If you hover the mouse over the underlined table headings on this page, a tooltip appears
However, in IE7, the tooltips appear about 300px above their intended position, and on the first table, they don't appear at all.
Also, the tooltips are not as nicely styled when shown in IE, e.g. the corners aren't rounded, and the drop shadows aren't shown. I'm not too concerned about the styling, but I would like to get the tooltips displaying in the correct position.
I'm using the YACOP JQuery plugin to display the tooltips (I've modified this plugin slightly to remove the fading effects). The CSS styles applied to each tooltip are:
.callout {
max-width: 400px;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #7992B0;
background-color: #FFE8A4;
border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
-moz-box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
-webkit-box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
}
IE < version 9 doesn't support native or vendor specific CSS3 rules like rounded corners or drop shadows.
As for the IE7 Issue, setup a targeted CSS for IE7 either using conditional comments
<!--[if IE 7]>
.callout_main
{
position: absolute;
display: none;
margin: 0px;
left: 576.5px;
top: -66px;
}
Or the CSS browser selector and reposition the callout div with CSS.
The first table's tooltip doesn't seem to appear because it is poistioned way above the top of the page, so above the browsers "render view."
Update:
In response to your question, there is: <div class="callout_main" style="..."> I'd move these inline styles to a CSS file, and for the the IE/ rules change top: 366px; to top: -66px;. I think this will help to resolve your issue :)
.callout {
max-width: 400px;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #7992B0;
background-color: #FFE8A4;
border-radius: 8px;
-webkit-border-radius: 8px;
-moz-border-radius: 8px;
box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
-moz-box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
-webkit-box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
}
You're using Webkit and Mozilla's css attributes, the ones starting with -webkit and -moz. These won't work on IE 6,7,8 (or any previous one) because they lack CSS 3 support. One day, all browsers will, hopefully, support CSS 3, but for now, you'll have to use some workarounds (likely), or force your users to use something that's not IE (depends on your users) if you want to have a nice looking tooltop.
There exists a compatibilty master table that will inform you of what you can and cannot use on various browsers.
Related
Please consider the following CSS:
div {
background: rgba(0,0,0,.05);
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
padding: 50px;
}
div > div {
background: rgba(0,0,0,.2);
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border-radius: 5px;
padding: 0;
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, .2), 0 2px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .14), 0 3px 1px -2px rgba(0, 0, 0, .12);
}
div > div:hover {
border-radius: 5px 5px 0 0;
background: rgba(0,0,255,.2)
}
with the following HAML:
%div
%div
Hovering on the inner element causes the border radius to change, as well as the background color. However, it also affects the box shadow. This should not happen. Please see snippet below:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/yGvydK?editors=1100
How can this be explained? Is this a bug in Google Chrome? It doesn't appear to be happening in Firefox, IE or Edge. I run Chrome version 71.0.3578.98 on a 64 bit Windows 10 laptop.
EDIT
Behavior in Chrome (incorrect):
Note how the shadow suddenly looks different on the left, top, and right when hovering.
EDIT 2
Behavior in Firefox 64.0 (correct):
It appears that this was a bug in Chrome 71. Updating to Chrome 72 resolved the issue.
How can I make a shadow effect like the one below with pure CSS?
I am new to CSS.
The following is what I have tried so far, but I am unable to come close to what I want. Please advise how I can make it look like the shadow in the image? Thanks!
box-shadow: 1px 1px 5px #999999 inset
This is the closest I could get : Demo. I think it's actually not bad.
It combines a black shadow and a white one on top of it.
.yourclass{
background-color: #fff;
box-shadow: -15px 0px 60px 25px #ffffff inset,
5px 0px 10px -5px #000000 inset;
}
Browsers' shadows smoothing might differ. I'm using chrome so you might want to tweek the values to get a cross-browser visual effect...
Read the CSS Tricks article about box-shadows to get how they're used.
For two shadows (both sides) you need 4 shadows (demo) :
Result:
.yourclass{
background-color: #fff;
box-shadow: 0px 100px 50px -40px #ffffff inset,
0px -100px 50px -40px #ffffff inset,
-5px 0px 10px -5px rgba(0,0,0,0.5) inset,
5px 0px 10px -5px rgba(0,0,0,0.5) inset;
}
Beware, browsers' shadows rendering/smoothing can differ a lot. I'm using chrome so you might want to tweek the values to get a cross-browser visual effect...
For more info on css shadows, read this article from CSS Tricks
What you want is basically the opposite of a page curl shadow. Take a look at this tutorial - you should be able to easily adapt it.
Here is an example: jsFiddle
div {
position: relative;
width: 250px;
height: 150px;
margin: 100px auto;
border: 1px solid black;
background-color: white;
}
div:after {
position: absolute;
height: 80%;
width: 10px;
content: " ";
right: 0px;
top: 10%;
background: transparent;
box-shadow: 0 0px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
z-index: -1;
}
We insert a pseudo-element, position it below our div and have it cast a shadow. This way, you have control over the shadows height and position.
