I have a div with position:fixed that is my container div for some menus. I've set it to top:0px, bottom:0px to always fill the viewport. Inside that div I want to have 2 other divs, the lower one of which contains lots of lines and has overflow:auto. I would expect that it would be contained within the container div, but if there are too many lines it simply expands outside the fixed div. Below is my code and a screenshot to clarify:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>MyPlan</title>
<meta name="X-UA-COMPATIBLE" value="IE=8" />
<style type="text/css">
#outerfixed { position:fixed; width:200px; background-color:blue; padding:5px; top:0px; bottom:30px;}
#innerstatic1 { width:100%; background-color:yellow; height:100px;}
#innerstatic2 { overflow:auto; background-color:red; width:100%;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="outerfixed">
<h3>OUTERFIXED</h3>
<div id="innerstatic1">
<h3>INNERSTATIC1</h3>
</div>
<div id="innerstatic2">
<h3>INNERSTATIC2</h3>
line<br />
...lots of lines
line<br />
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Is there any way for me to do this? Again, I want #innerstatic2 to be properly contained within #outerfixed and get scrollbars if it gets bigger than the space it has inside #outerfixed.
I know there are some possibilites to hack around this by also fixing #innerstatic2, but I would really like it to be within the flow inside #outerfixed if possible, so that if I move #outerfixed somewhere, the inner element would come with it.
EDIT: I know I can set overflow:auto on the #outerfixed and get a scrollbar on the whole thing, but I specifically want a scrollbar just on #innerstatic2, it is a grid and I want to scroll just the grid.
Anyone? Possible?
There's a two-step solution for this, but it comes at something of a cost:
Add overflow-y: scroll; to the css for #innerstatic2.
define a height (or max-height) for #innerstatic2, otherwise it won't overflow, it'll just keep increasing its height (the default for a div is height: auto).
Edited because I just can't stop myself, sometimes.
I've posted a demo on jsbin to show a jQuery implementation of this, which will calculate a height for you (it's not generalised, so it'll only work with your current html).
(function($) {
$.fn.innerstaticHeight = function() {
var heightOfOuterfixed = $('#outerfixed').height(),
offset = $('#innerstatic2').offset(),
topOfInnerstatic2 = offset.top,
potentialHeight = heightOfOuterfixed - topOfInnerstatic2;
$('#innerstatic2').css('height',potentialHeight);
}
})(jQuery);
$(document).ready(
function() {
$('#innerstatic2').innerstaticHeight();
}
);
I solved it by giving absolute position to the ul and height 100%
ul {
overflow-y: scroll;
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
}
check out this FIDDLE
overflow-y:scroll;
And add this for iOS devices. It does give a better scroll using touch. The overflow-y needs to be scroll! for secure reasons. auto wont work for some people. or at least thats what i heard.
-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;
you should set height for outerfixed and max-height for innerstatic2
see this might be helpful DEMO
It is the container div who has to be with the overflow:auto attribute. In this case, the #outerfixed div
The only way I figure, is to set innerstatic2 to absolute position (so you can use top and bottom to size it in relation to outerfixed), then inside innerstatic2 create another div where you put your text in. Then you give innerstatic2 the "overflow: auto;" indication. The drawback of this method, that innerstatic2 does not move down, when innerstatic1 grows, since it has to be position absolutely. If it needs to move, it must be "position: relative", but then you need to set a fixed height for it. So either way you have to settle for a compromise.
Once all browsers support the newer CSS3 features, like the calculation support, there will be better options to do this, without these drawbacks.
Not ideal, but this should get you 90% of they way
<div style="position:fixed; bottom:1px; left:5em; height: 20em; width:20em; background-color:blue;">
<div style ="width:15em; background-color: green;">
Title
</div>
<div style ="background-color:yellow; max-height:80%; width:15em; overflow:auto;">
<div style="height:100em; background-color:red; width:10em;">
scroll<br/>
scroll<br/>
scroll<br/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
So I couldn't do with the fixed position but I got the desired effect with the position as relative.
