I have a component which inherrits Group. I made a property called dataSource:ArrayList. I wish to draw a Line for each of the entries.
When the 'function set dataSource' -method is invoked I do the following (simplified):
var newLine:Line = new Line();
newLine.stroke = new SolidColorStroke();
newLine.xFrom = 0;
newLine.yFrom = 0;
newLine.xTo = 0;
newLine.yTo = height;
this.addElement(newLine);
The line doesn't stretch itself to the very bottom of the parent. I'm guessing I'm messing up life cycle, but I'm not finding flex life cycle particular easy to understand, so I'm not sure how to go about this.
If you don't want to interact with the line as an object on the display list, I'd simply draw it in updateDisplayList() using the Graphics api, and call invalidateDisplayList() from set dataSource()
The "right" way is slightly more verbose ;-)
private var dataSourceValid = true;
public function set dataSource(value:FooData):void {
_dataSource = foo;
dataSourceValid = false;
invalidateProperties();
}
override protected function commitProperties():void {
if (!dataSourceValid)
commitDataSource();
// Do it later in case we've invalidated something
// belonging to Flex while validating our stuff
super.commitProperties();
}
protected function commitDataSource():void {
// Do whatever we need to with our datasource,
// including adding or removing child elements.
// ...
// If we also need to re-draw something, then
// invalidateDisplayList();
dataSourceValid = true;
}
(All code typed in TextMate, so it's probably full of spelling errors and doesn't compile, but you get the idea)
I agree with you, it probably has to do with the component not being properly measured yet when you create your lines. You could try overriding updateDisplayList and setting the height of the lines you created to be the height parameter supplied to the updateDisplayList method. Don't create the lines in updateDisplayList since it can get called multiple times during the component life cycle. Regarding the life cycle in general, here's a link to a chart I've found helpful in the past: http://danorlando.com/?p=122 Hope that helps.
It isn't entirely clear what you're looking to do, but by putting a dataSource property on Group it appears as if you're trying to re-invent DataGroup. Perhaps you should consider just using the latter instead, along with a custom ItemRenderer within which you could draw a line?
Related
I have a simple list and a background refresh protocol.
When the list is scrolled down, the refresh scrolls it back to the top. I want to stop this.
I have tried catching the COLLECTION_CHANGE event and
validateNow(); // try to get the component to reset to the new data
list.ensureIndexIsVisible(previousIndex); // actually, I search for the previous data id in the IList, but that's not important
This fails because the list resets itself after the change (in DataGroup.commitProperties).
I hate to use a Timer, ENTER_FRAME, or callLater(), but I cannot seem to figure out a way.
The only other alternatives I can see is sub-classing the List so it can catch the dataProviderChanged event the DataGroup in the skin is throwing.
Any ideas?
Actually MUCH better solution to this is to extend DataGroup. You need to override this.
All the solutions here create a flicker as the scrollbar gets resetted to 0 and the it's set back to the previous value. That looks wrong. This solution works without any flicker and the best of all, you just change DataGroup to FixedDataGroup in your code and it works, no other changes in code are needed ;).
Enjoy guys.
public class FixedDataGroup extends spark.components.DataGroup
{
private var _dataProviderChanged:Boolean;
private var _lastScrollPosition:Number = 0;
public function FixedDataGroup()
{
super();
}
override public function set dataProvider(value:IList):void
{
if ( this.dataProvider != null && value != this.dataProvider )
{
dataProvider.removeEventListener(CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE, onDataProviderChanged);
}
super.dataProvider = value;
if ( value != null )
{
value.addEventListener(CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE, onDataProviderChanged);
}
}
override protected function commitProperties():void
{
var lastScrollPosition:Number = _lastScrollPosition;
super.commitProperties();
if ( _dataProviderChanged )
{
verticalScrollPosition = lastScrollPosition;
}
}
private function onDataProviderChanged(e:CollectionEvent):void
{
_dataProviderChanged = true;
invalidateProperties();
}
override public function set verticalScrollPosition(value:Number):void
{
super.verticalScrollPosition = value;
_lastScrollPosition = value;
}
}
I ll try to explain my approach...If you are still unsure let me know and I ll give you the source code as well.
