Hi
i have a 10 year, 5 minutes resolution data set of dust concentration
and i have seperetly a 15 year data set with a day resolution of the synoptic clasification
how can i combine these two datasets they are not the same length or resolution
here is a sample of the data
> head(synoptic)
date synoptic
1 01/01/1995 8
2 02/01/1995 7
3 03/01/1995 7
4 04/01/1995 20
5 05/01/1995 1
6 06/01/1995 1
>
head(beit.shemesh)
X........................ StWd SHT PRE GSR RH Temp WD WS PM10 CO O3
1 NA 64 19.8 0 -2.9 37 15.2 61 2.2 241 0.9 40.6
2 NA 37 20.1 0 1.1 38 15.2 344 2.1 241 0.9 40.3
3 NA 36 20.2 0 0.7 39 15.1 32 1.9 241 0.9 39.4
4 NA 52 20.1 0 0.9 40 14.9 20 2.1 241 0.9 38.7
5 NA 42 19.0 0 0.9 40 14.6 11 2.0 241 0.9 38.7
6 NA 75 19.9 0 0.2 40 14.5 341 1.3 241 0.9 39.1
No2 Nox No SO2 date
1 1.4 2.9 1.5 1.6 31/12/2000 24:00
2 1.7 3.1 1.4 0.9 01/01/2001 00:05
3 2.1 3.5 1.4 1.2 01/01/2001 00:10
4 2.7 4.2 1.5 1.3 01/01/2001 00:15
5 2.3 3.8 1.5 1.4 01/01/2001 00:20
6 2.8 4.3 1.5 1.3 01/01/2001 00:25
any idea's
Make an extra column for calculating the dates, and then merge. To do this, you have to generate a variable in each dataframe bearing the same name, hence you first need some renaming. Also make sure that the merge column you use has the same type in both dataframes :
beit.shemesh$datetime <- beit.shemesh$date
beit.shemesh$date <- as.Date(beith.shemesh$datetime,format="%d/%m/%Y")
synoptic$date <- as.Date(synoptic$date,format="%d/%m/%Y")
merge(synoptic, beit.shemesh,by="date",all.y=TRUE)
Using all.y=TRUE keeps the beit.shemesh dataset intact. If you also want empty rows for all non-matching rows in synoptic, you could use all=TRUE instead.
Related
I have weather dataset my data is date-dependent
I want to predict the temperature from 07 May 2008 until 18 May 2008 (which is maybe a total of 10-15 observations) my data size is around 200
I will be using decision tree/RF and SVM & NN to make my prediction
I've never handled data like this so I'm not sure how to sample non random data
I want to sample data 80% train data and 30% test data but I want to sample the data in the original order not randomly. Is that possible ?
install.packages("rattle")
install.packages("RGtk2")
library("rattle")
seed <- 42
set.seed(seed)
fname <- system.file("csv", "weather.csv", package = "rattle")
dataset <- read.csv(fname, encoding = "UTF-8")
dataset <- dataset[1:200,]
dataset <- dataset[order(dataset$Date),]
set.seed(321)
sample_data = sample(nrow(dataset), nrow(dataset)*.8)
test<-dataset[sample_data,] # 30%
train<-dataset[-sample_data,] # 80%
output
> head(dataset)
Date Location MinTemp MaxTemp Rainfall Evaporation Sunshine WindGustDir WindGustSpeed
1 2007-11-01 Canberra 8.0 24.3 0.0 3.4 6.3 NW 30
2 2007-11-02 Canberra 14.0 26.9 3.6 4.4 9.7 ENE 39
3 2007-11-03 Canberra 13.7 23.4 3.6 5.8 3.3 NW 85
4 2007-11-04 Canberra 13.3 15.5 39.8 7.2 9.1 NW 54
5 2007-11-05 Canberra 7.6 16.1 2.8 5.6 10.6 SSE 50
6 2007-11-06 Canberra 6.2 16.9 0.0 5.8 8.2 SE 44
