Given this markup:
<ul class="grafiek">
<li class="first-child">item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li class="last-child">item</li>
</ul>
How do I make it appear, cross-browser, like so:
In other words: the last item (with the fake pseudo-class last-child) should always stretch to accomodate the cumulative total width of the previous, arbitrary amounts (within reason of course), of <li>'s
This is what I have so far:
ul.grafiek {
float: left;
}
ul.grafiek li {
float: left;
display: block;
margin-left: 6px;
width: 56px;
height: 66px;
padding: 12px 0;
color: #fff;
text-align: center;
font-size: 11px;
line-height: 1;
background-color: #c5015a;
}
ul.grafiek li.first-child {
margin-left: 0;
}
ul.grafiek li.last-child {
clear: both;
margin: 10px 0 0 0;
width: 100%;
height: 23px;
padding: 0;
line-height: 23px;
background-color: #0a2d7f;
}
IE6 stretches the last <li> to the total width of the <ul>'s parent. IE7 doesn't stretch it at all. How do I make it work in these two browsers also?
PS.: Firefox, Chrome and Opera work a expected.
Can ul.grafiek be defined an explicit width? If so that should work out for IE, as it has issues calculating the total width of floats.
Try setting position: relative; and/or zoom: 1; on ul.grafiek
I have tried like mad to get this done in a clean, CSS-only manner, but I ended up coming to roughly the same point as yourself. IE6 calculates the 100% width of the last list-item first, then wraps the parent around it. (And my IE7 isn't working, couldn't test that.)
What I can recommend is that you create classes for all the different quantities of items you expect (up to a maximum of whatever the screen width will accommodate), and modify the class of the UL to match the number of LI's inside (again, up to the same maximum).
So your UL gains one class:
<ul class="grafiek items6_grafiek">
<li class="first-child">item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li class="last-child">item</li>
</ul>
And add to your existing CSS:
.items1_grafiek {width: 56px}
.items2_grafiek {width: 118px}
.items3_grafiek {width: 180px}
.items4_grafiek {width: 242px}
.items5_grafiek {width: 304px}
.items6_grafiek {width: 366px}
And possibly, if you are adding items dynamically in JS, you'll need to change the itemsN_grafiek class to the correct one.
I noticed that you have a fixed height on that last element. That opens us up the door to try some absolute positioning tricks, and I think that (along with some CSS hacks or conditional comments) will get you what you're looking for.
If I change ul.grafiek like so:
ul.grafiek {
float: left;
position: relative;
border: 1px dashed gray; /* just for visualization while working on the problem */
margin: 0;
padding: 1px;
*padding-bottom: 33px;
}
And add *position: absolute; and *bottom: 0; to ul.grafiek li.last-child, I get a layout that's essentially the same in Firefox 3.6, Safari 4, IE6, and IE7.
I say essentially because there are some differences in the li heights between IE and everything else. These will go away if you add a doctype declaration, but the layout will then break in IE6 again. :|
Related
I've been scratching my head with this one for a while. I need to make a ul li menu reduce width responsively. At the moment the last li wraps to another line as the screen width is reduced. Whilst I've managed to do it on one of my menus, the same type of css won't work on this as the li contents are not equally sized. I did find a fiddle from a previous SO question, but trying that method it completely breaks the styling of the dropdown for "Shop By Products"
I'm trying to achieve something like this as the viewport is reduced.
http://jsfiddle.net/au9muz43/
where the css is very simple as
.horizontal-style {
display: table;
width: 100%
}
.horizontal-style li {
display: table-cell;
}
.horizontal-style a {
display: block;
border: 1px solid red;
text-align: center;
margin: 0 5px;
background: #999
}
I've set up a fiddle with a large chunk of my css and html here: https://jsfiddle.net/1Le63xk0/1/
Even adding
display:table-cell;
to my css line
.mega-menu li{float:left;text-align:center;position:relative;margin-right:15px;border:none;}
breaks the dropdown layout for the Products
So a quick combining of the two fiddles, I noticed that some of the styles conflicted. I removed your display:block calls on the li / a, and made them display:table-cell; (which is the reason why it will shrink, instead of drop to a new line.
Brought all your css over, this was just a case of fixing certain divs that were still styled as block/inline-block and converting them to table formats.
