I have an ASP.NET application that I use to read the contents of a web page by a HttpWebRequest frequently. There's no problem with the remote address and my application is always working fine.
While I don't change anything, sometimes (about once a day) I get this error:
the remote name could not be resolved.
Why a previously resolved DNS name sometimes fails to be resolved?
The intermittent nature of this is going to be extremely difficult to resolve and it's going to take a configuration change instead of a code solution. (hint: read everything ;)
I would guess that the remote servers DNS is set to expire pretty often. Probably daily or maybe even every 12 hours or so. This is the TTL (time to live) setting. Admins sometimes set this to an artificially low level if they need the ability to quickly move the site to a new server.
You can determine how often it expires by going to a command prompt and running:
nslookup
set debug
www.theserverdomain.com
At the top of this will be a section that says "AUTHORITY RECORDS:" with an item under it that says "ttl".
Now, (and I'm making an educated guess here), what's probably happening when you query your DNS server to resolve that host name your server will have this value cached.
However, once it expires the your server will have to contact another server upstream to get the ip address resolution, called DNS forwarding. If there are a lot of hops between yours and the remote server OR if one of the DNS servers between the sites is overloaded then it could timeout and send back the message you are receiving.
If this is true then the ONLY thing you can do is hardcode the DNS and IP address combination in your web servers hosts file. This is usually at C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc and is a file named "hosts". There is an example on how to properly edit this within the file itself.
Once you create the host mapping in that file, your web server will no longer have to contact the DNS server to perform name resolution and it won't matter what the TTL is set to.
The only danger here is if they move the web site to a new IP address. At which point you could simply update your hosts file again...
The first thing I would check is if DNS is no longer correctly configured or malfunctioning.
Try (from a Windows command line)
nslookup MyDnsNameHere
and see if you get the IP you would expect.
Related
I am using a websocket connection with an ip address like ws://172.168.41.61. It is working fine. Now I want use the same service from an Android/IOS application, so I purchased a domain say, mydomain.example. Now I linked the above ip to this url: api.mydomain.example. But when I tried to use ws://api.mydomain.example it is not working as a replacement for the above IP address.
I have following 2 concerns:
Is it safe to deploy IP address (172.168.41.61) directly in the app for any API or websocket connection. (I guess no, because IP may be difficult to manage or bad practice, offcourse IP will be static)
Although I have tested the domain (api.mydomain.example) to IP conversion and the IP address is same as expected, then why can't I use the domain like ws://api.mydomain.example as a replacement for ws://172.168.41.61?
This the site from where I check the domain to IP conversion:
https://ipinfo.info/html/ip_checker.php
It is working now. There may be 2-3 issues because of which it was not working earlier:
Domain pointing takes some time. (But I waited for atleast 1-2 hour after pointing the domain and still it didn't work). May be it take more than that, sometimes.
May due to cache issue, when I tried the first time, the no response thing is cached and it continued to show the same thing even after 2-3 hour.
Although I confirmed the domain to IP is converting fine, still the cache in the my system was preventing me to access the original resource.
Thanks
I am having very strange network problems. I am on a domain where a few servers are located on a different subnet. I can ping these servers, dns look them up and remote desktop to them by IP-address. I however cannot find them when using:
net view \server
or
Try to access them via windows explorer.
The person next to me who has an identical machine and is on the same subnet has no problems, as a matter of fact, I am the only one in a 50 person company having this problem!
This wouldn't be so much of a problem except for the fact that my machine cannot use web services located on these servers, neither via HTTP or NET.TCP.
After trying everything I can find on the internet and some more (added a new network card, reset policies, etc.) I finally got WireShark to see what is going on. When doing net view \server I notice that the server never responds to "Session Setup Request" but it did respond to "Negotiate Protocol Request". So what could possibly cause the server never to responde to the Session Setup Request?
Here is the server side capture (Not same session)
OK I found out what this was by comparing my tcpip registry (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters) with a machine that worked. What I noticed is that I had the following 2 entries
EnablePMTUBHDetect 0
EnablePMTUDiscovery 1
but the other machine didn't. By deleting these entries, everything started working!
This however is very strange because these happen to be the default values for there registry keys so I do not understand why having these entries cause such a problem.
In one of my applications (ASP.NET/VB.NET), I need to read the Client Machine Name. Based on the Client Machine we trigger a Point of Sale payment device to accept the payment. On each of these systems we have a stand alone software installed which communicates to the bank using HTTP requests. I am using the following .NET code to read the Client Computer Name.
Dim name As String = String.Empty
Dim hostEntry = Dns.GetHostEntry(HttpContext.Current.Request.UserHostAddress)
If hostEntry.HostName.Contains(".") Then
name = hostEntry.HostName.Substring(0, hostEntry.HostName.IndexOf("."))
Else
name = hostEntry.HostName.Trim
End If
In the development environment, all our systems are in a domain ("xyz.com") and we don't have any issues. In the customer location they don't have a domain name setup. My above logic works well in some of the systems in the client environment and is able to make payments but in most of the systems our logic fails and is not able to read the host name. Any help will be appreciated.
