I'm looking for a way to intercept the ASP.NET processing pipeline in such a way to be able to register event handlers to all events on the Page class. The reason is, I need to maintain a session-bound instance of a component that needs to be notified of all important Page events, starting from OnPreInit.
There's an arbitrary number of Page descendants in the application, which are not under my control. Hence I cannot use an approach like using a single custom descendant, that would notify the session-bound component, as a base class for all pages in the web application.
I don't think creating a custom IHttpHandler or IHttpModule implementation would solve the problem. Also note I cannot create a custom HttpApplication descendant.
It isn't going to be an elegant process to do what you are looking at, especially if you need to handle multiple page events, but in theory it is fully possible from within the Global.asax to setup handlers that you need for each and every page.
The trick here is to add your code to the global.asax in the PreRequestHandlerExecute method, from here you can get access to the HttpApplication object, get access to the page from there, and then register your events. This process is necessary as a new page instance is created for every page that is processed.
Now, other options as you know are far more elegant, but this should get to where you need to be. One helpful tutorial I found although around Themeing shows you the whole process here.
EDIT:
After seeing your comment, yes, you can simply do what I'm stating above, in a custom HttpModule. The article I linked even shows you that process :)
Without knowing more about what you're trying to accomplish it really sounds like you do indeed want to create a http module or handler. You might want to take a look at this question
Related
I've developed an ASP.NET user control, instances of which may appear several times on a single page. Without getting into too much application detail, when the value of any one of the instances changes, all of the other instances need to be refreshed. Currently, in order to accomplish this, I'm requiring that the consuming page implement a couple of methods which iterate through each control on the form, find all the instances of my user control, and call a Refresh method in each one.
Functionally, it's working perfectly. However, I'd like to force the developer of the consuming page to implement these two methods exactly as per my requirements. I could have them implement an interface, but that doesn't provide the functionality in each method. Or I could have them extend an abstract class, but in either case (interface or abstract class) how can I force them to inherit? I need something that will trigger a compiler error if the necessary abstract class is not extended by the consuming page. Any ideas?
Thanks.
You can enforce implementation by using 'abstract methods' in C# or using the 'MustInherit' keyword in VB.NET.
In your particular case, you're expecting the developer to essentially implement 'your' code to force the refreshing and this is something I wouldn't want delegate. Without knowing too many details I would be tempted to utilise the 'Observer' design pattern or possibly the 'Mediator' using either a separate object as a controller or even applying the controlling / publishing code to the webpage. Here's a practical example of the 'Observer' in ASP.NET.
HTH
I am currently working on a project where I want to implement a bit of logic for each .aspx viewed.
My idea was to use an httphandler that will target *.aspx, and in the handler, I would do my bit of logic, such as printing out: This is the xth page you have visited in this session.
I am curious if there are any problems with my idea or is there a more proper solution I am not aware of.
Though I have tried implementing my solution, I run into an infinite loop. After I complete my logic with the handler, I redirect to the same page, but that of course calls the same handler. Is there a way to bypass the handler on the redirect or a specific way to execute the same page without accessing the handler.
Thanks for the help!
~
Are you using a master page? If so, you could simply increase the count of your session variable in the master page's load event and display or write to DB anytime thereafter.
I think possibly you mean an HttpModule - a handler is an endpoint, you wouldn't have much of a page to display as well.
I would have suggested you add such a counter to a root master page. Simple to implement, doesn't have pipeline complications, can encapsulate the output control a well as the logic behind it.
Your handler shouldn't redirect...
Create an HttpModule and put this in the request pipeline. That way your code will execute and add the info you want while letting the page itself execute as necessary.
Or you could just take Matt's idea and put this in the master page. You'll have more control over where your text goes that way AND it's way simpler to implement.
You should do this with an IHttpModule instead. Modules are executed once per request, and their purpose is to something that does not have to do with the rendering of a page, unlike a handler.
Based on my understanding, both of them essentially do the same thing (lets us execute a server side method from JS). Are there any differences?
Also, Ajax Page Methods can be implemented either using JQuery or using ScriptManager. Which one is preferred and why??
**BOUNTY: Adding a bounty to get clear explanation of the question. Thanks **
Fundamentally, Client Callbacks and Ajax Page Methods are doing the same thing. They use an XMLHttpRequest object to send a request (usually asynchronous) to some URL, get the results of that request, then execute a callback method you've provided (callback with a lowercase c), passing the results of the request to your method.
Having said that, there is one big difference between the two approaches:
Page Methods are implemented as static methods on your page. Your page class is just a convenient container for these methods, which could really be hosted anywhere (a web service, a custom HttpHandler, etc.). Since no instance is ever going to be constructed, the client doesn't have to send ViewState data and Asp.Net doesn't have to run through the Page's lifecycle. The flip side is that you don't have access to to your Page class's instance methods and properties. However, in many cases you can work around this by refactoring instance methods into static methods. (See this article for more information.)
Client Callbacks are implemented as instance methods on your page.
They have access to other instance methods on your page, including stuff stored in ViewState. This is convenient, but comes at a price: in order to build the Page instance, the client has to send a relatively large amount of data to the server and has to run through a fair chunk of the page lifecycle. (This article has a nice diagram showing which parts.)
Apart from that, the cost of setting them up varies quite a bit and clients use them differently:
Client Callbacks require a fair amount of idiosyncratic scaffolding
code that is intimately coupled to Asp.Net (as shown in the link above). Given
the much easier alternatives we have now, I'm tempted to say that this technology is obsolete (for new development).
Calling page methods using
ScriptManager requires less setup than Client Callbacks: you just have
to pop a ScriptManager onto your
page, set EnablePageMethods = true,
then access your page methods through the proxy the PageMethods proxy.
