I want to have 2 boxes right next to each other, one with a fixed width, and another with a width that will change based on the size of the browser. The box has overflow:auto, and I'm trying to get the first box to act as a side bar that will follow you down the page. But of course I can't seem to achieve this, and have come here hoping someone could give me some examples, or point me in the right direction.
Thanks!
To achieve the layout you asked try something along these lines:
HTML:
<div>
<div id="col1">Left Navigation Menu</div>
<div id="col2">Right Content</div>
</div>
CSS:
#col1
{
position:fixed;
width:400px;
}
#col2
{
position:absolute;
left:400px;
}
Will I was trying to think of a good way to do this in CSS, I was channeling my google-fu and found...
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/jStickyScroll
"This plug-in allows you to keep a div element at the top of the browser window when scrolling down a page. The most common use is to keep a sidebar navigation menu from disappearing when scrolling to the bottom of a web page."
You could maybe try...
#element{
position:fixed;
}
Although this doesn't work without hacks in IE6, see
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/fixedPosition.html
Give this a go (I hope this is what you are after?):
See a live demo here: http://jsfiddle.net/VcecU/
HTML
<div class="main_container">
<div class="content_a">1</div>
<div class="content_lotsoftext">Start. Lots of text goes here! Finish. </div>
</div>
CSS
.main_container{
background-color:#ccc;
overflow:auto;
zoom:1;
}
.content_a{
width:60px;
float:left;
background-color:#3FF;
}
.content_lotsoftext{
float:left;
background-color:#FCF;
margin:-20px 0 0 60px; /* -- Need conditional for IE6 and 7 to remove the margin to get it to work in those browsers --*/
/*-- The following classes help it to sit better in IE6 and 7 --*/
clear:left;
display:inline;
}
Please note, you will need a IE6&7 conditional to remove the margin, clear and display classes from .content_lotsoftext
Related
I'm having some trouble getting this done 'right'...
its a two parter. :)
1.) is getting the layout to look like how I need it (without resorting to tables!), but for some reason I can get the divs and nested divs to 'act right'... (surely its my error/mis-understanding)
I am trying to get a layout like so, using only DIVS and display..etc..
http://dmstudios.net/misc/layout.jpg
I have attempted it myself (so you dont think Im just looking for a handout) :)..
but some things like the vertical alignment of the custom div container isnt working..etc
Here is my JSFiddle attempt: http://jsfiddle.net/yeKxU/1/
JSFiddle Code:
<div class="container">
<div class="logo"><img src="http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/images/thumb/5/53/150px-Blue_morpho_butterfly_300x271.jpg" /></div>
<div class="custom">
<div class="president">item1</div>
<div class="mission">item2</div>
<div class="active">item3</div>
</div>
<div class="url">www.nike.com</div>
<div class="freetext">random text</div>
</div>
CSS:
* {
border: 1px dashed blue;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
div{
display: inline-block;
border:2px solid;
border-radius:2px;
border-color:#FF0000;
}
.container{
width:450px;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.logo{
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.custom{
vertical-align:top; /* doesnt work to move the 'custom div' to the top */
/* width:63%;*/ /*needs to auto stretch to fit the rest of the space after image*/
}
.custom div{
display:block;
background-color:#EEEEEE;
}
.url{
width:100%;
}
.freetext{
width:100%;
}
Couple notes: the '3' fields to the right of the image div, will have varying data in them.. (meaning I am not clear if they will need to wrap or not...hopefully not a problem)
The second portion of the question, is about implementing some dynamic capabilities. (jQuery I imagine should work)..
2.) Knowing the general (perfect scenario) layout I am trying to achieve above...
