Why would System.Type.GetType("Xyz") return null if typeof(Xyz) exists? - assemblies

I have come across a strange behaviour in my (huge) .NET 4 project. At some point in the code, I am referring to a fully qualified type, say:
System.Type type = typeof (Foo.Bar.Xyz);
later on, I do this:
System.Type type = System.Type.GetType ("Foo.Bar.Xyz");
and I get back null. I cannot make sense of why this is happening, because my type name is correct, and I have checked with other types and they get resolved properly. Moreover, the following LINQ query finds the type:
var types = from assembly in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies ()
from assemblyType in assembly.GetTypes ()
where assemblyType.FullName == typeName
select assemblyType;
System.Type type = types.FirstOrDefault ();
Are there any reasons why System.Type.GetType could fail?
I have finally had to resort to this piece of code instead of GetType:
System.Type MyGetType(string typeName)
{
System.Type type = System.Type.GetType (typeName);
if (type == null)
{
var types = from assembly in System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies ()
from assemblyType in assembly.GetTypes ()
where assemblyType.FullName == typeName
select assemblyType;
type = types.FirstOrDefault ();
}
return type;
}

If you just give a class name (which does need to be fully-qualified in terms of the namespace, of course) Type.GetType(string) will only look in the currently executing assembly and mscorlib. If you want to get types from any other assembly, you need to specify the absolutely full name including the assembly information. As François says, Type.AssemblyQualifiedName is a good way of seeing this. Here's an example:
using System;
using System.Windows.Forms;
class Test
{
static void Main()
{
string name = typeof(Form).AssemblyQualifiedName;
Console.WriteLine(name);
Type type = Type.GetType(name);
Console.WriteLine(type);
}
}
Output:
System.Windows.Forms.Form, System.Windows.Forms, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089
System.Windows.Forms.Form
Note that if you're using a strongly named assembly (like Form in this case) you must include all the assembly information - versioning, public key token etc.
If you're using a non-strongly-named assembly, it's easier - something like:
Foo.Bar.Baz, MyCompany.MyAssembly
for a type called Baz in namespace Foo.Bar, in assembly MyCompany.MyAssembly. Note the absence of ".dll" at the end - that's part of the filename, but not the assembly name.
You should also be aware of the differences between C# names and CLR names for things like nested classes and generics. For example, typeof(List<>.Enumerator) has a name of System.Collections.Generic.List`1+Enumerator[T]. The generics side is tricky to work out, but the nested type bit is easy - it's just represented with a "+" instead of the "." you'd use in C#.

As far as I know GetType looks for "Xyz" in an assembly named Foo.Bar.dll and I'm assuming it doesn't exist.
GetType relies on your passing the exact path to Xyz in the assembly.
Assembly and namespace don't have to be related.
Try System.Type type = System.Type.GetType(typeof(Foo.Bar.Xyz).AssemblyQualifiedName) and see if that works.
The reason you find it with your LINQ example is that you are using GetAssemblies which obtains the assemblies that have been loaded into the current execution context and thus has the details it needs to find all the types within the assemblies.

From the MSDN documentation (my emphasis):
If typeName includes the namespace but not the assembly name, this method searches only the calling object's assembly and Mscorlib.dll, in that order. If typeName is fully qualified with the partial or complete assembly name, this method searches in the specified assembly. If the assembly has a strong name, a complete assembly name is required.

