How do I create a global overlay of all tags?
Pressing a shortcut should make all tags appear in seperate boxes in one screen. It should look something like this:
How can I make something like this? How can I seperate tags in boxes?
My collision module or the bling module has something close enough. Getting the exact layout you ask for is non-trivial because AwesomeWM is not a compositing window manager. This means it cannot really take screenshots (let alone live-views) of invisible clients/windows. Usually, the only "safe" thing is to display the outline and client icon.
If you really, really want this, you need:
A compositing manager such as picom
Either these patches or use gears.surface(client.content) to take a screenshot
Lot of code to properly render a wibox with the right screenshots. You can read the bling or collision code to know how to get the size and position.
Here is a canvas: https://www.docker.com/#canvasCircle
I am thinking to use the function/images that creates this canvas. You can see that the circles are created first and then there is a ribbon like movement of the line from first canvas to last.
I have been trying to find either the images or the animation function. But couldn't. I would like to modify it and use it for my website.
In my case, as a front-end , I would use Photo Shop. Transfer everything to layers and extract the images. Than with css or Jquery , you can add :focus or :hover to make them pop or animate them. Not sure exactly what you want with it. With css you can also use transform etc. Hope this helps. It would help to know what exactly do you want the images to do so we can think of a code.
I have an image and want to create a mouse over effect as soon on the following page:
http://www.zalando.de/roxy-pam-snowboot-winterstiefel-grey-ro511c00e-101.html
To see the effect, move your mouse over the "Auf den Wunschzettel" on the right side. How are those tings done?
Thanks!
If you want to do this the 'easy way', take a look at the jQuery plugin qTip: little link.
If you want to build this yourself, here are the stuff you'll mostly likely need to learn:
CSS Positioning.
onmouseover/onmouseout events.
The CSS display property.
Hope that's enough to get you started!
Note: this might be possible to achieve using CSS only, but it's more paradigmatic to use JavaScript for such things.
This is an amazing effect like PPT. Link is here :
http://udc.weibo.com/builder2011/data.html
I know single part was made by css3-animation effects but I don't know
1.how to play all these effects in a timeline?
2.how to make position change and local to whole effect?
Where can I find a tutorial like this?
Thanks cordially.
You could actually make the whole thing out of CSS3.
Keyframes is how you'd be able to time the different functions: http://www.leemunroe.com/css3-animations/
You would need something like an entire CSS3 powered page page, and then just place a window over that with overflow hidden. Use keyframe to move the page around but the window will only show a portion of it.
Just realized, that actually happens to be exactly what they did.
I'm looking for a good way to implement reusable buttons in CSS on my forms. The requirements:
- Separate image and text (text is in many languages)
- Rollover effects
- Plays nicely cross browser
- No javascript (if possible)
- Rounded corners
Whats the best way to do this? Years ago I was using the sliding doors technique, but this seems out of date now. Would you use CSS3 with a fallback for older browsers? Any particularly well thought of techniques out there?
Jquery UI buttons are AWESOME. They're fully tested, completely compliant, and really look great. With one line of code, you can have a fully styled button in no time flat. Here's the thing--they can be executed without Jquery (go figure)
First, the tut
So, the standard method is to build an element (a, button, input) with an id and set it as a button in Jquery like this:$('#element').button()
However, if you do it in the manner that the tutorial shows, you just have to add some classes to an element to get a similar effect. So, to make a button out of an a tag, it would just be
Button
In this example, there's no need to set the button with the jQuery button declaration...you're doing it by style only. With the flexibility to style so many different type of elements, it opens up a ton of doors.
You would have to have the Jquery UI css loaded, which offers the added benefit of ThemeRoller, which can style elements on the page with a simple change of a file. It's really a great way to "theme" a site that has to change branding in a hurry, which has made custom themed apps my company puts out extremely profitable.
I would use css sprites for this. You can find out about them here:
http://css-tricks.com/css-sprites/
It is basically a way to make one large image that has all states of buttons(normal, hover, selected). The benefit is it is one http request and you don't see a flicker the first time a hover occurs. If you use this route, the css background property will be the image. You can then use text-align and line-height to center the text that you want to place over the image.
This library, Nifty Corners Cubed uses Javascript but is a fairly clean way to round div tags links, etc. It is tough to find a reusable solution without using a sliding doors derived technique. Otherwise you stuck making none-resuable buttons that have to fit to your size.
You can also take a look at PIE http://css3pie.com/
A sprite is a great option and I do use them from time to time.
Personally I don't mind if my websites aren't identical in all browsers and I go the CSS class route. I keep in mind what is and isn't supported by various browsers and if there is an element that needs to be a certain way I will double check with W3Schools for compatibility.
The main benefit the keeps me using CSS/CSS3 classes is if something changes it is done quickly by text in a single file, if need be I can do a quick change from a 10 year old computer with a dial-up connection (if they still exist) and no imaging software.
Where the advantage of a sprite is they are supported across all browsers and they will look identical (more or less). SpriteMe is a bookmarklet that I have heard of to help with sprites if you decide to go down this path.
I see this as a what do you prefer matter... these questions are what I ask myself when making this type of decision:
How often will it change? Big or small changes? Will it be a complete redesign job if it changes? What do you already know? How much time are you willing to spend learning something that you may not know? What does your gut say for this project?
I hope this can help you.