1) Create a variable to store the current scroll position of the viewport.
2) Add Event listener for Event.CHANGE and MouseEvent.MOUSE_WHEEL on the scroller and update the variable created in step 1 with the current scroll position;
3) Add a event listener on your viewport for FlexEvent.UpdateComplete and set the scroll position to the variable stored.
In a nutshell, what we are doing is to have the scroll position stored in variable every time user interacts with it and when our viewport is updated (due to dataprovider change) we just set the scroll position we have stored previously in the variable.
I have faced this problem before and solved it by using a data proxy pattern with a matcher. Write a matcher for your collection that supports your list by updating only changed objects and by updating only attributes for existing objects. The goal is to avoid creation of new objects when your data source refreshes.
When you have new data for the list (after a refresh), loop through your list of new data objects, copying attributes from these objects into the objects in the collection supporting your list. Typically you will match the objects based on id. Any objects in the new list that did not exist in the old one get added. Your scroll position will normally not change and any selections are usually kept.
Here is an example.
for each(newObject:Object in newArrayValues){
var found:Boolean = false;
for each(oldObject:Object in oldArrayValues){
if(oldObject.id == newObject.id){
found = true;
oldObject.myAttribute = newObject.myAttribute;
oldObject.myAttribute2 = newObject.myAttribute2;
}
}
if(!found){
oldArrayValues.addItem(newObject);
}
}
My solution for this problem was targeting a specific situation, but it has the advantage of being very simple so perhaps you can draw something that fits your needs from it. Since I don't know exactly what issue you're trying to solve I'll give you a description of mine:
I had a List that was progressively loading data from the server. When the user scrolled down and the next batch of items would be added to the dataprovider, the scrollposition would jump back to the start.
The solution for this was as simple as stopping the propagation of the COLLECTION_CHANGE event so that the List wouldn't catch it.
myDataProvider.addEventListener(
CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE, preventRefresh
);
private function preventRefresh(event:CollectionEvent):void {
event.stopImmediatePropagation();
}
You have to know that this effectively prevents a redraw of the List component, hence any added items would not be shown. This was not an issue for me since the items would be added at the end of the List (outside the viewport) and when the user would scroll, the List would automatically be redrawn and the new items would be displayed. Perhaps in your situation you can force the redraw if need be.
When all items had been loaded I could then remove the event listener and return to the normal behavior of the List component.
I am using view stack...so when view change like when we move from one page to another hide event is dispatched.So i am saving the information of last page in hide event before i go to next page.but thing is that if i change nothing still change on view hide event is invoked nd call go to backend...i just want do call only if sumthing change in the view..like sum text value...So i have two options
use event listener on each component if sumthing change its make the flag true...nd hide event check, if flag is true send call to backend.
event listener at container level ..if sumthing change in child componenet through bubbling container knows if sum event is dispatched.nd makes the flag true.
I have doubt with container...
Can i use container, and how?
Reason why I can't use container?
What are the pros and cons either way?
I would recommend using a dataProvider with the ability to compare them. For instance, if you are changing things with textinputs, you could basically do something like this:
[Bindable]
private var myDataProvider:Object = new Object();
private function creationCompleteHandler():void {
myDataProvider.updated = false;
myDataProvider.defaultValue = 'default';
myDataProvider.defaultValueTwo = 'default';
}
etc.
Then, in your mxml, you can have something like this:
<mx:TextInput id="myText" text="{myDataProvider.defaultValue}" change="myDataProvider.defaultValue=myText.text; myDataProvider.updated=true;" />
Lastly, in your hide event, you can do the following:
private function hideEventHandler( event:Event ):void {
if( myDataProvider.updated ){
// Call your RemoteServices (or w/e) to update the information
}
}
This way, when anything changes, you can update your dataProvider and have access to the new information each time.
Hope this helps!
I've used an approach similar to your first option in a couple of my past projects. In the change event for each of my form's controls I make a call to a small function that just sets a changesMade flag to true in my model. When the user tries to navigate away from my form, I check the changesMade flag to see if I need to save the info.
