How are attributes mapped between .NET (ADFS / WIF) and Java (Federation) - adfs

Assume there are two companies: A.NET which is a .NET shop and B.Java which is a Java shop.
Users in each company need to access the other company's web sites so the two companies set up Federation using ADFS and Oracle Identity Federation or OpenSSO Federation.
In the .NET world, the attributes are accessed as claims inside IClaimsPrincipal and IClaimsIdentity.
In the Java world, the attributes are accessed as HTTP headers.
Does the Federation infrastructure do this mapping automatically i.e.
If a A.NET user accesses a B.Java site do they get their attributes as claims?
If a B.Java user accesses a A.NET site do they get their attributes as headers?

Assuming you can use WS-Federation on both sides, then in both cases the main artifact you would be dealing with is a SAML token.
In general, your federation infrastructure is completely independent of the application stack. ADFS would issue SAML tokens in either case (for the Java app and for the .NET app). OIF would also have to issue SAML tokens for both sets of users.
In the .NET world, WIF will parse/validate, etc. the SAML token into a .NET object model that represents the information in it (the claims, the issuer, etc). That object model is the ClaimsPrincipal (and all related interfaces and types). You would have to look at the WIF equivalent on the java world. But in either case, the input is a SAML token.
In your scenario it is likely that there will be a token transformation in both STSs:
For the .NET app:
1- user from the B company authenticates on OIF and gets a SAML token for company A
2- user sends token to ADFS
3- ADFS reads the token from B, validates and issues a new token (potentially and very likely adding/transforming/removing claims)
4- user sends the transformed token to app A
The sequence from a user in A accesing the java app on B is exactly the same. Notice there's a bidirectional trust in this case (Company A trusts issuer in B and viceversa)

Related

Mixed Authentication in .net core API

I'm building a multi tenant Service Fabric Application, that allows a tenant to specify a login type - Identity(asp.net)/Azure AD.
I have an Authentication service that checks to which tenant the user is linked to and then proceeds to check if the username:password for the user is valid, if valid it returns a JWT token to the gateway API/web API that then allows access to the rest of the services on the cluster.
This is further secured by roles to limit actions and data access etc.
Question 1
What would be a secure way to save the app id and secret given by that tenant if they use azure AD?
In my DB and encrypt the info, it would have to be decrypted to connect to the AD(Trying to keep in dynamic).
Question 2
I'm implementing my own sliding refresh tokens to obtain a new JWT after it expires, is there a better/standard approach?
Question 3
Is there a better/standard way to handle this multi-tenant sign in process.
Question 4
Is there a way to have optional claims set on the JWT Subject that would allow access to shared services but prevent access to tenant specific services if the claim value is incorrect?
Edit
Ideally the Roles should not be part of the tenants AD/B2C because they role are dynamic and managed from within the application.
Instead of building your own STS logic, have a look at IdentityServer, a popular and great OSS tool.
For example, have a look here for a multi-tenant example using asp.net core.
It supports adding custom claims to the token, by implementing a Profile Service. Services can be configured to use claims for authorization.
This blog post may also be useful.
I will very strongly advise you ride upon the Azure tenant model and let Azure AD manage all credentials and authentication. In today's world its a very bad idea to store and manage user credentials when there are plenty of Identity Providers available.
Recommended reading:
How to build a multi-tenant app with Azure AD
How to secure a Web API with Azure AD.
Libraries like MSAL.NET will automatically manage token caches and refreshes.
Use roles and groups in Azure AD
Claims in tokens issued can be customized to some extent.
disclaimer: I work for Microsoft

How to build a Spring MVC based application to connect with any service provider to do the SSO

We want to build one spring MVC based application which will support below use case:
User access the application URL to login into application.
Once the valid credentials are entered to login into application, the user can access any of the service provider application for performing SSO.
On the access of any service provider application the SAML response should be generated and post to the Service provider ACS(Assertion consumer service) URL.
Also in addition to IDP initiated SSO, it should also support SP initiated SSO where the authentication request will we posted to the application login page, after valid credentials are entered by user, the application should redirect to service provider(which have posted the authentication request).
The application should have its own login page and authentication mechanism, it should not redirect to any other identity provider for authentication.
Should we use normal Spring MVC based application which will generated the SAML response using open SAML library, or any other SAML builder can be used for satisfying the above use case.
This basically means
- your app bundles a SAMLv2 compliant IdP (please don't try to build one yourself based on some SAML lib)
- your app calls an API of the IdP for authentication and issues a session token the IdP will recognize later on (otherwise authentication will always happen again when another application (acting as SAMLv2 SP) wants to perform SSO
Issue with the latter: The "token" will most likely be a cookie and then the restrictions of the cookie spec apply. This means you can only use host-based cookies (which security mandates) if your app and the IdP are deployed behind the same 'FQDN' (e.g. by using an HTTP reverse-proxy)
Another issue: How does your app know when the show the 'login screen' if the user actually has a valid session with the IdP because SSO was started at a different SP?
SAML way: You would first have to do a 'passive AuthnRequest' to check this.
Conclusion: Your use case can be achieved, but the effort seems quite high. I'm not aware that there is some lib/framework, which would offers this at the moment OOTB.