I just stumbled upon a similar problem and want to leave this here
First of all your can specify the AssemblyName in the string
var type = System.Type.GetType("Foo.Bar.Xyz, Assembly.Name");
However this only works for assemblies without a strong name. The explaination is already in Simons answer If the assembly has a strong name, a complete assembly name is required.
My problem was I had to resolve a System.Dictionary<?,?> from a string at runtime. For a Dictionary<int, string> this might be easy but what about a Dictionary<int, Image>?
this would result in
var typeName = "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.Int32, [System.Drawing.Image, System.Drawing, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]";
But I don't want to write the strong name. Especially because I don't want to include the versions since I am planning to target multiple frameworks with my code.
So here is my solution
privat statice void Main()
{
var typeName = "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.Int32, [System.Drawing.Image, System.Drawing]]";
var type = Type.GetType(typeName, ResolveAssembly, ResolveType);
}
private static Assembly ResolveAssembly(AssemblyName assemblyName)
{
if (assemblyName.Name.Equals(assemblyName.FullName))
return Assembly.LoadWithPartialName(assemblyName.Name);
return Assembly.Load(assemblyName);
}
private static Type ResolveType(Assembly assembly, string typeName, bool ignoreCase)
{
return assembly != null
? assembly.GetType(typeName, false, ignoreCase)
: Type.GetType(typeName, false, ignoreCase);
}
Type.GetType(...) has an overload which acceps a func for assembly and type resolving which in neat. Assembly.LoadWithPartialName is deprecated but if it's dropped in the future I could think of an replacement (iterate all assemblies in the current AppDomain and compare the partial names).

Related

Refer to ViewModels and Views which are in separate Portable Class Library project

Is it possible to refer to Viewmodels which are in a separate portable class library and Views which are in a different portable class library?
My project structure is as follows:
SampleApp (Portable) -> Views -> SecondPage.xaml
SampleApp(Droid)
TestVM (Class Library Project) -> ViewModels -> SecondPageViewModel
In App.cs, I registered the page as follows
Container.RegisterTypeForNavigation<SecondPage, TestVM.ViewModels.SecondPageViewModel>();
It navigated to SecondPage but the constructor, INavigationAware interface methods didnt get called and mvvm bindings didnt work.
So then I wanted to try solution as explained here Getting Started with Prism’s new ViewModelLocator
I have overridden ConfigureViewModelLocator
protected override void ConfigureViewModelLocator()
{
base.ConfigureViewModelLocator();
ViewModelLocationProvider.SetDefaultViewTypeToViewModelTypeResolver((viewType) =>
{
var viewName = viewType.FullName;
var viewAssemblyName = viewType.GetTypeInfo().Assembly.FullName;
var viewModelName = String.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0}ViewModel, {1}", viewName, viewAssemblyName);
return Type.GetType(viewModelName);
});
}
But how do I refer to the assembly where my viewmodels are located?
You can of course override the default configuration for the ViewModel Location Provider. A simpler and faster method however is to use the View/ViewModel registration extension. Just like you can do:
Container.RegisterTypeForNavigation<ViewA>()
you can also do:
Container.RegisterTypeForNavigation<ViewA,ViewAViewModel>()
The second method removes the need to locate the ViewModel through reflection which can provide slightly better performance. Because you're providing the ViewModel you do not need to worry about what assembly the ViewModel is in, or if you're following the proper conventions.
In response to your comment:
viewModelName: SampleApp.Views.SecondPageViewModel, SampleApp, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null
adapt var viewModelName = String.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0}ViewModel, {1}", viewName, viewAssemblyName); so that it produces your actual view model name:
TestVM.ViewModels.SecondPageViewModel, TestVM, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null
Something along the lines of
var viewModelName = $"{viewName.Replace("SampleApp","TestVM")}ViewModel, {viewAssemblyName.Replace("SampleApp","TestVM").Replace("Views","ViewModels")}";

Reflection in Portable class library

I want to dynamically load a dll in a portable class library. A code equivalent to that posted below. "AssemblyName.GetAssemblyName" does not seem to be supported in a portable class library. I need an equivalent code to the below that loads assembly based on name and path. I do not know the name of the assembly at compile time.
public static object GetAssembly(string assemblyPath, string typeName)
{
AssemblyName assamblyName = AssemblyName.GetAssemblyName(assemblyPath);
Assembly assembly = Assembly.Load(assamblyName);
Type type = assembly.GetType(typeName);
object instanceOfMyType = Activator.CreateInstance(type);
return instanceOfMyType;
}

