Dear Overflowing Stackers,
My page is proving to be a real pain the behind. I was experiencing this problem:
background is only as wide as viewport
and I tried to remedy it by putting a min-width on the body. That works just fine; everything displays properly, but only if my min-width has a value high enough to encompass my #navwrapper div (it's the one with the green swirly vector art background).
With such a high value (1265px) many users will be given a horizontal scrollbar, which I don't want. I have a really wide skyline image in the footer (3,000px) and it doesn't cause a scrollbar, so I'm wondering why my navwrapper does. Ideally, I want the page to have a min-width of 960px, so the navwrapper will stay centered, and the edges will get clipped if the edges extend past the viewport.
An early version of my page is here: http://jezenthomas.co.uk/poison2/
Hope someone can figure it out!
Your navwrapper has content in it. Your skyline is just a background image. Browsers treat content with priority and allow backgrounds to just fall outside of the viewport. If you want to prevent scrollbars, you can add
body {
overflow-x:hidden;
}
which will hide any horizontal scrollbars.
Related
The offending website: http://www.jasonmfry.com. The corresponding codepen: https://codepen.io/Auslegung/pen/Roapwv.
Scroll down until you can see a half inch of the image at the top of your screen, and you will notice another half inch of white above that. I want the images to fill the container and not leave that white space above themselves. I have tested this on the latest Chrome and Safari builds on Mac. On iPhone Chrome and Safari there is no white space, fwiw.
Removing line 88 of styles.css background-repeat: no-repeat fills that white space with the bottom of the image, but of course I don't want that. Reducing the scale value on line 94 transform: translateZ(1px) scale(1.08) will reduce the amount of white space shown, but at the expense of the parallax scrolling effect. How can I get the images to fill up that entire area, while still exhibiting parallax scrolling?
I've done a lot of googling and experimenting and haven't been able to figure anything out. Let me know if I'm missing any info that you need to help me out. I'm also having issues with image ratio during browser resize but that's another question altogether.
I used to be a WDI instructor, and actually probably would have taught your particular online class but left to go work on other things. Kudos on using StackOverflow! Say hi to Marc, Matt, and whoever else is around. :)
The issue here is that by default scale resizes things relative to the center of the element. You want it to center things relative to the bottom of the element.
Putting it another way: think of scale as sending out little arms to the edges of your image to pull in the edges. By default, the arms reach out from the center of your image and pull in all its edges equally. You want them to reach out out from the top of your image and "pull" up the bottom edge.
TLDR, just add this line: transform-origin:bottom;!
Edit:
The issue here is actually with the dimensions of the images themselves.
As long as the ratio of the window's height/width is greater than the image's height/width you won't have any issues, but once the window's ratio is smaller than the image's ratio you'll see that whitespace.
Your headshot is almost square, whereas the other images are very rectangular. If your browser window is wider than it is tall the headshot will behave, but resize the window to be taller than it is wide and you see the whitespace again. Conversely, make the window much shorter than it is wide and all the images will behave themselves.
You could resize all the images to be narrow and tall. The largest aspect ratio on devices is 16:9, so make the images <9x wide and >16x tall and you should be good.
Unfortunately I don't think there's slicker solution for this other than using Javascript.
I hope what I try is not impossible.
Let me explain first: I have a responsive design which requires a background to be fixed under some situations (media query blocks). The design in question is this one:
http://think-open.at/fileadmin/templates/responsive/content.html
Basically there are two media queries: one for the maximal height and one for the minimal width. If there is enough viewport height there is a scrollbar in the content area and the design height is fixed. But if the viewport is not large enough for showing the predefined height the height-mediaquery removes the scrollbar from the inner div so there won't be two nested scrolling containers (body + div) and sets the content area to height: auto.
There is also a responsive media query if the viewport is too narrow but this works flawless.
Now the problem: When the design switches to the mode where the whole page scrolls (below 830px height) I would like to position the image in the right container "fixed" so it does not scroll out of the viewport. But then the problem arises, that I can't really position the background in regards to the container div as "fixed" positions an background image in regard to the viewport. I have created a CSS fiddle here:
http://dabblet.com/gist/ae5c3598e1465ce0c90e
If you change the width you notice the problem. I would like to have the right border of the image aligned with the right border of the green box.