Authorization method for REST API utilising Active Directory

What is the best method of securing a REST Web API with the following requirements. The system has an Angular JS frontend with the REST APIs implemented in ASP.net.
There are two "roles" in the system, users will have one of the
roles. One role should allows access to some APIs (call it "VIEW"),
the other role allows access to other APIs
All users are in Active Directory, so if I have a username, I can check what role they are in- Some clients are on Windows boxes, the others are on Linux
I would like to persist the session so I don't have to look up AD for every API call
I would like single sign on. On the Windows machines, I don't require them to enter user and pass as I already can retrieve their username using Windows Authentication.
I believe that Oauth would be my best option.
There are two "roles" in the system, users will have one of the roles.
One role should allows access to some APIs (call it "VIEW"), the other
role allows access to other APIs
For role based authentication, you can use [Authorize("Role" = "Manager")]. The token will be provided by the identity server and will contain the claim as Role.
All users are in Active Directory, so if I have a username, I can
check what role they are in- Some clients are on Windows boxes, the
others are on Linux
If you have ADFS then you can have an Identity server that trusts the ADFS. The ADFS will provide a token which will have the claim for role and your Identity Server will do the claims transformation and will return the same Role claim back to angular app.
I would like to persist the session so I don't have to look up AD for
every API call
For this while requesting the token, you can ask for offline scope so the Identity server will provide the Refresh Token with Access Token so you don't need to ask for AD again and again.
I would like single sign on. On the Windows machines, I don't require
them to enter user and pass as I already can retrieve their username
using Windows Authentication.
For this one, you can have your Identity sever trust the WSFederation for windows Authentication.
So basically you need to setup Identity server that will provide you with the token and the REST API will use that token to verify claims to return the correct information back to the user.
I am not sure what you expect exactly. Anyway, first I'm gonna reformulate your question with requirements:
you accounts and role are in active directory
you want to manage roles based on an active directory group
you want anybody whatever the system (windows, linux, mac, mobile...) to connect on your application using the same authentication
you want to avoid your AD to be hit constantly (not at any call for example)
if the user is connected on an application that uses the authentication system, he doesn't have to do it so again on another application that uses the same authentication system
If these requirements are yours. I believe the only standard (and clean) solution is to use OAuth. I'm not gonna go in detailed description of OAuth, but this authentication protocol is the most standard one on the net (facebook, google, twitter...). Of course as you don't want to use facebook, google or twitter accounts in your business applications but your active directory accounts you'll have to install/setup/develop your OAuth identity provider using accounts of your active active directory server. Your choice will depend on how well you know ADFS protocol and its different flows (code, implicit, assersion) You have two solutions for it:
Use ADFS: install ADFS; it provides a OAuth portal that will work out of the box with asp.net mvc. This uses the code flow of OAuth that is the only OAuth flow supported by ADFS. For roles and its related AD groups, you'll have to map role claims with AD groups. (it's in the setup of adfs, you'll find many tutos on the net). You'll find lot of tutos as well about how to use ADFS with asp.net mvc/asp.net webapi. I mention .net here, but every technology has an implementation for OAuth authentication (nodeJs/express, php, java...).
Use thinktecture identity server (.net technology). This will provide all the foundation to implement a custom identity server with the least effort: http://www.thinktecture.com/identityserver / https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer3. It contains an addin to plug its accounts to active directory. With this, you can use implicit and assertion flows.
Use oauth2orize (for nodeJs): https://www.npmjs.com/package/oauth2orize. This will permit you to make the same than thinktecture identity server but in nodeJs. Apparently you'll have to make all the wirering with ad manually. With this, you can use implicit flows (not sure about assertion flows).
At application side, most of frameworks can authenticate easily using OAuth with a lot of existing frameworks. For example, even if you make a single page application, you can use adal.js or oidc.js for angular if you use angular. As I mentioned above, all this is taken in charge by asp.net mvc/webapi out of the box but I know it's the case for other server technologies. If you have more questions, don't hesitate as I'm not sure of what you expect exactly.

