I have an internal website that is using integrated windows authentication and this website uses sql server & active directory queries via the System.Directory.Services namespace.
To use the System.Directory.Services namespace in ASP.NET I have to run IIS under an account that has the correct privileges and importantly have impersonation set to true in the web config. If this is done then when I make a query against AD then the credentials of the wroker process (IIS) are used instead of the ASPNET account and therefore the queries will now succeed.
Now if I am also using Sql Server with a connection string configured for integrated security ('Integrated Security=SSPI') then this interprets the ASP.NET impersonation to mean that I want to access the database as the windows credentials of the web request not the worker process.
I hope I'm wrong and that I've got the config wrong, but I don't think I have and this seems not to be inconsistent?
It should be noted I'm using IIS 5.1 for development and obivously this doesn't have the concept of app-pools which I believe would resolve the problem.
Following the documentation if you want to impersonate a SPECIFIC user, you must put the username and password in the web.config file, so that it uses that same user account for all requests.
Related
I have created a group on AD, and configured this group to have access to my SQL Server. With it, any .Net app, SQL Server and SSIS are able to connect to SQL Server using any AD account that's on that group, they just need to set Trusted Connection/Windows Authentication.
Now I need to do the same on IIS apps. But I have never configured IIS and don't know how to do it. I Googled it, but everything refers to user authenticating to IIS using NTLM, not IIS connecting to SQL Server.
For Server2008 and higher you will likely want to use Application Pool Identity. This article helped get me going when I set up an IIS / SQL Application.
http://www.iis.net/learn/manage/configuring-security/application-pool-identities
EDIT:
Specifically where it demonstrates how to use a built in account there is an option to choose a custom account.
https://thycotic.force.com/support/s/article/Running-Secret-Server-IIS-Application-Pool-with-a-Service-Account
EDIT2:
Using windows auth - https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/chiranth/2014/04/17/setting-up-kerberos-authentication-for-a-website-in-iis/
Short version:
For IIS 7.5 web applications with Windows Authentication does the end
user need to have Read file access?
Long version:
I have an intranet ASP.NET web app that uses windows authentication. It's installed at dozens of different companies and normally the authentication works fine: users navigate to the site e.g. http://appserver/MyApp, the app recognizes who they're logged in as and displays pages accordingly. I just installed it at a new client and encountered a problem:
When connecting e.g. to http://appserver/MyApp I'm prompted for windows credentials but after entering them I'm repeatedly prompted. After several re-entering credentials I'm shown a 401 error page saying "401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials.". So not only is it not passing through my identity but even when entering the username & password it's still denying access.
Giving Read & Execute permissions to the end users of the app solves this problem, but I don't think this should be necessary at all.
In the windows Application Event Log there's a message "File authorization failed for the request" along with Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE and User: [the correct workstation users's domain account]. This suggests that the file access is being performed with the User's identity, not the AppPool identity of Network Service. Sure enough if I grant the end user Read & Execute permission (I didn't try Read only) to the application's directory then everything works correctly: when the user browses to the site they're authenticated automatically, not prompted, and the web site correctly recognizes their identity! Therefore my workaround solution is to give Read & Execute permission to Everybody on the application directory...but this is not an ideal solution.
This seems very strange. I've never needed to do this before in IIS 7.5, so far as I recall, and definitely never needed to in IIS 6 or IIS 7. Is this a new IIS7.5 thing? The documentation says that Impersonation is turned off by default. I added a element to the web.config to be sure, removed file permissions other than Network Service, but the problem remained.
Any thoughts? Is it normal for Windows Authenticated sites on IIS 7.5 for end users to need file permissions on the web server files?
Some relevant details:
Network Service
has Full Control file permissions to the app folder.
When connecting from the server itself I was prompted for credentials
but after entering them i'm authenticated and the application works
correctly including displaying my windows login and connecting and
retrieving data from the db. I later determined that it was prompting
for credentials because http://localhost was in the trusted sites
and therefore not recognised as the Intranet Zone and thus not
passing identity through. I also determined that it was working as
this user identity because it's an admin user who has file
permissions.
The web server is running Windows Server 2008 R2 / IIS
7.5. It didn't have IIS on it until I installed it. I installed the default features as well as Windows Authentication, ASP.NET, and
possibly a couple of other items. A separate WCF app I installed that
uses IIS, anonymous authentication & .net 2.0 is working fine on
that web server.
The app install process is a manual copy of files,
creation of IIS App Pools & web apps, updating connection strings,
etc.
I checked the IE security settings. It was recognizing the
server as in the Intranet zone and had the option 'Automatic logon
only in Intranet zone' selected. Also on Advanced Settings the
'Enable Integrated Windows Authentication' option was checked.