Try this
<div class="parent" style = "overflow: scroll; position: relative; width: content-box"">
<div class="scrollable-child" >
//Your content here
</div>
</div>
I used this in one of my vuejs projects
<template>
<v-flex class=" d-flex flex-column " style="overflow: scroll; position: relative; width: content-box">
//FIXED HEAD
<v-flex class="pt-10" style="position: fixed; background-color: black;width: 25.2em;z-index: 1;border-radius: 20px 20px 0 0">
<TextView class="mx-4" text="Thur 28, 2021" size="24" bold :color="colors.primaryText"/>
<TextView :text="`${order.totalOrder()} Items`" size="24" bold :color="colors.primaryText" class="my-2 mx-4"/>
<v-divider dark style="height: 5px" class="max-4" />
</v-flex>
//SCROLABLE LIST ITEMS
<v-flex class=" mx-4 d-flex flex-column justify-end " style="margin-top: 100px;padding-bottom: 100px; padding-top: 50px">
<!-- <TextView :text="receipt" :color="colors.primaryText"/>-->
<ProductComponent type="cartItem" v-for="(product,index) in order.products" :key="`order_item_${index}`" :product="product" :invert-theme="true" #onAdd="addOneMore(index)" #onRemove="removeOne(index)" />
</v-flex>
//BOTTOM FIXED BTN
<v-flex class="d-flex flex-column justify-end mb-2 xs12 mx-4 " style="max-height: 100px; position: fixed; bottom: 30px; width: 23em" >
<v-btn block ref="renderBtn" #click="renderReceipt()" depressed min-height="60" style="border-radius: 20px">
<TextView text="Order" bold/>
</v-btn>
</v-flex>
</v-flex>
</template>
Related
I have a bootstrap column defined as follows:
<div class="col-md-4 limit">
<img id="myImage" src="" class="img-responsive"/>
</div>
<style>
.limit {
max-height:500px;
overflow:hidden;
}
</style>
The source of the image is obtained programatically so I do not know in advance the height or width of my image. What I want to do is that the image in this column whose height is limited appear completely inside of the div. With the img-responsive class I have achieved the image to horizontally fill my column, however, as this class also sets the height to auto, most of the time this causes the image to overflow and be hidden. I do not want my image to overflow in any way.
So, lets say that my column measures:
Width: 300px (defined by bootstrap)
Height: 500px (.limit)
And my image dimensions are:
Width: 600px
Height: 1500px
The current configuration makes the image shrink to 300px x 750px. As its container is set to only 500px, this causes the last 250px to be lost inside the overflow. I would like to image instead to be resized to 200px x 500px in order for it to completely into the containing div
How can I do this?
Thanks!
Try this:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">
<div class="limit">
<img src="images/yourimage.png" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
<style type="text/css">
.limit{
width: 300px;
height: 500px;
max-height: 500px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.limit img{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
</style>
You could try to inherit the height or the width of the parent div (as both would not contain proportions). This could only work if you have the same type of img (all portret or landscape). Other solution is to calculate the dimensions based on the max width/height of the img in your program language. Pick the one that matches the condition (both var <= max value). Then echo the solution in your html.
#Luis Becerril I normally used this plugin with those type of issues. Please try this. If may suit to your requirement. jQuery Image Center
Simplest way in Bootstrap 4
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">
<img src="images/yourimage.png" alt="" class="w-100" />
</div>
</div>
I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>
Please consider the following code:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css">
.section {
display: block;
width: 200px;
border: 1px dashed blue;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.element-left,
.element-right-a,
.element-right-b {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #ccc;
vertical-align: top;
}
.element-right-a,
.element-right-b {
max-width: 100px;
}
.element-right-b {
position: absolute;
left: 100px;
}
</style>
<title>test</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="section">
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right-a">some text</span>
</div>
<div class="section">
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right-a">some more text to force line wrapping</span>
</div>
<div class="section">
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right-b">some text</span>
</div>
<div class="section">
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right-b">some more text to force line wrapping</span>
</div>
<div class="section">
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right-b">some more text to force line wrapping</span>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The element with absolute positioning apparantly makes the containing box "forget" which height he needs.