I need to also code things in a way.. that is certain parts of the data are MISSING, then that 'cell' (div) is removed/hidden (or something)
*(I am building this using PHP printed to screen, to spit out the HTML/DIVS..etc and using variables to populate the content of the DIV/image..etc)
So for example..
if the IMAGE was not there (variable is empty).. Id like the the CUSTOM div that has 3 child divs in it 1 for each of the text fields) to expand all thew way to the LEFT.. as the logo/image DIV will have nothing (or be removed/hidden since its empty)
Same goes for the text fields in the CUSTOM DIV container.. if one of those fields are BLANK... its should NOT just have a blank/empty placeholder... it should be removed/hidden.. and the rest of the data butted up to the TOP (under any other fields that may be present)
I've seen examples (sorta) where you have some DIV blocks on the stage.. click on one.. it removes it.. the other DIVS move over...etc... (sorta the same thing, except I cant manually click things to remove them)..
So maybe some jQuery to go through the 'DIVS' see if its empty and then remove itself?
-or-
would just having some sort of layout that is fluid/liquid work? be better? so I dont really need to check if its empty.. if nothing is IN the cell/DIV.. then the other just adjust their WIDTH/POSITION to make-up for it?
Let me know what you guys think? JSFiddle examples are appreciated!
Thanks!
to get the layout in question one you do like this...
#divA {float:left;}
#divB {float:left;}
before divC you can put an empty div (id="empty") like this...
#empty {clear:both;}
this should fix the design, assuming you have your width seth on the divs...
for question 2 i suggest you create the divs dynamically, when you create your content on page... if you want examples, just let me know...
There are a lot of properties you can set on your divs, one is max-width... one risk of not setting any value on width on your divs is that if your total width get wider than your holding container your divB will stack up under divA... and i think you dont want that to happen... :) you can do some experiments with min-width and max-width on your divs to get the behavior you want because i guess you have some values on your pic to play with...
divA {
float:left;
max-width:50px;
}
divB {
float:left;
min-width:400px;
}
as example, you have to find your values, trial and error-way i guess...
there is also a lot of guides on internet if you search on css and positioning... happy hunting!
I am making a menu that is a div with with:100%; and height:45px;
each element inside the menu are divs. My goal is to make it adapt to any screen resolution so I start by placing the first div with a margin-left:2%;but the for the next one I am not sure of what I must use.
I could make the first element in float:left; and use margin like margin-left:10%; but then if we change the screen resolution it's not good anymore. If I don't put anything it goes under the first button. If I use the margin-left in px it won't be good because of the first margin-left:2%; How can I achieve this?
This is what I curently have(you can see that the buttons get under the first one):
Why don't you use display:inline-block; and whatever the margins that are great for you?
Meaning that, the first element can have 2% and the second one as well:
<div id="menu">
<div class="element">1</div>
<div class="element">2</div>
</div>
#menu{
width:100%;
height:45px;
background:#f00;
}
.element{
background:#0f0;
display:inline-block;
margin-left:2%;
}
I think you should provide something like a jsfiddle source when asking these type of questions :)
I have the page with the structure:
<div id="container">
<div id="header">top menu</div>
<div id="content">content</div>
<div id ="footer" align="center">
<div class="left">left part of footer menu</div>
<div class="right">right part of footer menu</div>
</div>
</div>
Css style:
#container {
position:relative;
height:auto !important;
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
#content {
padding:0em 0em 12em;
}
#footer {
position:absolute;
width:100%;
bottom:0;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.right {
float: right;
}
That works fine in all browsers. But when I add
<script type="text/javascript"></script>
inside
<div class="left">
in FireFox(only) the part of footer after the script come up to the top - between header and content divs.
What's wrong with it?
UPD
This all was about wrong mark-up inside #content. And only FireFox didn't understand when I missed one of closed table tag:) Thank you guys, you helped me to sort it out.
The #footer has absolute position and is inside the relatively positioned #container div so I would expect this. Maybe try making container absolutley positioned.
Also I think your markup is not what you intended. There are one too many opening div tags.
change the #container height from auto to 100% and remove the extra lines for height.
The auto is messing up the calculations as it overrides the 100% lines due to the !important value
Since #footer's position is absolute, with bottom 0, it will be positioned relative to its first (non statically positioned) parent, which is #container. Essentially what's happening here is that #container is becoming mush less high, and dragging #footer with it.