Your question doesn't have the specifics required to answer your question. There are many questions that need to be answered about both environments to give a correct answer. Since I can't ask questions, I will make some assumptions which might apply to future readers of this post and be able to help them out.
I would ask a question but my profile was forked for some unknown reason and I don't have the required reputation to ask a question. That being said I will run through the list of issues I can identify off the bat and suggest solutions for the issue and hopefully one will lead you to a solution.
So...
1) You state you need to read the client machine name. However, if your application isn't running on an internal LAN (aka an intranet) you can't read client machine names period. So this could be your first problem.
2) Combining point 1 and given that you are reading the IP Address from UserHostAddress of the client to look up a DNS host name and when the host look up succeeds you are taking the first part of the name up until the first "." it should be safe to assume that this an intranet application running on a LAN in both your development environment and at the client environment. With that assumption and given the statement that all machines are given an domain of xyz.com it can be assumed that DNS in your development environment is being dynamically updated from presumably through Active Directory (AD). In such case, whenever a client machine on development network requests an IP address, presumably through AD, the DHCP server integrated with AD issues the new IP Address. When it does and the DHCP offer is acknowledged and accepted by the client AD updates DNS (which on a windows network is also AD integrated) by adding a host entry with the computer name of the client machine pointing to the IP Address. Additionally a DNS pointer, depending on configuration, can be added to AD's DNS which allows an IP Address lookup to resolve to the record (which in this case would be the Client's machine name). So with your development environment (presumably running on Windows Active Directory Domain) everything works. Addi tonally, by default the top level domain name (XYZ.COM) gets appended to the clients computer name in initial DNS requests from the client.
3) Your client is not running a domain which leaves further questions. Are they running windows? If they are running windows is it as a non-Ad environment, for example a work group. First assumption would be they are not AD integrated or otherwise you most likely wouldn't be having this problem although I can think of a few rare case scenarios where they might. However, odds are the relevant questions are What DNS server are they running and what DHCP sever are they running? Your application is trying to use a client IP Address on their network and the host name lookup based on their IP is failing so it tells me in their environment for one reason or another you can't get a host name from the IP Address of the client. Mind you if they could be on AD and configured entirely correctly their DNS server is just overwhelmed and not responding within 2 seconds causing the name lookup failure but that is the rate case. With more information I could help more.
3) Assuming in 2 that they are not on AD, do you have the ability manually code host names on the computer your application is running? For example, lets say yourapp.exe runs client-server-01 and clients connect to it. Then on client-server-01 you could add static DNS entries in the host file for each PC on the client network that you expect to connect. On the other hand if your application is running locally on the client PCs you could pass the machine name as a header in the web request and then read it from the Request.Headers variable on the server.
4) Again, making another assumption the clients are web based and your application in the client environment is being hosted on the server... Is the server on a DMZ outside the client environment? If so the client environment may likely be configured, per best practices, that the server host your web app is in a DMZ and DNS requests to the box are forwarded to the client's ISP and not back into their network that has the DNS server capable of resolving an internal IP to a client machine name. If this is the case you need to send the client machine name as a variable from your client or code local IPs to host names in the servers host file (assuming the internal network isn't behind NAT and exposes the real client machine's IP) or request that the DMZ'd server can access the internal DNS and configure the access accordingly.
....
The list really goes on and on but I think I highlighted the problems for 99% of the situations and provided answers to their various solutions.
You can try to take it from X-Forwarded-For header
The X-Forwarded-For (XFF) HTTP header field is a common method for
identifying the originating IP address of a client connecting to a web
server through an HTTP proxy or load balancer.
This is what X-Forwarded-For should return:
X-Forwarded-For: client, proxy1, proxy2
Here some example code:
string ip = Request.ServerVariables["HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR"] ;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(ip))
{
string[] ipRange = ip.Split(',');
ip = ipRange[0];
}
else
{
ip = Request.ServerVariables["REMOTE_ADDR"];
}
There was an issue with Firewall setup on the client machine.Due to that our .NET code was failing. After adding an exception to all the incoming requests from xyz.com. My code is working without any issues.
Thank you guys #Alexander Higgins, #halfer for the help.
My client has a website that is showing some strange behavior. The site is built in ASP.Net and used to be hosted on their internal network. It's now been moved to a different server outside their network. They have other sites hosted on the same server, some built using DotNetNuke, and some classic ASP. All these sites are hosted on one application server, with a database (SQL Server 2008) on a separate server (which is on the same network as the application server). They share the application server, and the database server.
Now that this site has been moved to the outside server, they can't access it. I can, and so can others that I work with (from different IPs, across the country). But the client can't from their network. They can access the landing page subsite.clientdomain.com (no db access), but nothing else. So, for instance, there's a link to subsite.clientdomain.com/folder. When they click that link, the URL changes to subsite.com/folder, which does not work. For myself and others not at the client site, the URL does not change and opens with no problems.
