What, exactly, is needed for "margin: 0 auto;" to work? - css

I know that setting margin: 0 auto; on an element is used to centre it (left-right). However, I know that the element and its parent must meet certain criteria for the auto margin to work, and I can never seem to get the magic right.
So my question is simple: what CSS properties have to be set on an element and its parent in order for margin: 0 auto; to left-right centre the child?

Off the top of my head:
The element must be block-level, e.g. display: block or display: table
The element must not float
The element must not have a fixed or absolute position1
Off the top of other people's heads:
The element must have a width that is not auto2
Note that all of these conditions must be true of the element being centered for it to work.
1 There is one exception to this: if your fixed or absolutely positioned element has left: 0; right: 0, it will center with auto margins.
2 Technically, margin: 0 auto does work with an auto width, but the auto width takes precedence over the auto margins, and the auto margins are zeroed out as a result, making it seem as though they "don't work".

Off the top of my head, it needs a width. You need to specify the width of the container you are centering (not the parent width).

Complete rule for CSS:
(display: block AND width not auto) OR display: table
float: none
position: relative OR position: static
OR
parent element with display: flex

Off the top of my cat's head, make sure the div you're trying to center is not set to width: 100%.
If it is, then the rules set on the child divs are what will matter.

Off the top of my head, if the element is not a block element - make it so.
and then give it a width.

It will also work with display:table - a useful display property in this case because it doesn't require a width to be set. (I know this post is 5 years old, but it's still relevant to passers-by ;)

Here is my Suggestion:
First:
1. Add display: block or table
2. Add position: relative
3. Add width:(percentage also works fine)
Second:
if above trick not works then you have to add float:none;

Please go to this quick example I've created jsFiddle. Hopefull it's easy to understand. You can use a wrapper div with the width of the site to center align. The reason you must put width is that so browser knows you are not going for a liquid layout.

It's perhaps interesting that you do not have to specify width for a <button> element to make it work - just make sure it has display:block : http://jsfiddle.net/muhuyttr/

In case you don't have a fixed width for your parent element, having your parent element with display: flex worked for me.

For anybody just now hitting this question, and not being able to fix margin: 0 auto, here's something I discovered you may find useful: a table element with no specified width must have display: table and not display: block in order for margin: auto to do work. This may be obvious to some, as the combination of display: block and the default width value will give a table which expands to fill its container, but if you want the table to take it's "natural" width and be centered, you need display: table

Related

Strange container div behaviour

I'm asking this for learning purposes; there aren't any negative aspects on this behaviour, but I just wonder if this could have any negative consequences in the future.
So I have a container div: content_wrap, which has two other div's: side_bar and main_content. The container div is 980px width, and is used to center its contents using margin-left and margin-right.
It's doing this correctly, however, when I was debugging the page (in Firefox), I noticed that the browser renders the div as being 0x0px and renders the parent div off-screen. However, it does position the child divs correctly. See this JSFiddle for an example: http://jsfiddle.net/7fsXp/7/
I Googled this and most of the answers have something to do with floats and are solved by using clear:both, but I don't use any floats. I did notice that if I change the main_content div from position:absolute; to position:relative;, the content_wrap is displayed correctly. Or I can fix it by setting a height for content_wrap.
I don't actually need to be able to see the content_wrap, so there isn't really a problem, as it is doing its job in means of centering the child divs. I just wondered if it would be a bad practice to leave it like this? Is it a bad thing, or does it matter?
Try adding other elements to this HTML and enjoy the horror :D
There are actually many things in your code, that I wouldn't do. First of all, when an element is with position: absolute or position: fixed its layout is "ignored" by other elements or in other words cannot "push" any element and that is why your container is having 0 height. It's like they are ethereal (best explanation ever, I know).
You should check this article on positioning -- http://css-tricks.com/absolute-relative-fixed-positioining-how-do-they-differ/
The fact that they are in the place you expect them to be is that there are actually no other elements in the HTML and the absolute element is positioned relatively to the body and so is the fixed one (but that's what elements with position: fixed always do). Looks what happens when I add some other content to the parent div -- http://jsfiddle.net/7fsXp/13/
So long story short - you shouldn't form your layout with absolute or fixed elements if you can do it without them.
position: fixed and position: absolute take the elements out of the flow, so using either of these positions on all child divs will collapse the parent div entirely.
If you have content below a collapsed div, it will flow up and over/under that content like this.
You don't need to position the main_content div absolutely, but you'll need to change a few things to top align the sidebar and main_content.
DEMO
Since sidebar is fixed, it's using the document, not the container div as a reference for top, while main_content would use the body (unless you add position: relative to the container). Getting rid of the body's default padding/margin will fix the small alignment difference.
body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#main_content {
//remove position: absolute;
margin-top:70px; //top: 70px won't work unless you specify position
}
It depends on what you are willing to do, but because the default position for div is position: static; changing the position: relative; will avoid the collapse of parent div.

