I'm designing a custom wordpress template for some friends, and want a horizontally justified top menu. All would be fine, except that wp_page_menu outputs the list elements all in one line, which (after a LOT! of head-scratching) appears to break the formatting and removes all space between the elements. For example, the following outputs 1, 2 and 3 spaced out and then 456 all together. (Tested in Safari, Firefox and Chrome, all on mac.)
<style>
.menu {
text-align: justify;
width: 700px;
margin: 10px;
}
.menu * {
display: inline;
}
.menu span {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
}
</style>
<div class="menu">
<ul>
<li>1</li>
<li>2</li>
<li>3</li>
<li>4</li><li>5</li><li>6</li>
</ul>
<span></span>
</div>
I've already got a custom function editing the output from wp_page_menu to add the span after the ul, so I guess the easiest thing to do would be to extend that function to put the line breaks in as well, but if anyone's got other ideas, or can tell me why this is happening (especially that!) that would be great.
EDIT:
Have fixed it now by adding a function that inserts a space to the html (code below if anyone's interested for now or if someone comes across this in the future). Seems that was all that was necessary! Would still be interested to hear if anyone can tell me why this is needed.
// Add a space after the </li> in wp_page_menu to allow justification of the menu
function add_break($break) {
return preg_replace('/<\/li>/', '</li> ', $break, -1);
}
add_filter('wp_page_menu','add_break');
To answer your question, that's how xHTML works.
If you have the following:
testtest1
That would show up as
testtest1
And if you have the following:
test test1
That would show up as
test test1
Now, the same logic works for <li> elements, as well as various other selectors such as <img> selectors.
Have you have had a header with three images in a line, but when you tried to do this:
<img src="#" />
<img src="#" />
<img src="#" />
That will insert a space ( ) after each image, whereas having them in line would not.
Your function accomplishes exactly what you wanted. You could've done it using Javascript or CSS as well, but your solution is better. Just in case you are curious, here is how to do it with CSS:
.menu li:before {
content:' ';
}
Hope that helped.
instead of display:inline, try floating your lis left. then maybe:
no:
.menu * {
display: inline;
}
instead
.menu li{
float:left;
padding:0 5px;
list-style:none;
}
I guess i kind of embelished with the other stuff but give it a try!
If I understand it correctly - what you really need is a tabular layout.
Try adding this to the css:
.menu { display: table; }
.menu ul { display:table-row; }
.menu li { display:table-cell; }
You could just ditch the li tag altogether and just make them div's with the same class name.
Related
I'm making a hoverable ul that displays a p element in another div.
As there is no parent selector to be had in pure CSS, I'm stuck and cannot figure out how this is supposed to work.
Fiddle won't work for some reason(for me), so here is a bin:
https://jsbin.com/yohapudimo/edit?html,css,output
My best effort was:
#infoDrop > li:hover ~ #aboutPara > p{
display: inline;
}
while trying to target a sibling div
I think it might be possible without JS... this is untested though so bear with me -- it also has to be an adjacent element, which I'm not sure is a problem or not for you?
If this doesn't work for you, then I'm afraid you'll need JS.
#myPCont p {
display: none;
color: #fff;
}
.myCont:hover+#myPCont p {
display: block;
}
#myPCont {
background: #333;
height: 300px;
width: 300px;
}
<div class="myCont">
<ul class="hoverShowP">
<li>This is my first list item</li>
<li>This is my second..</li>
<li>And this is my third.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="myPCont">
<p>Heyooo!</p>
</div>
I would like to ask anyone who could help me where is the difference between this two CSS tags.
.bmenu:hover li a{...}
VS
.bmenu li a:hover{...}
Thank you very much for help and sry for my bad english.
Edit 1: I would like to ask for explanation mainly, how do they both work, because in the first case, there is a "li a" behind the :hover. What does it mean please? Thx
To explain this, I'll use this example code:
<div class="bmenu">
<ul>
<li>one</li>
<li>two</li>
</ul>
</div>
if you use .bmenu:hover you're saying you want the CSS to apply when you hover the ENTIRE .bmenu div.
When you say .bmenu li a:hover you are saying that you want to apply the CSS when you hover the a tag within a .bmenu li.
Here's a quick example I made, the top is using the .bmenu:hover method, and the bottom is using the li a:hover method. fiddle here.
In the first case an <a> will apply styles when you hover .bmenu, in the second case - when you hover the <a> itself. Take a look at these two blocks:
.bmenu1, .bmenu2 {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin: 10px;
padding: 40px;
background-color: orange;
}
a {
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: firebrick;
}
.bmenu1:hover a {
background-color: lightblue;
}
.bmenu2 a:hover {
background-color: lightblue;
}
<div class="bmenu1">
</div>
<div class="bmenu2">
</div>
We have a left nav that I am trying to tweak just a tad. Please don't critique the validity of the HTML, we have a CMS and external developers that are driving the ship and, frankly it works for now.
What I want to do is apply a style to <DIV>s that are after the <DIV class="nav_selected">, I just want indent them with some padding-left:30px;
Thats it, but everything I have tried applies to the "nav_selected" div as well which is what I dont want. It is kind of a header, and the divs under that are children.
<div class="left_nav_2">
<div class="left_nav_2_container">
<ul class="no_bottom_border">
<div class="nav_selected"><li><h2>Link 1 Selected</h2></li></div>
<div><li>Link 2</li></div>
<div><li>Link 3</li></div>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
You can try creating a class for the first line, then use a negation pseudo class to utilize it.
:not(/*put all the classes in your css document here.*/){ /* put the css you want for it here.*/}
Something like this could work too:
CSS
.no_bottom_border li{
padding-left: 30px;
}
.no_bottom_border .nav_selected li{
padding-left: 0px;
// or just the opposite values of the .no_bottom_border li
}
Is it something like that?
ok you can use this:
ul.no_bottom_border > div:not(:first-child) {
padding-left: 30px;
}
hope it helps
Here it is which you want
Add padding-left to both the divs like
.no_bottom_border li{
padding-left: 30px;
}
.nav_selected li{
padding-left: 0px;
}
I have a really basic list in HTML that looks like this:
<div id="navmenu">
<ul>
<li>photography</li>
<li>•</li>
<li>people</li>
<li>places</li>
<li>things</li>
<li id="lastElement">about</li>
</ul>
</div>
My CSS formatting looks like this:
div#navmenu li {
display: inline;
margin-right: 40px;
}
However, I want the last li element's margin-right be 0px. So I did:
li#lastElement {
margin-right: 0px;
}
When I check on Chrome's dev tools, this last CSS specification is crossed out. I don't understand why it's overridden by the "div#nav menu li" property? Isn't the last li element with its own id more specific?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
The one that is overriding it is more specific, it has two tag and an id selector, while your other only has a tag and id selector.
You could change it to div#navmenu li#lastElement or make the other selector less specific.
Hi now used to this
div#navmenu #lastElement {
margin-right: 0px;
}
or this
div#navmenu li:last-child {
margin-right: 0px;
}
I'd like to make use of unordered list for many reasons like using drag n drop jquery plugins and other effects like that.
The issue i'm facing is that <li> behave oddly when putting stuff in it.. What a robust CSS to make <li> tags behave like <div> tags but still keep the vertical ordering style?
Here's one simple way:
ul, li {
display: block;
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
use this
li{
display:block;
}
gl