Please refer to the following link as I tried to simplify the problem I was having and now have run into a problem that I cannot solve.
Link: Qt: How to use QTimer to print a message to a QTextBrowser every 10 seconds?
In the posting for the link above I simplified the task I am trying to do by simply saying that I wanted to push a button and have it display something in a QTextBrowser every 10 seconds. I was having trouble getting QTimer working at the time so I thought that if I could get QTimer to work then I could finish my task.
What I am really trying to do is read lines from a file and after every 2500 lines I would like to print a message and then wait 10 seconds.
Pseudocode:
while(not at the end of the file)
{
read in 2500 lines
print a message
wait 10 seconds
}
QTimer is nice but it does opposite of what I want it to do. Instead of transmitting a message and waiting 10 seconds, first they wait 10 seconds, timeout and then send the message.
So to get it to work the way I want I first called the printMessage() SLOT and then I made a SLOT called stopTimer() that simply stops the timer. So after the 10 seconds has passed it will simply call stopTimer() and then continue processing the input file.
Onto the REAL problem:
Qt does not wait for a QTimer to finish before it moves on through the code. I want the code to wait the full 10 seconds before it reads the next 2500 lines of code. I found that QTimer has an isActive() function that returns a bool value.
So in the place where I wanted the 10 second delay to finish I put the following:
while(timer->isActive());
I figured the program would stay in this loop for 10 seconds and then exit after the QTimer timed out because the condition would then be false. The problem is that it doesn’t exit the loop because the status of the timer never changes regardless of how long it waits in this loop! I checked with the debugger and isActive( ) remains true regardless of elapsed time.
I then omitted the while(timer->isActive()) loop and observed the timer in the debugger. It seems that the timer does not actually start timing until it exits the while(not at the end of the file). So I believe that since the while(timer->isActive()) loop is nested inside this, it is causing it to never timeout. I could be wrong but this is what seems like is happening. Also, what is annoying is that the QTimer object has no field that shows the elapsed time of the timer when it is active. Therefore, I cannot check the elapsed time at all to further debug.
Someone please test this out or let me know a workaround for this!
For something that sounds so easy, this has been the biggest pain I have had in recent time, but I generally don’t use Qt so it could be my lack of experience.
Here is an excerpt from code I have which currently freezes as stated above:
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
QTimer *timer = new QTimer(this);
QFile file(“file.txt”);
QTextStream stream(&file);
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(stopTimer()));
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
printMessage();
timer->start(10000);
while(timer->isActive()); //Wait for timer to timeout before continuing
}
}
}
Sorry for the long post and if I might have made any grammatical errors with my code here. I do not have internet access on my dev machine so I had to retype this here.
Doing something like while(timer.isActive()) is not a good idea at all as it will cause your application to consume around 100% CPU time. It will also cause your application to never return to the event processing loop where the actual code for timer is executed, that's why it freezes.
If you still want to use this approach, you should call QCoreApplication::processEvents() in the loop. It will temporarily pass control back to the event loop, so it will cause timer to time out. Instead of connecting timeout() to stopTimer(), you can just call timer.setSingleShot(true) before you start it, it will cause it to stop automatically after the first timeout.
Note that you have a memory leak there as you create a new timer on each button push. Surely they are children of your form and will be destroyed, but only when the form is destroyed.
If you want a more elegant approach, you can create a separate class for reading that file. In the constructor you'd open your file and stream which should be fields in this class. This class should also have a sort of readMore() slot which will read 2500 lines, then put a message and return. If it doesn't reach the end of the stream, then it would call QTimer::singleShot(10000, this, SLOT(readMore())), which will cause the event loop to call readMore() again in 10 seconds. The code would looks something like this (didn't check for errors):
// myfilereader.h
class Form;
class MyFileReader: public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
public:
MyFileReader(const QString &fileName);
// this should be called after you create an instance of MyFileReader
void startReading() {readMore();}
private:
QFile file;
QTextStream stream;
private slots:
void readMore();
signals:
void message(); // this should be connected to printMessage() in the Form
void finished();
};
// myfilereader.cpp
MyFileReader::MyFileReader(const QString &fileName):
file(fileName),
stream(&file),
{
// open the file, possibly throwing an exception
// or setting some sort of "invalid" flag on failure
}
void MyFileReader::readMore()
{
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
emit message();
break;
}
}
if (stream.atEnd())
emit finished();
else
QTimer::singleShot(10000, this, SLOT(readMore()));
}
This is a kind of more heavyweight approach, but this is the price of asynchronous event handling. You could also put all this stuff into the Form class, but I think using a separate class is better.