WindDir9am WindDir3pm WindSpeed9am WindSpeed3pm Humidity9am Humidity3pm Pressure9am
1 SW NW 6 20 68 29 1019.7
2 E W 4 17 80 36 1012.4
3 N NNE 6 6 82 69 1009.5
4 WNW W 30 24 62 56 1005.5
5 SSE ESE 20 28 68 49 1018.3
6 SE E 20 24 70 57 1023.8
Pressure3pm Cloud9am Cloud3pm Temp9am Temp3pm RainToday RISK_MM RainTomorrow
1 1015.0 7 7 14.4 23.6 No 3.6 Yes
2 1008.4 5 3 17.5 25.7 Yes 3.6 Yes
3 1007.2 8 7 15.4 20.2 Yes 39.8 Yes
4 1007.0 2 7 13.5 14.1 Yes 2.8 Yes
5 1018.5 7 7 11.1 15.4 Yes 0.0 No
6 1021.7 7 5 10.9 14.8 No 0.2 No
> head(test)
Date Location MinTemp MaxTemp Rainfall Evaporation Sunshine WindGustDir WindGustSpeed
182 2008-04-30 Canberra -1.8 14.8 0.0 1.4 7.0 N 28
77 2008-01-16 Canberra 17.9 33.2 0.0 10.4 8.4 N 59
88 2008-01-27 Canberra 13.2 31.3 0.0 6.6 11.6 WSW 46
58 2007-12-28 Canberra 15.1 28.3 14.4 8.8 13.2 NNW 28
96 2008-02-04 Canberra 18.2 22.6 1.8 8.0 0.0 ENE 33
126 2008-03-05 Canberra 12.0 27.6 0.0 6.0 11.0 E 46
WindDir9am WindDir3pm WindSpeed9am WindSpeed3pm Humidity9am Humidity3pm Pressure9am
182 E N 2 19 80 40 1024.2
77 N NNE 15 20 58 62 1008.5
88 N WNW 4 26 71 28 1013.1
58 NNW NW 6 13 73 44 1016.8
96 SSE ENE 7 13 92 76 1014.4
126 SSE WSW 7 6 69 35 1025.5
Pressure3pm Cloud9am Cloud3pm Temp9am Temp3pm RainToday RISK_MM RainTomorrow
182 1020.5 1 7 5.3 13.9 No 0.0 No
77 1006.1 6 7 24.5 23.5 No 4.8 Yes
88 1009.5 1 4 19.7 30.7 No 0.0 No
58 1013.4 1 5 18.3 27.4 Yes 0.0 No
96 1011.5 8 8 18.5 22.1 Yes 9.0 Yes
126 1022.2 1 1 15.7 26.2 No 0.0 No
> head(train)
Date Location MinTemp MaxTemp Rainfall Evaporation Sunshine WindGustDir WindGustSpeed
7 2007-11-07 Canberra 6.1 18.2 0.2 4.2 8.4 SE 43
9 2007-11-09 Canberra 8.8 19.5 0.0 4.0 4.1 S 48
11 2007-11-11 Canberra 9.1 25.2 0.0 4.2 11.9 N 30
16 2007-11-16 Canberra 12.4 32.1 0.0 8.4 11.1 E 46
22 2007-11-22 Canberra 16.4 19.4 0.4 9.2 0.0 E 26
25 2007-11-25 Canberra 15.4 28.4 0.0 4.4 8.1 ENE 33
WindDir9am WindDir3pm WindSpeed9am WindSpeed3pm Humidity9am Humidity3pm Pressure9am
7 SE ESE 19 26 63 47 1024.6
9 E ENE 19 17 70 48 1026.1
11 SE NW 6 9 74 34 1024.4
16 SE WSW 7 9 70 22 1017.9
22 ENE E 6 11 88 72 1010.7
25 SSE NE 9 15 85 31 1022.4
Pressure3pm Cloud9am Cloud3pm Temp9am Temp3pm RainToday RISK_MM RainTomorrow
7 1022.2 4 6 12.4 17.3 No 0.0 No
9 1022.7 7 7 14.1 18.9 No 16.2 Yes
11 1021.1 1 2 14.6 24.0 No 0.2 No
16 1012.8 0 3 19.1 30.7 No 0.0 No
22 1008.9 8 8 16.5 18.3 No 25.8 Yes
25 1018.6 8 2 16.8 27.3 No 0.0 No
I use mtcars as an example. An option to non-randomly split your data in train and test is to first create a sample size based on the number of rows in your data. After that you can use split to split the data exact at the 80% of your data. You using the following code:
smp_size <- floor(0.80 * nrow(mtcars))
split <- split(mtcars, rep(1:2, each = smp_size))
With the following code you can turn the split in train and test:
train <- split$`1`
test <- split$`2`
Let's check the number of rows:
> nrow(train)
[1] 25
> nrow(test)
[1] 7
Now the data is split in train and test without losing their order.
