I have two applications which access camera and mic written in flex.When these two resources had to be used it ask flash player asks for the use of system resource Allow or Deny Is there any way to by pass this.In gmail->settings->chat->view settings it doesnt ask for this confirmation.How to code this
No, it's not possible to bypass this dialog. I couldn't find the gmail feature you were referring to, but I highly doubt that they have some way of working around this security barrier.
Related
We have an internal CRM system which is currently a website that can only be accessed inside our intranet. The boss is now wanting to have it exposed to the outside world so that people can use it from home and on the road. My concern is security based in the fact we will be exposing our Customer base to the outside world. I have implemented 3 layers of security as follows:
User Name and Strong password combination to login
SSL on all data being pushed across the line
Once the user is logged in and authenticated the server passes them a token which must be used in all communication with the server from than on.
Basically Im a bit of newb in the respect of web security. Can anyone give me advice on whether I am missing anything? Or something should be changed?
There's a whole world of stuff you should consider, and it'll be really hard to quickly answer this - so I'll point you at a range of resources that should help you out / get you started.
First, I'll plug http://security.stackexchange.com, for any specific questions you have - they could be a great help.
Now, on to more immediate things you should check:
Are your systems behind a firewall? I'd recommend at least your DB is placed on a server that is not directly available to the outside world.
Explore and run a range of (free) security tools against your site to try and find any problems. e.g.:
https://asafaweb.com
http://sectools.org/
Read up on common exploits (e.g. SQL injection) and make sure you are guarding against them:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-Main
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Vulnerability
How is your token being passed around, and what happens to it if another user gets hold of it (e.g. after it being cached on another machine)?
Make sure you have a decent password protection policy (decent complexity, protects against brute force attacks by locking accounts after 3 attempts).
If this is a massive concern for you (consider the risk to your business in a worst case scenario) consider getting an expert in, or someone to run a security test against your systems?
Or, as mrunion excellently points out in the comments above (+1), have you considered other more secure ways of opening this up, so that you don't need to publish this on the web?
Hope that gets you started.
I don´t know if this is the best place to ask this question.
But I need to find a solution to a problem I have.
I need to provide access to personal virtual desktops to a few users.
And I need to see what options I have for this.
I can provide some machines to work as servers if needed. And I can pay if there is some type of option using the cloud or other service.
I just need to be able to provide a few user the access to a desktop with security and with long lag and latency . So they can work and use application in the remote server.
I will be thankfull for all the help and solutions
Did you try with https://deskroll.com/ ?
I use it bc it doesnt require installation, works easy in the browser and has free trial and very cheap license.
I am developing a flex 4.5 web based application and I need to make sure if the client chooses a certain level of security, each user can log only from an authorized computer.
So the question is how can I get some unique computer information? Anything like HDD serial number, CPU specifications, motherboard information, even the user that is logged into the Operating System can do.
So far the information on the web isn't giving me much hope that this can be achieved, but I had to ask.
Thanks in advance.
I suppose the only option available for web application is to create unique id from fields of flash.system.Capabilities class.
Other strategy which can be used is to generate unique UID in process of computer's authorization and then store it in local storage using SharedObject. Then web app tries to read authorization data from SharedObject on web app start. If there is no such data computer isn't authorized.
Richard is right. For security, unique identifying information is not available for applications running through Flash Player. You could write an Active X control (for IE) or a plugin (for Mozilla based browsers) to obtain additional information for your app if users (and their IT administrators) allow it. Information available will vary depending on the browser and operating system the user is running.
Adobe Air, on the other hand, allows access to additional network information including MAC address in the NetworkInfo class. Maybe it's worth considering an installed client app for users who require the additional security. Take a look at: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/flex/articles/retrieving_network_interfaces.html
This is not easy using a browser based Flex application, but there are some workarounds.
The browser based Flash Player can communicate with an AIR app on the desktop using localconnection. So, you could create an AIR app that utilizes NativeProcess to retrieve your machine specific information.
You could also use NativeProcess from a AIR app without using the browser at all.
A third option would be to install an application server on the client machine and have the browser based app communicate with the server to retrieve the client information.
I consider most of these options too difficult to be practical, but it depends on how important this feature is to you.
The Flash Player security sandbox will not let you read anything unique about the system on which the SWF is running, so I'm afraid this is not possible. The closest you will get is likely Capabilities.serverString along with maybe IP address, but the serverString property just lists all the capabilities of the client, which is obviously not a unique thing, and also might change from time to time for the same computer.
Warning: my knowledge of server-side scripting is limited to say the least.
This isn't a technical solution, but rather a different approach to your problem.
An alternative solution to would be to inspect the raw packet at the server in order to obtain data such as the IP and MAC address. Based on this the server can then deny or allow the login attempt.
I am used to working on embedded web servers running on micro controllers where C-based black magic is rather common, so I am not sure if this is possible or practical in a more traditional environment.
I build ASP.NET websites (hosted under IIS 6 usually, often with SQL Server backends and forms authentication).
Clients sometimes ask if I can check whether there are people currently browsing (and/or whether there are users currently logged in to) their website at a given moment, usually so the can safely do a deployment (they want a hotfix, for example).