As Daniel points out, if reading 2500 lines takes a long time, say 5 seconds, the message will be printed after 10 seconds after the reading has finished, that is, 15 seconds after it has started. If you want the message to be printed approximately each 10 seconds no matter how long reading takes, you should add a QTimer timer field to the class, connect it's timeout() signal to the readMore() slot in the MyFileReader constructor, then in the startReading() method call timer.start() before calling readMore(). Now, at the end of readMore() do this:
if (stream.atEnd()) {
timer.stop();
emit finished();
}
You need a QTimer field in this case because you can't cancel a QTimer::singleShot() call, but you need to do it if you have reached the end of the stream, otherwise your readMore() will just keep on getting called again and again, even if there is nothing more to read. Note that even in this case, it is still possible for the message to appear less frequently than every 10 seconds in case if reading 2500 lines takes longer than these 10 seconds. If you want exactly 10 seconds, you should probably check the elapsed time in the loop instead, but I think that's an overkill, unless you expect reading to be very slow.
Slightly off topic, but if you want an easy way to avoid memory leaks, you can also do this in the constructor:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(deleteLater()));
It will automatically mark your reader for deletion when you emit finished(), and, once that happens, the reader will be deleted as soon as the control goes back to the event loop. That is, after all slots connected to the finished() signal return. This approach allows you to just allocate a MyFileReader on the heap, then discard the pointer without worrying about memory leaks.
QTimer has a signal called timedout(). If you connect a slot to this, you can set the initial timer to a REALLY short interval (1 MS maybe). When the timer expires, inside the slot, you can send your message. At the end of the slot, set the interval to 10 seconds, set singleshot to false, and the start the timer again.
If you don't want to do the setting each and every time the slot is called, you can simply make 2 slots. The first time, the slot does the setup for the rest of the calls. It also disconnects itself from the QTimer and connects the second slot. Then things continue merrily on their way.
Edit:
Also, realize that when slots are called they are called on the event thread. So, by clicking a button and putting a loop that spin-blocks/busy-waits until the timer expires, you are guaranteeing that you will not enter this state because you are blocking the very thread that the timeout signal will be processed on.
QTimer does all of its processing inside Qt's event loop, so your code must return to the event loop to cause the timer to time out. So what you want to do is have startBtn_pushed set up the timer, connect a slot to the timer's timeout signal, then probably call that slot itself (so that it is called immediately). It would look something like this:
// timer, file, and stream are now instance variables (or maybe file and stream
// are broken out into their own class... up to you.
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
// timer has been allocated before (but not started)
file.open(“file.txt”);
stream.setDevice(&file);
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(readAndPrint()));
timer->start(10000);
readAndPrint(); // respond to the button press immediately
}
void Form::readAndPrint()
{
int lineCount = 0;
while(!(stream.atEnd() && lineCount < 2500)
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
printMessage();
}
}
}
I have figured out a solution that is much simpler than those proposed here.
I realized it was much easier to use a QTime object instead of a QTimer object.
Basically you start a QTime object and then you use its elapsed() function to check how much time has passed to since it was started.
Thanks to everyone for taking the time to help. I did try to implement a couple of your solutions into my code but had some trouble since I am not a pro at Qt and they were more complex than I would have thought. In the end I find this solution to be a easy solution to what should have been an easy problem.
I certainly learned a lot from this problem and I hope you all did too.
My question to you is why didn't anyone suggest using QTime from the start?
Thanks again!
My solution:
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
QTime *timer = new QTime();
QFile file(“file.txt”);
QTextStream stream(&file);
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(stopTimer()));
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
timer->start();
while(1)
{
QApplication::processEvents();
if(timer->elapsed() == 10000)
{
printMessage();
break;
}
}
}
}
}
QEventLoop l;
connect( timer, SIGNAL( timeout() ), &l, SLOT( quit() ) );
l.exec(); // Waiting without freezing ui
Related
I found time to investigate a bit into QT, and it is very interesting for me. However, right now I am encountering a problem that I am not aware about how to solve it. My aim is actually simple. I have a QCheckBox that I want to activate. If it is activated, I am starting a process (I am opening a file, reading it, taking some values out and change different labels accordingly). This process is repeated until the user is deactivating the QCheckBox. Some small code example to get a better idea of what I am going to do.
