How can i override img css for particular image.
Let say ,
i have css in my website like
img{
border:2px solid #ECECEC;
padding:4px;
}
i have one img with in the website say <img id="example" src="../example.png"/>
Now , i don't want to apply img css to this particular image.
How can i do that?
Thank
use the id as a selector and change the css properties you want.
#example{
border:0;
padding: 0;
}
img#example {border:none !important; }
No border for image with example id
If for some reason you can't touch the markup, you could use an attribute selector.
img[src="../example.png"] {
border:0;
padding:0;
}
add a separate class to the image
Example
<img class="example" id="example" src="../example.png"/>
.example{
border:0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
}
Try this example:
Give it an inline style, mine worked very simply
Related
How do you get the :before pseudoclass to render properly? Do I need some special CSS to make this work?
This does not work and does not display anything:
http://jsfiddle.net/XzMH6/
HTML
<div id="test"></div>
CSS
#test:before{
width:100px; height:100px; background: #ddd;
display:block;
}
You need the content property.
#test:before{
width:100px; height:100px; background: #ddd;
display:block;
content: "";
}
http://jsfiddle.net/ULfeu/
try this
please add this content:"" in #test class then :before is working properly
Demo
I have next code:
<div class="form_field">
<input type="text" />
</div>
styles
.form_field { height:22px; border:1px solid #B7AB8C; background:#FFFFEA; padding:0 5px; line-height:22px; }
.form_field input[type="text"] { width:100%; border:none; border:0; border-color: transparent; margin:0; padding:0; height:22px; line-height:22px; }
In IE7 I can't remove the border around the input field.
What are the ideas?
The best decision for myself, I identified as set a class for field "input" as recommended "tylerdurden".
And I add next properties for this field as "background:transparent; vertical-align:top;".
But I could not override the property line-height for field "input".
What are the ideas? (:
Added: I removed the property "height" for container .form_field - helped to align text vertically.
For IE7 you'll have to add a classname to the input element, or select it in a different way as IE<8 doesn't support attribute selectors.
But this css should work with the right selector:
.form_field input
{
border:0
}
But please note that using border-color: transparent; with border: none; will impact the input’s box model by removing the border dimensions.
This will alter the input’s relationship, like vertical positioning, with surrounding elements.
This is because the code below for input[type="text"] is not known in IE7 or below.
.form_field input[type="text"] { width:100%; border:none; border:0; border-color: transparent; margin:0; padding:0; height:22px; line-height:22px; }
Note: IE7 and IE8 support attribute selectors only if a !DOCTYPE is specified. Attribute selection is NOT supported in IE6 and lower.
You may want to add this to the top of your html.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
You don't need quotes around "text" in the CSS selector. Instead of all those border proerties, just do border: 0; on its own (or if you want to be thorough border: 0px none transparent but that's overkill)
Give a class to text field ;
.form_field .textInput
{
border:none;
}
Then in your html;
<div class="form_field">
<input type="text" class="textInput" />
</div>
Try this
<!--[if IE]>
<style type="text/css">
.form_field input{
filter:chroma(color=#000000);
border:none;
}
</style>
<![endif]-->
It seems IE7 doesn't want the "none" value, "0" seems to work.
Say I have a <div> like this that is going to have all of the same properties with a background image or something like that:
div.someBaseDiv {
margin-top: 3px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
And I wanted to inherit from it like this:
div.someBaseDiv someInheritedDiv {
background-image: url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 950px;
height: 572px;
}
Of course I’m pretty sure this is written wrong, and I’m not afraid to ask for help, so can someone tell me how to make this work and include the HTML markup?
The easiest is to add your someInheritedDiv element to the first rule like this.
div.someBaseDiv,
#someInheritedDiv
{
margin-top:3px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-bottom:0px;
}
This will tell your #someInheritedDiv to apply the same styles as div.someBaseDiv has. Then you extend this set of styles with more specific to your #someInheritedDiv:
#someInheritedDiv
{
background-image:url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:950px;
height:572px;
}
This is how specificity in CSS works.
Use both classes and combine them like so:
.baseClass
{
margin-top:3px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-bottom:0px;
}
.baseClass.otherClass /* this means the element has both baseClass and otherClass */
{
background-image:url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:950px;
height:572px;
}
The markup is as follows:
<div class="baseClass otherClass"></div>
Now, in this fashion you can override baseClass if necessary... and since you don't have to keep adding your new class names to the baseClass definition, it's a bit cleaner.
For this task, I would recommend you use a powerful extension of CSS called LESS. It compiles into CSS or can be used on-the-fly with a javascript file as the link explains.
LESS supports inheritance (almost) as you describe. The documentation has the details (see the section "Mixins").
