<ul> within another <ul> inherits style - css

I have the following structure in some HTML:
<ul class="li_inline">
<li>
<ul class="li_block">
<li>Stuff</li>
<li>Stuff under stuff</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<ul class="li_block">
<li>Stuff</li>
<li>Stuff under stuff</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
With the CSS like this:
.li_inline li
{
display: inline;
}
.li_block li
{
display: block;
}
What I would like to happen is to have the two inner <ul>s side by side, but any <li>s inside them to be below each other. This is so I can get a sidebar and main body side by side, but elements inside them behave normally (ie. one below the other).
Can someone suggest some CSS I can use so that the inner (li_block) lists' <li> elements are displayed as block elements, but the <ul>s themselves are displayed side by side?
Thanks,
James


Use a reset rule.
ul ul { list-style:none; padding: 5px 20px; margin: 5px 10px; }
In your case using the !important can get your job done. But try not to use it
UPDATE
Solution: http://jsfiddle.net/Starx/KHjmP/ (FF3+, Safari 4+, IE8+)


it ain't pretty but you get the jist of it :)
<div style="overflow: hidden;">
<ul class="li_block" style="float: left;">
<li>Stuff</li>
<li>Stuff under stuff</li>
</ul>
<ul class="li_block" style="float: left;">
<li>Stuff</li>
<li>Stuff under stuff</li>
</ul>
</div>


This worked for me:
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
ul.outer{}
ul.outer > li{
float: left;
}
ul.outer > li > ul > li{
display: block;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul class="outer">
<li>
<ul>
<li>1.1</li>
<li>1.2</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<ul>
<li>2.1</li>
<li>2.2</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>


You should be able to do something as simple as the following. I tested it in Firefox, Chrome and IE7.
.li_inline > li {
display: inline;
}
.li_inline > li > ul {
float: left;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/fzBnG/


.li_inline li {
display: inline-block;
float: left;
}
.li_block li {
display: block;
clear:both;
}


First, thanks for everyone's help! I'm really sorry to look like I'm ignoring your hard efforts away, but I have taken note of all your answers, and they're all very handy.
The solution I have come up with is to simply use display: inline-block for both inner uls, with the outer one left default.
Once again, thanks for your help everyone.
James

Related

How do I make my CSS Drop-down menu work?

I was trying to make dropdown menu using only css, however it doesn't work in my case.
It's kinda working when I don't put position:absolute at .dropdown_content in CSS, but even when I do that, dropdown doesn't work.
HTML:
<nav>
<ul>
<div class="dropdown">
<li>Game order</li>
<div class="dropdown_content">
Half-life
Half-life 2
Half-life EP1
</div>
</div>
<li>Portal series</li>
<li>Half Life Alyx</li>
</ul>
</nav>
CSS:
.dropdown {
position:relative;
display:inline-block;
}
.dropdown_content {
box-shadow: 0px 8px 16px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
z-index: 1;
min-width: 160px;
display:none;
}
.dropdown_content a {
color:white;
text-decoration: none;
display:block;
padding: 12px 16px;
}
}
.dropdown:hover .dropdown_content {
display: block;
}

To keep things simple, I have reduced your code to a bare minimum.
I'm not sure exactly how you want it to look, but here's a possible solution.
When making css only menu's I try to stick to a nested list of <ul> and <li>'s.
This makes it clearer to read, and keeps the semantics in order.
Ther is no need for container divs within. (like the <div class="dropdown_content"> in your code)
The HTML is a nested list. Initially we hide the nested ul, and only show it when it's parent is hovered over. By using .dropDown li:hover>ul you only target the ul that is DIRECTLY under the hovered li. That way you dan nest as deep as you want.
.dropDown ul {
display: none;
position: absolute;
background: white;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.dropDown li:hover>ul{
display: block;
}
<ul class="dropDown">
<li>Game order
<ul>
<li>Half-life</li>
<li>Half-life 2</li>
<li>Half-life EP1</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Portal series</li>
<li>Half Life Alyx</li>
<li>deeper nesting
<ul>
<li>level 1</li>
<li>more here
<ul>
<li>level 2</li>
<li>more here
<ul>
<li>level 3</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

