I have an existing Spring application which I wish to also allow users to register / sign in through facebook.
The facebook sign-in is working fine, and is currently executed from the client using the Actionscript-Facebook API ( which is essentially a wrapper for the Facebook JS API).
However I'm unsure as to what is an appropriate approach for me to take in using the client-side authenticated session to authenticate against my own app server / session (ie., the Spring session).
In my own application, the user registers/authenticates with an email address & password.
My first thoughts in a facebook authenticated solution is to use the facebook email and secret values returned from the login call. These would be stored in my database when the user performs registration via facebook, (or specifically, a hash of secret) and using these to authenticate during login in the same manner as a regular login.
However, I'm unsure of what the secret value actually is, and whether it's a appropriate to use in this scenario. (The Facebook API seems unclear in what the return values of the login call actually mean)
Is this value bound to the user, or the session?
Does this value change, should the user change their password on Facebook?
Is this an appropriate value to store a hash of?
Finally, is there a more appropriate way of achieving this task?
Related
In Firebase, it is possible to log in a user as anonymous with a token, and when the user decides to register, just update the credentials. I have a hard time understanding whether the same is possible with Auth0.
We are now using Auth0 as identity provider, the flow is the following:
The user is using the app anonymously with limited access.
User registers in the app with Auth0.
Auth0 issues a token
Firebase receives the token and lets the user use the restricted parts. All the data generated by the anonymous user is lost
What I want to achieve:
When the user starts using the app, Auth0 immediately creates a user token
The token is valid to access certain parts of Firebase database
If/when the user decides to register, their token remains valid but receives additional credentials
Firebase lets the user use the restricted parts
It's Konrad from Auth0 Community Team. Yep as Baskaro said unfortunately it's not supported from our side of stack. It will be great if you can submit it as a feature request to our product team using our feedback form (you will be contacted by one of our product managers within 10 business days):
https://auth0.com/feedback
My system works as follows;
I have an ASP.Net RESTful API server, which contains a user database.
I also have a Xamarin.Forms application, with a registration and login page.
What I want is to have the ability to authenticate a login using a social IdP, and then, if that user has not been logged in before, register that user in my local database.
I have been reading up on how to implement OAuth 2.0 with OpenID Connect to authenticate my users with a social IdP, however, I cannot seem to wrap my head arround it. From what I've read, I shouldn't use an Access token for authentication, since that i what the ID token is for, however, I have also read that the only intended purpose for an ID token, is the client.
My problem then is, how can I make sure that calls made to my ASP.Net server, has been made by "real person", and how do I determine who makes the call?
Access token will be used determine whether the client application was authorized by a user to access a resource. The concept of ID token comes from OpenID Connect. Main purpose of the ID token is to authenticate the user to the client application (i.e. letting the client application know that the person who authorized the access is a valid person).
To do this, you have to validate the ID token. This can be done using third party libraries such as nimbusds or auth0. You can validate the signature of the token verify the integrity of the token and check the claims included in the token (by comparing them with expected values) to verify the user details. Also, you can add custom claims (any claim that is specific for your application/implementation) to the tokens through your identity provider so that you'll be able to validate those particular claims in order to verify the user.
On our app we are using "One account per email address". We want users to sign up using a specific authentication provider, which we keep track of, and stick with it.
What I've noticed today is that if I log in using a Google or Facebook provider I can then send myself a password reset link to the associated email address, which allows me to use the email/password provider instead.
There is a slight difference in behaviour depending on the first provider:
If I use Google first, after I use the password reset link I can now user either provider to log in, and both are linked to the same firebase uid. If I debug, I can see both in the providerDetails array on the authData object I get back from Firebase.
If I use Facebook first, after I use the password link the password provider replaces the Facebook one completely, although it retains the old firebase uid. At this point I can no longer use the Facebook login.
My questions are: is this behaviour intended, and, is there any way to switch it off?
This can cause confusion if say a user logs in using Facebook (which we track) and then later forgets and sends a password reset. It isn't the end of the world because they can carry on using the password login, but it certainly muddies the water.
Thanks
The behavior is intentional.
For end users, if they had signed into the app using Google or Facebook, and later they want to recover the password, the most likely reason is they (or an attacker) can not login with that identity provider.
After the user clicks the password reset link, Firebase removes the non-email identity providers to prevent other people from accessing the account silently. If the user still wants to add Facebook/Twitter login, they can do that via manual account linking (if the app supports).
In case the user's email service is the same as identity provider (e.g. #gmail.com users login into the app using Google), Firebase has an optimization to keep the identity provider since there is no security risk.
I want to enable Facebook authentication and the FB-Graph in my website, which already has forms authentication. Using http://multitiered.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/getting-started-with-the-facebook-c-sharp-sdk/, I was able to figure out how to login server-side.
However, the problem with this approach is that a secure cookie will not be created, since the call returns the authentication code in the querystring via a callback. This means that the user will have to login every time.
I can see two ways around this:
Store the access token in a secure cookie manually
Instead of the above approach, use the FB JS API to login - this stores a secure cookie with the access token automatically
I would prefer not to use the second approach, as I would like the login code to be server-side.
Which would be the better approach? Am I missing something?
I use the JavaScript method to first authenticate the user, the JS SDK then writes an encrypted cookie (called "fbs_[YourAppID]") when a connected user hits your page; using one of the many Facebook c# SDKs, this cookie can be decoded using your application secret giving you the user ID, oAuth token, expiry date etc.
Then I hook into the AuthenticateRequest event of my .NET application, check the presence of the cookie, decode if it found, and then find a user who has been assigned this facebook ID (your user table must have a extra field for storing the ID of their facebook account).
If a match is found, I write a normal forms authentication cookie for this user, then .NET will recognise them for all future requests. If no user is found, then this is a brand new user who has just connected. Use the SDK again to query the graph API using their oAuth token, get things like their name/email etc and create a new account, then issue a authentication token as normal.
By writing a normal authetication cookie, the user will stay logged into to your site for all requests, just as if they were a normal user.
One side point, when using email address, check for duplicates, and check for the facebook cookie in all requests. For example, an existing registered logged in user may have just connected.
I want to know more about win32 LogonUser api function. The last parameter is a token which can be used to impersonate a windows identity to execute code on a person's behalf. Say I have a login page where I enter my username, password and domain. When the user submits the page I validate the user by making a call to LogonUser() and get a token reference.
I am thinking why not store the token in a cookie and use it at a later stage (perhaps in another page). I just don't know what issues I might have to face upfront...
Can the token expire even if we don't close it properly using the CloseHandle() win32 call? Is there any article related with this particular requirement?