I need to place an icon of 48x48 as background. I have this icon in my image sprite where of course there are many other images.
Is there a way to show as background only a porition of the image?
thanks
EDIT: Is there a way to do this without setting width-height of the backgrounded element? (I am not sure if acutally i can set a width-height)
Edit2: this is what i need: http://jsfiddle.net/pdxnj/
Thanks
Set the width and height of the element to 48px.
.element{
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
}
Set the background of the element to your image
.element{
background-image: url('image.png');
}
Move the background so that the top left corner of the icon is positioned correctly.
.element{
background-position: 20px 94px;
}
The two numbers in background-position are the X and Y coordinates (respectively) where the top left corner of your 48px by 48px is in your sprite image. So maybe it's actually 96px 0px or something.
EDIT
If you can't control the width and height of the element you are trying to put the background in, but you can add new DOM elements, you can try adding a span inside the element you really want to put the image as a background for.
It would look something like:
<div id="noControl">
<span id="justCreated">
</span>
</div>
and the CSS would look exactly the same as above, except you would need to treat the inline span as a block element:
#justCreated{
display: inline-block;
}
EDIT 2
If you have control over new DOM elements, and want to make your sprite the background without messing with a span, just add another div inside your original one.
Would wind up looking like:
<div id="noControl">
<div id="justCreated">
ALL of the content that used to be inside #noControl
</div>
</div>
and the CSS for it would be
#justCreated{
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
background-image: url('image.png');
background-position: 96px 0px;
z-index: -200;
/* z-index of all the contents needs to be not set, or set to larger than -200 */
}
This is all theoretical, but it SHOULD work.
This way, you can apply the sprite sizing to a block element without messing with the inline stuff. This may affect CSS if it addresses elements by child status (like #noControl > a), because you are inserting a div between the parent and the child.
I am still researching whether you can do this at all if you have no control over the DOM at all.
simple answer no, but by using html elements you can. Html element hight and width should match the background portion of image.
You can if you're not going to be setting a repeating background. Otherwise no.
To do this, you need to play around with the background offset, and width/height of the actual element that you're setting the background on.
it will depend on how much whitespace is around it in the sprite whether it will fit where you need it to without showing parts of other images.. however you could e.g. put a span where you want the image and crop the span to 48x48 so that it only shows the icon itself. it kind of depends what you want to use it for and how the sprite is built
It's better using ::before or ::after so you can easily define your image size without having overflow problems!
This is possible. You need to display that in a 48x48 div then set position: absolute style for the div and define left and top too for it. Also set z-index: 0 for the div so that it appears under everything.
Related
Now these days I want to believe everything is possible, when I saw the power of CSS - making irregular shapes with block elements, i.e. triangles, chamfered CSS Border Corners — how easy but how enthusiastic! So I tried to dream about something, something that I believe can be possible with some great knowledge of CSS.
div.image{
width: 18px;
height: 18px;
background: url(images/image-sprite.png) -70px 0;
display: inline-block;
}
Suppose I put an "Image Sprite" () with a width and height of 18px. But the image I called is NOT an 18px x 18px box-shaped image, suppose the image is Round or some Irregular shapes. When I put box-shadow to the div, it highlighted like a box, when I put text-shadow, it doesn't work, as the div/anchor element doesn't contain any texts in it.
If I want to put shadow onto the element, not onto the container (like a box-shaped HTML element), as the image shown, shadow to the outline of the background-less image only — then:
How can it be done with CSS? or,
Is that really possible?
NOTE: I know, when I have a background-less image and Photoshop, I can put necessary shadows into almost any element. But I asked the question, if something like this can be possible with raw CSS then it'd be a great achievement for us.
The new CSS filters will allow you to do this but browser support is not super deep.
Codepen Example
<div class="image">
<img src="http://www.equissage.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/equissage-red-horse.png" alt="" />
</div>
.image img {
width:400px;
-webkit-filter: drop-shadow(4px 4px grey);
}
The only way to do what you're asking is by recreating the shape with css or using a icon font.
As the element you want to border-shadow is an image these always become square or rectangular.
How would I add a small arrow beside the links that have a drop down in css?
background: url('arrow.png') no-repeat 0 0;
When I use this it adds an arrow on the left side of EVERY link but i want it only on the ones that have a sub menu.
Any help?
Use this:
background: url('arrow.png') no-repeat right top / 70% 70%;
The 70% percentages are for example, they are the width and height of the background size, change them as they suit you. (Since you wanted it smaller in your original question).
Apply this rule to the class of the links that will have a drop down.
Based on the other answers you've had it looks like your question has changed considerably... but to answer it as it stands, if you just want it on SOME of the links, you could add an additional class to those links, and add your background image just to that class.
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_background.asp is a good reference for any sort of CSS syntax questions.
The way that you defined the CSS rule puts the arrow at the top left. To have it centered on the right, for example, use:
background: url('arrow.png') no-repeat right center;
I would also suggest adding a padding if you do that, so that the background image is not behind the text:
padding-right: 15px;
And to make padding work, you'll need to override the display of the links from inline to inline-block:
display: inline-block;
To resize the arrow, you could either just use a smaller image, or you could use the background-size attribute, although using the latter would lose support for IE8 and below.
My css:
a.red, object, embed {
display: inline-block;
background-image:url(/bowties/red.png);
background-size: contain;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width: 100%;
height: 30%;
}
My Html:
<a class="red"/>
What I want to do is have the image automatically sized right so I can use these as menu items. One on top of the next and so on. If I kept them in an image tag wrapped in an anchor then "height: auto;" works. I want to turn them into sprites which is why I am pulling it out, but I would like these to scale based on the size of the screen. Thanks in advance!
From my understanding this is not possible.