Foundation 6.4 tweaking top bar

Foundation's top bar navigation tool is set-up to fully flesh out a hierarchy of links, relying upon list and item tags.
<div class="top-bar">
<div class="top-bar-left">
<ul class="dropdown menu" data-dropdown-menu>
<li class="menu-text">Site Title</li>
<li>
One
<ul class="menu vertical">
<li>One</li>
<li>Two</li>
<li>Three</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Two</li>
<li>Three</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
However, in an attempt to soften this structure, the goal is to have the second layer links on a single line, say
<ul><li>
One Two Three
</li></ul>
Unfortunately, either display is relinquished to the browser definition for line-item or display:block; from the base code of Foundation overrides even <li style='display: float'><a href="#" style='display: float'> with its .menu a class definition.
How can this one-liner be achieved?

Looks like you may have mixed up your css rules: display: block; and float: none. The default behaviour looks like it wants it to be vertical, and the structure looks to be built in that way. I didn't see anything in their docs for this (I skimmed them lol) but what I did to make it work was to use position:absolute; on that submenu, and then position it. I don't know what the rest of your menu looks like, but you will need to adjust I assume.
I created a codepen that might do what you need it to.
https://codepen.io/bjorniobennett/pen/bGGajWZ
ul.dropdown > li {
position: relative;
&:hover {
> ul.vertical {
display: block;
}
}
> ul.vertical {
display: none;
position: absolute;
width: 500%;
background: #c5c5c5;
top: 120%;
> li {
display: inline-block;
float: left;
}
}
}

Looking for CSS to place children of different list items into one line without float on the list item?

I'm working in a legacy environment where it's too challenging to change the HTML rendered to a page. Instead, I'm looking for a CSS solution for a situation where only the child of the list item has an existing class I can use:
HTML structure
<ul>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
</ul>
Desired output
A
A
A
BBB
I've tried
li {
display:inline-block;
}
li > div {
display:block;
}
li > div.floated {
display:inline-block;
float:left;
}
Updated:
I found a CSS-only solution that works in my particular case (below)

I was able to solve my particular situation using the div to provide the bullet by default, and the extra class to take it away.
ul {
list-style:none;
margin:0;
padding:0
}
li {
display:inline;
}
li .myobject::before { /* add the new bullet point */
display: inline-block;
content: '';
-webkit-border-radius: 50%;
border-radius: 50%;
height: 0.25em;
width: 0.25em;
margin-right: 0.5rem;
background-color: #000;
position: relative;
top: -0.2em;
}
li .floated {
display:inline-block;
}
li .floated::before {
height:0;
width:0;
background-color:transparent;
margin-right:0;
}

Lately in 2017, in the Selectors Level 4 they have introduced :has() selector which will be able to select an element based on its children, but it hasn't been approved yet, and it's not yet supported in any browser.
Assumption:
If it was available it would be very easy by using:
li:has(>div.floated) {
display:inline-block;
float:left;
}
JS/jQuery:
But unfortunately, it's not supported yet by any browser, it's however used by jquery or by Javascript .querySelector() and you can use it like this:
$('li:has(>div.floated)').css({
"display": "inline-block",
"float": "left"
});
$('li:has(>div.floated)').css({
"display": "inline-block",
"float": "left"
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<ul>
<li>
<div class="myobject">A</div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="myobject">A</div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="myobject">A</div>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
<div class="myobject floated">B</div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="myobject floated">B</div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="myobject floated">B</div>
</li>
</ul>
Another option:
Another option is to use another class with the li itself instead of its div:
.myLi {
display: inline-block;
float: left;
}