I know the web is basically stateless so I can't be sure whether someone has closed the browser window, but I imagine there'd be some count of not-yet-timed-out sessions or something, and surely logged-in-users...
Is there a standard and/or easy way to check this?
Jakob's answer is correct but does rely on installing and configuring the Membership features.
A crude but simple way of tracking users online would be to store a counter in the Application object. This counter could be incremented/decremented upon their sessions starting and ending. There's an example of this on the MSDN website:
Session-State Events (MSDN Library)
Because the default Session Timeout is 20 minutes the accuracy of this method isn't guaranteed (but then that applies to any web application due to the stateless and disconnected nature of HTTP).
I know this is a pretty old question, but I figured I'd chime in. Why not use Google Analytics and view their real time dashboard? It will require minor code modifications (i.e. a single script import) and will do everything you're looking for...
You may be looking for the Membership.GetNumberOfUsersOnline method, although I'm not sure how reliable it is.
Sessions, suggested by other users, are a basic way of doing things, but are not too reliable. They can also work well in some circumstances, but not in others.
For example, if users are downloading large files or watching videos or listening to the podcasts, they may stay on the same page for hours (unless the requests to the binary data are tracked by ASP.NET too), but are still using your website.
Thus, my suggestion is to use the server logs to detect if the website is currently used by many people. It gives you the ability to:
See what sort of requests are done. It's quite easy to detect humans and crawlers, and with some experience, it's also possible to see if the human is currently doing something critical (such as writing a comment on a website, editing a document, or typing her credit card number and ordering something) or not (such as browsing).
See who is doing those requests. For example, if Google is crawling your website, it is a very bad idea to go offline, unless the search rating doesn't matter for you. On the other hand, if a bot is trying for two hours to crack your website by doing requests to different pages, you can go offline for sure.
Note: if a website has some critical areas (for example, writing this long answer, I would be angry if Stack Overflow goes offline in a few seconds just before I submit my answer), you can also send regular AJAX requests to the server while the user stays on the page. Of course, you must be careful when implementing such feature, and take in account that it will increase the bandwidth used, and will not work if the user has JavaScript disabled).
You can run command netstat and see how many active connection exist to your website ports.
Default port for http is *:80.
Default port for https is *:443.
I am looking for a best practice for End to End Authentication for internal Web Applications to the Database layer.
The most common scenario I have seen is to use a single SQL account with the permissions set to what is required by the application. This account is used by all application calls. Then when people require access over the database via query tools or such a separate Group is created with the query access and people are given access to that group.
The other scenario I have seen is to use complete Windows Authentication End to End. So the users themselves are added to groups which have all the permissions set so the user is able to update and change outside the parameters of the application. This normally involves securing people down to the appropriate stored procedures so they aren't updating the tables directly.
The first scenario seems relatively easily to maintain but raises concerns if there is a security hole in the application then the whole database is compromised.
The second scenario seems more secure but has the opposite concern of having to much business logic in stored procedures on the database. This seems to limit the use of the some really cool technologies like Nhibernate and LINQ. However in this day and age where people can use data in so many different ways we don't foresee e.g. mash-ups etc is this the best approach.
Dale - That's it exactly. If you want to provide access to the underlying data store to those users then do it via services. And in my experience, it is those experienced computer users coming out of Uni/College that damage things the most. As the saying goes, they know just enough to be dangerous.
If they want to automate part of their job, and they can display they have the requisite knowledge, then go ahead, grant their domain account access to the backend. That way anything they do via their little VBA automation is tied to their account and you know exactly who to go look at when the data gets hosed.
My basic point is that the database is the proverbial holy grail of the application. You want as few fingers in that particular pie as possible.
As a consultant, whenever I hear that someone has allowed normal users into the database, my eyes light up because I know it's going to end up being a big paycheck for me when I get called to fix it.
Personally, I don't want normal end users in the database. For an intranet application (especially one which resides on a Domain) I would provide a single account for application access to the database which only has those rights which are needed for the application to function.
Access to the application would then be controlled via the user's domain account (turn off anonymous access in IIS, etc.).
IF a user needs, and can justify, direct access to the database, then their domain account would be given access to the database, and they can log into the DBMS using the appropriate tools.
I've been responsible for developing several internal web applications over the past year.
Our solution was using Windows Authentication (Active Directory or LDAP).
Our purpose was merely to allow a simple login using an existing company ID/password. We also wanted to make sure that the existing department would still be responsible for verifying and managing access permissions.
While I can't answer the argument concerning Nhibernate or LINQ, unless you have a specific killer feature these things can implement, Active Directory or LDAP are simple enough to implement and maintain that it's worth trying.
I agree with Stephen Wrighton. Domain security is the way to go. If you would like to use mashups and what-not, you can expose parts of the database via a machine-readable RESTful interface. SubSonic has one built in.
Stephen - Keeping normal end users out of the database is nice but I am wondering if in this day and age with so many experienced computer users coming out of University / College if this the right path. If someone wants to automate part of their job which includes a VBA update to a database which I allow them to do via the normal application are we losing gains by restricting their access in this way.
I guess the other path implied here is you could open up the Application via services and then secure those services via groups and still keep the users separated from the database.
Then via delegation you can allow departments to control access to their own accounts via the groups as per Jonathan's post.