Ienumerable of T, T is only available at runtime

I have a method with this signature
public IEnumerable<T> GetAll<T>() where T : new()
{
// Orm Lite Version
return Connection.LoadSelect<T>();
}
At compile time I don't know the Type T. I only know the class name at runtime is it possible to call this method using reflection with something like this?
string TargetTBLName = ...;//TargetTBLName get's it's value at runtime
Type ParentTableClass = Type.GetType(TargetTBLName);
IEnumerable<Type.GetType(TargetTBLName)> test = Repository.GetAll<Type.GetType(TargetTBLName)>();
Any Ideas?
I'd give a Dynamitey library a go. You can do that in many different ways, but I prefer this one because of its simplicity. You can find it here.
var name = InvokeMemberName.Create;
var test = Dynamic.InvokeMember(Repository, name("GetAll", new[]{ParentTableClass }));
foreach(var obj in test)
{
obj.SomeMethodFromMyType();
}
Keep in mind, that if Repository is static, than you have to tweak it a bit to use static invocation context (look up the link).
Now you have a test object, which is a dynamic - you can use it with duck typing (which has some implications on speed, for example), but in general you can do whatever you want to do with a normal IEnumerable<YourType>.
If you want to use reflection:
MethodInfo getAll= typeof(Repository).GetMethod("GetAll");
MethodInfo getAllGeneric= getAll.MakeGenericMethod(ParentTableClass);
object result = getAllGeneric.Invoke(this, null);
//or null, null is Repository is static
var finalObject = result as IEnumerable;
Mind that since this ParentTableClass is an unknown during compilation, you won't have access to anything that the actual type provides - unless you use dynamic approach.

Getting Information about a assembly which is present in Solution

Scenario: I want to load a assembly at run time which is present in Solution.
The belo code will not work as it is not present in Cuurent App Domain.
Assembly[] assemblies = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies();
Also if i will search in referenced assemblies, then also it can not be found as it is not referenced. So the below code will also not work:
public static IEnumerable<Assembly> GetAssemblies()
{
var list = new List<string>();
var stack = new Stack<Assembly>();
stack.Push(Assembly.GetEntryAssembly());
do
{
var asm = stack.Pop();
yield return asm;
foreach (var reference in asm.GetReferencedAssemblies())
if (!list.Contains(reference.FullName))
{
stack.Push(Assembly.Load(reference));
list.Add(reference.FullName);
}
}
while (stack.Count > 0);
}
Do you guyz have some suggestion ?
Sign your assembly, then in your app.config, specify the fully qualified assembly name. Call Assembly.Load(string), passing the assembly name from your app.config.
NOTE: The assembly you are attempting to load must be in a location where the runtime can find it. Your best bet is either to put it into the Global Assembly Cache, or make sure it is in the same folder as your executing assembly.

How do I create an instance of a class in an ASP.NET application

How do you go about creating an instance of an object when given the class name as a string in an ASP.NET v2 application? For example, I've got a class called SystemLog defined in the app_code section of the application. The class is defined within the Reports namespace. To create an instance of the object, I do something like this:
Dim MyObject As New Global.Reports.SystemLog
However, I want to create this object using a string to define the type. The type name is stored in a SQL database as a string. I thinks it's probably something to do with Activator.CreateInstance(AssemblyName, TypeName) but what I don't know is what to pass in those strings. What is the assembly name of an ASP.NET web app?
Help!
Thanks, Rob.
PS. I don't want a hard coded Select statement :-)
string typeName = "Your Type Name Here";
Type t = Type.GetType(typeName);
object o = Activator.CreateInstance(t);
This will give you an instanciated type. If will be up to you to cast it to the correct type and call your appropriate methods.
If you need to create a type that doesn't have a parameterless constructor there is an overload on CreateInstance that takes a params of objects to pass to a constructor. More info at this MSDN article.
The following is able to create type, even if it's from another assembly:
public object CreateInstance(string typeName) {
var type = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.SelectMany(a => a.GetTypes())
.FirstOrDefault(t => t.FullName == typeName);
return type.CreateInstance();
}
You can use this to get it from a particular assembly:
Assembly assembly = Assembly.Load("myAssembly");
Type ObjectType = assembly.GetType("Type name here");
then.....object o = Activator.CreateInstance(ObjectType);

Resources