recently i was working on windows based application in .net, where i have form which has field know as Joining date, which datetimepicker control, whenever user submits the form all the details goes in the sql server table, now the issue is for the date of joining field, sql server inserts its own datetime stamp, as the field is datetime type, but i want to insert the joining date as dd.MM.yyyy, so i used Convert.. like below...
CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), #JoiningDate, 104), i checked this statement in select query with #JoiningDate replaced with GetDate(), it showed me expected results but when i try to insert record, it does not insert record as expected... i am using SP, in sql server 2008, enterprise edition...
can anyone please tell me why this happening...
please reply as soon as possible as it is of utmost important.
Regards
Abbas Electricwala.
your problem may have something to do with the type of your table column. you see, if the column's type is datetime,with your convert operation, you are getting the date value the exact way you want it, but since your column type is datetime, sql will insert a datetime value to it.
you can try and change the column type to varchar(10), and see if it makes a difference.
Related
I am trying to fill a datatable in vb using SQLiteDataAdapter from a SQLITE database. There are 3 fields in the table that contain dates and they appear as either recent dates or "1899-12-30" . The Fill command generates a "String was not recognized as a valid DateTime." error. I cannot find a date entry that does not look valid, except "1899-12-30", is this a valid date?
Any other thoughts would be appreciated.
Brad
The short answer is 'yes'. I built a table with the three possible ways of storing dates, thus:
CREATE TABLE `JustDate` ( `Date_1` INTEGER, `Date_2` TEXT, `Date_3` REAL )
Then I populated each of those fields in one record with the value you suspect.
And then I did a trial query against the fields to see if sqlite would treat them as proper dates.
I am having an issue with an SQLite database. I am using the SQLite ODBC from http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/ Installed the 64-bit version and created the ODBC with these settings:
I open my Access database and link to the datasource. I can open the table, add records, but cannot delete or edit any records. Is there something I need to fix on the ODBC side to allow this? The error I get when I try to delete a record is:
The Microsoft Access database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time.
When I edit a record I get:
The record has been changed by another user since you started editing it. If you save the record, you will overwrite the changed the other user made.
Save record is disabled. Only copy to clipboard or drop changes is available.
My initial attempt to recreate your issue was unsuccessful. I used the following on my 32-bit test VM:
Access 2010
SQLite 3.8.2
SQLite ODBC Driver 0.996
I created and populated the test table [tbl1] as documented here. I created an Access linked table and when prompted I chose both columns ([one] and [two]) as the Primary Key. When I opened the linked table in Datasheet View I was able to add, edit, and delete records without incident.
The only difference I can see between my setup and yours (apart from the fact that I am on 32-bit and you are on 64-bit) is that in the ODBC DSN settings I left the Sync.Mode setting at its default value of NORMAL, whereas yours appears to be set to OFF.
Try setting your Sync.Mode to NORMAL and see if that makes a difference.
Edit re: comments
The solution in this case was the following:
One possible workaround would be to create a new SQLite table with all the same columns plus a new INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column which Access will "see" as AutoNumber. You can create a unique index on (what are currently) the first four columns to ensure that they remain unique, but the new new "identity" (ROWID) column is what Access would use to identify rows for CRUD operations.
I had this problem too. I have a table with a primary key on a VARCHAR(30) (TEXT) field.
Adding an INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column didn't help at all. After lots of testing I found the issue was with a DATETIME field I had in the table. I removed the DATETIME field and I was able to update record values in MS-Access datasheet view.
So now any DATETIME fields I need in SQLite, I declare as VARCHAR(19) so they some into Access via ODBC as text. Not perfect but it works. (And of course SQLite doesn't have a real DATETIME field type anyway so TEXT is just fine and will convert OK)
I confirmed it's a number conversion issue. With an empty DATETIME field, I can add a time of 01-01-2014 12:01:02 via Access's datasheet view, if I then look at the value in SQLite the seconds have been rounded off:
sqlite> SELECT three from TEST where FLoc='1020';
2014-01-01 12:01:00.000
SYNCMODE should also be NORMAL not OFF.
Update:
If you have any text fields with a defined length (e.g. foo VARCHAR(10)) and the field contents contains more characters than the field definition (which SQLite allows) MS-Access will also barf when trying to update any of the fields on that row.
I've searched all similar posts as I had a similar issue with SQLite linked via ODBC to Access. I had three tables, two of them allowed edits, but the third didn't. The third one had a DATETIME field and when I changed the data type to a TEXT field in the original SQLite database and relinked to access, I could edit the table. So for me it was confirmed as an issue with the DATETIME field.
After running into this problem, not finding a satisfactory answer, and wasting a lot of time trying other solutions, I eventually discovered that what others have mentioned about DATETIME fields is accurate but another solution exists that lets you keep the proper data type. The SQLite ODBC driver can convert Julian day values into the ODBC SQL_TIMESTAMP / SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP types by looking for floating point values in the column, if you have that option enabled in the driver. Storing dates in this manner gives the ODBC timestamp value enough precision to avoid the write conflict error, as well as letting Access see the column as a date/time field.