Calling page methods using jQuery only requires you to link the jQuery library (and familiarity with jQuery, of course).
I prefer to use jQuery to access page methods because it's independent of the server framework and exposes just the right amount of implementation details, but it's really just a matter of taste. If you go with ScriptManager, its proxy makes the page method calls a little easier on the eyes, which some might consider more important.
I would say there are differences, but would tend to say do it the way you feel more comfortable with.
I have used both approaches, and having jQuery calls from the page is generally faster. I write an ashx handler that does the job the jquery call needs (query the database, process something, etc.) and call it from the page. I wouldn't use an aspx page for a jQuery call, because you're sending a lot of info that you won't need at all. The difference/ benefit of using an Ajax.Net call is that you don't need to build another page to process things, you can use the same page events to do it.
For example, if you need to fill a second drop down list using the selected value on a first one, you could use Ajax.Net to call the SelectedIndexChanged in the page code behind and when it fires go Page_Load, SelectedIndexChanged, Page_PreRender and so on. In the event method you'd query the db and fill the second ddl.
With jQuery that could be a bit different. You make your call to an ashx handler, the handler is just a server method that do the magic and return data in the form you want to have (json, array of strings, xml, etc) and fill the second ddl using javascript.
As I told you before, some people doesn't feel too mcuh comfortable with Client code and tend to do it in the server, but I always say that you need to use the correct tool for the right job, so know your tools and apply them wisely.
If you want to know more about ASP.Net, ASHX handlers and jQuery, you can read a post that I wrote about it.
Hope it helps.-
They are essentially the same. Both:
Setup a webservice for you that the javascript for the control can call.
Provide asynchronous response without involving the page lifecycle.
They are different:
Page Methods simply require that you decorate a static method with an attribute and you are done. The rest of the magic is handled by HTTP Handlers and Modules. Callbacks require you implement a few interfaces and handle the async event handlers yourself. I find them to be a little more of a pain.
Callbacks only work with certain controls. Calling page methods allows you to affect any control through custom javascript. Callbacks have a slight advantage here in that the client-side behavior is already written and fixed. With page methods you have more flexibility, though (the behavior on the client side is determined by you).
There are a few other differences, but these are the basics. My understanding is that client callbacks tend to perform as well as Page methods, but are not used as much becuase they are only available in certain situations, whereas a Page Method is always a valid avenue.
As for the ScriptManager vs. JQuery question, my feeling here is it's about taste more than anything. I like JQuery's syntax and I feel like it performs better, but in the grand scheme of things the most expensive thing is the XmlHttpRequest... after that the execution of the javascript is likely to be insignificant in difference next to that.
I am creating a completely custom (only inherits from WebControl) combobox/dropdownlist search control with autoComplete capabilities.
JQuery handles assigning the onhover and onclick events for list items (divs with strings in them) and handles the web service call for getting the list of items for the matching text.
The server handles the custom attributes and control rendering.
The issue is that I need to implement a property that is similar to SelectedValue so that when a user selects an item from the search results, the value can be used on the server for other processing. I have done days of research but have not found a clear, concise way of handling the post back data.
I did read a blog that mentioned implementing the IPostBackDataHandler interface, but the implementation of RaisePostDataChangeEvent() calls for calling a server method (like SelectedIndexChange) that I am not implementing at the moment.
public void RaisePostDataChangedEvent()
{
this.SelectedIndexChanged(EventArgs.Empty);
}
Now for the question: Does anyone have advice for handling this? Or am I better off simply inheriting from the dropdownlist control and overriding the existing functionality?
I feel like I'm missing a very small piece that will fit this all together.
Have you considered pulling down the source code from Microsoft's source server and taking a look at how they implemented DropDownList? This would allow you so see how they solved the binding and events part of the problem and give you a good idea what it does otherwise. This way you can decide if you want to inherit from it, or if you can just borrow some ideas for how they implemented IPostBackDataHandler.
Since I have no idea what specifically you are doing, I couldn't advise you if you should inherit from dropdown as it is, but based on my impressions of what you are doing I'd say you probably don't.
Also you might look at source from the AjaxControlToolkit as it has a similar component. Again, you can get ideas for how these specific things are handled and adapt them to your own needs.
I have to integrate an existing, simple asp.net web forms app including postbacks etc. into another external site with a jQuery load() call., an app that was intended to be integrated through an iframe. I doubt that's possible without a rewrite of the app.
The app is a basic questionnaire that leads the user to a product suggestion at the end.
Does anyone have any pointers to how I could solve this? I guess I will probably have to rewrite the app with web services and dynamic calls to RenderUserControls, I will also need access to the page that calls the load() and write additional jQuery methods to handle the user input... I will probably have to remove all of asp.net's postback calls and rewrite the handling of the user input?
First of all you should note that the load() function, like all ajax, can only work on the same domain. So if the 'external site' is on another domain ajax is the wrong choice.
It does sounds like a lot of hard work, depending on the complexity of the page. Postbacks can occur in many places - image clicks, combo selects, etc. Also, there are hidden fields to worry about, like the View State and Event handler - those have the same names on both pages. You'll have an easier time if the external site has no state and postbacks.
If the pages are relatively simple this can probably be done. It's been my experience that forms don't work well in other forms, so you'll have to remove one of them (probably the loaded page's form), or place them one after the other. As you've mentioned, you'll have to rewrite postbacks, you'll want to serialize the data. You may be able to change this string to fit the names on the original page (if you've changed the name of the viewstate, etc, it's easier to change it back on the serialized string than to mess with IDs), post it to the original page, and load again.
Personally, as much as I like jQuery, and as much as this project sounds interesting (and it is), I'd probably go for a server-side solution. It sounds much easier to create a user control (that may use ajax itself), or to the expose the page's functionality using web services or better, generic handlers.