The main issues were found in these lines:
.mega-menu li a{color:#fff;outline:0;padding:12px 35px 0px 0px;text-decoration:none;display:block;font-weight:normal;text-transform:uppercase;}
.mega-menu li:hover a{color:#007dc5;position:relative;z-index:11;padding:4px 11px 3px 11px;}
Where you had a large amount of padding that was pushing each div.
Here is the JSFiddle.
Edit: Updated just to bring more of his css over.
Edit 2: Still getting downvoted, there literally is no other way to explain it other than, double checking OPs display properties. OP hasn't responded explaining something is wrong with the fiddle, so as far as I can see, it has everything he asked for: A shrinking nav, with his dropdowns working the same.
First: there is a ; missing on width:100%. Secondly it can be solved by changing display to block and inline-block. The table display is for tables and (probably) not intended to be used in this case.
.horizontal-style {
display: block;
width: 100%;
}
.horizontal-style li {
display: inline-block;
float:left;
}
.horizontal-style a {
display: block;
border: 1px solid red;
text-align: center;
margin: 0 5px;
background: #999
}
div {
background: #ccc
}
<div style="width: 100%;">
<ul class="horizontal-style">
<li>Home</li>
<li>Shop By Products</li>
<li>Shop By Brand</li>
<li>Why Choose Us</li>
<li>Support</li>
<li>Offers</li>
<li>Contact Us</li>
</ul>
</div>
Take a better look in this JSFiddle. StackOverflow snippet does not support resizing.
I'm trying to make two boxes where to put a chart and I'd like them to have same width for the entire width of page and autoresizing when I resize the page:
<style>
#middle_row_contents li {
display: inline-block;
list-style-type: none;
padding-right: 2em;
*display: inline;
}
</style>
<div class="middle_row_box">
<ul id="middle_row_contents">
<li>
<div class="hours_rooms_used">
<div><h3>Meeting hours per room</h3><select id="years_rooms_used"></select></div>
<div class="tab_rooms_used"><canvas id="chart_rooms_used"></canvas></div>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="hours_per_customer">
<div><h3>Meeting hours per customer</h3><select id="years_rooms_customer"></select></div>
<div class="tab_rooms_customer"><canvas id="chart_per_customer"></canvas></div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
I tried to put width: 50%; on both and assing width: 100% on middle_row_box's div but it didn't worked...how I could do that? And if I put two elements like and a inside a , shouldn't they appear side by side since in my case looks like in a new row?
Cheers,
Luigi
You need to set width to LIs too. How they should know you want to resize them?
#middle_row_contents {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
#middle_row_contents li {
display: inline-block;
list-style-type: none;
padding-right: 2%; /* ems and % aren't compatible, use the same units */
*display: inline;
width: 47%; /* lower than 48% because of a white-space gap between inline-block elements. Use float to avoid this gap. */
background: red;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/x98g7c3k/
Try this javascript snippet
document.getElementById("hoursd_per_customers").style.width = (document.getElementById("hours_rooms_used").clientWidth - 10) + "px";
Hope it will work.
For more details, Click here...
Did a lot of research on all the separate components. However, I don't understand how the components work together. Several placement issues have plagued me on different occasions. I would like to understand why it behaves like it does.
Designing a site with a fixed header, containing some buttons. I want the buttons to be placed on a colored row (NAV). That's why I made a child of NAV. However I can't seem to place the buttons over the bar.
Html
<body>
<nav class="row">
<ul class="menu">
<li id="link1">Link 1</li>
<li id="link2">Link 2</li>
<li id="link3">Link 3</li>
<li id="link4">Link 4</li>
<li id="link5">Link 5</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<div class="row main">
#RenderBody()
</div>
CSS
nav, div, li {
-moz-box-sizing: content-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: content-box;
box-sizing: content-box;
border: 1px dashed black;
}
.row {
width: 100%;
padding-left: 20px;
padding-right: 20px;
}
nav {
position: fixed;
top: 80px;
height: 40px;
z-index: 100;
background-color: Green;
border-bottom: solid greenyellow 2px;
}
.menu li {
display: block;
background-color: darkgreen;
float: left;
height: 40px;
width: 60px;
}
.menu a {
color: white;
}
Result
It can be fixed by several things, like button margin or placing the buttons relative with a negative Top offset. However, these solutions feel 'dirty', like it's not the right way to do it. Why are the LI's not on top of NAV?
because your broswer applies by default some margin to the ul tag
try adding
ul {
margin: 0;
}
you could avoid these issues by using a css reset (Eric Meyer is the authority here: http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/) or Necolas' Normalize.css: http://necolas.github.io/normalize.css/
the first one zeroes all the values of all elements - you have to rebuild the style of some elements like lists.