R beginner here, my question is: How do I change this function so that it can be used across all my time periods without copying and pasting the function over and over? The time periods are indicated in the function by the from = X$pre.start1[i] and to = X$pre.start2[i] arguments. I would like to have all the results end up in a single .csv file as well. Is that possible?
I know this function works and I have used it in the past by copying it and changing the time periods but with multiple spreadsheets with data like this it is tedious to apply this way. So I am looking to modify it so that I am not copying and pasting hundreds of times.
The function:
ADIanalyzeFUN <- function(X) {
adianalyzeFUN <- function(X, i){
r <- read_wave(X$sound.files[i], from = X$pre.start1[i], to = X$pre.start2[i])
soundfile.adi <- acoustic_diversity(r)
return(soundfile.adi$adi_left)
return(soundfile.adi$adi_right)
}
output <- vector("logical", ncol(X))
for (i in seq_along(X$sound.files)) {
output[[i]] <- adianalyzeFUN(X, i)
}
X$adi.values.pre1to2 <-output
write.csv(X, "/media/parks/Seagate Portable Drive 2 (2tb)/Parks/2021 Threat Experiment/ADI index values/ADI01.csv", row.names = TRUE)
}
Below is a sample of the data
Each column is a list of times in seconds and I am applying the function to the wave file between one time and the next eg between pre.start1 and pre.start2.
pre.start1 pre.start2 pre.start3 pre.start4 pre.start5 pre.start6 pre.start7 pre.start8 pre.start9 pre.start10 pre.end duringpb.start1
1 2304 2364 2424 2484 2544 2604 2664 2724 2784 2844 2904 2964
2 1386 1446 1506 1566 1626 1686 1746 1806 1866 1926 1986 2046
3 1680 1740 1800 1860 1920 1980 2040 2100 2160 2220 2280 2340
4 1553 1613 1673 1733 1793 1853 1913 1973 2033 2093 2153 2213
5 1661 1721 1781 1841 1901 1961 2021 2081 2141 2201 2261 2321
6 1728 1788 1848 1908 1968 2028 2088 2148 2208 2268 2328 2388
duringpb.end1 duringpb.start2 duringpb.end2 duringpb.start3 duringpb.end3 duringpb.start4 duringpb.end4 duringpb.start5 duringpb.end5
1 3024 3084 3144 3204 3264 3324 3384 3444 3504
2 2106 2166 2226 2286 2346 2406 2466 2526 2586
3 2400 2460 2520 2580 2640 2700 2760 2820 2880
4 2273 2333 2393 2453 2513 2573 2633 2693 2753
5 2381 2441 2501 2561 2621 2681 2741 2801 2861
6 2448 2508 2568 2628 2688 2748 2808 2868 2928```
Thanks for any help!
