I am writing an application in Visual Basic 2010 Express.
I have two objects of a class from a driver DLL that is provided to me. They have some of their own subroutines that I'd like to call, and I'd like an easy way to toggle between them.
Instead of writing a whole bunch of code like this:
selected = x
...
If selected = x then
DriverInstanceX.DoSomething()
Else If Selected = y then
DriverInstanceY.DoSomething()
Endif
I would like to do this:
Bob = (some reference to X - NOT a copy of X!)
...
Bob.DoSomething()
Bob.DoSomethingElse()
I'm sure this is really easy - I am just not sure where to look.
Thanks for any help!
' set the object based on what was selected first, here...
Dim selectedDriverInstance = new DriverObject
' now you can run the method without checking for each as selected was already set.
selectedDriverInstance.DoSometng()
Cool?
Of course, DriverObject can be the instance x or instance y depending on what u set it to, do the assignment there and set it to our fixed name object selectedDriverInstance. this way you can do everything using selectedDriverInstance as it is set to either instance x or instance y already, get me?
Related
I'm switching over to using the Auto-IVC component as opposed to the IndepVar component. I'd like to be able to get a list of the promoted output names of the Auto-IVC component, so I can then use them to go and pull the appropriate value out of a configuration file and set the values that way. This will get rid of some boilerplate.
p.model._auto_ivc.list_outputs()
returns an empty list. It seems that p.model__dict__ has this information encoded in it, but I don't know exactly what is going on there so I am wondering if there is an easier way to do it.
To avoid confusion from future readers, I assume you meant that you wanted the promoted input names for the variables connected to the auto_ivc outputs.
We don't have a built-in function to do this, but you could do it with a bit of code like this:
seen = set()
for n in p.model._inputs:
src = p.model.get_source(n)
if src.startswith('_auto_ivc.') and src not in seen:
print(src, p.model._var_allprocs_abs2prom['input'][n])
seen.add(src)
assuming 'p' is the name of your Problem instance.
The code above just prints each auto_ivc output name followed by the promoted input it's connected to.
Here's an example of the output when run on one of our simple test cases:
_auto_ivc.v0 par.x
For a project I am creating different layers which should all be written into one geopackage.
I am using QGIS 3.16.1 and the Python console inside QGIS which runs on Python 3.7
I tried many things but cannot figure out how to do this. This is what I used so far.
vl = QgsVectorLayer("Point", "points1", "memory")
vl2 = QgsVectorLayer("Point", "points2", "memory")
pr = vl.dataProvider()
pr.addAttributes([QgsField("DayID", QVariant.Int), QgsField("distance", QVariant.Double)])
vl.updateFields()
f = QgsFeature()
for x in range(len(tag_temp)):
f.setGeometry(QgsGeometry.fromPointXY(QgsPointXY(lon[x],lat[x])))
f.setAttributes([dayID[x], distance[x]])
pr.addFeature(f)
vl.updateExtents()
# I'll do the same for vl2 but with other data
uri ="D:/Documents/QGIS/test.gpkg"
options = QgsVectorFileWriter.SaveVectorOptions()
context = QgsProject.instance().transformContext()
QgsVectorFileWriter.writeAsVectorFormatV2(vl1,uri,context,options)
QgsVectorFileWriter.writeAsVectorFormatV2(vl2,uri,context,options)
Problem is that the in the 'test.gpkg' a layer is created called 'test' and not 'points1' or 'points2'.
And the second QgsVectorFileWriter.writeAsVectorFormatV2() also overwrites the output of the first one instead of appending the layer into the existing geopackage.
I also tried to create single .geopackages and then use 'Package Layers' processing tool (processing.run("native:package") to merge all layers into one geopackage, but then the attributes types are all converted into strings unfortunately.
Any help is much appreciated. Many thanks in advance.
You need to change the SaveVectorOptions, in particular the mode of actionOnExistingFile after creating the gpkg file :
options = QgsVectorFileWriter.SaveVectorOptions()
#options.driverName = "GPKG"
options.layerName = v1.name()
QgsVectorFileWriter.writeAsVectorFormatV2(v1,uri,context,options)
#switch mode to append layer instead of overwriting the file
options.actionOnExistingFile = QgsVectorFileWriter.CreateOrOverwriteLayer
options.layerName = v2.name()
QgsVectorFileWriter.writeAsVectorFormatV2(v2,uri,context,options)
The documentation is here : SaveVectorOptions
I also tried to create single .geopackages and then use 'Package Layers' processing tool (processing.run("native:package") to merge all layers into one geopackage, but then the attributes types are all converted into strings unfortunately.
This is definitively the recommended way, please consider reporting the bug
I have a unit test for a function that adds data (untransformed) to the database. The data to insert is given to the create function.
Do I use the input data in my asserts or is it better to specify the data that I’m asserting?
