eval+paste)
for (j in 1:2)
{
assign(paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"),unique_id)
for (i in 1:2)
{
eval(as.symbol((paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"))))<-
merge(eval(as.symbol(paste("numeric_data",j,sep="_"))),
eval(as.symbol(paste("sd_1",i,sep="_"))),all.x = TRUE)
}
}
However R does not accept eval while assigning new variables. I looked at the forum and everywhere assign is suggested to solve the problem. However, if I use assign the loop overwrites my previously generated "numeric_data" instead of adding to it, hence I get output for only one value of i instead of both.
Here is a very basic intro to one of the most fundamental data structures in R. I highly recommend reading more about them in standard documentation sources.
#A list is a (possible named) set of objects
numeric_data <- list(A1 = 1, A2 = 2)
#I can refer to elements by name or by position, e.g. numeric_data[[1]]
> numeric_data[["A1"]]
[1] 1
#I can add elements to a list with a particular name
> numeric_data <- list()
> numeric_data[["A1"]] <- 1
> numeric_data[["A2"]] <- 2
> numeric_data
$A1
[1] 1
$A2
[1] 2
#I can refer to named elements by building the name with paste()
> numeric_data[[paste0("A",1)]]
[1] 1
#I can change all the names at once...
> numeric_data <- setNames(numeric_data,paste0("B",1:2))
> numeric_data
$B1
[1] 1
$B2
[1] 2
#...in multiple ways
> names(numeric_data) <- paste0("C",1:2)
> numeric_data
$C1
[1] 1
$C2
[1] 2
Basically, the lesson is that if you have objects with names with numeric suffixes: object_1, object_2, etc. they should almost always be elements in a single list with names that you can easily construct and refer to.

Integers/expressions as names for elements in lists

I am trying to understand names, lists and lists of lists in R. It would be convenient to have a way to dynamically label them like this:
> ll <- list("1" = 2)
> ll
$`1`
[1] 2
But this is not working:
> ll <- list(as.character(1) = 2)
Error: unexpected '=' in "ll <- list(as.character(1) ="
Neither is this:
> ll <- list(paste(1) = 2)
Error: unexpected '=' in "ll <- list(paste(1) ="
Why is that? Both paste() and as.character() are returning "1".
The reason is that paste(1) is a function call that evaluates to a string, not a string itself.
The The R Language Definition says this:
Each argument can be tagged (tag=expr), or just be a simple expression.
It can also be empty or it can be one of the special tokens ‘...’, ‘..2’, etc.
A tag can be an identifier or a text string.
Thus, tags can't be expressions.
However, if you want to set names (which are just an attribute), you can do so with structure, eg
> structure(1:5, names=LETTERS[1:5])
A B C D E
1 2 3 4 5
Here, LETTERS[1:5] is most definitely an expression.
If your goal is simply to use integers as names (as in the question title), you can type them in with backticks or single- or double-quotes (as the OP already knows). They are converted to characters, since all names are characters in R.
I can't offer a deep technical explanation for why your later code fails beyond "the left-hand side of = is not evaluated in that context (of enumerating items in a list)". Here's one workaround:
mylist <- list()
mylist[[paste("a")]] <- 2
mylist[[paste("b")]] <- 3
mylist[[paste("c")]] <- matrix(1:4,ncol=2)
mylist[[paste("d")]] <- mean
And here's another:
library(data.table)
tmp <- rbindlist(list(
list(paste("a"), list(2)),
list(paste("b"), list(3)),
list(paste("c"), list(matrix(1:4,ncol=2))),
list(paste("d"), list(mean))
))
res <- setNames(tmp$V2,tmp$V1)
identical(mylist,res) # TRUE
The drawbacks of each approach are pretty serious, I think. On the other hand, I've never found myself in need of richer naming syntax.

Weird behavior of double-nested lists in R

This just took me two hours of debugging to identify:
> list1 = list() # empty list
> list1['first'] = list(a=list(a1='goat', a2='horse'), b=42) # double-nested
> print(list1$first$b)
NULL # Should be 42?
> print(list1) # let's check the actual contents of list1
$first
$first$a1 # how did the contents of the innermost a-list end up here?
[1] "goat"
$first$a2
[1] "horse"
In this case, the list assigned to 'first' becomes the list in a so b just disappears without warning. What is happening here, and where did the bvalue go?
I'm using R 3.0.2. How can I do something like this when R prevents me from doing the above?
As joran pointed out in a comment, the solution is to use double-brackets in the assignment:
list1[['first']] = list(a=list(a1='goat', a2='horse'), b=42)
Apparently you get a warning in newer R versions but not in older, if you use single-brackets.

Accessing same named list elements of the list of lists in R

Frequently I encounter situations where I need to create a lot of similar models for different variables. Usually I dump them into the list. Here is the example of dummy code:
modlist <- lapply(1:10,function(l) {
data <- data.frame(Y=rnorm(10),X=rnorm(10))
lm(Y~.,data=data)
})
Now getting the fit for example is very easy:
lapply(modlist,predict)
What I want to do sometimes is to extract one element from the list. The obvious way is
sapply(modlist,function(l)l$rank)
This does what I want, but I wonder if there is a shorter way to get the same result?
probably these are a little bit simple:
> z <- list(list(a=1, b=2), list(a=3, b=4))
> sapply(z, `[[`, "b")
[1] 2 4
> sapply(z, get, x="b")
[1] 2 4
and you can define a function like:
> `%c%` <- function(x, n)sapply(x, `[[`, n)
> z %c% "b"
[1] 2 4
and also this looks like an extension of $:
> `%$%` <- function(x, n) sapply(x, `[[`, as.character(as.list(match.call())$n))
> z%$%b
[1] 2 4
I usually use kohske way, but here is another trick:
sapply(modlist, with, rank)
It is more useful when you need more elements, e.g.:
sapply(modlist, with, c(rank, df.residual))
As I remember I stole it from hadley (from plyr documentation I think).
Main difference between [[ and with solutions is in case missing elements. [[ returns NULL when element is missing. with throw an error unless there exist an object in global workspace having same name as searched element. So e.g.:
dah <- 1
lapply(modlist, with, dah)
returns list of ones when modlist don't have any dah element.
With Hadley's new lowliner package you can supply map() with a numeric index or an element name to elegantly pluck components out of a list. map() is the equivalent of lapply() with some extra tricks.
library("lowliner")
l <- list(
list(a = 1, b = 2),
list(a = 3, b = 4)
)
map(l, "b")
map(l, 2)
There is also a version that simplifies the result to a vector
map_v(l, "a")
map_v(l, 1)

Resources