I would like the output to be something like:
X pre.start1-pre.start2 pre.start2-pr.estart3 pre.start3-pre.start4
1 0.86 0.56 0.89
2 0.27 0.09 0.03
3 0.18 0.10 0.55
4 0.39 0.52 0.74
5 0.14 0.17 0.97
6 0.91 0.64 0.71
You could use purrr package and their map variant called map2_df() (this package is a part of the Tidyverse)
Your example isn't easily reproducible, so here's an example of taking 2 first columns from the iris dateset and constructing a dataframe (a tibble in this case) with the sum for each row and putting it into one dataframe.
library(tidyverse)
iris %>% tibble
#> # A tibble: 150 × 5
#> Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <fct>
#> 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 2 4.9 3 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 setosa
#> 4 4.6 3.1 1.5 0.2 setosa
#> 5 5 3.6 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 6 5.4 3.9 1.7 0.4 setosa
#> 7 4.6 3.4 1.4 0.3 setosa
#> 8 5 3.4 1.5 0.2 setosa
#> 9 4.4 2.9 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 10 4.9 3.1 1.5 0.1 setosa
#> # … with 140 more rows
map2_df(
.x = iris$Sepal.Length,
.y = iris$Sepal.Width,
.f = ~ tibble("sum" = sum(c(.x, .y)))
)
#> # A tibble: 150 × 1
#> sum
#> <dbl>
#> 1 8.6
#> 2 7.9
#> 3 7.9
#> 4 7.7
#> 5 8.6
#> 6 9.3
#> 7 8
#> 8 8.4
#> 9 7.3
#> 10 8
#> # … with 140 more rows
Created on 2021-09-04 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
This question already has answers here:
Categorize numeric variable into group/ bins/ breaks
(4 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am attempting to add a new column to the state sample data frame in R. I am hoping for this column to cluster the ID of states into broader categories (1-4). My code is close to what I am looking for but I am not getting it quite right.. I know I could enter each state ID line by line but is there a a quicker way? Thank you!
library(tidyverse)
#Add column to denote each state
States=state.x77
States=data.frame(States)
States <- tibble::rowid_to_column(States, "ID")
States
#Create new variable for state buckets
States <- States %>%
mutate(WAGE_BUCKET=case_when(ID <= c(1,12) ~ '1',
ID <= c(13,24) ~ '2',
ID <= c(25,37) ~ '3',
ID <= c(38,50) ~ '4',
TRUE ~ 'NA'))
View(States) #It is not grouping the states in the way I want/I am still getting some NA values but unsure why!
You can use cut or findInterval if all of your groups will be using contiguous ID values:
findInterval(States$ID, c(0, 12, 24, 37, 51))
# [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
If you want to make it a bit more verbose, you can use dplyr::between in your case_when:
States %>%
mutate(
WAGE_BUCKET = case_when(
between(ID, 1, 12) ~ "1",
between(ID, 13, 24) ~ "2",
between(ID, 25, 37) ~ "3",
between(ID, 38, 50) ~ "4",
TRUE ~ NA_character_)
)