Even storing sub-second precision in the date string doesn't work, which is possibly a bug in the driver because the resulting TIMESTAMP_STRUCT contains the same values, but the fractional seconds must be lost elsewhere.
I am currently stuck with a database issue where I need to manipulate data using my database inserts. I am currently doing a website with C# ASP.NET on Visual studio 2012 and the database I am using is SQL Management 2008.
Firstly, I currently store my System.Date into a string and store it as a nvarchar datatype in my database. If I would like to perhaps get the latest 10 rows from for example, user= 'x', how should I actually go about doing the SELECT statement to only get the data I specified?
And I currently store information like Date Of Birth using the calander Ajax toolkit so the format the dates are saved in is in month/day/year format. The data is stored into my database as a nvarchar as well. If I want to perhaps calculate the age of user='x' how should I calculate it?
I think Jon's comment about storing the data properly as a datetime is spot on:
Why are you storing it as an nvarchar to start with? It's logically a
date/time, not a string - so store it as a date/time. Get rid of the
string part, and all your formatting problems go away too.
Definitely do that if you can.
If, for some reason, you can't change your database structure, you can use a CAST / CONVERT statement in your ORDER BY clause to get what you want:
SELECT TOP 10 *, CAST(yourDateField AS datetime) AS convertedDate
FROM yourTable
WHERE
user='Some user'
ORDER BY CAST(yourDateField AS datetime) DESC
This assumes that your nvarchar data can be properly converted to a datetime (which it should be if you're using the Ajax Control Toolkit calendar extender).
My database table have a Timestamp column named as inTime and i am using LINQ for insert, update data in SQL server. Now i want to add the timestamp value in my database but i don't know how to insert?
spaBL.attendance obj = new spaBL.attendance();
obj.FK_employeeId = 1;
obj.inTime =[what to write here??]
inTime is of timestamp type.
Timestamp as in SQL Server Timestamp data type?
;) If I got a cent every time someone did not read the documentation and thought that is a TIME STAMP I would be more rich than bill gates.
Timestamp data time has NO TIME INFORMATION IN IT. It is a running version number, legacy to Sybase SQL Server where SQL Server from Microsoft originated and a totally borked design.
So, no, you CAN NOT SET THAT FIELD, sorry, and it has no usable value except to see whether it changed (then the row was updated).
The documentation is explicitly clear on that, even if some people think reading is maybe a lost art:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182776(v=sql.90).aspx
Is a data type that exposes automatically generated, unique binary
numbers within a database. timestamp is generally used as a mechanism
for version-stamping table rows.
There is no way for you to set it. CHange your LINQ setup to not update this column.
Timestamp values are auto generated by the server on inserts. You should insert rows to the table without supplying a value for the timestamp column. Sql server will then generate the value for the column.
Note the columns of type timestamp does NOT contain values that can be parsed as a DateTime. The idea behind timestamp columns is that they can be used to check if a row has been updated between fetching the row and trying to update the row with new values.
You do not provide values for columns with a Timestamp (Rowversion) data type. SQL Server will provide a value for you automatically (and it won't be a datetime value). Therefore you do not need to be concerned with having Linq To SQL insert a Timestamp value for you. In fact, you cannot do it. SQL Server will do it for you. You can however, retrieve the value of a Timestamp column. I believe the corresponding C# type will be System.Data.Linq.Binary.
How to add Timestamp value in SQL database by using LINQ
hope it helps
You cannot update a timestamp. See here. And indeed, as TomTom indicated, it doesn't contain actual time information.
I'm using MS SQL 2000, VS2008, MVC and C#.
I'm trying to insert and update some data using stored procedures.
Some columns are of type datetime.
Regional settings on both server and client are set to Dutch (Belgium)
This means the default date format is dd/mm/yyyy.
When i try to insert or update with a date of eg. 28/03/2009, I get following errors:
Insert:
Error converting data type nvarchar to datetime
Update:
The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range datetime value
When I try with a date like 01/03/2009, I get no errors but the date is saved as 03/01/2009, which is the US date format.
This is typical behaviour for problems with regional settings. But both are set to Dutch (Belgium).
Why does it save dates in the US format?
What am i missing here?
Thanks!
Stijn
You should be inserting data into the database using a DateTime object, not a string. Your client-side code should convert the client's date entry to a DateTime object using the client's regional settings, then the DateTime struct should be added to the parameter that is ultimately sent into the database.
The SQL Instance has it's own locale setting, by default "us_english"
Now, this usually happens if you pushing using varchar rather than native datetime to store data values. If your code/tables use datetime columns and you define parameters as datetime then you won't get errors.
i had this problem too, its something to do with the date format for you SQL server,
i solved it by formatting the date string to be inserted like so
DateTime.Now.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm")
hope that helps
All above suggestions are correct but I find if you are adding a datetime as a string/varchar the safest way is in the format 'YYYY-MM-DD'
So eg.
Update MyTable
Set MyDate = '2010-03-01'