For eample:
$personRequest = [
'name'=>'John',
'age'=>21,
];
$id = savePerson($personRequest);
$personFromDb = getPersonById($id);
$this->assertEquals($personRequest['name'], $personFromDb['name']);
$this->assertEquals($personRequest['age'], $personFromDb['age']);
Or
$id = savePerson([
'name'=>'John',
'age'=>21,
]);
$personFromDb = getPersonById($id);
$this->assertEquals('John', $personFromDb['name']);
$this->assertEquals(21, $personFromDb['age']);
I think 1st option is better. Your input data may change in future and if you go by 2nd option, you will have to change assertion data everytime.
2nd option is useful, when your output is going to be same irrespective of your input data.
I got an answer from Adam Wathan by e-mail. (i took his test driven laravel course and noticed he uses the 'specify' option)
I think it's just personal preference, I like to be able to visually
skim and see "ok this specific string appears here in the output and
here in the input", vs. trying to avoid duplication by storing things
in variables." Nothing wrong with either approach in my opinion!
So i can't choose a correct answer.
I'm trying to populate a list with a dataset and set the selected option with a helper function that compares the current data with another object's data (the 2 objects are linked)
I made the same type of list population with static variables:
Jade-
select(name='status')
option(value='Newly Acquired' selected='{{isCurrentState "Newly Acquired"}}') Newly Acquired
option(value='Currently In Use' selected='{{isCurrentState "Currently In Use"}}') Currently In Use
option(value='Not In Use' selected='{{isCurrentState "Not In Use"}}') Not In Use
option(value='In Storage' selected='{{isCurrentState "In Storage"}}') In Storage
Coffeescript-
"isCurrentState" : (state) ->
return #status == state
This uses a helper isCurrentState to match a given parameter to the same object that my other code is linked to so I know that part works
The code I'm trying to get to work is :
Jade-
select.loca(name='location')
each locations
option(value='#{siteName}' selected='{{isCurrentLocation {{siteName}} }}') #{siteName}
Coffeescript-
"isCurrentLocation": (location) ->
return #locate == location
All the other parts are functioning 100%, but the selected part is not
I've also tried changing the way I entered the selected='' part in a manner of ways such as:
selected='{{isCurrentLocation "#{siteName}" }}'
selected='{{isCurrentLocation "#{siteName} }}'
selected='{{isCurrentLocation {{siteName}} }}'
selected='#{isCurrentLocation "{{siteName}}" }'
selected='#{isCurrentLocation {{siteName}} }'
selected='#{isCurrentLocation #{siteName} }'
Is what I'm trying to do even possible?
Is there a better way of achieving this?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
UPDATE:
Thanks #david-weldon for the quick reply, i've tried this out a bit and realised that I wasn't exactly clear in what I was trying to accomplish in my question.
I have a template "update_building" created with a parameter( a buidling object) with a number of attributes, one of which is "locate".
Locations is another object with a number of attributes as well, one of which is "siteName". One of the siteName == locate and thus i need to pass in the siteName from locations to match it to the current building's locate attribute
Though it doesn't work in the context I want to use it definitely pointed me in a direction I didn't think of. I am looking into moving the parent template(The building) date context as a parameter into the locations template and using it from within the locations template. This is easily fixable in normal HTML spacebars with:
{{>locations parentDataContext/variable}}
Something like that in jade would easily solve this
Short answer
selected='{{isCurrentLocation siteName}}'
Long answer
You don't really need to pass the current location because the helper should know it's own context. Here's a simple (tested) example:
jade
template(name='myTemplate')
select.location(name='location')
each locations
option(value=this selected=isCurrentLocation) #{this}
coffee
LOCATIONS = [
'Newly Acquired'
'Currently In Use'
'Not In Use'
'In Storage'
]
Template.myTemplate.helpers
locations: LOCATIONS
isCurrentLocation: ->
#toString() is Template.instance().location.get()
Template.myTemplate.onCreated ->
#location = new ReactiveVar LOCATIONS[1]
I looked into the datacontexts some more and ended up making the options that populate the select into a different template and giving that template a helper, accessing the template's parent's data context and using that to determine which location the building had saved in it so that I could set that option to selected
Jade-
template(name="location_building_option")
option(value='#{siteName}' selected='{{isSelected}}') #{siteName}
Coffeescript -
Template.location_building_option.helpers
'isSelected': ->
parent = Template.parentData(1)
buildSite = parent.locate
return #siteName == buildSite
Thanks #david-weldon, Your answer helped me immensely to head in the right direction
I've an external app with a model like this:
class Society(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
class Office(models.Model):
society = models.ForeignKey(Society)
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
I need, everytime that an Office is created and saved, autocreate a page with the name of the office.
I was thinking at a def save-model on the Office(models.Model), in whick insert a cms.api create_page,
but I'm not able to make work it. Anyone could help me?
Like this maybe?
import cms
parent_page = Page.objects.get(pk=1) # you will want something more valid than this
approval_user = User.objects.get(pk=1) # again, just selecting the first user,
# do something better
# like maybe the current request.user?
try:
page = create_page(title=office.name,
template=cms.constants.TEMPLATE_INHERITANCE_MAGIC,
language='en',
parent=parent_page,
published=True) # May not want to auto publish?
except Exception, err:
pass
# need some handling if the creation fails