I found a resource that simply had me add a relatively sized 'filler' image. A blank placeholder that caused the div to get a height and width, then be able to be re-sized on the container re-size. Slight bit of a hack, but worked.
Is it possible that I can create a margin/padding between the background image and container that holds the image? In other words, I need to move the background image sprite_global_v3.png 20px to the right of the left border of #nav-primary.
Here the position "0 -470px" are used to pick the right picture from sprite. And I don't know how to apply a padding/margin of 20px in order to achieve what I expected.
#nav-primary {
background:url("http://static02.linkedin.com/scds/common/u/img/sprite/sprite_global_v3.png") no-repeat scroll 0 -470px transparent;
}
<div id="nav-primary">
<span>Hello World</span>
</div>
Based on http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp
body
{
background-image:url('img_tree.png');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:right top;
}
If I understood correctly, the background-position is used to control the alignment of the background image. Now I need to control alignment and choose the right picture from a sprite. I don't know whether or not I can mix it together.
Thank you
No, there is no concept of padding/margin for background images.
Options:
1) Positioning the background (as already stated). The key is that the container would have to have fixed dimensions.
2) Nest a container inside a parent container. Parent gets the padding, child gets the background image.
Given that you are trying to do this with a sprite, both are likely options since a sprite has to have a fixed sized container anyways. For option 1, you'd need to make sure your sprite images have enough white space between each other in the file.
No, you can't mix them together.
You can place an image at an offset from the corner:
background-image: url('img_tree.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 20px 20px;
But you can't combine this with the sprite techinque. This technique uses the fact that the element is smaller than the background image to clip the image, but you can't clip the background image 20 pixels into the element.
You can specify the exact position of the background to the pixel.
If you wanted a 10-pixel gap on the left-hand side, for example:
#nav-primary {
background:url("http://static02.linkedin.com/scds/common/u/img/sprite/sprite_global_v3.png") no-repeat scroll transparent;
background-position:10px 0px;
}
That being said, it looks like you already specified it to be set at (0, -470). Does that not work?
The background-position property allows for percentages and values, e.g. "20px 0", which I think is what you're looking for.
Here's a question that's been haunting me for a year now. The root question is how do I set the size of an element relative to its parent so that it is inset by N pixels from every edge? Setting the width would be nice, but you don't know the width of the parent, and you want the elements to resize with the window. (You don't want to use percents because you need a specific number of pixels.)
Edit
I also need to prevent the content (or lack of content) from stretching or shrinking both elements. First answer I got was to use padding on the parent, which would work great. I want the parent to be exactly 25% wide, and exactly the same height as the browser client area, without the child being able to push it and get a scroll bar.
/Edit
I tried solving this problem using {top:Npx;left:Npx;bottom:Npx;right:Npx;} but it only works in certain browsers.
I could potentially write some javascript with jquery to fix all elements with every page resize, but I'm not real happy with that solution. (What if I want the top offset by 10px but the bottom only 5px? It gets complicated.)
What I'd like to know is either how to solve this in a cross-browser way, or some list of browsers which allow the easy CSS solution. Maybe someone out there has a trick that makes this easy.
The The CSS Box model might provide insight for you, but my guess is that you're not going to achieve pixel-perfect layout with CSS alone.
If I understand correctly, you want the parent to be 25% wide and exactly the height of the browser display area. Then you want the child to be 25% - 2n pixels wide and 100%-2n pixels in height with n pixels surrounding the child. No current CSS specification includes support these types of calculations (although IE5, IE6, and IE7 have non-standard support for CSS expressions and IE8 is dropping support for CSS expressions in IE8-standards mode).
You can force the parent to 100% of the browser area and 25% wide, but you cannot stretch the child's height to pixel perfection with this...
<style type="text/css">
html { height: 100%; }
body { font: normal 11px verdana; height: 100%; }
#one { background-color:gray; float:left; height:100%; padding:5px; width:25%; }
#two { height: 100%; background-color:pink;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="one">
<div id="two">
<p>content ... content ... content</p>
</div>
</div>
...but a horizontal scrollbar will appear. Also, if the content is squeezed, the parent background will not extend past 100%. This is perhaps the padding example you presented in the question itself.
You can achieve the illusion that you're seeking through images and additional divs, but CSS alone, I don't believe, can achieve pixel perfection with that height requirement in place.
If you are only concerned with horizontal spacing, then you can make all child block elements within a parent block element "inset" by a certain amount by giving the parent element padding. You can make a single child block element within a parent block element "inset" by giving the element margins. If you use the latter approach, you may need to set a border or slight padding on the parent element to prevent margin collapsing.
If you are concerned with vertical spacing as well, then you need to use positioning. The parent element needs to be positioned; if you don't want to move it anywhere, then use position: relative and don't bother setting top or left; it will remain where it is. Then you use absolute positioning on the child element, and set top, right, bottom and left relative to the edges of the parent element.
For example:
#outer {
width: 10em;
height: 10em;
background: red;
position: relative;
}
#inner {
background: white;
position: absolute;
top: 1em;
left: 1em;
right: 1em;
bottom: 1em;
}
If you want to avoid content from expanding the width of an element, then you should use the overflow property, for example, overflow: auto.
Simply apply some padding to the parent element, and no width on the child element. Assuming they're both display:block, that should work fine.
Or go the other way around: set the margin of the child-element.
Floatutorial is a great resource for stuff like this.
Try this:
.parent {padding:Npx; display:block;}
.child {width:100%; display:block;}
It should have an Npx space on all sides, stretching to fill the parent element.
EDIT:
Of course, on the parent, you could also use
{padding-top:Mpx; padding-bottom:Npx; padding-right:Xpx; padding-left:Ypx;}