void Analyzer::on_actualTemperature_stateChanged(int arg1)
{
// Read data and change labels
if (arg1 != 0)
{
qDebug() << "Start data analysis";
// Infinity loop to get the data and display it
while true
{
// Open file and extract data
const actualTemperature = getData();
// Change any label or do something with the data
ui->anyLabel->setText(actualTemperature);
// Some break
QThread::sleep(1);
// Leave the loop if user deactivate the QCheckBox
// Something like on_actualTemperature_stateChange == 0
}
}
// Stop reading the data
else
{
qDebug() << "Stop data analysis";
}
}
It is obvious that after activating the QCheckBox, the loop will not finish at all and the GUI will not recognize anything anymore. Hence, I guess I have to start some new thread and have to kill it. However, I have no idea how to proceed here. An idea would be:
void Analyzer::on_actualTemperature_stateChanged(int arg1)
{
// Read data and change labels
if (arg1 != 0)
{
// Start reading the file and updating the label using some other thread
startThread(XY);
}
// Stop reading the data
else
{
// Kill thread 1234
killThread(XY);
}
}
Any hint is warmly welcomed and I hope this question is not too basic for you. Thank you for reading, Tobi.
I think killing a running thread is not a decent behavior. Let's be gentle to our threads with a loop control variable. In this example it named keepLoop. Set keepLoop when checkbox checked. Then start thread if it is not running. We are using QtConcurrent::run, and monitoring it by a QFuture in this case.
connect(ui->checkBox, &QCheckBox::toggled,
[&](const bool checked) {
analyzer->keepLoop = checked;
if (checked && !future.isRunning())
future = QtConcurrent::run(analyzer, &Analyzer::on_actualTemperature_stateChanged);
}
);
Don't call user interface slots directly, instead connect them to signals. Connections will be queued connection when signals emitted from another thread. It means slots will be called in event loop of main thread and changes will be shown when the next frame painted.
connect(analyzer, &Analyzer::temperatureCalculated, ui->anyLabel, &QLabel::setText);
Our asynchronous function does not forced to die immediately when user toggle checkbox. Instead we letting it to finish the iteration it already on halfway through.
Analyzer::on_actualTemperature_stateChanged() {
while (keepLoop) {
// Open file and extract data
const QString& actualTemperature = getData();
// send data
emit temperatureCalculated(actualTemperature);
}
}
You can use atomic bool if you want a more precise loop control.
Bonus:
If you don't want to mess with threads, you can avoid GUI freezing by using QTimer to run your loop periodically in main thread.
When I create slots by name with this kind of syntax:
on_<widgetname>_clicked();
If I want to display a particular widget Inside this function it won't display until it reaches the end of the function.
That is, when I create the following function:
void MyWindow::on_myWidget_clicked()
{
// the stackedWidget is composed of:
// page_1 with myWidget
// page_2
ui->stackedWidget->setCurrentWidget(ui->page_2);
waitSomeTime();
}
whith
void MyWindow::waitSomeTime()
{
QThread t;
t.sleep(2); // Wait 2 seconds to see which line is going to be executed first.
}
When the code is launched, the 2 seconds elapsed first and only then the page_2 is displayed.
Why the line
ui->stackedWidget->setCurrentWidget(ui->page_2);
is not executed first?
void QThread::sleep(unsigned long secs) [static]
Forces the current thread to sleep for secs seconds.
the waitSomeTime function make the main (current) thread sleep, so it will block everything, even GUI processing. As #scopchanov commented, you could use QApplication::processEvents(), which will process the event of setCurrentWidget. However, the whole GUI will still be blocked until the sleep is done, which means, that the widget will be shown, but won't be able to handle any operation.
So it would be better to use QTimer::singleShot if you want to delay the work, or start another new QThread to do it.
I am using QSound to play audio file. Audio file duration is 10 sec.
I have some task after playing the complete 10 sec audio file. So for this I am using QSound::isFinished method, but this always returns false instantly. example
Based on the current wording of the question, I'm assuming you're checking isFinished immediately, which will indeed return false.
I think you're best bet is to use QTimer and connect it's timeout signal to some slot which will check isFinished. You would start the timer when the sound starts playing. When isFinished returns true, you can stop the timer and do whatever it is that needs doing. If it returns false, wait for the next timeout.
// In the .h
// ...
private slots:
void onTimeout();
private:
QTimer* timer;
QSound sound;
// ...