Identity Management and SSO for ASP.NET MVC

I am currently evaluating possible Identity Management (IdM) solutions that enable single user identity store and SSO across applications.
I am leaning heavily toward Thinktecture IdentityServer v2, but I am not able to validate that all of the following requirements can be met with it.
I am also familiar with and have used the MembershipReboot project as a replacement for the ASP.NET Membership Provider. I like it that MR provides a lot of the self-serve and pwd mgmt requirements I'd need, but I don't fully understand how this would "fit in" with IdentityServer - and by that I don't mean the actual implementation of the I*Repository interfaces, but rather from a high level architecture.
Would someone tell me which of the following are (or are not) possible with it, and perhaps provide other options that may better address these requirements?
Support for ASP.NET (WebForms and MVC)
Maintain central user identity store
Self service password management
Password policy configuration
Ability to authenticate both AD users as well as user in SQL store (centralized)
store (forms) - this means we want to have some internal users (AD) and some custom (forms/sql) users in the same application
Customization of pages (e.g. login, self service, etc.)
Roles/Claims management specific to each application (I know this is
Authorization, not Authentication, but I need to understand how to
manage app-specific claims related to central user identities)
Permissions management (not sure if this should this be in app, or centralized)
SSO across different domains
Support for token standards like SAML 2.0, JWT, WsFed
Open Source, or Low Cost
Extensible (lower priority)
Any suggestions/recommendations or comments based on the above requirements?
If you're using IdentityServer then you're doing single sign-on. This means your app can be any tech as long as you have a library that can handle whatever protocol your IdP supports. IdentityServer v2 supports WS-Fed primarily for browser-based applications. IdentityServer v3 will first be focused on OIDC (OpenID Connect) but will eventually also support WS-Fed.
MembershipReboot is an identity management library. This means it stores things like passwords and other identity data for your users. It can be used by both IdentityServer v2 and v3.
Most, if not all, of the things you list can be achieved with either platform. Some will require custom coding on your part.
IdentityServer v3 will be in alpha very soon.

How to integrate AD authentication + SSO with exsisting Forms authenticated Saas web application

We are running a Saas ASP.NET 3.5 Web application using Forms authentication on a IIS 7.5 public server with protected content for thousands of users. We also have some subapplications running ASP.NET MVC 2.
Usernames and passwords are stored in our database and every user has roles and groups attached, with privileges and access rights defined.
Now we have been asked to also facilitate for simple SSO login via Active Directory so that users do not have to enter username and passwords twice to login. These users will originate from different networks and domains.
No user "sync" should take place from our servers to LDAP serves. We are not sure that any communication with LDAP is needed since all users will be created in our system and maintained there. Forms authentication will be used for most of our users.
From here on we are unsure which is the best path to choose. For our scenario what would be the "best practice" way to proceed?
The simple answer is SAML. It is considered the "best practice" and many large SAAS providers support it.
SAML protocol defines the single sign on flow between multiple systems. It establishes trust between systems using certificates. Your application accepts an assertion containing attributes (user id, name, email address, etc.) from other systems. Your app will map the user into your user store.
In .NET world there are several options. You can find a library that implements SAML (ComponentSpace has one) and hook it into ASP.NET authentication. You can create your own using Windows Identify Framework (WIF). Here's the boatload of WIF videos http://www.cloudidentity.com/blog/2010/06/23/ALL-WILL-BE-REVEALED-7-HOURS-RECORDINGS-FROM-THE-WIF-WORKSHOPS/. You can try IdentityServer http://thinktecture.github.io/
Depending on how secure your app must be, you can opt for a simple option of passing user id from trusted networks using a simplified method. I've seen apps that allow user id to be sent via URL parameter or form field. Of course, this is horribly insecure, and you are taking on more risk, because the trust between two networks is not cryptographically enforced. You can mitigate it somewhat by checking referrer string or IP address (if you can isolate IP range of a corporate network for example). But you are still open to spoofing because any user can impersonate others by simply replacing user id within HTTP request.
It probably doesn't answer your question fully, but hopefully points you in the right direction.
I recommend looking into ADFS 2.0 it is very powerful in terms of claims mapping and works with AD: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ee335705.aspx
What you would make is a token consuming portion of your app that would receive and parse the final claims returned to your web server after the authentication loop.

Resources