I have a page with filters and accordingly to what the user selects, it has to generate a query. I'm using this code:
var riskitem = (from risk in context.RisksList
where risk.ProjectCode == sProjectCode &&
(
(search == "" && status == "" && ispublic == TriState.NA) ||
(search != "" && (
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(risk.Description) && risk.Description.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0) ||
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(risk.Title) && risk.Title.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0) ||
(risk.Probability.HasValue && risk.Probability.Value.ToString().IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0) ||
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(risk.Mitigation) && risk.Mitigation.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0) ||
(!String.IsNullOrEmpty(risk.Observations) && risk.Observations.IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0)
)) ||
(
(status != "" && risk.Status.Value.ToString() == status) ||
(status == "" && search != "" && risk.Status.Value.ToString().IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0)
) ||
(
(ispublic != TriState.NA && ((risk.IsPublic.Value && ispublic == TriState.True) || (!risk.IsPublic.Value && ispublic == TriState.False))) ||
(ispublic == TriState.NA && search != "" && risk.IsPublic.HasValue && risk.IsPublic.Value.ToString().IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) >= 0)
)
)
select risk).Take((pagesize * (pageindex + 1)) + 1);
However Linq-To-Sharepoint doesn't convert most of this to CAML and the list I'm querying has more than 50000 items. It takes about 4-8 seconds to retrieve the items which is not acceptable.
I've been trying to generate a dynamic query but so far I haven't been able to get it to work.
With AND and OR operations to generate the query I could put all those conditions on code and increase performance.
If someone could help I would be appreciated.
I've scrapped using linq to sharepoint for large lists with complex predicate filters. I've had far better performance using unions and/or merging the data from the splistitemcollection results of an SPQuery results.
It looks as though you are duplicating the work of the sharepoint search engine, have you considered if it is possible to replace with something like the keyword or fulltext query classes?
Also, you should be able to eliminate the need to do duplicate evaluation such as checking for empty string AND indexof. i.e... just simply something like
Risk.IsPublic.Value.ToString().IndexOf(search, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) > -1
What is the datatype for IsPublic ? If this is a boolean field you can save yourself some time as well without having to additional conversions.
Related
I'm adding data to Tableview like that.
I would like to export/write these tableview data to txt file for example. I wan't to create event for button.
How could i do that?
lisaTabelisse.setOnMouseClicked(l -> {
if ((eesnimi.getText() == null || eesnimi.getText().trim().isEmpty()) ||
(perenimi.getText() == null || perenimi.getText().trim().isEmpty()) ||
(aadress.getText() == null || aadress.getText().trim().isEmpty()) ||
(email.getText() == null || email.getText().trim().isEmpty()) ||
(telefon.getText() == null || telefon.getText().trim().isEmpty()) ||
(lisaks.getText() == null || lisaks.getText().trim().isEmpty())) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Kõik väljad on kohustuslikud");
} else {
tableView.getItems().addAll(new Sisendid(eesnimi.getText(), perenimi.getText(), aadress.getText(),
email.getText(), telefon.getText(), lisaks.getText()));
}
});
Thank you for reply.
I managed to add data to txt file. Just a for loop worked well.
I noticed one other moment.
Every time i insert new data, previous rows will be changed according to new data.
So everything will be same in the end.
How should i change that.
I've looked around for a while for an answer but no one has one and everyone keeps saying it's how it's supposed to work.
I need to render an & (ampersand) as plain javascript code. Not as a string.
if (#(Model.Month == null ? "now.getMonth() == tooltipItems[0].index" : "now.getMonth() == tooltipItems[0].index && now.getDay() == tooltipItems[0].index") && now.getFullYear() == $('#DistinctYears').val()) {
//
} else {
//
}
I need this section:
"now.getMonth() == tooltipItems[0].index && now.getDay() == tooltipItems[0].index"
To render as plain javascript code but when it renders, the ampersands automatically get converted to &&
Surround the entire ternary expression with Html.Raw():
#Html.Raw(Model.Month == null ? "now.getMonth() == tooltipItems[0].index" : "now.getMonth() == " + (Model.Month - 1) + " && now.getDate() == (tooltipItems[0].index + 1)")
This article stated that "[writeFields] is now deprecated".
Additionally, I cannot find any documentation for writeFields, it is not even listed as part of Request in the documentation anymore.
Problem
The problem I am facing with Cloud Firestore Security Rules is that verifying that only particular fields are modified requires massive amounts of conditions.
