I have a multiline (> 50 lines) textbox containing plain text. I want to add either a session variable to the text in this box. In asp I would have done it by putting in <% %> code blocks but in .net I am getting the following error: "Code blocks are not supported in this context". I assume therefore that this would need doing in code behind.
Is there a quicker way than putting all the text from the textbox in a string in code-behind and then adding the variable on like this? I would like to keep the text in my aspx page if possible.
Thanks
How about your codebehind does something like:
myTextbox.Text += Session ["mySessionVariable"];
after you've filled the textbox.
Incidentally, you don't have to
'put all the text from the textbox in
a string in codebehind'
as the .Net framework exposes all the front-end controls as codebehind objects automatically.
EDIT:
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" Rows="15" TextMode="MultiLine" Columns="70" Text='<%# Session["var1"] %>'></asp:TextBox>
This will work for binding just the session variable to the control. Don't forget to call
Page.DataBind();
after you've set your Session variables. Probably in Page_Load.
This will allow the binding such as it is, to occur. This won't work if you want to mix up static markup text with dynamic variables. For that, you'll need to get busy in the code-behind.
HTH.
Have you tried <%=Session["MySessionKey"] %> ?
Related
This is the page code for the control:
<asp:TextBox id="someID" maxlength="10" columns="10" runat="server" Text="<%# work %>" />
This is how I set up and populate the variable before page is rendered, it is in the code behind, I have tried I think all the variations available for the variable declaration, e.g. public, shared, protected, etc.:
Public work As String
work = "987654321"
The textbox always comes up blank. referred to this ms kb page for how this work and it has a specific example.
However, it didn't explain anywhere if there is some special way of declaring the variables used in the binding or some special way to set the value of the variable, or is there something needed to allow the <%# syntax to work?
Binding doesn't happen automatically. You have to call DataBind() either from Page control or the text control. Try put it in Page_Load() method.
I'm trying to perform two-way data binding on the controls in my user control, which is hosted inside a FormView template:
<asp:ObjectDataSource runat="server" ID="ObjectDataSource"
TypeName="WebApplication1.Data" SelectMethod="GetItem" UpdateMethod="UpdateItem">
</asp:ObjectDataSource>
<asp:FormView runat="server" ID="FormView" DataSourceID="ObjectDataSource">
<ItemTemplate>
<uc:WebUserControl1 runat="server"></uc:WebUserControl1>
</ItemTemplate>
<EditItemTemplate>
<uc:WebUserControl1 runat="server"></uc:WebUserControl1>
</EditItemTemplate>
</asp:FormView>
The web user control:
<%# Control Language="C#" ... %>
<asp:TextBox runat="server" ID="TitleTextBox" Text='<%# Bind("Title") %>'>
</asp:TextBox>
The binding works fine when the FormView is in View mode but when I switch to Edit mode, upon calling UpdateItem on the FormView, the bindings are lost. I know this because the FormView tries to call an update method on the ObjectDataSource that does not have an argument called 'Title'.
I tried to solve this by implementing IBindableTemplate to load the controls that are inside my user control, directly into the templates (as if I had entered them declaratively). However, when calling UpdateItem in edit mode, the container that gets passed into the ExtractValues method of the template, does not contain the TextBox anymore. It did in view mode!
I have found some questions on SO that relate to this problem but they are rather dated and they don't provide any answers that helped me solve this problem.
How do you think I could solve this problem? It seems to be such a simple requirement but apparently it's anything but that...
My current workaround for this is, although rather cumbersome, to subclass the FormView class and use subclassed controls in it, implementing my own data binding logic (taking the data field name from a new property) instead of using the <%# %> syntax. Apparently, the code the latter generates is the real culprit here as it doesn't support this nested control scenario.
I ended up, using old asp include statement
<--%include file = "filename" -->
instead of using user controls for dealing with the code duplication issue.
I'm a bit new to .Net development, been working in Java for some time now. I have an aspx page and we need to externalize some strings to make it more flexible.
If I have a table somewhere and there is just a string sitting outside an asp tag, I can replace it so that
<th> Specific Foo String </th>
becomes
<th> <%= Strings.foo %> </th>
and everything is fine, the problem I'm running into is how do you do this kind of interpolation on an asp tag property
I tried changing
<asp:Label runat="server" ID="lblFoo" Text="Specific Foo String Entry" />
to
<asp:Label runat="server" ID="lblFoo" Text='<%= Strings.foo %> Entry' />
and
<asp:Label runat="server" ID="lblFoo" Text='<%#Eval("Strings.foo") %> Entry' />
but neither worked. Is what I'm doing not possible in the aspx file, I know that I can simulate this by rewriting their properties in the code behind, but that's a level of overhead I'd rather not deal with.
Thanks
I think you are looking to do this:
<asp:Label runat="server" id="label1" Text='<%# Strings.Foo + " Entry"%>' />
Then in your code behind (most likely in your OnPageLoad) you need to call
if(!Page.IsPostBack) Page.DataBind();
You need to be cautious however as calling DataBind on controls like textboxes or any labels that may have changed due to logic in the code behind will have their values overwritten with the bound values. Checking that you are not on a post back can help with this, but there are still gotchas.
