I need some help positioning two nav elements (2 and 3) in a subheader (1). Please, refer to the mockup.
I am really only concerned with positioning here. I want to position the daysNav (2) on the left, and opposite it, the paginationNav (3) on the right. It would also be cool if I didn't have to define a fixed height for the subheader both elements are in; instead, it'd expand and collapse automatically based on the largest height size of either element.
Thanks!
#subhead {overflow:hidden;}
.days-nav {float:left;}
.pagination-nav {float:right;}
<div id="subhead">
<div class="days-nav">
....
</div>
<div class="pagination-nav">
....
</div>
</div>
Related
Hello i used Bootstrap and my 2 div col-md-6 and col-md-6 are not in align in height.
Use this css for the first div.
div.col-md-6 {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align:middle;
}
The simplest way to align vertical align here is to add padding from top in the first div.Your second div have buttons and must be having padding also.
Use min-height for both using class to div. It will solve your query.
eg:
<div class="col-md-6 mycol">
</div>
<div class="col-md-6 mycol">
</div>
style.css
.mycol{
min-height:100px;
}
Without the code, it's hard to find the cause, but I guess your two div are without a css height property and then adapt to their content.
The div on the right contains items that seems to have a padding on top and bottom, resulting in an item with a greatest height than the one on the left.
Your two div are aligned on the top and as it's already been mentionned you need to add the same padding on the left and right cols (I don't like the vertical align answer, as it work in this case, but could cause issues as the cols height could change).
If you dont have a scenario where you text will wrap to the next line, you can use line-height which will be same for both the sections.
I have a problem with positioning divs on my page, I don't want to use top:50px; because I want to have comments in there as well so here comes my question is there any other way to position divs apart from "top" such as display:block in list styles?
thank you so much for any help!
Divs will appear naturally in the DOM flow. They will take up 100% of the width of their parent container by default and will base their height from the non-floated content within them. Use margins to space them out accordingly. By default they have position:static. If you want list styles, use <li> which are display:list-item and not display:block.
Example:
HTML:
<div class="comments"> Some really long comments </div>
<div class="foo"> Something that should appear below the comments </div>
CSS:
.foo {
margin-top : 50px;
}
I would like to know if it is possible for block elements, floated in a direction, not to wrap when they exceed the width of the parent element.
That was the quick and short question, for a little more details and an example, please see below.
I have done some research about this and I have not found a definite answer of whether it is impossible or not and that is why I am looking for a definite answer here of whether this can be done or not.
And in the case that it is not possible, I would appreciate a quick explanation about it so that I can improve my understanding of how CSS works.
Please see the following example.
I have 1 "container" div and inside it I have 3 "row" divs. Let's say the "container" has a hypothetical width of 200px and each "row" has a hypothetical width 100px. These values are not specified in the css, they vary based on the content on the page.
Each "row" is floated to the left so that they appear horizontally.
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
</div>
.row {
float: left;
}
In this case, when the total width of the "rows" exceeds the width of the "container", is it possible for the "rows" not to wrap and to remain in a single horizontal line ?
Just to emphasize, I cannot specify an exact width for the "container" in the css because I want the layout dynamic in order to accommodate different content.
Thank you.
The behaviour you're looking for can be achieved by replacing float: left with display: inline-block, and having white-space: nowrap on the parent container.
See this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/XYzea/1/
Blocks inside the container are aligned side by side (like float) but their parent has no width specified. By the way, the wrapper encloses nested divs. inline-block works in all modern browsers except IE<8 in which is not possible to use that display property with any hack if the element is a natural block element
The only way I can think of is to have the container > wrapper > rows. The container can be dynamic in size and have overflow:hidden while the wrapper will keep the rows in a single line
I have come across a weird problem where floated elements wrap to the next line when there is still plenty of space for them.
I realize this can be solved by removing the < p > or the < div > but I want clean valid code.
Most importantly I want to know why this is happening.
HTML:
<div class="section" style="width: 8000px;">
<div style="" class="bottom">
<div class="img6"></div>
<p class="n">
</p>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
p.n{margin:0;}
div.section{width: 8000px;}
div.section:after{content:"";display:block;clear:left;}
div.section div{float:left;}
a.b{display:block;float:left;}
div.img6{background:#933;width:78px;height:15px;}
a.t1{background:#123;width:74px;height:15px;}
a.t2{background:#456;width:86px;height:15px;}
a.t3{background:#555;width:92px;height:15px;}
a.t4{background:#786;width:126px;height:15px;}
Or you can see it here at JSbin
One interesting thing worth noting is that no matter how many elements you add only the last one is wrapped.
This is happening because the p is not floated left. If you inspect the elements with for example firebug, you will see that the wrapper div.bottom has the exact width of it´s largest, unfloated, block level element, p.n, 378px.
If you float p.n as well, your problem is solved.
The problem is that floating the .bottom div left reduces its width and therefore everything it contains. Try changing div.section div {float: left} to div.bottom div {float:left}.
If you need to float everything, consider floating the external content right and/or specify fixed widths.
In this example http://jsbin.com/inoka4 no width is defined for parent element
if i want to wrap red boxes in container border.
then we can make this in 5 ways
to giving float also to <div class="container">
overflow:hidden or overflow:auto
any clearfix hack to <div class="container clearfix">
Giving height to <div class="container">
adding one more html element (for example another div or <br >) after 2
boxes in <div class="container"> enter code hereand give
clear:leftor:bothor:right` to that
element
my question is any other option except float do not make any changes in <div class="container"> and inner boxes width. but if we use float:left or right to parent box then it's shrink the whole box and inner-boxes as well.
Why?
example link: http://jsbin.com/inoka4
Edit: My question is not about which method i should use, the question is why Float shrink the width
I think the better option is to use overflow:hidden. It is a simple one line change and it works.
div#container {
...
overflow: hidden;
}
Adding extra divs for clear fix requires changes in html for something that is really css. Alternatively, when using clear fix by doing hacks like...
div:after {
content:....
...
}
your css just gets bigger and messier. But it still is a good option (especially when you need to have things that overflow the box)
Reference:
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/css-fudamentals-containing-children/
If you dont' use float on the container it's width is set to 100%. If you add a floating, it only takes the space it needs. In this case the width is calculated by the two divs inside.
To wrap the red boxes in the container border there is not other option except adding float to the container. The only other option would be to absolutely position all the elements but in this case you have to know the width and height of all elements in advance. So that really isn't an option.
So my advice is to use float on the container and add a clear: both on the element after the container.
Your best bet is to always clear your floats. Just after you close the div with class .right, and just before you close the div with class .container, add a new div like this:
<div class="clear"></div>
.clear is just {clear:both;} in your stylesheet. That's what I use all day long, and works like a treat.
The final markup would be:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"> ... </div>
<div class="right"> ... </div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
Edit: Just like your last example, apparently. :)