I need the absolute positioning inside the "section" box, is there another solution for this?
edit
Using tables is not really an option, I need some sort of "multi-level"/"nested" layout, where the second col is always on the same position:
| some text in first column | some text in 2nd column
| some indented text | 2nd column
| also indented | 2nd col
| even more indent | 2nd column with a lot of text that
| makes it wrap
| text | ...
| blah blah | ...
(of course whithout the "|"s)
When you use position:absolute;, the element is taken out of the normal page flow. Therefore it no longer affects the layout of its container element. So the container element does not take into account its height, so if there's nothing else to set the height, then the container will be zero height.
Additionally, setting display:inline-block; does not make any sense for an element that is position:absolute;. Again, this is because absolute positioning takes the element out of the page flow. This is at odds with inline-block, which only exists to affect how the element fits into the page flow. All elements that are position:absolute; are automatically treated as display:block, since that's the only logical display mode for absolute positioning.
If you need absolute positioning, then the only solution to your height problem is to set the height of the container box.
However, I suspect that you could do without the absolute positioning.
It looks like what you're trying to do is position the second <span> in each block to a fixed position in the block, so that they line up.
This is a classic CSS problem. In the "bad-old-days", web designers would have done it using a table, with fixed widths on the table cells. This obviously isn't the answer for today's web designers, but it is something that causes a lot of questions.
There are a number of ways to do it using CSS.
The easiest is to set both the <span> elements to display:inline-block;, and give them both a fixed width.
eg:
<div class='section'>
<span class="element-left">some text</span>
<span class="element-right">some text</span>
</div>
with the following CSS:
.section span {display:inline-block;}
.element-left {width:200px;}
.element-right {width:150px;}
[EDIT]after question has been updated
Here's how I would achieve what you're asking now:
<div class='section'>
<span class="element-left"><span class='indent-0'>some text</span></span>
<span class="element-right">some text</span>
</div>
<div class='section'>
<span class="element-left"><span class='indent-1'>some text</span></span>
<span class="element-right">some text</span>
</div>
<div class='section'>
<span class="element-left"><span class='indent-2'>some text</span></span>
<span class="element-right">some text</span>
</div>
with the following CSS:
.section span {display:inline-block;}
.element-left {width:200px;}
.indent-1 {padding:10px;}
.indent-2 {padding:20px;}
.element-right {width:150px;}
A small amount of extra markup, but it does achieve the effect you want.
No.
You could position absolutely then have a copy of the element inside the section box with visible: none but absolute positioning by definition makes it a "floating" element that doesn't interact with elements above it.
Assuming your page layout is fixed you could use padding-left: #px; to achieve your goal, as I don't think relative positioning is what you want.
Alternatively, you could use display: table-* to force it to retain a stricter form without affecting the document structure as shown here
However depending on whether you want the cells to be fluid you may need to alter the .section divs into display: table-row if you don't like a predetermined width setup and want the separate .section's to line up.
This can in fact be done easily and simply with divs. You just need to place a div with position:relative inside the inline or block display div. Set its width and height to the same as the containing div. You will then find you can position another div absolutely inside it.
I have a login form on my website that displays when a user clicks a button. It is a div that floats over other content. It only takes up a small portion of the page (directly below the sign in link).
It all works fine apart from one small thing. It displays aligned to the left of the sign in link (i attempted a diagram below).
|sign in|
|sign in stuff here|
I actually want it to look like this (align to the right of the sign in link):
|sign
in|
|sign in stuff here|
This is my HTML:
<div class="clear">
<a class="button" id="SignInBtn" href="#" onclick="toggleSignInBox(); return false;"><span id="spanSignIn">Sign In / Register <img src="../../Content/shared/arrow_down.png" border="0" /></span></a>
</div>
<div id="signinbox" style="display:none;">
<p>Who would you like to sign in with?</p>
<p>Google</p>
<p>Yahoo</p>
<p>Other</p>
</div>
And the CSS for the sign in box:
signinbox {background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px; z-index:1; position:
absolute; top:66px; }
Is it possible to do this in just CSS?