Not sure about your legacy environment but You could achieve this by using nth-child() selector as shown below. Ofcourse this will only work if you do have access to the mentioned CSS selector.
ul:nth-child(2) {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
ul:nth-child(2) li {
display: inline-block;
}
<ul>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject">A</div></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
<li><div class="myobject floated">B</div></li>
</ul>

third level of CSS dropdown menu not appearing in two-column format

I have constructed a three-level dropdown using CSS. It works until I add this to the CSS:
columns: 2;
-webkit-columns: 2;
-moz-columns: 2;
The HTML is basically just two unordered lists (by the way, the "feelings" list and the "needs" list have the same content -- that will change eventually -- this is just for experimenting!):
<div class="feelings">
<ul class="nav feelings">
<li class="feelings" id="feelings"> FEELINGS
<ul>
<li>AFRAID
<ul>
<li>apprehensive</li>
<li>dread</li>
<li>foreboding</li>
<li>frightened</li>
<li>mistrustful</li>
<li>panicked</li>
<li>petrified</li>
<li>scared</li>
<li>suspicious</li>
<li>terrified</li>
<li>wary</li>
<li>worried</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ANNOYED
<ul>
<li>aggravated</li>
<li>dismayed</li>
<li>disgruntled</li>
<li>displeased</li>
<li>exasperated</li>
<li>frustrated</li>
<li>impatient</li>
<li>irritated</li>
<li>irked</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ANGRY
<ul>
<li>enraged</li>
<li>furious</li>
<li>incensed</li>
<li>indignant</li>
<li>irate</li>
<li>livid</li>
<li>outraged</li>
<li>resentful</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>AVERSION
<ul>
<li>animosity</li>
<li>appalled</li>
<li>contempt</li>
<li>disgusted</li>
<li>dislike</li>
<li>hate</li>
<li>horrified</li>
<li>hostile</li>
<li>repulsed</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>CONFUSED
<ul>
<li>ambivalent</li>
<li>baffled</li>
<li>bewildered</li>
<li>dazed</li>
<li>hesitant</li>
<li>lost</li>
<li>mystified</li>
<li>perplexed</li>
<li>puzzled</li>
<li>torn</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>DISCONNECTED
<ul>
<li>alienated</li>
<li>aloof</li>
<li>apathetic</li>
<li>bored</li>
<li>cold</li>
<li>detached</li>
<li>distant</li>
<li>distracted</li>
<li>indifferent</li>
<li>numb</li>
<li>removed</li>
<li>uninterested</li>
<li>withdrawn</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>DISQUIET
<ul>
<li>agitated</li>
<li>alarmed</li>
<li>discombobulated</li>
<li>disconcerted</li>
<li>disturbed</li>
<li>perturbed</li>
<li>rattled</li>
<li>restless</li>
<li>shocked</li>
<li>startled</li>
<li>surprised</li>
<li>troubled</li>
<li>turbulent</li>
<li>turmoil</li>
<li>uncomfortable</li>
<li>uneasy</li>
<li>unnerved</li>
<li>unsettled</li>
<li>upset</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>EMBARRASSED
<ul>
<li>ashamed</li>
<li>chagrined</li>
<li>flustered</li>
<li>guilty</li>
<li>mortified</li>
<li>self-conscious</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>FATIGUE
<ul>
<li>beat</li>
<li>burnt out</li>
<li>depleted</li>
<li>exhausted</li>
<li>lethargic</li>
<li>listless</li>
<li>sleepy</li>
<li>tired</li>
<li>weary</li>
<li>worn out</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>PAIN
<ul>
<li>agony</li>
<li>anguished</li>
<li>bereaved</li>
<li>devastated</li>
<li>grief</li>
<li>heartbroken</li>
<li>hurt</li>
<li>lonely</li>
<li>miserable</li>
<li>regretful</li>
<li>remorseful</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>SAD
<ul>
<li>depressed</li>
<li>dejected</li>
<li>despair</li>
<li>despondent</li>
<li>disappointed</li>
<li>discouraged</li>
<li>disheartened</li>
<li>forlorn</li>
<li>gloomy</li>
<li>heavy hearted</li>
<li>hopeless</li>
<li>melancholy</li>
<li>unhappy</li>
<li>wretched</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>TENSE
<ul>
<li>anxious</li>
<li>cranky</li>
<li>distressed</li>
<li>distraught</li>
<li>edgy</li>
<li>fidgety</li>
<li>frazzled</li>
<li>irritable</li>
<li>jittery</li>
<li>nervous</li>
<li>overwhelmed</li>
<li>restless</li>
<li>stressed out</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>VULNERABLE
<ul>
<li>fragile</li>
<li>guarded</li>
<li>helpless</li>
<li>insecure</li>
<li>leery</li>
<li>reserved</li>
<li>sensitive</li>
<li>shaky</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>YEARNING
<ul>
<li>envious</li>
<li>jealous</li>
<li>longing</li>
<li>nostalgic</li>
<li>pining</li>
<li>wistful</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="needs">
<ul class="nav needs">
<li class="feelings" id="needs"> NEEDS
<ul>
<li>AFRAID
<ul>
<li>apprehensive</li>
<li>dread</li>
<li>foreboding</li>
<li>frightened</li>
<li>mistrustful</li>
<li>panicked</li>
<li>petrified</li>
<li>scared</li>
<li>suspicious</li>
<li>terrified</li>
<li>wary</li>
<li>worried</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ANNOYED
<ul>
<li>aggravated</li>
<li>dismayed</li>
<li>disgruntled</li>
<li>displeased</li>
<li>exasperated</li>
<li>frustrated</li>
<li>impatient</li>
<li>irritated</li>
<li>irked</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ANGRY
<ul>
<li>enraged</li>
<li>furious</li>
<li>incensed</li>
<li>indignant</li>
<li>irate</li>
<li>livid</li>
<li>outraged</li>
<li>resentful</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>AVERSION
<ul>
