When using the core drupal 'Upload' module, I get a user-friendly way of uploading files to my website and providing a download link on the page.
But the page is formatted like this:
Attachment Size
Somefile.doc 13.37mb
Article contents here
And I would rather it was the other way around, showing the article contents before the attachments. I have explored how to do this and come up blank.
I'm using the 'Garland' theme if it makes a difference to how I can implement a solution.
You must be using some module that changed that order. Or had it in use. Since Drupal-core has no way to re-order fields, and Drupal core upload-field has hardcoded its position in the form and in the display.
However, if you want to re-order fields in Drupal nodes, there are several ways:
The first option would be to solve this in your theme. But since you are using a vanilla (core) theme, changing the code of that theme is out of the question.
The second option, just as valid, but a lot more disrupting, is to involve the "CCK (content construction kit)" module. A warning is in place: this module is both complex and powerfull. Over 90% of the Drupal sites use this module, but since it is large and heavy, it will make your project a lot more complex, debugging a lot harder and performance a potential problem. Use CCK only if you think it fits well in your entire project, not just for re-ordering a set of fields.
The third option is to write a simple module that re-orders fields.
With hook_form_alter(), you can change the appearance, workings and order of fields in any form, including the node forms.
With hook_nodeapi(), you can change the behaviour of any node on many stages, including when it gets displayed: to re-order fields.
As said above: you may have such a module (with hook_nodapi) re-ordering your output, since Drupal core upload has the weight of that field hardwired.
Related
It may sound 'weird' but I need to have a view that lists all the content types I have.
For example i have two content types : contenttypeA, contenttypeB
I want to create a view that just displays the two content types (and show number of items of that type, but that can be done later).
For now what I did is add one content of each content type and list them but only show the 'node type'; it works well if there's at least one content but I want to display even without any content of that content type.
Any idea ?
Introducing the node_type table to Views requires a custom module and some Views API knowledge however http://drupal.org/node/1001222 will give you a head start.
Use a Customfield: PHP code field and custom code the whole thing with PHP. This is provided by the Views Custom Field module.
Use the Table Wizard module to make the node_type table available to views. You may need to use the Data module as well since they say that all future development is going there.
Expose the node_type table yourself by writing a custom module using the Views API as suggested by chx.
Number one is the quick and dirty way, but number 2 might be a little more manageable, but I am not completely sure it will do everything you want. If you do number 3 make sure you contribute back to the community by putting your module on drupal.org.
There is no native functionality in Views to do that. You can write a static page or (overkill) a module that provide a "system"-like type similar to Views Watchdog.
(I've posted this on the drupal forum too btw)
I'm converting the company websites to use Drupal, or at least trying to check that its going to be the best way forward. I have a background in PHP development, and I'm currently using the CakePHP framwork. I've built this site (not my design) and I can see how to replicate most of the functionality using Drupal, most likely using the CCK module.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yk6u8mt
As you can see from the homepage:
A user chooses a country.
The country is passed using an ajax call to a script that decides which phone is best based on 'in country' network coverage.
A div is shown recommending the visitor the best phone for that country.
I'm wondering how to go about this in Drupal, I'm definitely not after a step by step guide, I just want to know if this kind of thing is possible with Drupal, and what approach to use.
If someone can help that would be superb. Thanks.
Okay, so you've got a path you're defining in hook_menu, which is where your form is being presented - or else you've got it set up as a webform in a node, that could work too.
Either way, in your form you're going to be using AHAH - check out http://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/developer--topics--forms_api_reference.html/6#ahah and http://drupal.org/node/348475 .
Basically, you're going to define another path in hook_menu that's of type MENU_CALLBACK, and which will receive the country as input, and then will return the div that you'll display on the screen.
One core example of AHAH that may be useful to you is where you're entering a password and it lets you know if the password is secure enough - check that out.
Edit: There's also some good examples at http://drupal.org/project/examples.
I would look into using CCK and views. you can set up filters for the views. If filters don't work, you have the ability to include php code. I have also successfully added jquery code in the header of a view through which I was then able to have my view filtered by what is typed in a text box.
Coming from CakePHP using Drupal is a pain in the a** - even more for developers.
It's application structure might be designed to ease extensibility but this only means you have a system to enable your own plugins and themes.
While modules are basically the M+C-part the themes are the V-part of an MVC-application. The problem is that this seperation is not very strict in Drupal - in fact you have to break it sometimes in order to make things work (e.g. you have to include a theme_mymodule_myfunction() into your module as default output which you then can override with your theme using mytheme_mymodule_myfunction() ) And don't even bother looking for classes ( see http://drupal.org/node/547518 ).
Also there is no real link from a module to a theme. On many occations this is a good thing as you can switch modules and themes seperatly without creating a problem. For application builders coming from CakePHP (or any other framework) you often feel a lack of "wholesomeness" - you create parts for a base software and have to live with it's drawbacks.
IMHO I wouldn't recommend this step. Drupal is fine if you have to manage a website and might add a few modules to add neccessary value (image gallery etc.) but I definetly don't recommend it as a base for a customized web-app.
I have inherited a Drupal site on which (for some reason) there are two different content types for news: one for press releases and one for everything else. I would like to combine the two and use a taxonomy to categorize the press releases and other news types.
Is it even possible to do this? The site is using a number of modules, including Views and CCK, and I don't know how much a change like this would affect module data.
http://drupal.org/project/node_convert
The module linked above works extremely well for migrating nodes from one content type to another.