Thanks
Wrap the signin info inside another div and call it inner-signin then position that relative to the absolute positioned outter div. You may also have to set the width on the absolute positioned outter div.
div.inner-signinbox {
position: relative;
right: 20px;
}
signinbox {
width: 250px; //ADD A WIDTH
background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px;
z-index:1;
position: absolute;
top:66px;
}
If that does not work, why not just add a "left" property to the signingbox to set the horizontal position as well as the vertical. Is there a reason you don't can't absolute position the element with x and y?
I think you may want to try
float: right
or
text-align: right
Put the sign-in stuff inside the div containing the sign-in button.
Make the container position: relative.
Then give the sign-in stuff position: absolute; and right: 0;.
Incidentally, take care here; requiring Javascript merely to log in is pretty rude. A lot of people run NoScript for a variety of reasons.
I have created new div with class "main-pane". You can adjust the position of "signinbox". from the css by changing the value of "right" and "top".
<div class="main-pane">
<div class="clear">
<a class="button" id="SignInBtn" href="#" onclick="toggleSignInBox(); return false;">
<span id="spanSignIn">Sign In / Register <img src="../../Content/shared/arrow_down.png" border="0" /></span>
</a>
</div>
<div id="signinbox" style="display:none;">
<p>Who would you like to sign in with?</p>
<p>Google</p>
<p>Yahoo</p>
<p>Other</p>
</div>
</div>
.main-pane{
position:relative;
}
#signinbox{
width: 250px;
background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px;
z-index:5;
position: absolute;
top:66px;
right:0px;
}
Thanks,
Arun Krishnan
I (absolute beginner) would like to put an image into a box with a little margin around. I tried with padding and so, didn't work. Then I tried this:
<div style="border:1px solid #CC6699; width:11em; height:5.5em;">
<img style="align:center; width:10em; height:5em;" src="path">
</div>
But instead the image gets stuck in the upper left corner.
Couple of ways to do this:
My usual is to set a background image instead.
In your css:
div#img_container {
background: url(images/myImage.png) center center
}
In your html:
<div id="img_container"></div>
Or to just put some padding around it in your CSS
img#myImage {
padding: 20px;
}
and the HTML
<img id="myImage" src="images/myImage.png" />
Try this:
<html>
<head>
<style>
#wrap {
width: 500px;
text-align: center;
}
.pic {
padding: 5px;
border: 2px solid #000;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<img src="logo.gif" class="pic">
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS level 2 doesn't have a property for centering things vertically. There will probably be one in CSS level 3. But even in CSS2 you can center blocks vertically, by combining a few properties. The trick is to specify that the outer block is to be formatted as a table cell, because the contents of a table cell can be centered vertically.
<div style="border:1px solid #CC6699; width:11em; height:5.5em;text-align:center;vertical-align:middle;display:table-cell;">
<img style="width:10em; height:5em;" src="path">
</div>
EDIT
As rpflo suggests, using the background-position property is especially great if the container happens to be smaller than the image. Just remember to include the "background-repeat:none" style if you don't want the image to be tiled.
Use the following small jQuery plugin. It centers the loading image in the middle of the specified container (vertically and horizontally):
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/CenterImage
Demo site:
http://www.demosites.somee.com/demos/centerimage.html
Usage: This plugin positions a loading image centrally over a specified html container (div, span...).
Currently available configuration settings:
{ path: "../Images/ajax.gif", overlayColor: 'green', opacity: 0.2, zindex: 2000, isrelative:true }
Minimum configuration for initialization:
$('.4th').CenterImage({ path: "../Images/ajax-bar.gif" });
Call this, in order to remove the loading image (and the overlay)
$('.4th').CenterImage('remove');