After
installing IIS I ran aspnet_regiis -i for .net 2.0 and
aspnet_regiis -iru for .net 4.0.
Anonymous authentication is
disabled for my app and Windows Authentication enabled.
The app is
running on ASP.NET v4 but there's another app I installed
experiencing the same issue running ASP.NET v2.
The app is running
with Identity = Network Service and in 32-bit mode.
Database
connection string includes Trusted Connection=True and database
permissions are granted to the web server account [domain]\[server]$
e.g. DGM\MyServer$.
In IIS > Authentication > Windows Authentication > Providers the list was Negotiate first then NTLM. I tried reordering so NTLM is first.
In the Windows Security Event Log there
were a series of Microsoft Windows security auditing events: Logon
and Logoff. They indicated that the Logon was successful and was
displaying the User Id of the workstation user. This are from when
I'm connecting from another workstation and receive a 401
Unauthorized after several attempts.
I see someone has had this problem reported here but with no solution. Originally I posted in the ASP and then the IIS forums with no answers so far.
Update:
This msdn article says
When Windows authentication is enabled but impersonation is disabled, ASP.NET performs file access checks in the file authorization module using the credentials that are sent from the browser (my emphasis). Impersonation does not need to be enabled, because the FileAuthorizationModule module ensures that the requesting user is allowed read access or write access to the resource, depending on the request verb (for example, GET or POST) before executing the request. This behavior applies to any requests that enter managed code. In earlier versions of ASP.NET, accessing files based on URIs such as "Default.aspx" triggered the access check. In ASP.NET MVC applications, where access to resources is typically performed using extensionless URLs, this check typically does not apply, because there is not a physical file to check. In that case, the FileAuthorizationModule class falls back to checking access-control lists (ACLs) for the folder.
This does suggest that the end user needs permissions to the files (in the case of .aspx) or the folder (for MVC) ... although still this seems slightly tucked away and non-definitive. This article about App Pools says they're used as the identity for securing resources, which contradicts the idea of needing to grant privileges to end users. Unless the rules are different for App Pools and NETWORK SERVICE, which could be the case but would be surprising.
Are authenticated users allowed to the app folder?
We were also fighting with this issue, and started setting up security groups so we could give our users file level permissions. Then one of our server admins stumbled across a couple of new properties that allow the app to authenticate to the file system under set credentials, and resolved the need for the users to have access. Here is what he came up with…
There are two IIS settings that control this:
Physical Path Credentials Physical Path Credentials Logon type
By default, Physical Path Credentials is set to Application User
(Pass-through authentication). This means that IIS doesn’t do any
impersonation when handling Windows Authentication requests. This can,
however, be set to a specific user (though not, unfortunately, the
application pool identity, which would be ideal). Physical Path
Credentials Logon Type is set by default to Clear-Text. For my testing
I set this to Interactive (though this may not be the correct value).
Possible values are Clear-Text, Batch, Interactive, and Network.
To set this up I did the following:
Created a local account (IIS-AccessUser)
Granted IIS-AccessUser read and execute access to the /home directory of the site.
Added IIS-AccessUser to IIS_IUSRS group (necessary for accessing .NET temporary files)
Set IIS-AccessUser as the Physical Path Credentials
Set Physical Path Credentials Logon Type to Interactive
Doing the above allowed me to log in to the application directly,
without having to allow Authenticated Users, or me having to be a
member of any of the groups in the /home folder. It also still
preserved .NET Authorization roles, so I still could not access parts
of the site that I was not allowed to.
The short answer is NO. You are not required to grant file access permissions when using Windows Authentication in IIS 7.0 and IIS 7.5.
We were only able to discover this because our server admin smelled the security and management issues that arise from taking the route of granting file level access to users and groups.
For anyone dealing with this issue or if you are setting up a new IIS7/IIS7.5 server and/or moving from IIS 6, here is an article that gives you all of the Windows Authentication options and configurations that need to be modified to avoid granting file level access to individuals or groups.
Please read the two comments in at the end of the POST for some valid critiques of the methods used in this article.
http://weblogs.asp.net/owscott/iis-using-windows-authentication-with-minimal-permissions-granted-to-disk
In addition to the information in the article, please be aware that IIS 7.5 is not using the web configuration tags for system.web (at least not in my MVC 4 application).
It is looking in the system.webserver tags for authorization configuration (where you will need to list the windows domain\groups a user needs to be in to access your application).