// In the .cpp
// In your constructor
// ...
timer = new Timer();
connect( timer, SIGNAL( timeout() ), this, SIGNAL( onTimeout() ) ),
// ...
// Starting the sound
// ...
sound.play();
timer.start( 10 ); // In milliseconds.
// ...
// onTimeout slot
void MyClass::onTimeout()
{
if( sound.isFinished() )
{
timer.stop();
// Do some things.
}
}
I chose 10 milliseconds in the assumption that the audio file's of different length could be played. QSound is also not guaranteed to start playback immediately.
If you know for a fact that the audio played will always have the same length, you could forgo the isFinished check and change the Timer to a single shot with a duration the same length of the file (plus a bit to account for variable start times). This will result in it only timing out once, and should do so after the file has finished. That's not my preferred method, but it is a possibility.
Use a QSoundEffect instead and connect to the playingChanged signal.
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsoundeffect.html#playing-prop
I have recently stumbled upon this while working with QTimer that calls a function with internal QEventLoop
So, say we have a QTimer instance
QTimer* timer = new QTimer;
somewhere in the constructor we start it and it begins ticking away once every 100ms
timer->start(100);
now the fun part, we connect it to a slot that has internal QEventLoop
void SlotFunction()
{
qDebug() << "entered";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
putting aside how stupid this loop really is, we see that we will never finish processing the slot and timer's subsequent timeouts will keep stacking into execution queue. Everything is ok and as it should be.
What is NOT as it should be comes next: since QEventLoop makes sure our app stays responsive while the slot mindlessly idles away we can make a button and its clicked() slot that looks like:
void OnClicked()
{
timer->start(100);
}
what I am doing here is essentially restarting current timer cycle, nothing less, nothing more. Right? Nope! After this restart, SlotFunction fires again suggesting that tick after timer's restart is not in fact equal to all other ticks that were issued before it...
My only question is : WTF?! Why manually restarting the timer enables it to enter the slot additional time? I've asked on freenode but the only answer I got was "It is as it should be"
I tried this and every click creates another "entered" line.
The main Eventloop cannot handle another event since we are stuck in a new eventloop.
This is quite easy to see when implementing a second slot and also connecting this slot to the timeout signal.
The maineventloop will get stuck when calling the next eventloop and not processing any more queued events.
The timer itself will also not queue any more events, since the queueing up itself would be done in the now stuck main-eventloop. The timer does not run in its own eventloop (thats why Qtimers are no precision timers).
As soon as the button is clicked the new eventloop checks the timer if an event timeout() should be generated.
As soon as the new event is handled we again are stuck in another eventloop...
This will go on until we exit the application.
When exiting the application we see the loops reversing and calling the second slot as often as we clicked the button and ran into the first slot
Code:
#include <QDebug>
#include <QTime>
MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent) :
QMainWindow(parent),
ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
timer = new QTimer;
timer->setInterval(2000);
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot()));
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot2()));
timer->start();
}
MainWindow::~MainWindow()
{
delete ui;
}
void MainWindow::on_pushButton_clicked()
{
timer->start(2000);
}
void MainWindow::timerslot()
{
qDebug()<<"In";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
void MainWindow::timerslot2()
{
qDebug()<<"More";
}
Output on start:
In
Output on every click:
In
Output after 3 clicks:
In
In
In
In
Output exiting the application:
In
In
In
In
More
More
More
More
I'we started experimenting with unit testing in Qt and would like to hear comments on a scenario that involves unit testing signals and slots.
Here is an example:
The code i would like to test is (m_socket is a pointer to QTcpSocket):
void CommunicationProtocol::connectToCamera()
{
m_socket->connectToHost(m_cameraIp,m_port);
}
Since that is an asynchronous call i can't test a returned value. I would however like to test if the response signal that the socket emits on a successful connection (void connected ()) is in fact emitted.
I've written the test below:
void CommunicationProtocolTest::testConnectToCammera()
{
QSignalSpy spy(communicationProtocol->m_socket, SIGNAL(connected()));
communicationProtocol->connectToCamera();
QTest::qWait(250);
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1);
}
My motivation was, if the response doesn't happen in 250ms, something is wrong.
However, the signal is never caught, and I can't say for sure if it's even emitted. But I've noticed that I'm not starting the event loop anywhere in the test project. In the development project, the event loop is started in main with QCoreApplication::exec().
To sum it up, when unit testing a class that depends on signals and slots, where should the
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
return a.exec();
be run in the test environment?