That's happening because you have two height: settings in the css for #container (somehow the script tag triggers it to refresh) so the behaviour would be undefined.
If you're trying to make the footer stick to the bottom of the window, including as it's resized, I'd advise having a javascript function handle it, triggered by the window's resize event (it's fairly simple, see this question on javascript window resize event
You could try the CSS a different way with absolute positioning. I try and avoid float as it can lead to unexpected rendering issues. See this jsFiddle for an alternate approach. Working in IE6, Chrome12 and FF3.6 and FF4 for me.
how can one create a css layout as seen on google wave that resizes automatically according to window size without the need for scrolling (apart from the specific elements on each page which are using scrollbars) with each div positioned in a similar fashion as seen on the website? i really love this interface and have been trying to create it on dreamweaver (web programming is a hobby) without using tables as practice.
i am learning css from scratch.
i have included an image for reference.
many thanks!
The columns can be achieved using CSS floats. Simply create three div tags and apply float: left and assign a width to each one.
The 100% height can be achieved through CSS, but in Wave's case javascript is probably being used. The particular logic depends on the site's design, since you need to take into account other elements on the page, such as a header bar.
If you were interested, you could use Firebug/Developer console to inspect how Google Wave's basic layout is setup tag-wise. One wrapper div, 3 column divs, and a div or two within each column for the panels.
I made a lil example about how you could try to start achieving that kind of layout: http://jsfiddle.net/steweb/A77gy/
Working with widths is pretty simple because you set floating columns, % widths/margins and opla' you get the fluid width layout.
Working with heights is very hard I think, because if you want a 'fluid' behavior that also affects heights, without using abs positioning (good for setting % height, but you lose the % width powerful), you should do something with JS too (even if I would avoid to do something that concerns the pure layout by JS) - I apologize for this complicated sentence :D.
By dealing with this kinds of layout 'problems' you will also notice that some browsers (...IE?...) sometimes behave in a weird way... so you will need some kinds of tricks to make everything working in EVERY browser (this is the main challenge IMO)
markup:
<div id="header">
link 1
|
link 2
|
link 3
|
link 4
<!-- or a <ul> -->
</div>
<div class="column" id="first-column">
<div class="window" id="window-1"></div>
<div class="window" id="window-2"></div>
</div>
<div class="column" id="second-column">
<div class="window" id="window-3"></div>
</div>
<div class="column" id="third-column">
<div class="window" id="window-4"></div>
</div>
css:
body, html{
height:100%;
}
#header{
width:100%;
height:30px;
background:black;
}
.column{
float:left;
margin:1%
}
#first-column{
width:10%;
}
#second-column{
width:30%;
}
#third-column{
width:50%;
}
.window{
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
border:1px solid #CECECE;
width:100%;
}
#window-1{
height:100px;
}
#window-2{
margin-top:10px;
height:200px;
}
#window-3{
height:310px;
}
#window-4{
height:310px;
}
I'm creating a calendar and need to replicate the behaviour I would get with
overflow-x:visible;
overflow-y:hidden;
for browsers that don't support these css attributes. Is there some kind of workaround I can do? I don't just want to compromise and add in overflow:hidden for those browsers, since the client really wants this feature. Does anyone have any good ideas?
Many thanks.
Here is someone who asks roughly the same question (overflow-x visible and -y hidden).
http://forums.devnetwork.net/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=116457
Someone named Weirdan says I'd say there's isn't any expected behavior because such style is unavoidably internally inconsistent, and shows an example where it is not clear (says Weirdan) whether the area to the southeast should be hidden or shown.
S/he also says that the effect you want is easily achieved by wrapping the outer div with another div and setting overflow-y on that div to hidden, and shows this example (I hope it's OK that I copy it to here?).
<style type="text/css">
#outer-wrapper {
overflow-y:hidden;
}
#outer {
width:100px;
height:100px;
background:red;
border:solid red 1px;
overflow:visible;
}
#inner {
width:200px;
height:200px;
background:green;
}
</style>
<div id="outer-wrapper">
<div id="outer">
<div id="inner"></div>
</div>
</div>