Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
Microsoft Project and Waterfall
Does using Microsoft Project force you into a waterfall model? Could anyone point me to examples of successful iterative (agile for example) projects that successfully use(d) MS Project as a supporting tool?
Consider other alternatives for providing management with the transparency into development work which they presumably want. It's not going to help you with the frequent replanning that's at the core of agile methods -- MS Project is more likely to prove a hindrance.
Instead, talk to them about using low-tech whiteboards to show progress on objectives through e.g. percentages of user stories completed, estimated and actual velocities and highlighted issues. But if they're pushing MS Project, they're going to need to be at least tentatively converted to iterative/agile methods. Google around... they may ask for figures to back your position: show them the numbers on agility rather than on MS Project.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building a program that I want to be able to exchange information with other programs running in another computer. I started using C# and a library called SimpleTCP. The main issue is that is too simple and only send and receive messages.
I'm looking for something that I can predetermine functions that one or the other can call from each other.
I looked on google and stack overflow but I was unable to find an appropriated subject to study, what should I be looking for to learn this? Thank you
The most complete protocol for what you want is gRPC. There is a learning curve but worth it in my opinion. https://github.com/grpc/grpc
There is a way but it's little bit different
Such programs like this written in tow different languages
You can make a center database between the both programs
In this situation it's very easy to communicate and receive ,send data
You can mysql ,oracl, mariadb or any Database you prefer
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
My research team has a series of "relatively" standard analyses that they run for different experiments, but need slightly different analysis procedures. I want to give them the freedom to analyze their own data, despite being programming naive. I would like to create a GUI that asks them a series of questions that will lead them to the right script (which I will have written, and have available on the back end) so that they can just push "run" and have their analysis spit out.
Any ideas on how to create a GUI that will lead them to the right script would be fantastic. Even better would be a GUI that allows them to input variable names, which then amend the code so that the outputs are a little more custom.
If you have access to a web server (intranet or internet), Shiny can do what you want. It is a web application layer on top of R.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Recently, I am working on my course project, the topic is the creation of a new hybrid software process model by integrating Scrum and Team Software Process (TSP). Integration of these two models will be based on the SEMAT Essence Kernel Framework.
I am wondering:
Which steps should be followed for this integration (like
determination of the roles and artifacts in these two models)?
What should be the criteria to decide on good sides?
Thanks in advance!
The best way I think I can answer this question is by quoting the agile manifesto.
"Individuals and interactions over processes and tools"
Agile is about people, teamwork and craftsmanship. It's about involving the customer closely to figure out what really is needed - and delivering that, in small increments of working software. Agile is inspect and adapt, based on experimental delivery and the feedback and evidence that comes from that.
Trust yourself. Work closely together and you can do this. The best learning often comes from doing. :)
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have some software which we added an open common file format (.iwb) to. The government organisation that initiated that work has been cut in the cutbacks.
Now a not for profit organisation has taken up the mantle, however its going to cost and once you pay you are not allowed to reveal the "materials" you gain.
http://www.imsglobal.org/iwbcff/jointheIWBCFFIalliance.cfm
I understand people need to be paid but the whole not sharing thing makes it feel like its going against what a standard is meant for.
What's a good strategy:
Pay up and shut up (there might be plenty of closed standards
that work in this way)
Fork the standard to an organisation that will not require people to pay to read it
Drop the file format
Stay behind the curve and reverse engineer the files
Any standard that is not freely accessible is no standard at all but is instead a proprietary format. I'd say either:
petition them to open the standard up
Drop your support for it (and tell your customers why you have to)
Fork an earlier open version and create a free version of the standard
Paying for access to a standard sounds like a horrible idea because:
It encourages this behavior
It's likely to just be wasted money because others won't want to pay either, and a standard used by no one is not a standard.
Publish the last version you had access to.
Site that you support that version of the standard.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
My software is a video-audio converter and video cutter. I have used Qt(compiled from source) and ffmpeg (compiled from source). I have to prepare System Usage Specification outline and Specify Usage patterns of the system and indicate it using Run charts / Histograms. I am told to use Winrunner for this purpose. I don't know exactly what to do. Please help.
I never heard about 'System Usage Specification', this must be a terminology specific to your company.
A wild guess would be that it's something close to the Use Case diagram of UML, to define what the users can do and which action they have to perform to lead them to the expected result.
Sounds like a uggly word for "handbook" or "usage guide" from the pov of a end-user (though I never heared of that specific term)