# ID Population Income Illiteracy Life Exp Murder HS Grad Frost Area WAGE_BUCKET
# 1 1 3615 3624 2.1 69.05 15.1 41.3 20 50708 1
# 2 2 365 6315 1.5 69.31 11.3 66.7 152 566432 1
# 3 3 2212 4530 1.8 70.55 7.8 58.1 15 113417 1
# 4 4 2110 3378 1.9 70.66 10.1 39.9 65 51945 1
# 5 5 21198 5114 1.1 71.71 10.3 62.6 20 156361 1
# 6 6 2541 4884 0.7 72.06 6.8 63.9 166 103766 1
# 7 7 3100 5348 1.1 72.48 3.1 56.0 139 4862 1
# 8 8 579 4809 0.9 70.06 6.2 54.6 103 1982 1
# 9 9 8277 4815 1.3 70.66 10.7 52.6 11 54090 1
# 10 10 4931 4091 2.0 68.54 13.9 40.6 60 58073 1
# 11 11 868 4963 1.9 73.60 6.2 61.9 0 6425 1
# 12 12 813 4119 0.6 71.87 5.3 59.5 126 82677 1
# 13 13 11197 5107 0.9 70.14 10.3 52.6 127 55748 2
# 14 14 5313 4458 0.7 70.88 7.1 52.9 122 36097 2
# 15 15 2861 4628 0.5 72.56 2.3 59.0 140 55941 2
# 16 16 2280 4669 0.6 72.58 4.5 59.9 114 81787 2
# 17 17 3387 3712 1.6 70.10 10.6 38.5 95 39650 2
# 18 18 3806 3545 2.8 68.76 13.2 42.2 12 44930 2
# 19 19 1058 3694 0.7 70.39 2.7 54.7 161 30920 2
# 20 20 4122 5299 0.9 70.22 8.5 52.3 101 9891 2
# 21 21 5814 4755 1.1 71.83 3.3 58.5 103 7826 2
# 22 22 9111 4751 0.9 70.63 11.1 52.8 125 56817 2
# 23 23 3921 4675 0.6 72.96 2.3 57.6 160 79289 2
# 24 24 2341 3098 2.4 68.09 12.5 41.0 50 47296 2
# 25 25 4767 4254 0.8 70.69 9.3 48.8 108 68995 3
# 26 26 746 4347 0.6 70.56 5.0 59.2 155 145587 3
# 27 27 1544 4508 0.6 72.60 2.9 59.3 139 76483 3
# 28 28 590 5149 0.5 69.03 11.5 65.2 188 109889 3
# 29 29 812 4281 0.7 71.23 3.3 57.6 174 9027 3
# 30 30 7333 5237 1.1 70.93 5.2 52.5 115 7521 3
# 31 31 1144 3601 2.2 70.32 9.7 55.2 120 121412 3
# 32 32 18076 4903 1.4 70.55 10.9 52.7 82 47831 3
# 33 33 5441 3875 1.8 69.21 11.1 38.5 80 48798 3
# 34 34 637 5087 0.8 72.78 1.4 50.3 186 69273 3
# 35 35 10735 4561 0.8 70.82 7.4 53.2 124 40975 3
# 36 36 2715 3983 1.1 71.42 6.4 51.6 82 68782 3
# 37 37 2284 4660 0.6 72.13 4.2 60.0 44 96184 3
# 38 38 11860 4449 1.0 70.43 6.1 50.2 126 44966 4
# 39 39 931 4558 1.3 71.90 2.4 46.4 127 1049 4
# 40 40 2816 3635 2.3 67.96 11.6 37.8 65 30225 4
# 41 41 681 4167 0.5 72.08 1.7 53.3 172 75955 4
# 42 42 4173 3821 1.7 70.11 11.0 41.8 70 41328 4
# 43 43 12237 4188 2.2 70.90 12.2 47.4 35 262134 4
# 44 44 1203 4022 0.6 72.90 4.5 67.3 137 82096 4
# 45 45 472 3907 0.6 71.64 5.5 57.1 168 9267 4
# 46 46 4981 4701 1.4 70.08 9.5 47.8 85 39780 4
# 47 47 3559 4864 0.6 71.72 4.3 63.5 32 66570 4
# 48 48 1799 3617 1.4 69.48 6.7 41.6 100 24070 4
# 49 49 4589 4468 0.7 72.48 3.0 54.5 149 54464 4
# 50 50 376 4566 0.6 70.29 6.9 62.9 173 97203 4
It is a vector of length > 1. The comparison operators works on a single vector. We could use between
library(dplyr)
States <- States %>%
mutate(WAGE_BUCKET=case_when(between(ID, 1, 12) ~ '1',
between(ID, 13,24) ~ '2',
between(ID, 25,37) ~ '3',
between(ID, 38,50) ~ '4',
TRUE ~ NA_character_))
Or another option is to use & with > and <=
States %>%
mutate(WAGE_BUCKET=case_when(ID >= 1 & ID <=12 ~ '1',
ID >= 13 & ID <= 24) ~ '2',
ID >= 25 & ID <= 37 ~ '3',
ID >= 38 & ID <= 50 ~ '4',
TRUE ~ NA_character))
Or may be the OP meant to use %in%
States %>%
mutate(WAGE_BUCKET=case_when(ID %in% c(1,12) ~ '1',
ID %in% c(13,24) ~ '2',
ID %in% c(25,37) ~ '3',
ID %in% c(38,50) ~ '4',
TRUE ~ NA_character_))
