I have an SQLite table that I need to sort. I am familiar with the ORDER BY command but this is not what I am trying to accomplish. I need the entire table sorted within the database.
Explanation:
My table uses a column called rowed which sets the order of the table (a key?). I need to sort the table by another column called name and then re-assign rowid numbers in alphabetical order according to name. Can this be done?
Assuming you created your original table like so:
CREATE TABLE my_table (rowid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT, somedata TEXT) ;
You can create another sorted table like so:
CREATE TABLE my_ordered_table (rowid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT, somedata TEXT) ;
INSERT INTO my_ordered_table (name, somedata) SELECT name,somedata FROM my_table
ORDER BY name ;
And if you then want to replace the original table:
DROP TABLE my_table ;
ALTER TABLE my_ordered_table RENAME TO my_table;
I think this issue relates to wanting the primary key to mean something. Avoid that trap. Choose an arbitrarily generated primary key that uniquely identifies a row of data and has no other meaning. Otherwise you will eventually run into the problem of wanting to alter the primary key values to preserve the meaning.
For a good explanation of why you should rely on ORDER BY to retrieve the data in the desired order instead of assuming the data will otherwise appear in a sequence determined by the primary key see Cruachan's answer to a similar question
Related
I have a problem with a sqlite command.
I have a table with three columns: Id, user, number.
The id is continuing. Now if I put a user and a number inside my list, my app should compare if such a user with this number already exist. The problem is, if I use a standard "insert or ignore" command, the Id column is not fixed, so I will get a new entry every time.
So is it possible just two compare two of three columns if they are equal?
Or do I have to use a temporary list, where are only two columns exist?
The INSERT OR IGNORE statement ignores the new record if it would violate a UNIQUE constraint.
Such a constraint is created implicitly for the PRIMARY KEY, but you can also create one explicitly for any other columns:
CREATE TABLE MyTable (
ID integer PRIMARY KEY,
User text,
Number number,
UNIQUE (User, Number)
);
You shouldn't use insert or ignore unless you are specifying the key, which you aren't and in my opinion never should if your key is an Identity (Auto number).
Based on User and Number making a record in your table unique, you don't need the id column and your primary key should be user,number.
If for some reason you don't want to do that, and bearing in mind in that case you are saying that User,Number is not your uniqueness constraint then something like
if not exists(Select 1 From MyTable Where user = 10 and Number = 15)
Insert MyTable(user,number) Values(10,15)
would do the job. Not a SqlLite boy, so you might have to rwiddle with the syntax and wrap escape your column names.
I've created a SQLite table using:
CREATE TABLE T1 (
CN INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ASC,
Name TEXT
);
If I do:
SELECT * FROM T1
Will I get the rows order by CN even without specifying a ORDER BY clause?
Is CN an alias to ROWID?
There is no such thing as a default order, if you need your results ordered add an explicit order by clause.
The dbms is simply optimised to look for the best way to quickly get the required data based on the query. In this case it's the primary key on CN, but that's only because your example is so simple. Never ever rely on the dbms choosing the order you want.
The second question might be useful to others.
From the SQLite documentation:
Except for WITHOUT ROWID tables, all rows within SQLite tables have a 64-bit signed integer key that uniquely identifies the row within its table. This integer is usually called the "rowid".
... if a rowid table has a primary key that consists of a single column and the declared type of that column is "INTEGER" in any mixture of upper and lower case, then the column becomes an alias for the rowid.
This also holds for columns that are declared of type "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ASC", so in your table CN is an alias for "rowid"
Further information can be found here:
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtable.html#rowid
I have a table with unique usernames and a bunch of string data I am keeping track of. Each user will have 1000 rows and when I select them I want to return them in the order they were added. Is the following code a necessary and correct way of doing this:
CREATE TABLE foo (
username TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
col1 TEXT,
col2 TEXT,
...
order_id INTEGER NOT NULL
);
CREATE INDEX foo_order_index ON foo(order_id);
SELECT * FROM foo where username = 'bar' ORDER BY order_id;
Add a DateAdded field and default it to the date/time the row was added and sort on that.
If you absolutely must use the order_ID, which I don't suggest. Then at least make it an identity column. The reason I advise against this is because you are relying on side affects to do your sorting and it will make your code harder to read.
If each user will have 1000 rows, then username should not be the primary key. One option is to use the int identity column which all tables have (which optimizes I/O reads since it's typically stored in that order).
Read under "RowIds and the Integer Primary Key" # http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtable.html
The data for each table in SQLite is stored as a B-Tree structure
containing an entry for each table row, using the rowid value as the
key. This means that retrieving or sorting records by rowid is fast.
Because it's stored in that order in the B-tree structure, it should be fast to order by the int primary key. Make sure it's an alias for rowid though - more in that article.
Also, if you're going to be doing queries where username = 'bob', you should consider an index on the username column - especially there's going to be many users which makes the index effective because of high selectivity. In contrast, adding an index on a column with values like 1 and 0 only leads to low selectivity and renders the index very ineffective. So, if you have 3 users :) it's not worth it.
You can remove the order_id column & index entirely (unless you need them for something other than this sorting).
SQLite tables always have a integer primary key - in this case, your username column has silently been made a unique key, so the table only has the one integer primary key. The key column is called rowid. For your sorting purpose, you'll want to explicitly make it AUTOINCREMENT so that every row always has a higher rowid than older rows.
You probably want to read http://www.sqlite.org/autoinc.html
CREATE TABLE foo (
rowid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
username TEXT UNIQUE KEY,
...
Then your select becomes
select * from foo order by rowed;
One advantage of this approach is that you're re-using the index SQLite will already be placing on your table. A date or order_id column is going to mean an extra index, which is just overhead here.
All I know is only table name, and id value on which I want to perform query, but I do not know what is id called in that table.
You can probably lookup the column name for the primary key column(s) using the answer to a quite similar question..
sqlite> pragma table_info(...)
It should also work programmatically, if needed.
I have a sqlite table that was originally created with:
PRIMARY KEY (`column`);
I now need to remove that primary key and create a new one. Creating a new one is easy, but removing the original seems to be the hard part. If I do
.indices tablename
I don't get the primary key. Some programs show the primary key as
Indexes: 1
[] PRIMARY
The index name is typically in the [].
Any ideas?
You can't.
PRAGMA INDEX_LIST('MyTable');
will give you a list of indices. This will include the automatically generated index for the primary key which will be called something like 'sqlite_autoindex_MyTable_1'.
But unfortunately you cannot drop this index...
sqlite> drop index sqlite_autoindex_MyTable_1;
SQL error: index associated with UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraint cannot be dropped
All you can do is re-create the table without the primary key.
I the database glossary; a primary-key is a type of index where the index order is typically results in the physical ordering of the raw database records. That said any database engine that allows the primary key to be changed is likely reordering the database... so most do not and the operation is up to the programmer to create a script to rename the table and create a new one. So if you want to change the PK there is no magic SQL.
select * from sqlite_master;
table|x|x|2|CREATE TABLE x (a text, b text, primary key (`a`))
index|sqlite_autoindex_x_1|x|3|
You'll see that the second row returned from my quick hack has the index name in the second column, and the table name in the third. Try seeing if that name is anything useful.