The second one normalizes the values of elements to fix browsers inconsistencies
When you use the "float" property on some elements (here the "LI"), the parent (here the "menu") ignore his floating children to calculate his height.
So you have to specify a valid height to your menu, or probably better, use "overflow:auto" on it to remember him his children.
So remove your
nav {
height:40px;
}
and add in your CSS :
.menu {
overflow:auto;
}
As in this fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/bE3QH/
When using the element ul it sometimes creates whitespace on browsers. By making the margin 0px you are removing the whitespace decreasing the area used by element. hope this helps. The following code can be used...
ul {
margin:0px
}
You can use this instead of your code.
You will get ready made menu control on this website.
You can modify as you want & you will get your menu control available in a moment.
Here's the link.
http://cssmenumaker.com
http://tympanus.net/codrops/2010/07/16/slide-down-box-menu/
http://cssmenumaker.com/builder/1666948
Please check it out.
These are very useful and it will definitely save your time as well.
I hope this will resolve your issue.
Add this to your CSS:
ul{
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
This clears the default properties for ul elements
You would be better off if you didn't specify a width and a height for the list items, but rather displaying the anchor tags as blocks, and giving those a width and height.
OK so this is actually a little complicated.
I have a navigation list where the list items are set to inline-block. The number of items is the list is dynamic so may vary.
My aim is to have the list items span the whole width of the container. (e.g. if there were 4 list items each one would take up 25% of the container width [ignoring margin/padding etc])
There is the added complication that browsers seem to add a 4px margin to inline-block elements where there is whitespace between them (linebreak/space etc).
I have made a fiddle as a starting point which has 2 examples: the first is just the list items in inline-block mode which the 2nd justifies them accross the width.
Neither achieves what I want which is for the whole width to be taken up by the elements without them breaking onto another line.
http://jsfiddle.net/4K4cU/2/
edit: slightly separate but why in my 2nd example is there a space beneath the lis, dispite the fact I have set line-height and font-size to 0?
OK, despite many decent answers and my inital thinking that js/jquery was the only way to go there is in fact a good css-only solution: using table cells. Original suggestion by #Pumbaa80
.list {
margin:0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
display: table;
table-layout: fixed;
width:100%;
}
.list>li {
display: table-cell;
border:1px green solid;
padding:5px;
text-align: center;
}
.container {
border: 1px #777 solid;
}
<div class="container">
<ul class="list">
<li>text</li>
<li>text</li>
<li>some longer text</li>
<li>text</li>
</ul>
</div>
This is superior to other solutions as:
css-only
no 4px margin problem as with inline-block
no clearfix need for floated elements
maintains equally distributed width independent of li content
concise css
Fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/rQhfC/
It's now 2016 and I wanted to update this question with an answer using flexbox. Consult with CanIUse for browser-compatiblity.
/* Important styles */
ul {
display: flex;
}
li {
flex: 1 1 100%;
text-align: center;
}
/* Optional demo styles */
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
ul {
margin-top: 2em;
justify-content: space-around;
list-style: none;
font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;
}
li {
padding: 1em 0;
align-items: center;
background-color: cornflowerblue;
color: #fff;
}
li:nth-child(even) {
background-color: #9980FA;
}
<ul>
<li>text</li>
<li>text</li>
<li>text</li>
<li>text</li>
</ul>
Pre-edit fiddle (now inlined in above snippet)
Here is one way of modifying your original concept.
The CSS is:
.list {
padding:0;
margin:0;
list-style-type:0;
overflow: hidden;
height: 42px;
}
.list li {
display: inline-block;
line-height: 40px;
padding: 0 5px;
border:1px green solid;
margin:0;
text-align:center;
}
On your parent container, .list, set a height to enclose the child elements.