For example, if I want to verify that the only modified value of a document is cakes, I have to write the following rule:
allow update: if request.resource.data.size() == 20
&& request.resource.data.likes == resource.data.likes
&& request.resource.data.name == resource.data.name
&& request.resource.data.date == resource.data.date
&& request.resource.data.body == resource.data.body
&& request.resource.data.title == resource.data.title
&& request.resource.data.tags == resource.data.tags
&& request.resource.data.comments == resource.data.comments
&& request.resource.data.answers == resource.data.answers
&& request.resource.data.awards == resource.data.awards
&& request.resource.data.image == resource.data.image
&& request.resource.data.link == resource.data.link
&& request.resource.data.format == resource.data.format
&& request.resource.data.type == resource.data.type
&& request.resource.data.user == resource.data.user
&& request.resource.data.views == resource.data.views
&& request.resource.data.reports == resource.data.reports
&& request.resource.data.roles == resource.data.roles
&& request.resource.data.category == resource.data.category
&& request.resource.data.votes == resource.data.votes
&& request.resource.data.cakes is int;
Using writeFields, the exact same rule would have looked like this:
allow update: if request.writeFields.hasOnly(['cakes']) && request.resource.data.cakes is int;
What can I do to decrease the code size of my rules / what is the alternative to writeFields?
Limits
There are two limits mentioned in the documentation that make this problem even worse:
Maximum number of expressions evaluated per request: 1,000
Maximum size of a ruleset: 64 KB
I expect to reach both of these at some point with this limitation.
Yes! There is now a replacement called "Map Diffs". Check this syntax out:
allow update: if request.resource.data.diff(resource.data).affectedKeys().hasOnly(['cakes'])
&& request.resource.data.cakes is int;
Unfortunately, what you're doing right now is currently your best option.
The Firebase rules team is working on a language improvement to make it easier to compare/diff map type objects, which will drastically cut down on the number of expressions it takes to do this sort of thing, but there is no timeline for that right now. Please stay tuned.
I end up writing these helper function:
// returns true if all the fields changed are contained in the array parameter
function onlyAllowedFields(fieldsArray) {
return fieldsArray.toSet().hasAll(request.resource.data.diff(resource.data).affectedKeys());
}
// returns true if none of the fields are changed
function noneOfDisallowedFields(fieldsArray) {
return request.resource.data.diff(resource.data).affectedKeys().hasAny(fieldsArray.toSet()) == false
}
I found more helpful this way instead of using hasOnly() that would require that all fields that could be changed must have been changed.
So I have some code running an IP check to ensure an ADMIN account cannot have access from outside my network.
string strIP = Request.ServerVariables["REMOTE_ADDR"];
if (
(strIP.Substring(0, 9) != "XXX.XX.X.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 10) != "XXX.XX.XX.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX.")
)
{
..// Check user for being an ADMIN // ....
}
This code was working fine for several weeks, but suddenly has started consistently to err out. The error message is:
Exception
Exception Type: System. ArgumentOUtOfRangeException
Exception Message: Index and length must refer to a location within the string. Parameter name: length.
When I remove the line with "Substring(0,10)", everything works. Also, when I change the line "Substring(0,10)" to "Substring(0,9)" and remove the last ".", everything works.
Can anyone tell me why or perhaps instruct on what is being done incorrectly? For the life of me I can't figure out what is going on.
The problem is that strIP doesn't have 10 characters because your configuration changed for some reason. You could do something like:
(strIP.Length >= 9 && strIP.Substring(0, 9) != "XXX.XX.X.")
|| (strIP.Length >= 10 && strIP.Substring(0, 10) != "XXX.XX.XX.")
|| (strIP.Length >= 6 && strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX.")
Notice that the fourth line was a duplicate of the third.
Do not allow an out of bounds error to happen by putting a check for length of strIP before you try to do any of the sub-string comparisons, like this:
if (strIP.Length == 10)
{
if ((strIP.Substring(0, 9) != "XXX.XX.X.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 10) != "XXX.XX.XX.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX.")
&& (strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX."))
{
..// Check user for being an ADMIN // ....
}
}
else
{
// Do something here, error, message to user, deny access, etc.
}
UPDATE:
If you want to only apply checks, based upon the length of the string, then use a switch statement, like this:
switch (strIP.Length)
{
case 6:
if(strIP.Substring(0, 6) != "XX.XX.")
{
// Check user for being an ADMIN
}
break;
case 9:
if(strIP.Substring(0, 9) != "XXX.XX.X.")
{
// Check user for being an ADMIN
}
break;
case 10:
if(strIP.Substring(0, 10) != "XXX.XX.XX.")
{
// Check user for being an ADMIN
}
break;
default:
// IP string is not in format expected, do something here
// Most likely would want to err on the side of caution and deny access
break;
}
I'm having a bit of trouble trying to find if my url parameters exist or not.
I have tried the following:
// doesn't work
(Request.QueryString["showTop"] != "" && Request.QueryString["showTop"] != null)
// doesn't work
(Request.Params["showTop"] != "" && Request.Params["showTop"] != null)
I am trying to find the correct value. The full statement looks like:
showTop = (Request.QueryString["showTop"] != "" &&
Request.QueryString["showTop"] != null) ?
Request.QueryString["showTop"] : (10).ToString();
Which works fine, if showTop exists with a value.
This is being done within the view.
Try the following:
showTop = string.IsNullOrEmpty(Request["showTop"]) ? "10" : Request["showTop"];
Assuming you want "showTop"to default to "10".
First check whether QueryString has keys or not by calling this method.
bool qKeys = Request.QueryString.HasKeys();