<li>animosity</li>
<li>appalled</li>
<li>contempt</li>
<li>disgusted</li>
<li>dislike</li>
<li>hate</li>
<li>horrified</li>
<li>hostile</li>
<li>repulsed</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>CONFUSED
<ul>
<li>ambivalent</li>
<li>baffled</li>
<li>bewildered</li>
<li>dazed</li>
<li>hesitant</li>
<li>lost</li>
<li>mystified</li>
<li>perplexed</li>
<li>puzzled</li>
<li>torn</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>DISCONNECTED
<ul>
<li>alienated</li>
<li>aloof</li>
<li>apathetic</li>
<li>bored</li>
<li>cold</li>
<li>detached</li>
<li>distant</li>
<li>distracted</li>
<li>indifferent</li>
<li>numb</li>
<li>removed</li>
<li>uninterested</li>
<li>withdrawn</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>DISQUIET
<ul>
<li>agitated</li>
<li>alarmed</li>
<li>discombobulated</li>
<li>disconcerted</li>
<li>disturbed</li>
<li>perturbed</li>
<li>rattled</li>
<li>restless</li>
<li>shocked</li>
<li>startled</li>
<li>surprised</li>
<li>troubled</li>
<li>turbulent</li>
<li>turmoil</li>
<li>uncomfortable</li>
<li>uneasy</li>
<li>unnerved</li>
<li>unsettled</li>
<li>upset</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>EMBARRASSED
<ul>
<li>ashamed</li>
<li>chagrined</li>
<li>flustered</li>
<li>guilty</li>
<li>mortified</li>
<li>self-conscious</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>FATIGUE
<ul>
<li>beat</li>
<li>burnt out</li>
<li>depleted</li>
<li>exhausted</li>
<li>lethargic</li>
<li>listless</li>
<li>sleepy</li>
<li>tired</li>
<li>weary</li>
<li>worn out</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>PAIN
<ul>
<li>agony</li>
<li>anguished</li>
<li>bereaved</li>
<li>devastated</li>
<li>grief</li>
<li>heartbroken</li>
<li>hurt</li>
<li>lonely</li>
<li>miserable</li>
<li>regretful</li>
<li>remorseful</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>SAD
<ul>
<li>depressed</li>
<li>dejected</li>
<li>despair</li>
<li>despondent</li>
<li>disappointed</li>
<li>discouraged</li>
<li>disheartened</li>
<li>forlorn</li>
<li>gloomy</li>
<li>heavy hearted</li>
<li>hopeless</li>
<li>melancholy</li>
<li>unhappy</li>
<li>wretched</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>TENSE
<ul>
<li>anxious</li>
<li>cranky</li>
<li>distressed</li>
<li>distraught</li>
<li>edgy</li>
<li>fidgety</li>
<li>frazzled</li>
<li>irritable</li>
<li>jittery</li>
<li>nervous</li>
<li>overwhelmed</li>
<li>restless</li>
<li>stressed out</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>VULNERABLE
<ul>
<li>fragile</li>
<li>guarded</li>
<li>helpless</li>
<li>insecure</li>
<li>leery</li>
<li>reserved</li>
<li>sensitive</li>
<li>shaky</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>YEARNING
<ul>
<li>envious</li>
<li>jealous</li>
<li>longing</li>
<li>nostalgic</li>
<li>pining</li>
<li>wistful</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
Here is the CSS:
#charset "UTF-8";
/* CSS Document */
ul ul, ul ul ul {
columns: 2;
-webkit-columns: 2;
-moz-columns: 2;
}
.nav feelings needs {
padding-left: 10px;
padding-right: 10px;
width: 200px;
color:#ff0000;
background-color:#ffffff;
}
.nav{
height: 39px;
border-radius: 3px;
min-width:500px;
border:1px solid #ddd;
background-color:#ffffff;
}
.nav li, .nav li li {
list-style: none;
display: block;
float: left;
height: 40px;
position: relative;
background-color:#ffffff;
}
.nav a {
width: 200px;
overflow:hidden;
}
.nav li a{
display: block;
}
.nav ul {
display: none;
visibility:hidden;
position: absolute;
top: 40px;
}
.nav ul ul {
top: 0px;
left:170px;
display: none;
visibility:hidden;
border: 1px solid #DDDDDD;
position: relative;
}
.nav ul li {
display: block;
visibility:visible;
}
.nav li:hover > ul, nav li:hover * {
display: block;
visibility:visible;
z-index:1;
}
If I eliminate the first CSS item (setting the menu to two columns), the last level of the menu appears (the items in small letters as opposed to all caps). With the two-column CSS in place, the third level doesn't appear.
Here is a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/Lq7NK/2/
Interestingly, on the fiddle, the third level does seem to be trying to appear a bit, but it's certainly not working the way I'd like it to, which is the third level appearing in a vertical column to the right of the second level item.
Any thoughts will be appreciated!
/* image below was added after original question, in response to a request for a picture */
The top screenshot in this picture shows what comes up now when I hover over the first feeling, AFRAID -- and it is actually pretty much what I want (though obviously it needs some prettifying): two sets of two-column dropdowns, namely, the one in all caps and the one in all small letters. (This is basically with the code shown above, but with one change, namely, removing ul ul to leave only ul ul ul as suggested by user3369554.) However, when I move the cursor, stuff starts jumping all over the place; the screenshot on the bottom shows one state, but things just jump all over in a very disconcerting way. For instance, I would like to be able to just move the cursor over to where ANGRY is at the top of the second column. But if I try to do that, it jumps to somewhere else. And if I go to that place, it jumps to still another location. If the both sets of emotions (all caps and all small letters) would hold still in the configuration shown at the top, and let me click on them, I'd be happy.