Data models are your friend!
If you get in the habit of creating strongly typed data models out of your loaded data, questions like this become very basic.
I always have a key binding set to generate a code snipit similar to this...
private var _foo:String;
public function get foo():String
{
return _foo;
}
public function set foo(value:String):void
{
if(_foo == value)
return;
var oldVal:String = _foo;
_foo = value;
this.invalidateProperty("foo", oldVal, value);
}
If your data used getters/setters like this, it would be very easy to validate a change on the model level, cutting the view out of the process entirely.
I have a quite large Flex application with a large set of views and I ceratain views I'd like to add shortcuts.
And i'm looking for something like:
<mx:Vbox>
<foo:Shortcut keys="ctrl+s" action="{bar();}"/>
....
</mx:VBox>
Is there any framwork or component already done that does something like this? I guess it should be too difficult to build? When building this I only want the shortcuts to be active when the view is visible. How do I detect this? What base class is best to inherit from when working with non visual components?
I don't know of any framework component that does that already, but the examples above should get you started if you try to build your own.
There's no need to inherit from any component for a non-visual component like the one you've described here (your "foo" class needs no parents.) There's nothing in the Flex framework you need to inherit from for this.
However you architect it, your foo class is going to have to take in and parse keyboard codes to listen for and accept one or more methods to call. All you have to do is figure out when to add and remove the event listeners that will call the passed-in methods.
To handle turning your keyboard events on and off based on visibility, just have your foo component bind to the "visible" property of it's parent and add/remove event listeners accordingly.
You might also consider having the listeners added when the component that foo is nested in is on the display list rather than just visible. To do this, simply added and remove your event listeners in one of the component lifecycle methods - probably commitProperties is the most appropriate.
I don't think this solution answer your question directly but anyway, to help solve your problem here is an example.
For instance, I've extended the TextArea component like so. This is the best I can do so far, it can definitely be improved upon. Like, I don't know how to make the cursor go to the end after the next shortcut is pressed.
public class TextArea extends mx.controls.TextArea
{
// the keysmap is an example dictionary holding keycodes
private var keysmap:*={
112 = "some text for F1"
,113 = "the text for F2!"
//etc, etc
}
public var handleKeyDown:Boolean =false;
public function TextArea(){
if(handleKeyDown ==true){
this.addEventListener(KeyboardEvent.KEY_DOWN,this.keydownHandler);
}
}
public function keydownHandler(e:KeyboardEvent):void{
if(e.keyCode >= 112 && e.keyCode <= 123){
e.currentTarget["text"] += String(keysmap[e.keyCode]) +" ";
}//focusManager.setFocus(this);
}
}
I can't give you a solution using MXML, however my first thought would involve a singleton static class with a Dictionary that contains a list of objects as its keys and dynamically created dictionaries as the value pairing that contain keys denoting the desired key press with a function reference as the value.
So, say you had a Sprite and you wanted to capture ctrl+s for save when focus is on that object, I would get the instance of that Singleton, and call a function such as registerKeyBinding passing in the Sprite, the keyCode you want, and your pre-defined callback:
private var registeredObjects:Dictionary = new Dictionary(true);
public function registerKeyBinding(targetObject:Object, keyCode:int, callback:Function) {
if (registeredObjects[targetObject]) {
Dictionary(registeredObjects[targetObject])[keyCode] = callback;
}
else {
registeredObjects[targetObject] = new Dictionary();
Dictionary(registeredObjects[targetObject])[keyCode] = callback;
targetObject.addEventListener(KeyboardEvent.KEY_DOWN, keyDownListener);
}
}
private function keyDownListener(e:KeyboardEvent):void {
if (e.ctrlKey == true) {
//calls the function if that key exists.
Dictionary(registeredObjects[e.target])[e.keyCode];
}
}
Can't say I've tested this, but it was just the first thing that popped into my head. You could then setup functions to deregister and delete keys from the dictionaries, check states of the objects in addition to the keyCodes, remove old listeners, and delete entire dictionaries when there is no longer a need for them. Hopefully this is at least a tiny bit helpful.