I realize this is an old thread but as I hit it and as others will, there is no answer and the answer by peter and other comments still miss the point of using QSignalSpy.
To answer you original question about "where the QCoreApplication exec function is needed", basically the answer is, it isn't. QTest and QSignalSpy already has that built in.
What you really need to do in your test case is "run" the existing event loop.
Assuming you are using Qt 5:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsignalspy.html#wait
So to modify your example to use the wait function:
void CommunicationProtocolTest::testConnectToCammera()
{
QSignalSpy spy(communicationProtocol->m_socket, SIGNAL(connected()));
communicationProtocol->connectToCamera();
// wait returns true if 1 or more signals was emitted
QCOMPARE(spy.wait(250), true);
// You can be pedantic here and double check if you want
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1);
}
That should give you the desired behaviour without having to create another event loop.
Good question. Main issues I've hit are (1) needing to let app do app.exec() yet still close-at-end to not block automated builds and (2) needing to ensure pending events get processed before relying on the result of signal/slot calls.
For (1), you could try commenting out the app.exec() in main(). BUT then if someone has FooWidget.exec() in their class that you're testing, it's going to block/hang. Something like this is handy to force qApp to exit:
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
QApplication a( argc, argv );
//prevent hanging if QMenu.exec() got called
smersh().KillAppAfterTimeout(300);
::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
int iReturn = RUN_ALL_TESTS();
qDebug()<<"rcode:"<<iReturn;
smersh().KillAppAfterTimeout(1);
return a.exec();
}
struct smersh {
bool KillAppAfterTimeout(int secs=10) const;
};
bool smersh::KillAppAfterTimeout(int secs) const {
QScopedPointer<QTimer> timer(new QTimer);
timer->setSingleShot(true);
bool ok = timer->connect(timer.data(),SIGNAL(timeout()),qApp,SLOT(quit()),Qt::QueuedConnection);
timer->start(secs * 1000); // N seconds timeout
timer.take()->setParent(qApp);
return ok;
}
For (2), basically you have to coerce QApplication into finishing up the queued events if you're trying to verify things like QEvents from Mouse + Keyboard have expected outcome. This FlushEvents<>() method is helpful:
template <class T=void> struct FlushEvents {
FlushEvents() {
int n = 0;
while(++n<20 && qApp->hasPendingEvents() ) {
QApplication::sendPostedEvents();
QApplication::processEvents(QEventLoop::AllEvents);
YourThread::microsec_wait(100);
}
YourThread::microsec_wait(1*1000);
} };
Usage example below.
"dialog" is instance of MyDialog.
"baz" is instance of Baz.
"dialog" has a member of type Bar.
When a Bar selects a Baz, it emits a signal;
"dialog" is connected to the signal and we need to
make sure the associated slot has gotten the message.
void Bar::select(Baz* baz) {
if( baz->isValid() ) {
m_selected << baz;
emit SelectedBaz();//<- dialog has slot for this
} }
TEST(Dialog,BarBaz) { /*<code>*/
dialog->setGeometry(1,320,400,300);
dialog->repaint();
FlushEvents<>(); // see it on screen (for debugging)
//set state of dialog that has a stacked widget
dialog->setCurrentPage(i);
qDebug()<<"on page: "
<<i; // (we don't see it yet)
FlushEvents<>(); // Now dialog is drawn on page i
dialog->GetBar()->select(baz);
FlushEvents<>(); // *** without this, the next test
// can fail sporadically.
EXPECT_TRUE( dialog->getSelected_Baz_instances()
.contains(baz) );
/*<code>*/
}
I had a similar issue with Qt::QueuedConnection (event is queued automatically if the sender and the receiver belongs to different threads). Without a proper event loop in that situation, the internal state of objects depending on event processing will not be updated. To start an event loop when running QTest, change the macro QTEST_APPLESS_MAIN at the bottom of the file to QTEST_MAIN. Then, calling qApp->processEvents() will actually process events, or you can start another event loop with QEventLoop.
QSignalSpy spy(&foo, SIGNAL(ready()));
connect(&foo, SIGNAL(ready()), &bar, SLOT(work()), Qt::QueuedConnection);
foo.emitReady();
QCOMPARE(spy.count(), 1); // QSignalSpy uses Qt::DirectConnection
QCOMPARE(bar.received, false); // bar did not receive the signal, but that is normal: there is no active event loop
qApp->processEvents(); // Manually trigger event processing ...
QCOMPARE(bar.received, true); // bar receives the signal only if QTEST_MAIN() is used