For your example, the LESS code would be:
.someBaseDiv {
margin-top:3px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-bottom:0px;
}
someInheritedDiv {
.someBaseDiv;
background-image:url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:950px;
height:572px;
}
Note that it would have to be .someBaseDiv and not div.someBaseDiv
What you want to do is make some CSS apply to two different types of elements, but allow them to have some differences as well. You can do this using some simple HTML:
<div class="base">
<div class"inherited">
</div>
</div>
And CSS:
.base, .inherited{
margin-top:3px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-bottom:0px;
}
.inherited{
background-image:url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:950px;
height:572px;
}
This will add the shared properties to both types of div, but specific ones only to derived divs
That really depends on your markup. If your inherited element resides under a div with class someBasDiv, then all child elements of it will automatically inherit those properties.
If however, you want to inherit the someBaseDiv class in any place in your markup, you could just make the element which you want to inherit with, use both of those classes like this:
<div class="someBaseDiv someInheritedDiv">
and your css would be like this:
div.someBaseDiv
{
margin-top:3px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
margin-bottom:0px;
}
div.someInheritedDiv
{
background-image:url("images/worldsource/customBackground.gif");
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:950px;
height:572px;
}
If you want all the inner DIVs with a specific class to inherit from the base class build the HTML markup like this:
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">X</div>
</div>
And the CSS
.parent { border: 2px solid red; color: white }
.parent .child { background: black }
If all DIVs must inherit change .child to div.
See this example on jsFiddle
The following code
// parent // all DIVs inside the parent
.someClass div { }
Means: A top element (any) with the class someClass will add the styles to all its children DIVs (recursively).
I have a background color on my links (on hover, rails-style). And I have an img inside an a-tag that I don't want to have a background on hover.
I tried
a:hover img{ background-color: #fff; }
but that's not doing anything. How do I exclude img-tags inside a-tags from the hover?
Thx,
MrB
edit: jsFiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/rasvf/1/
In the example: "google" has a red background on hover, as intended. But when you hover over the image, it also does. It's supposed not to have a hover background.
if i understand you correctly, i think you are trying to do something like this:
a:hover img{ visibility: hidden; }
or
a:hover img{ display: none; }
EDIT
In that case you want:
a:hover img {background-color: transparent;}
Example posted on: http://jsfiddle.net/6qwJy/
It's hard to understand your example. Say I have this piece of HTML:
<a class="foo" href="#"><img src="bar.gif"/> Click me</a>
then with these style rules
a#foo:hover { background-color: blue; }
a#foo img { background-color: white; }
the image background color will always be white, also on hover.
If however you have background images on the element that contains your link and you want that to show behind the foreground image, then you can't do this. In that case you'll have to wrap the "Click me" text of the link in a span and write in your stylesheet:
a#foo:hover span { background-color: blue; }
Is this what you intended?
Ah! I did it. Easy. I just put the not-to-have-a-background-image in a different div and then did:
.otherdiv a:hover{ background-color: transparent; }
a img {
vertical-align: bottom;
}
Ok, you won't believe me, but I had the same problem above and I resolved as follows:
I had something like this:
<img src"path/to/image.gif">
And in my CSS I had:
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
And, believe me, I just had to put the 'img' tag in the same line as the 'a' tag, like this:
<img src="path/to/img.gif">
And that was all!!!
Is there a reason my below CSS only half works?
div.share
{
position:relative;
top: -4px;
left: 25px;
font-family:Tahoma;
background-color:#000000;
font-size:11px;
font-weight:bold;
}
/* share link css */
a.share:active
{
color: #000000;
}
a.share:hover
{
color: #FFFFFF;
background-color:#000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
The div.share CSS is all working but the CSS for the active and hover is not
CSS is valid, but make sure the link does have the "share" class, if its in the DIV, change the css to:
div.share a:active
{
color: #000000;
}
div.share a:hover
{
color: #FFFFFF;
background-color:#000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
adding your html would make this easier.
I can only guess that you have a <div> with class='share' and no <a> tag with the same.
e.g., does your html look like:
<div class='share'>
<a class='share' href='http://yoursite.com'>Your site</a>
</div>
or
<div class='share'>
</div>
...
<a class='share' href='http://yoursite.com'>Your site</a>
If it's the first, then
div.share a:hover {
...
}
would make more sense.
If it's the second, then the selector looks fine... though it might be better to choose different, but appropriate class names.
Use div.share a:active and div.share a:hover.
The way you have it right now it is looking for an <a> tag with a share class applied directly. However the share class is on the outer div.
Can you show us an HTML snippet using this CSS? Is it really the <a> tag that has the share class or is it nested inside the <div class="share">?