I'm embedding an image like this:
[Embed(source="/tool_deleteUp.png")]
private static const c_deleteButton_styleUp:Class;
I'm using it like this:
_removeButton = new Button();
_removeButton.setStyle('upSkin', c_deleteButton_styleUp);
When I rotate the button, the image doesn't scale smoothly. I know the tricks one uses to scale an image loaded in an Image control, but I'm banging my head against a wall trying to figure out how to do it here.
Help!
a hacky way would be to traverse the children/grandchildren of the button, to find the corresponding Bitmap that is of type c_deleteButton_styleUp, and set its smoothing to true ... it is a big flaw of flex, that sometimes it requires classes for styling although some IDisplayObjectFactory would completely suffice for that purpose and would make your life a lot easier ... but life is life ...
don't know of a clean flex only way ... the only possibility i could think of, is to create an SWF, that contains your asset as a symbol, with smoothing turned on, and embed this symbol from that SWF ...
hope that helps ...
greetz
back2dos
A better, more general solution. Not only does it handle the above case, but it does it
Without subclasses
It works with any UIComponent, including IRawChildContainers (like Container), which hide skin children in rawChildren
It only smooths newly added items, instead of running every time the control updates.
public static function smoothChildBitmaps(object:UIComponent):void{
// Define a nested smooth method
function smoothChildren(val:UIComponent):void{
var childList:IChildList;
if(val is IRawChildrenContainer){
childList = (val as IRawChildrenContainer).rawChildren;
}
else{
childList = object;
}
for(var i:int = 0; i < childList.numChildren; i++){
var child:Bitmap = childList.getChildAt(i) as Bitmap;
if(child != null){
child.smoothing = true;
}
}
};
// Call the nested method on the object right away
smoothChildren(object);
// Set up an event handler to re-call the method when a child is added
object.addEventListener(
Event.ADDED,
function(args:Event):void{
smoothChildren(object);
}
);
}
Silly, but it works.
import flash.display.Bitmap;
import mx.controls.Button;
public class SmoothButton extends Button{
protected override function updateDisplayList(unscaledWidth:Number, unscaledHeight:Number):void{
for(var i:int = 0; i < this.numChildren; i++){
var child:Bitmap = this.getChildAt(i) as Bitmap;
if(child != null){
child.smoothing = true;
}
}
}
}
I do not know what you folks banged your head on no offense, just joking. I had a desk :-P
Anyway, those scripts presented are totally useless! For one thing you cannot cast a uicomponent to bitmap! The other thing is, that the seconds script with rawchildren ist more ore less the same. rawchildren gets your the children and the chrome of the container - that's it. If you have a button in a container you can try to smooth the chrome of the container - the rest stays the same since all casts to bitmap will fail.
So, did anyon rdfm?
On the other hand. One could try out stage.quality to stagequality.best. If you check the adobe forums http://forums.adobe.com/thread/427899 you will see that flex runs well - just air kind of ignores this :-(
If those two scripts ever worked - esp. the part with button as bitmap - I'll go and smash my head somewhere :-). I see NO WAY in the class hierarchy that this could work. After all, numChildren only gives you uicomponents or displayobjects but nothing more!
I am creating a canvas in actionscript like :
private var cvs_preview:Canvas = null;
private function show_preview():void
{
this.cvs_preview = new Canvas();
this.cvs_preview.id = "cvs_preview_1";
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('backgroundColor', 0x000000);
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('backgroundAlpha', 1);
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('borderColor', 0x417FDD);
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('cornerRadius', 10);
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('borderStyle', 'solid');
this.cvs_preview.setStyle('dropShadowEnabled', true);
var pt:Point = image.localToGlobal(new Point(image.x, image.y));
this.cvs_preview.x = pt.x - 50;
this.cvs_preview.y = pt.y - 50;
this.cvs_preview.height = 200;
this.cvs_preview.width = 250;
//this.cvs_preview.addEventListener(FlexEvent.CREATION_COMPLETE, get_focus_on_canvas);
//this.cvs_preview.focusManager.setFocus(
//this.cvs_preview.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, end_preview_on_focus_change);
this.cvs_preview.addEventListener(FocusEvent.MOUSE_FOCUS_CHANGE, end_preview_on_focus_change);
Application.application.addChild(this.cvs_preview); //add as top-most visible container
btn_mini_preview.enabled = false;
}
So on the focus change i want to run the "end_preview_on_focus_change()"
but this is not working.