When you are done, you can then use VBO (http://drupal.org/project/views_bulk_operations) to mass manipulate the taxonomy changes you need.
Is it possible? Yes.
Is it easy? No.
To quote a well used phrase:
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
You can get your site to work like you describe, and if you started with a clean site that you were going to build, it would be no problem. It's just a matter of choice. Now when you do have a database with views, content and other stuff, it wont be easy. You would have to:
Go through all the views, and set them up to use taxonomy and the 1 content type.
Migrate all the data into 1 content type. This might evolve setting up CCK for this content type to fit both, and take this into consideration when migrating the data.
It's possible the content types are used elsewhere, in custom modules, settings etc, these need to be tracked down and fixed as well.
So it's a lot of work with little/no gain.
Of course it's possible. The change won't necessarily be difficult if you've got a good understanding of how each content type is being used. You'll just need to be careful as it's a fundamental change.
If you think that the two different content types are not warranted and it is, in fact duplication of information then you could justify merging the two. Good house keeping!
You could phase out the unwanted content type over time and then when you're confident you've got it just right, build your self a merge module to move the old nodes into the new format. You could also build yourself test views and content types that you can dispose of later.
It may also help to install the devel module to get a programmatic overview of what your nodes look like. You shouldn't leave this module running on live sites as it effects performance.
Sometimes, there's a fair amount of crossover between content taxonomy and content types. It helps to ask yourself: What is a classification of an object and what's an attribute?
It is possible to change the content type of nodes.
The problem is if the content types use different CCK fields, which are present in a content type but not in the other. In such case, if you change the content type, those fields would not appear in the converted node; you should convert all those fields manually, or create a custom module to do that.
The Content Construction Kit (CCK) is one of the most useful Drupal modules. It allows you to easily add custom fields to a content type.
However, these new fields are created through Drupal itself and stored in the database. This means that if you change a CCK field in your development environment you need to manually make the same change in your test and production environments.
Worse, there's no simple way to determine if your environments have gotten out of sync. So if you ever inadvertantly mess up or omit a change as you put it into test or production you may never realise.
I'm looking for a technique that allows me to export CCK field definitions that supports:
Importing into new environments (obviously)
Creating new fields
Ideally the export would also support:
Diffing
Modification of existing fields
Deletion of existing fields
Some kind of conflict resolution in situations where data clashes with field changes
The simpler and more repeatable the solution the better. I would like to avoid custom scripting or GUI automation unless there is a very clean way to do this.
Are you aware of the Content Copy module that is part of the standard cck package? It offers export/import functionality for fields and whole content types to some extent.
It does not offer diffing by itself, and I'm not sure about how well it does modifications of already existing fields, but it helps a lot for moving new fields and/or content types.
Also, you can save the output of exports from different instances and diff them locally, which gives you a pretty good overview of changes (especially revealing 'out of sync' situations quickly).
After enabling, check the new export and import tabs on top of '/admin/content/types'.
It is not that mature yet but the features module will allow you to do this. It packages up CCK fields (among other things) into drupal modules which you can distribute.
I personally use the Node Export module + Node Export File module (included, for CCK /image fields).
The entire node is exported into a textarea, as an associative array. The import form is similar: you paste the node array into a textarea. These processes are implemented as node operations, so they can be done in bulk (on the /admin/content/node page, or in your custom deployment module).
The benefit of this process is that you can modify the node data in transit.
Using a text editor, you can change the content type, title, add/remove/modify fields, whatever you want. Using a text editor with good find/replace, you can mass-edit hundreds of nodes. Since you have text, you can probably do all the things on your requirements list using existing tools or quickie scripts.
I'm about to embark on a journey to build a multilingual Drupal site, where I will most likely have to use Views, Panels and Taxonomy pretty heaily. I am a bit worried about the new-node-for-every-language approach, especially using Panels.
So far I've gotten it to work similarly to what I want by not having multilingual support for the Panels content-type, and fetching content that is from Current language and language neutral . This seem to work as expected, but I'm seeing some problems with it. There might be the occasion that I will have to have a language specific Panel (not published in English for example). If I need to have all my Panels multilingual, there seems to be alot of work to place the nodes for every column in every page in every language. I'm thinking I could possibly solve this by fetching the content with some kind of view with arguments, but this will most likely also lead to alot of work.
Is there some proper way of doing what I'm attempting to describe, or do I have alot of seemingly unnecessary work to expect?
I assume you have i18n module (http://drupal.org/project/i18n) and Views module installed. Then you can create a view for each language - one can choose language in "Filter" section of the view definition.
Once you have views, then you can link them to menus or blocks. The problem is you must have a separate version of block or menu for every language, with a proper view associated - Drupal is choosing proper language version itself according to the configuration (typically content type set in a browser). I haven't found any easier way of doing that.
Fortunately preparing multilingual content is not that hard thanks to the "transalte" functionality for nodes after enabling i18n module, so new node for every page is something one can live with.
BTW you are right that the way Drupal is doing i18n is not the best solution one can think of. I am having hard time with it sometimes.
Well there are some serious issues with views over translating taxonomy terms or vocabs names. This could be resolved with some extra modules or / and custom PHP code inside views fields. Usually 70% of modules does not support translation, then you need to patch them to support it. While others does have translation possibility, but it could be two possible ways: uses variables table to hold different translations UI dependent (need to switch to other language to find a string) or uses translation field tables to utilize "translation interface" from admin menu.
So far that's it :)
I wish you luck!