I am using pie.htc to allow me to have radius corners and drop shadows on my website in old versions of IE.
The trouble is it seems to be making IE run very very slowly.
Here's an example of my code... can anyone see how I can improve this?
div.myDiv {
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
behavior: url(/PIE.htc);
}
I used CSS3Pie a lot in projects, because I was forced to make the sites exactly look alike which of course is nonsense in for a technician, but not a sales guy.
Actually, using any kind of .htc files is very slow because pie needs to parse these rules and create according VML-Elements to emulate the according css3-behaviour. If you have bigger projects you will have no choice other than:
Completely omitting CSS3-features for IE8 (and convince your salesguy) <- my favorite option
Omitting pie and using IE filters wherever possible
using a more lightweight framework with lesser support but faster processing, because PIE is (because it has such a superb support) quite bloated and thus rather slow
Using positions like Razor adviced does not really fix the speed issue and prefixing with -ms might give you serious trouble in IE9 trying to use both, css3pie and the prefixed css3-property.
try this for a change
div.myDiv
{
border-radius: 5px;
-ms-border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
-ms-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
-webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
-moz-box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);
behavior: url(/PIE.htc);
position:relative;
}
PIE.htc file loads asynchronously along with DOM when it is ready. Setting the position:relative can certainly give you an edge. i prefix -ms- in code snippet which helps to detect IE. it worked for me. i used latest PIE.htc file.
In the image below, the top image is what I currently have on a site, it uses an actual Image.
What I want to do is make something more like the bottom image using pure CSS, I cannot figure out how to do it though, can anyone help?
CSS3 has a lot of solutions. Try this:
div.exampleboxshadowj {
background-color: #EEE;
float: left;
margin-top: 20px;
margin-right: 40px;
height: 65px;
width: 160px;
text-align: center;
-webkit-box-shadow: inset -5px -5px 5px 5px#888;
box-shadow: inset -5px -5px 5px 5px #888;
}
Though you can change the color to blue, if you want.
Here is a great link for all the info you could want.
You can try using this link to get the gradient effect on those buttons (I haven't tested it myself)
http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/cross-browser-css-gradient
I'd imagine that since they use the background property, you would need to have the actual images on the buttons inside some sort of position container.
It would be easier and possible more cross-browser friendly to simply create the images in a sprite map and switch the background-position when they are clicked.
If I understood you properly, you are trying to change the image when it is clicked or is active. If so, for that you can use :focus or :active to generate such effect.
Here is a demo with background color instead of a picture.
hi you can use this css3 browsers compatible css code for your requirement :-
.shadow {
width:150px;
height:150px;
background-color: rgb(55,79,99); /* Needed for IEs */
-moz-box-shadow: inset 13px 0px 19px 5px rgba(38,56,70,0.9);
-webkit-box-shadow: inset 13px 0px 19px 5px rgba(38,56,70,0.9);
box-shadow: inset 13px 0px 19px 5px rgba(38,56,70,0.9);
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Blur(PixelRadius=3,MakeShadow=true,ShadowOpacity=0.30);
-ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Blur(PixelRadius=3,MakeShadow=true,ShadowOpacity=0.30)";
zoom: 1;
}
or see the live demo :- http://jsfiddle.net/dte78/32/
and can read more about box shadow
I am new to the designing/programming world so I am sure the issue is easy to solve. I am trying to add the moz-box-shadow effect to my header. But as soon as I add that component, the header which is taking up space horizontally shortens up. I want the header to be like Twitter's, where they use a shadow effect.
#header {
background-color: #990000;
width:101.3%;
margin-left:-8px;
margin-top:-8px;
height:40px;
-moz-box-shadow: 1px 1px 10px #D7D7D7;
}
Also, the way i have set the width is it likely going to create cross browser issues?
Here's a version similar to what Twitter has:
This is Twitter's version, more or less:
Live Demo (edit)
HTML:
<div id="top-fixed">
<div id="top-bar"></div>
</div>
CSS:
html, body {
margin: 0; padding: 0
}
body {
padding-top: 50px;
background: #c0deed
}
#top-fixed {
position: fixed;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 1000;
}
#top-bar {
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
background-color:#00a0d1;
background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear,0 0,0 100%,from(#00a0d1),to(#008db8));
background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(#00a0d1,#008db8);
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#00a0d1',endColorstr='#008db8');
-ms-filter:"progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#00a0d1',endColorstr='#008db8')";
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25);
-moz-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25);
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25);
}
The trick that Twitter is using, is putting in an absolutely positioned box and giving that box a width of 100% and the shadow. Using overflow-x: hidden on it´s parent, you get the effect that you are looking for.
I've been doing shadows with .png's. I see no benefit of using this (esp. since I would assume browsers started supporting .png prior to supporting box shadowssee, for example, Mozila's statement that FF started supporting box shadows in FF3.5,) but of course, if this is better than doing shadows via .png, feel free to leave a comment proving me wrong!