In this case, I chose 40px and added 2px to account for the border.
Also, set overflow: hidden on .list to hide the 2nd line generated by the pseudo-element.
On the li elements, set line-height: 40px which will center the text vertically.
Since the height is fixed, the second line gets hidden and you can style your parent with a border and so on without extra white space breaking the design.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/WaRZT/
Not Foolproof...
In some cases, you may have more links than can fit on a single line. In that case, the items could force a second row to form and because of overflow hidden, you would not see them.
Evenly Spaced Border Boxes
If you want the border boxes to be evenly distributed, you need to set a width to the li elements.
If the content comes from a CMS, and you have some control over the coding, you can dynamically generate a class name to set the correct width using predefined CSS rules, for example:
.row-of-4 .list li { width: 24%; }
.row-of-5 .list li { width: 19%; }
.row-of-6 .list li { width: 16%; }
See: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/WaRZT/3/
There are multiple fixes to this. The one I prefer is simply to remove the whitespace between the elements, simply because the font-size trick involves non-semantic CSS. And its a lot easier haha. Code because answer requires it:
<ul class="list">
<li>
text
</li><li>
text
</li><li>
text
</li><li>
text
</li>
</ul>
Updated jsFiddle, where the first list has items set to width:25%; and fits in the window on one line. If this isn't what you were going for, I must have misunderstood.
EDIT: for unknown number of list items
There is some CSS3 stuff for this, but to be cross-browser compatible back to IE8, you want a JS solution. Something like this should work:
var listItems = document.querySelectorAll('li');
listItems.style.width = listItems.parentNode.style.width / listItems.length;
SECOND EDIT: for jQuery instead of JS
Winging it, but:
var $listitems = $('.list').children();
$listitems.width($listitems.parent().width()/$listitems.length);
you can use the display:inline-block with li element,and use the text-align:justify with ul element. If you are interested ,please click here.
I have a containing div that is NOT restricting the width of its child divs. The divs are stretching all the way to the full width of the screen, when i have a set width on both the container and the child. Why is this happening. I do NOT have any positioning or floating going on.
Please view my HTML:
<ul class="tabs_commentArea">
<li class="">Starstream</li>
<li class="">Comments</li>
</ul>
<div id="paneWrap">
<div class="panes_comments">
<div class="comments">member pane 1</div>
<div class="comments">member pane 2</div>
<div class="comments">member pane 3</div>
</div>
My CSS, the relevant parts of it at least:
#MembersColumnContainer {
width: 590px;
float: left;
padding-right: 0px;
clear: none;
padding-bottom: 20px;
padding-left: 2px;
}
ul.tabs_commentArea {
list-style:none;
margin-top: 2px !important;
padding:0;
border-bottom:0px solid #666;
height:30px;
}
ul.tabs_commentArea li {
text-indent:0;
margin: !important;
list-style-image:none !important;
padding-top: 0;
padding-right: 0;
padding-bottom: 0;
padding-left: 0;
float: right;
}
#paneWrap {
border: solid 3px #000000;
}
.panes_comments div {
display: ;
padding: px px;
/*border:medium solid #000000;*/
height:150px;
width: 588px;
background-color: #FFFF99;
}
You could set max-width on either, or both, of the div elements to prevent their expansion:
#containerDiv {
min-width: 400px; /* prevents the div being squashed by an 'extreme' page-resize */
width: 50%; /* defines the normal width of the div */
max-width: 700px; /* prevents the div expanding beyond 700px */
}
It might also be that you're allowing the div's overflowed contents to be visible, as opposed to hidden (or auto). But without specific examples of your mark-up and css it's very difficult to guess.
Generally giving elements layout is pretty straight forward (always assuming you have a good understanding of floating, positioning and the box model), and in most cases you wouldn't have to use max- min-width to control elements on the page.
My two cents: If I was you, I'd start stripping out code (starting with the !important rule), and see when the problem is solved. De-constructing the code like that is a good way to find bugs.
Sorry I couldn't help, but I'm reluctant to give advice since the code you provided shows a lot of other stuff going on elsewhere that might be contributing to your problem (like having to use !important).
:D
I figured out the problem. The file that was calling in the css was conflicting with another external css file that had the same element with the same name in it. Thank you all for your help though.