Is this somehow possible? I have no problem using calc() as there will be a condition in my CMS to use the plain old-school design if an older browser gets detected.
I solved it myself now. Sorry for posting.
The trick was: As my design is centered, I started to try using calc(50% + somepixelvalue). This did the job.
I adjusted the CSS playground:
http://dabblet.com/gist/5b63553f47a81f3bb701
Now the image is always up in line with the right border of the green area. When scaling there is sometimes a 1pixel difference but this doesn't matter as the background will get assigned to some container element which acts as mask.
Please visit website: http://viewlike.us/ and change resolution to e.g. 1920x1200 - in mostly cases header (div with input form and submit button ) is not anymore 100%. How to avoid this situation? Ive tried to use width:100% !important, min/max width - but without success. I suppose there should be a small trick/fix or sth to avoid it but Im struggling with lack of ideas.. thanks~!
I think the default value for the width property is auto for most elements. And in this case, the <div> is expanding to 100 percent of its parent element, which in your case is <body>. Since the <body> tag has no width defined, it will default to 100 percent of the browser window. So even though the width of the page located below the resolution selection bar is greater than the browser window's width, the top bars (URL entry and resolution selection) still have the width of the browser window. That is why you see the edge of them when you scroll to the right.
You might want to experiment with using position: fixed in combination with the CSS properties top and left for your top bars. That way, those bars will be on-screen even when you scroll the page to the right. (I tried that breefly and it should work.)
I hope that helps you!
I have an absolutely positioned div that has a width of 100% with a background image tiling horizontally. When the browser is shrunk to the point that the width of the browser is less than the page, the remaining right portion of the div's background color is truncated.
Is there a better approach or a hack to resolve this?
Here's the example: link with the div in question being the menu.
Edit: to clarify, reduce the size of your browser so that the full width of the page (960px) requires a scroll-bar. At this point, 100% of the "page", or the viewable area, is actually less than 100% of the content. When this occurs, the menu's background doesn't span the remaining content that would require scrolling to the right to see.
This issue is present in ie7, ie8, and firefox 3.5. I haven't tested the other browsers but I can only assume that this happens there as well.
Thanks
Add:
min-width: 960px;
to the menu div selector. Fixes it for me.
With regards to the actual code structure, and as someone pointed out (but promptly deleted their post), perhaps structure your elements in a more logical layout. There's no reason to have the menu as the bottom child element (as far as I could tell anyway)
It's a more linear, free flowing code structure, rather then a spaghetti mess of containers in random orders, that it can turn into.
I have this website.
The div container contains a background with a grungy look, and the body contains another background that is repeated on the x coordinate.
If you view the site you'll see whitespace on the left and right side. I am wondering how I can set the background images to expand based on the screen resolution. Would it work to set a width based on percentage for each div?
To my knowledge, CSS does not support scaling background images, which is disappointing to say the least. Long story short, you'll probably have to fake it with a fixed-position, z-indexed img tag. That, or what you did: a large image with a background-repeat.
I dont see any issues with what you've got in FF3/IE6/IE7 and chrome. only issue i see is the transparent png in ie6 with the ugly gray behind it.
ie6 I gotta fix but what the customer wants is for the with of the page to size up based on the users computer resolution
Unfortunately, you can't scale the image itself.
What you could do would be remake the div structure so that the inner div contains the center of the grungy background and the sides were tiled through two separate divs. You could then recut the center piece to tile both vertically and horizontally and give it a width that is a percentage of the window size. You could keep it from getting too small via javascript.
This is not an optimal solution, but if the client is set on having it scale with the browser window, this might accomplish it for them.
thanks for all your answers, when i said white space i didnt mean actual white space what i was refering to was that the entire container div wasnt sizing (width wise) towards what the users computer resolution was. and since allot of the divs are set with a background image there is no css code for setting the width on the image but i guess it would work on the divs. but thankfully after talking with the customer he changed his mind and doesnt want it anymore :)