When I try to fit an exponential decay and my x axis has decimal number, the fit is never correct. Here's my data below:
exp.decay = data.frame(time,counts)
time counts
1 0.4 4458
2 0.6 2446
3 0.8 1327
4 1.0 814
5 1.2 549
6 1.4 401
7 1.6 266
8 1.8 182
9 2.0 140
10 2.2 109
11 2.4 83
12 2.6 78
13 2.8 57
14 3.0 50
15 3.2 31
16 3.4 22
17 3.6 23
18 3.8 20
19 4.0 19
20 4.2 9
21 4.4 7
22 4.6 4
23 4.8 6
24 5.0 4
25 5.2 6
26 5.4 2
27 5.6 7
28 5.8 2
29 6.0 0
30 6.2 3
31 6.4 1
32 6.6 1
33 6.8 2
34 7.0 1
35 7.2 2
36 7.4 1
37 7.6 1
38 7.8 0
39 8.0 0
40 8.2 0
41 8.4 0
42 8.6 1
43 8.8 0
44 9.0 0
45 9.2 0
46 9.4 1
47 9.6 0
48 9.8 0
49 10.0 1
fit.one.exp <- nls(counts ~ A*exp(-k*time),data=exp.decay, start=c(A=max(counts),k=0.1))
plot(exp.decay, col='darkblue',xlab = 'Track Duration (seconds)',ylab = 'Number of Particles', main = 'Exponential Fit')
lines(predict(fit.one.exp), col = 'red', lty=2, lwd=2)
I always get this weird fit. Seems to me that the fit is not recognizing the right x axis, because when I use a different set of data, with only integers in the x axis (time) the fit works! I don't understand why it's different with different units.
You need one small modification:
lines(predict(fit.one.exp), col = 'red', lty=2, lwd=2)
should be
lines(exp.decay$time, predict(fit.one.exp), col = 'red', lty=2, lwd=2)
This way you make sure to plot against the desired values on your abscissa.
I tested it like this:
data = read.csv('exp_fit_r.csv')
A0 <- max(data$count)
k0 <- 0.1
fit <- nls(data$count ~ A*exp(-k*data$time), start=list(A=A0, k=k0), data=data)
plot(data)
lines(data$time, predict(fit), col='red')
which gives me the following output:
As you can see, the fit describes the actual data very well, it was just a matter of plotting against the correct abscissa values.
So I'm starting with a dataframe called max.mins that has 153 rows.
day Tx Hx Tn
1 1 10.0 7.83 2.1
2 2 7.7 6.19 2.5
3 3 7.1 4.86 0.0
4 4 9.8 7.37 2.7
5 5 13.4 12.68 0.4
6 6 17.5 17.47 3.5
7 7 16.5 15.58 6.5
8 8 21.5 20.30 6.2
9 9 21.7 21.41 9.7
10 10 24.4 28.18 8.0
I'm applying these statements to the dataframe to look for specific criteria
temp_warnings <- subset(max.mins, Tx >= 32 & Tn >=20)
humidex_warnings <- subset(max.mins, Hx >= 40)
Now when I open up humidex_warnings for example I have this dataframe
row.names day Tx Hx Tn
1 41 10 31.1 40.51 20.7
2 56 25 33.4 42.53 19.6
3 72 11 34.1 40.78 18.1
4 73 12 33.8 40.18 18.8
5 74 13 34.1 41.10 22.4
6 79 18 30.3 41.57 22.5
7 94 2 31.4 40.81 20.3
8 96 4 30.7 40.39 20.2
The next step is to search for 2 or 3 consective numbers in the column row.names and give me a total of how many times this occurs (I asked this in a previous question and have a function that should work once this problem is sorted out). The issue is that row.names is class NULL which is preventing me from applying further functions to this dataframe.
Help? :)
Thanks in advance,
Nick
If you need the row.names as a data as integer:
humidex_warnings$seq <- as.integer(row.names(humidex_warnings))
If you don't need row.names
row.names(humidex_warnings) <- NULL