-- DSB
I have installed a new web application that access a SQL Server database in a different server. I'm using Windows Authentication and get the error of:
Login Failed for user XXX
When I try to set identity impersonate="true" in the web.config file, it just throws an error
Login Failed for anonymous user
Also, I'm using forms authentication to validate users from my website and using a different application pool.
Update: connection string Basically like this:
Data Source=myServerAddress;Initial Catalog=myDataBase;Integrated Security=SSPI;
Update:
My Virtual Directory has Anonymous Authentication and Windows Authentication enabled.
Typically ASP.NET runs as an anonomous account. In order to access a remote SQL Server using integrated authentication (SSPI), you'll need to have a bit more "permenant" presence. Easy way would be to shift the app pool to use the NETWORK SERVICE built-in account. Slightly trickier would be to use a named account. On the SQL server side of the equation you will need to give the same account -- either matching user/pass or NETWORK SERVICE -- proper permissions to your database.
Your DBA should be able to help.
It is difficult to provide you with an exact answer because you have not provided your connection string or info on your SQL Server config. Your best bet is to look at the IIS configuration and work out what user is attempting to access the different SQL Server. You then need to give this account access to the database. This is a common problem and most of the changes need to happen in SQL Server unless you can change the account that the web server is running under.
Here's the situaiton. I'm working on developing a new website to access an old database. This is a DoD installation so there's lots of security around.
The current application is written in classic ASP, VBScript and some javascript. The new systems is ASP.NET.
Accessing the database in the old system meant hitting the server with your own credentials (domainname\username). Now I'm trying to test some of the early development I've done. When I used Cassini (under VS2008), I had no trouble getting to the database because ourdomain\myusername registered with the SQL Server instance as a trusted connection. Due to security aspects that I have to write, Cassini can't serve as a test server anymore - I have to use IIS (we have security card readers here). Cassini can't handle them.
So when I went through all the problems of getting the appropriate accounts added to Administrators on my local pc so that I could debug in VS2008 while using IIS, I tried to connect to the database and I was rejected because MYPC\ASPNET was not a trusted connection.
Altering the existing database is out of the question. Hard coding usernames and passwords for access to the database is out of the question.
I asked the DBA if he could add MYPC\ASPNET to of the domain groups so that SQL Server could see it as a trusted connection (since MYDOMAIN\MYNAME was in a group that was seen as a trusted connection). He tells me that is not technically possible.
In the end there are going to be three or four machines (mine, another developer, the eventual live web server and a future test web server) who's ASPNET accounts are going to be hitting our two SQL servers (live and test).
What do I have to do to make the existing SQL server see me as Friend and not Foe? I looked at impersonation but I get the impression it's not compatible with our system - the business rules make a call to a common routine to create a SqlConnection object and open it (maybe even a SqlTransaction object to go with it) and this object is used for the rest of the business rules and data-access layer until it's done. It didn't look like impersonation would persist once the SqlConnection was opened (and passed, ByRef back to the calling routine)
Thanks in advance for any advice.
You have two options:
Run your web application in an application pool configured to run in the context of a domain account
Use impersonation and configure your web application to use windows authentication only
Use Impersonation
As has already been suggested you should use impersonation.
However if your SQL Server is running on a different machine than your web server then impersonation will not suffice as the credentials of the user will not be delegated to the SQL Server (server hop). In that case you will have to either enable delegation in the AD or create a non-Windows login on your SQL Server and use that instead (this will not work if your SQL Server actually uses the Windows login for access control to tables etc.).
Sounds like you want to impersonate the client who is accessing your web site correct? Have you tried to use impersonation or are you assuming it won't work?
Edit
As Albert points out, impersonation requires the user to be authenticated using Windows authentication. You will want to disable Anonymous Access, and enable Windows Authentication in IIS Management tool.
Best practice says to keep my web app and database on separate machines, but when doing that it seems I can't get a clear explanation on how best to make this connection. Whil windows auth is the recommended authentication, I don't see how to make a trusted connection . Must I use impersonation to have my application connect to a db server?
Are most people simply using SQL authentication in this case?
Both machines are on a virtual cloud network.
If both computers are in the same domain, I'd use Windows Authentication for the SQL connection. To set it up:
Create a domain account to use for the app.
Give the id the absolute minimum priveleges necessary to host the site on the web server. For example, it must have read access to the web site itself, write access only to folders updated by the web site, etc.
Change IIS so that the domain account is used to run the app. In IIS6 & IIS7, you do this through the application pool. In IIS5, you have to change the settings in the machine.config or in the web.config for the ProcessModel.
All calls to the database will be done through this domain account; you won't have to setup impersonation. In fact, if you are using SQL authentication today, the only change you need to make is to the database connection string; no code changes are needed.