why wont {margin:auto;} give an auto margin at the top and bottom? [duplicate]

If I set the CSS margin properties of a div like so:
div { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }
I get a div which is centered horizontally in the page, like so.
However, if I change the CSS to this:
div { margin-top: auto; margin-bottom: auto; }
my div is not vertically centered. I don't need to know a workaround (plenty of solutions are available) but I would like to know the reason for this behaviour. Why don't margin-top and margin-bottom work in the same way? What am I missing?
The short answer is the spec says so.
10.6.2 Inline replaced elements, block-level replaced elements in normal flow, 'inline-block' replaced elements in normal flow and floating replaced elements
If 'margin-top', or 'margin-bottom' are 'auto', their used value is 0.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#Computing_heights_and_margins
Assuming we are talking about auto margins within a Flexbox..
The reason that margin-left and margin-right set to auto will center an item is because the width by default is 100% of the available container for a block element.
The height on the other hand attempts to fill as little as the space as possible, so margin-top and margin-bottom as auto will default to 0. BUT, if your element is within an element with a fixed height, then margin-top and margin-bottom will be able to calculate the center based on that height.
Ex. http://jsfiddle.net/jwz76e3g/24/

CSS centering multiple images in rows (pyramid formation)

http://jsfiddle.net/XKL6E/
How can I centre these images so they form a pyramid (overlapping each other halfway)?
If you don't care to support IE7, you can use display: inline-block instead of float: left and just center the whole chunk: http://jsfiddle.net/XKL6E/16/
Add display:inline-block to .empty-button, and text-align:center to .button_row:
http://jsfiddle.net/XKL6E/14/
If you change all of the buttons to span elements instead of div, you can apply the display: inline-block to them.
Credit to #Blender for the inline-block idea and the original version of this fiddle.
http://jsfiddle.net/XKL6E/21/
Edit:
I forgot to mention, the difference between inline-block on a div and a span element is IE7 support. Articles like this one give all sorts of hacky ways to make this work. In the case of div elements, substituting span is good enough.
Using fixed width divs and centring them automatically with
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
The fixed width is dependant on the width of the images. If the image width is always the same, which I assume in your case is, you can multiply the width by an integer ( use jQuery .css(attr,value) selector ).

Why don't margin-top: auto and margin-bottom:auto work the same as their left and right counterparts?

If I set the CSS margin properties of a div like so:
div { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }
I get a div which is centered horizontally in the page, like so.
However, if I change the CSS to this:
div { margin-top: auto; margin-bottom: auto; }
my div is not vertically centered. I don't need to know a workaround (plenty of solutions are available) but I would like to know the reason for this behaviour. Why don't margin-top and margin-bottom work in the same way? What am I missing?
The short answer is the spec says so.
10.6.2 Inline replaced elements, block-level replaced elements in normal flow, 'inline-block' replaced elements in normal flow and floating replaced elements
If 'margin-top', or 'margin-bottom' are 'auto', their used value is 0.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#Computing_heights_and_margins
Assuming we are talking about auto margins within a Flexbox..
The reason that margin-left and margin-right set to auto will center an item is because the width by default is 100% of the available container for a block element.
The height on the other hand attempts to fill as little as the space as possible, so margin-top and margin-bottom as auto will default to 0. BUT, if your element is within an element with a fixed height, then margin-top and margin-bottom will be able to calculate the center based on that height.
Ex. http://jsfiddle.net/jwz76e3g/24/

How can I make a div assume 100% of its containing div?

I'm trying to make a div assume 100% of it's parent div. The parent div acts as a page wrapper, so it's already assuming 100% of the page width. I've tried adding width: 100%, but this did not seem to work. I'm a little baffled, because this seems like a relatively simply thing to do.
Don't specify a width at all. For a div element (or any block level element for that matter), this will make it assume 100% width regardless what padding/margin settings it has set.
Depending on the box model, explicitly setting 100% width can actually make the element too wide because paddings are calculated into it.
If this doesn't work, there is some other CSS setting interfering and you need to show more of your layout and HTML code.
display: block;
width: auto;
Should work for you.
You need to show more of your existing css code as normally, a div takes by default the whole space available to it, provided it has some content.
Other than that, make sure you set margin and padding of the parent div to 0.
.parent{
margin:0;
padding:0;
overflow:auto;
}
.child{
margin:0;
padding:0;
}

Resources