As per my understanding, i think the canvas not getting any focus in the first place. I was trying to use focusManager.setFocus to do that after the canvas's creation complete. but even that is giving me an error.
the code i was trying on Creation.Complete is :
private function get_focus_on_canvas(e:FlexEvent)
{
focusManager.setFocus(e.target);
//Alert.show("testing img complete");
}
this is giving me an error "1118: Implicit coercion of a value with static type Object to a possibly unrelated type mx.managers:IFocusManagerComponent."
basically i just want to use the focus out event of the canvas.
Can someone help me with this...
I have been on this issue since a long time.
Regards
Zeeshan
The error is correct. You have an object of type Object which you are trying to use as an IFocusManagerComponent. This will not work. To accomplish that line of code, you need to do something like
focusManager.setFocus( IFocusManagerComponent( e.target ) );
This, of course, assumes that the target implements IFocusManagerComponent. It will give you an error otherwise (and likely will in this case because Canvas is not listed as an IFocusManagerComponent). The good news is that Canvas does have a drawFocus method which will accomplish the same thing.
As to your MOUSE_FOCUS_CHANGE event, that will only be fired if an object already HAS focus and then loses it. I think you are better off using FlexEvent.CREATION_COMPLETE. This will ensure that the component has registered itself with all of the appropriate classes in the Flex SDK so that the FocusManager can even be aware of the new object. Whatever you do, do not try to set focus on something which has not been added to the stage (ie: Event.ADDED has been called).
As another piece of advice -- Event.ADDED bubbles, make sure that event.currentTarget == event.target to make sure that you are listening to the correct object. Otherwise, you might be calling the same function multiple times erroneously.
Only a few classes implement IFocusManagerComponent as others mentioned and Canvas is not one of them. If you really must call FocusManager.setFocus() you will have to extend the canvas class to implement this interface and use that class instead. You don't have to write any methods to implement this interface, all methods have already been implemented by UIComponent itself
//FocusableCanvas.as (include appropriate package and import statements)
public class FocusableCanvas extends Canvas implements IFocusManagerComponent
{
public function FocusableCanvas()
{
super();
}
}
//Now use this class instead of Canvas
this.cvs_preview = new FocusableCanvas();
//setFocus in creation complete handler
FocusManager.setFocus(IFocusManagerComponent(e.target));
But if all you want to do is to set focus on the canvas upon it's creation, you can call canvas.setFocus() from the creationComplete handler instead.
private function get_focus_on_canvas(e:FlexEvent)
{
Canvas(e.currentTarget).setFocus();
trace("done");
}
I see two problems, and no perfect solutions. With any luck, this can help you out.
First of all, e.target returns an object typecast with type Object. This explains your implict coercion error, because Object does not implement IFocusManagerComponent.
Second, iFocusManagerComponent is only implemented by Accordion, AdvancedListBase, Button, ButtonBar, ChartBase, ComboBase, DateChooser, DateField, HTML, ListBase, MenuBar, NumericStepper, TabNavigator, TextArea, TextInput, UIMovieClip as per this entry in the Flex 3.4 AS3 Reference.
This leads me to believe that a Canvas element cannot take focus and has simply inherited access to the FocusManager through inheritance of UIComponent.
The only solutions I can see are to utilize something other than Canvas to handle your focus related concerns, or subclass Canvas and implement iFocusManagerComponent, though that looks fairly complex.
Edit
Apologies for missing drawFocus in the above solution.
Please try;
private function get_focus_on_canvas(e:FlexEvent)
{
this.cvs_preview.setFocus();
}