I don't know if I'm understanding well, but you can get the third level in a 2 column format to the right of the second level, if you replace:
ul ul, ul ul ul
for
ul ul ul
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/QKkg4/
Is that what your're after?

css3 last-child not working as expected

I have match listings dynamically generated. After each member I display a li that displays VS within it. However the very last ul li in the div match shouldnt be visible. Any ideas how I can do that?
HTML
<style>
.match {
}
.match ul {
}
.match ul li {
float: left;
margin-right: 50px;
}
.match ul li:last-child {
display: none;
}
</style>
<div class="content">
<div class="match">
<ul>
<li>Wade Barrett</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Shaemus</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Randy Orton</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>John Cena</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Edge</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Chris Jericho</li>
<li style="">VS</li>
</ul>
<p class="clear"></p>
</div>
</div>

The :last-child pseudo-class should apply to the ul, not li, because you want VS text of the last ul of the list to be hidden. By applying the pseudo-class to li, you're applying styles to the last li of every ul, which is incorrect.
You should also apply a class attribute to the li elements with the VS text so that it's more convenient to match with a class selector.
Change
<li style="">VS</li>
to
<li class="vs">VS</li>
And use this instead of your current :last-child selector:
.match ul:last-child li.vs {
display: none;
}

What browser are you using, IE does not support it. The latest version of the other browsers do, but I would recommend placing a class on it to make it 100%.

Resources