So I have a small div for the border, and three divs inside (see image at end). Green is full size (minus padding etc); Blue should float left and have specific width; Red should float right and also have a specific width. However I'm messing something up. Both of the blue and red divs float outside the main div. What am I doing wrong here?
Here's my current code:
<div style="border: 2px solid black; width: 630px;">
<div style="width:auto;">Lorem ipsum</div>
<div style="width:150px; float:left;">This is the blue box</div>
<div style="width:150px; float:right;">This is the red box</div>
</div>
Ideal Float http://www.mfrl.org/images/howtofloat.png
Positioning of floats is funny. Basically, the main div is not taking into account the height of the floated elements when figuring out its own height. The easiest way to resolve this is to add a clearing element after the floated elements.
This fiddle should explain itself clearly: http://jsfiddle.net/QQxb3/2/
I think that the folks who commented on your post saying that it does work must have misunderstood what you mean by "main div", because specification, which Chrome does follow and IE follows in this particular instance, would place the floated elements outside of its parent div.
Related
I have a problem about bottom alignment of a div and I don't find any solutions.
All div are contained in a main div, one is left floated and all other must be place on the right of it;
Just one of them it must be bottom aligned, but trying with position absolute and bottom tag it's placed over the floated one.
CSS:
#container {width:730px;position: relative;min-height:120px;}
#image_box {width:220px; float:left; padding-right:10px;background:#222;color:#FFF;}
#box_dx1 {width:500px;background:#666;}
#box_dx2 {width:500px;padding-top:10px;background:#999;}
#box_dx3 {width:500px;padding-top:10px;background:#CCC;}
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="image_box">Box Sx Image <br>Row<br>Row<br>Row<br>Row<br>Row<br>Row</div>
<div id="box_dx1">Box Dx Title</div>
<div id="box_dx2">Box Dx Description</div>
<div id="box_dx3">Box Dx Param</div>
</div>
Moreover div's heights are variable, image_box is optional(cannot exist) and text of box_dx2 could wrap under the image_box.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
If the height of box_dx1, box_dx3 and image-box is always going to be same, you could just set a min-height for box_dx2. That way, if you add more content to box_dx2 it will eventually become taller than the image and text will wrap around it. In your example it would be something like:
#box_dx2 {
width: 500px;
padding-top:10px;
background:#999;
min-height: 70px;
}
jsFiddle
However, if the height of those boxes isn't fixed, maybe the easist thing is to calculate the min-height using some jQuery.
Can anybody explain why no background color is displayed in the outermost div in the space of the inner div's margin?
<div style="background-color:yellow;">
<div style="margin-top:10px;background-color:black;color:white;">
Why isn't the background color yellow inside my top margin?
</div>
</div>
Divs are block elements, but they take up no space on their own (other than creating a line break) so your inner div is filling all available space within the outer div, masking the yellow background. Add some padding to the outermost div and you will see the yellow.
This is known as "margin collapse".
In CSS, the adjoining margins of two or more boxes (which might or might not be siblings) can combine to form a single margin. Margins that combine this way are said to collapse, and the resulting combined margin is called a collapsed margin.
As found in other answers, adding padding or border to the parent will prevent the margins collapsing.
I also had success applying the following CSS to the container, based on tarkabak's method described here. (Please note limited browser compatibility of :before and :after.)
.prevent-margin-collapse:before,
.prevent-margin-collapse:after
{
content: "\00a0"; /* No-break space character */
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
height: 0;
}
<div style="background-color:yellow;" class="prevent-margin-collapse">
<div style="margin-top:10px;background-color:black;color:white;">
Why isn't the background color yellow inside my top margin?
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/yCHkW/
In addition to the other answers: This is a matter of collapsing margins. The section "Collapsing Margins Between Parent and Child Elements" should apply in this specific case.
Update: Here's a statement regarding this topic taken directly from the box model specification of CSS3 (you can find almost the same sentence within the CSS2 specification as well):
Certain adjoining margins combine to form a single margin. Those margins are said to “collapse.” Margins are adjoining if there are no nonempty content, padding or border areas or clearance to separate them.
To achieve what you want to see change your html as followed:
<div style="background-color:yellow; padding-top:10px;">
<div style="background-color:black;color:white;">
Why isn't the background color yellow inside my top margin?
</div>
</div>
The reason is that the outer div has no width set and just takes the size of its content.
I would imagine it has something to do with not inheriting any properties from elsewhere.
<div style="background-color:yellow; position: fixed;">
<div style="margin-top:10px;background-color:black;color:white;">
Why isn't the background color yellow inside my top margin?
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/rJ3HG/
I'm not sure if that title made sense but I'll try to explain to the best of my ability.
I want to add a div basically on top of an image, which is simple. I wrap the image around a div and then give things like top:, left:, from that.
Yet this div that the image is inside of exceeds the border of the actual image and goes all the way out to the parent div. How do I make it so that the border of the div just wraps around the actual image inside the div.
The black square is an image. But the div with the class of image, does not have a border that wraps around the image.