I didn't write the site, and didn't even know it existed before this problem cropped up, so I know very little more than this. Any help is appreciated.
I'm going to go with Martijn B's answer. There's a DNS issue on the internal network. Somewhere on of the DNS servers is a definition that maps http://companywebsite to an ip address like 192.168.1.20 or whatever.
I would open a command prompt on your PC and type
ping new_website_name.com
Take a look at the IP address that comes back. You can also do an nslookup on new_website_name.com that will give you more information. If you (person A) gets one IP address and Person B (inside the network) gets a different IP address....there is definitely a DNS issue on the internal network.
You're going to have to do some network tracing to determine exactly where any redirection is occurring. Given that the problem is only manifested in certain locations, it is likely that it is a function of network configuration in that location (as previously suggested). Without understanding exactly what redirection is occurring, it would be unwise to make configuration changes that might make the problem worse or introduce new issues.
A DNS server cannot AFAIK redirect to a different URL. So something is redirecting from subsite.clientdomain.com/folder to subsite.com/folder, which could be caused by a HTTP redirect. This can be triggered by the software/website itself or by IIS.
Assume you have one box (dedicated server) that's on 24 7 and several other boxes that are user machines that have unused bandwidth. Assume you want to host several web pages. How can the dedicated server redirect http traffic to the user machines. It is desirable that the address field in the web browser still displays the right address, and not an ip. Ie. I don't want to redirect to another web page, I want to tell the web browser that it should request the same web page from a different server. I have been browsing through the 3xx codes, and I don't think they are made for anything like this.
It should work some what along these lines:
1. Dedicated server is online all the time.
2. User machine starts and tells the dedicated server that it's online.
(several other user machines can do similarly)
3. Web browser looks up domain name and finds out that it points to dedicated server.
4. Web browser requests page.
5. Dedicated server tells web browser to repeat request to user machine
Is it possible to use some kind of redirect, and preferably tell the browser to keep sending further requests to user machine. The user machine can close down at almost any point of time, but it is assumed that the user machine will wait for ongoing transactions to finish, no closing the server program in the middle of a get or something.
What you want is called a Proxy server or load balancer that would sit in front of your web server.
The web browser would always talk to the load balancer, and the load balancer would forward the request to one of several back-end servers. No redirect is needed on the client side, as the client always thinks it is just talking to the load balancer.
ETA:
Looking at your various comments and re-reading the question, I think I misunderstood what you wanted to do. I was thinking that all the machines serving content would be on the same network, but now I see that you are looking for something more like a p2p web server setup.
If that's the case, using DNS and HTTP 30x redirects would probably be what you need. It would probably look something like this:
Your "master" server would serve as an entry point for the app, and would have a well known host name, e.g. "www.myapp.com".
Whenever a new "user" machine came online, it would register itself with the master server and a the master server would create or update a DNS entry for that user machine, e.g. "user123.myapp.com".
If a request came to the master server for a given page, e.g. "www.myapp.com/index.htm", it would do a 302 redirect to one of the user machines based on whatever DNS entry it had created for that machine - e.g. redirect them to "user123.myapp.com/index.htm".
Some problems I see with this approach:
First, Once a user gets redirected to a user machine, if the user machine went offline it would seem like the app was dead. You could avoid this by having all the links on every page specifically point to "www.myapp.com" instead of using relative links, but then every single request has to be routed through the "master server" which would be relatively inefficient.
You could potentially solve this by changing the DNS entry for a user machine when it goes offline to point back to the master server, but that wouldn't work without an extremely short TTL.
Another issue you'll have is tracking sessions. You probably wouldn't be able to use sessions very effectively with this setup without a shared session state server of some sort accessible by all the user machines. Although cookies should still work.
In networking, load balancing is a technique to distribute workload evenly across two or more computers, network links, CPUs, hard drives, or other resources, in order to get optimal resource utilization, maximize throughput, minimize response time, and avoid overload. Using multiple components with load balancing, instead of a single component, may increase reliability through redundancy. The load balancing service is usually provided by a dedicated program or hardware device (such as a multilayer switch or a DNS server).
and more interesting stuff in here
apart from load balancing you will need to set up more or less similar environment on the "users machines"
This sounds like 1 part proxy, 1 part load balancer, and about 100 parts disaster.
If I had to guess, I'd say you're trying to build some type of relatively anonymous torrent... But I may be wrong. If I'm right, HTTP is entirely the wrong protocol for something like this.
You could use dns, off the top of my head, you could setup a hostname for each machine that is going to serve users:
www in A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # ip address of machine 1
www in A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # ip address of machine 2
www in A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # ip address of machine 3
Then as others come online, you could add then to the dns entries:
www in A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # ip address of machine 4
Only problem is you'll have to lower the time to live (TTL) entry for each record down to make it smaller (I think the default is 86400 - 1 day)
If a machine does down, you'll have to remove the dns entry, though I do think this is the least intensive way of adding capacity to any website. Jeff Attwood has more info here: is round robin dns good enough?