Also note that I had to move the " Entry" text into the binding statement. If it is placed outside the last '%>' then the binding does not work and it will spit out:
<%# Strings.foo %> Entry
In the codebehind of the page you would do this:
lblFoo.Text = Strings.foo + " Entry";
A good place to put this code would be in the overriden OnLoad method but that is simply a suggestion as I am unfamiliar with your application and the life cycle needs of your page.
If you want to do all this in the aspx page then simply do this:
<span><%= Strings.foo %> Entry</span>
as a Label renders as a span anyhow.
If your objective is an HTML table of strings, then you can create either a ListView or a GridView and DataBind to that. It would save you the trouble of writing out all of your properties and will also produce the correct table tags for the data.
Without knowing more about your data, I cannot provide a detailed code snippet.
You're talking about resources. Read Basic Instincts Resources and Localization in ASP.NET 2.0 which shows you the built in resource editor, and how to use the "<%$ ... %>"-binding, or using meta:resourceKey attribute.
I have a custom server control with a property of Title. When using the control, I'd like to set the value of the title in the aspx page like so:
<cc1:customControl runat="server" Title='<%= PagePropertyValue%>' >
more content
</cc1:customControl>
When I do this, however, I am getting the exact String <%= PagePropertyValue%> being displayed rather than the Property Value that I would like to see.
So after trying the databinding expression (as suggested below). I don't get the string literal that looked bad but I don't get anything else either.
<cc1:customControl runat="server" Title='<%# PagePropertyValue%>' >
more content
</cc1:customControl>
What do I need to do to my custom control to take this sort of value? Or is there something I need to do to the page.
You cant. <%= %> will write the string directly to the response-stream, which happens after the server control is constructed. See this post for an explanation.
So its either codebehind, or <%# + databinding as Zachary suggests.
As a followup to my own question, I have discovered that what I really wanted was to use ASP.NET Expressions using the <%$ syntax, since what I wanted to do was put in localized content.
This can be done with apparently no extra handling on the server control side.
<cc1:customControl runat="server" Title='<%$ Resouces: ResourceFile, ContentKey %>' >
more content and controls
</cc1:customControl>
This works just fine.
Try using databinding syntax:
<%# PagePropertyValue %>
For the bind property value to work correctly as suggested, you will have this in the aspx or ascx file :
<cc1:customControl runat="server" Title='<%# PagePropertyValue %>' >
more content
</cc1:customControl>
You will then need to actually bind data in your page wich you have to add this in you code behind file (code in C#)
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
DataBind();
}
That way it will bind the data in your ascx or aspx file.
Note that this is specific to control attributes. When using the <%= syntax outside control attributes meaning anywhere else in the page the syntax works as expected. So this
<%=GetCapitalUserName()%>
would call the correct method and inject the result of the call in the page.
I have a Repeater which displays a list of items (in a grid-like/table view). When a user clicks an item, I display an UpdatePanel under this item with additional information relevant to the item (similar to Accordion control). I know how to populate the elements of the UpdatePanel in code-behind (I pass the ID of the selected element in the Repeater control as CommandArgument, get additional info for this ID, and set up the text fields of the active UpdatePanel controls). But I'm wondering if I could set up binding directly in the ASPX (instead of code-behind). When I used the <%= %> syntax to assign text fields of the UpdatePanel control the values of the page properties, e.g. <%= Comment %>, it sort of worked, but it changed the fields of all UpdatePanels in the repeater. Is there any way to bind the active UpdatePanel to the current values and leave already bound UpdatePanels unchanged?
Are you looking to display a container that displays additional information? Is there other activity in the "box" that requires it be an updatepanel?
<asp:repeater>
<itemtemplate>
<%# Eval("Name") %> <%# Eval("LastName") %><br />
<span onclick="$get('<%# Eval("Id") %>')">View Age</span>
<div id="<%# Eval("Id")%>" style="display:none;">
Age: <%# Eval("Age") %>
</div>
<itemtemplate>
</asp:repeater>
Ithink that's right, some syntax may be off a bit (typing without intellisense). Would that work?
I used ID as a unique identifier for the div id and the onclick command. You could also use jquery, asp:controls or whatever else you wanted.
Easiest way is to nest a FormView inside the update panel. Then the only thing you need to do in the code behind is get the additional info, assign it to the FormView.DataSource, and call FormView.DataBind(). Everything in the FormView will use the <%# Eval("SomeColumn") %> syntax. You'll probably need to use a FindControl() to get a reference to the FormView. I'd type up the code for you but I'll save you some headaches down the road and say DON'T DO THIS.
The update panel is about the most inefficient way to do any ajax stuff. The only way to get it all to wire up correctly with this repeater and server side code is to either have a gigantic viewstate or to rebind the repeater in your page load. You are turning a request that could be 300ms into something that will take over a second...or longer! Get familiar with a good ajax framework and don't be afraid to write real html. At the very least, use a webservice that loads a usercontrol with your markup.
I know the update panel is easy, and it's built in. It might even be adequate for what you are doing, but you must resist. You'll be glad you did.