<div id="page">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Black_300.jpg">
<div class="innerimage"></div>
</div>
</div>
Add display: inline-block to the .image div:
display: inline-block;
http://jsfiddle.net/wwRhB/4/
Short version: Why does overflow:auto cause a div to the right of a left floated div not to wrap its text around the left floated div? (Bonus: Is this an acceptable way to accomplish a column effect?)
Long version...
I have two divs that I wish to be next to each other, and displayed as columns. The div on the left has a specific width and height. And the div on the left is shorter than the div on the right. However, I do not want the text in the right div to wrap under the left div.
Here was my first attempt...
<div>
<div style="border:1px solid grey;
width:100px;
height:100px;
float:left;">
Div on the left.
</div>
<div>
Imagine lots and lots of text here...
</div>
<div style="clear:both"/>
</div>
...I knew the text in the right div would wrap under the left div. And it did.
Then I remembered a page I had created that had a column effect. I had copied and pasted it from I know not where. All it did was assign overflow:auto to the div on the right. It looks like this...
<div>
<div style="border:1px solid grey;
width:100px;
height:100px;
float:left;">
Div on the left.
</div>
<div style="overflow:auto">
Imagine lots and lots of text here...
</div>
<div style="clear:both"/>
</div>
Voila, the right divs text no longer wrapped under the first (left) div! The second (right) div appeared as a column.
So, I read everything I could find on overflow:auto and found no mention of why I should see this behaviour. Can anyone explain it to me?
Also, is this an acceptable way to achieve a column effect?
overflow: auto (or anything but visible) causes your second div to create a new block formatting context. This means the text within that div is now in its own formatting context, rather than sharing the same one as your first, left-floating div (which is the containing block of both divs), and so it is no longer allowed to flow around the first div.
Floats also generate their own BFCs, but that doesn't exactly relate to the matter at hand. It does however also prevent reflow, achieving a column effect, as shown in the other answers.
Is this an acceptable way of creating a column effect? I don't know, but it does seem unconventional. You can just float the second div as well instead for the reason mentioned above (although even that, in favor of upcoming true layout modes like flexbox and grids, is now seen as a browser compatibility hack these days, but is the best we've got for the time being).
Remember that inline content is designed to be able to flow naturally around floated content; see CSS2.1, §9.5 Floats.
Remember also that the purpose of overflow is to control content overflow in a box with a limited size. That it causes a box to create a new BFC, influencing floats as a result, is but a side effect, the reason for which is explored here. It's a lengthy read, but it includes a bit about preventing reflow, which I'll quote here for ease of reference:
And so, this change was brought about in CSS2.1, documented here. Now if you apply an overflow value other than visible only to the second box, what a browser does is push the entire box aside to make way for the float, because the box now creates a new block formatting context that encloses its contents, instead of flowing around the float. Here's what it looks like with overflow: auto for example:
Note that there is no clearance; if the second box had clear: left or clear: both it would be pushed down, not to the side, regardless of whether it established its own BFC.
By the way, yes, this means your clearing div needs to be there if you want to always clear the first div.
To get the divs next to each other they both will need a float and fit in the surrounding div.
Example:
<div style="width:200px;">
<div style="width:100px; float:left;">
content
</div>
<div style="width:100px; float:left;">
content
</div>
</div>
If you want the outlining div to grow with the largest div place overflow:hidden; to the div.. If that div doesnt have a height with it then it will scale with the larges div.
Preview:
http://jsfiddle.net/WzVBE/
Remove float:left from the first div.
<div>
<div style="border:1px solid grey; width:100px; height:100px;">
Div on the left.
</div>
<div style="overflow:auto; ">
Imagine lots and lots of text here...
</div>
<div style="clear:both"/>
</div>
DEMO
You can try this
<div style="width:800px; background-color:#CCC">
<div style="width:300px; height:100px; float:left; background-color:#CCC">
Div on the left.
</div>
<div style="height:100px; float:left; width:500px; background-color:#999">
Imagine lots and lots of text here...
</div>
<div style="clear:both"/>
</div>
Once assigning overflow with a value other than visible, all its child elements will be clipped. It is the purpose of the overflow property. However, I have to make one of the child elements to be 'floated' and not clipped (like a popup) -- just one of them; not all. Is it possible?
Take the following as an example. Is there any CSS setting that does not clip the yellow div, while clipping the blue element? (Currently they are both clipped)
<div style="position:absolute;width:100px;height:50px;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid black">
<div style="top:30px;width:50px;height:100px;background:yellow">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;left:50px;top:0;width:50px;height:100px;background:blue">
</div>
</div>
The code can be also found at http://jsfiddle.net/kZBxD/
Do you need something like this:
check this fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/kZBxD/3/
<div style="position:absolute;width:100px;height:50px;overflow:hidden;border:1px solid black">
<div style=" position:fixed;width:50px;height:100px;background:yellow"></div>
try the below fiddle: the yellow div is floating outside and blue div is inside as per you need.
http://jsfiddle.net/kZBxD/2/