Yesterday I spent half of day trying to force Flex Remoting to use HTTPS with no success.
Today I tried to connect to other domain.
I changed url of endpoint, but it looks like flex just ignores my changes.
I am sure that an old url doesn't exist in any file in src directory,
I even renamed services-config.xml to services-config2.xml, cleaned and rebuilded project many times, even made a release build, but it still connects to the same domain.
I have tested flex application in localhost and in the same domain, that has AMF services, but it works in the same way.
My services-config.xml is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<services-config>
<services>
<service id="amfphp-flashremoting-service" class="flex.messaging.services.RemotingService" messageTypes="flex.messaging.messages.RemotingMessage">
<destination id="amfphp">
<channels>
<channel ref="my-amfphp-secure"/>
<channel ref="my-amfphp"/>
</channels>
<properties>
<source>*</source>
</properties>
</destination>
</service>
</services>
<channels>
<channel-definition id="my-amfphp-secure" class="mx.messaging.channels.SecureAMFChannel">
<endpoint uri="https://xxx.dev.company.com:443/AMF" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.SecureAMFEndpoint"/>
<properties>
<polling-enabled>false</polling-enabled>
<serialization>
<instantiate-types>false</instantiate-types>
<log-property-errors>true</log-property-errors>
</serialization>
<add-no-cache-headers>false</add-no-cache-headers>
</properties>
</channel-definition>
<channel-definition id="my-amfphp" class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel" >
<endpoint uri="http://xxx.dev.company.com/AMF" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint" />
<properties>
<polling-enabled>false</polling-enabled>
<serialization>
<instantiate-types>false</instantiate-types>
<log-property-errors>true</log-property-errors>
</serialization>
<add-no-cache-headers>false</add-no-cache-headers>
</properties>
</channel-definition>
</channels>
</services-config>
RemoteObject definition in mxml:
<mx:RemoteObject id="Agentrpc" destination="amfphp" source="Agentrpc" showBusyCursor="true">
<mx:method name="getAgentID" result="getAgentID_resultHandler(event)" fault="faultHandler(event)"/>
</mx:RemoteObject>
I'm using Flex 3.
Edit: I took a look at generated/ dir and I see that FlexInit files (like MainModule_FlexInit-generated.as) contains code:
ServerConfig.xml =
<services>
<service id="amfphp-flashremoting-service">
<destination id="amfphp">
<channels>
<channel ref="my-amfphp-secure"/>
<channel ref="my-amfphp"/>
</channels>
</destination>
</service>
<channels>
<channel id="my-amfphp-secure" type="mx.messaging.channels.SecureAMFChannel">
<endpoint uri="https://gintautas.dev.company.com:443/AMF"/>
<properties>
<polling-enabled>false</polling-enabled>
</properties>
</channel>
<channel id="my-amfphp" type="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel">
<endpoint uri="http://gintautas.dev.company.com/AMF"/>
<properties>
<polling-enabled>false</polling-enabled>
</properties>
</channel>
</channels>
</services>;
That's correct, but application doesn't make requests to gintautas.dev.company.com
Edit 2: I installed Flash Builder 4 and tried to compile using 3.5 and 4.0(in compatibility mode) compilers, but both has the same problem :(
Can you try to clear your browser cache ? The content of the services.xml is injected into the SWF at compile time.
you can check what is being compiled into flex from the *-config.XML files with the following:
trace( ServerConfig.XML );
Also, if using WTP with tomcat, check if server is using the actual installation of tomcat, or a temp eclipse folder to run. that can sometimes cause mix ups.
You must "clean project" in Flex Builder when you change services-config.xml
Related
I have a WPF desktop application that I have packaged into an MSIX package. In the package manifest I have defined a windows.protocol extension to launch the main executable when a specific protocol is used. This protocol activation works fine when I install using the MSIX package directly.
The application should be auto-updating, so I created a .appinstaller file that references the MSIX. That also works well, but when the application is installed using the .appinstaller file, the protocol activation does not work. In fact Windows prompt for an application when the custom protocol is used. I have not changed the MSIX package in any way, just referenced it. The MSIX package is signed using a valid bought signing certificate.
The protocol in question provides deep links into the application that users can share using email.
For the moment I have to choose to either have protocol activation (install the MSIX directly) or auto-updating (install using the .appinstaller file), but I can't get both to work.
appmanifest.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Package
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10"
xmlns:uap="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/uap/windows10"
xmlns:uap3="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/uap/windows10/3"
xmlns:rescap="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10/restrictedcapabilities"
IgnorableNamespaces="uap uap3 rescap">
<Identity
Name="MyApp"
Publisher="CN=CompanyName, O=CompanyName, L=City, S=Province, C=BE"
Version="1.0.0.0"
ProcessorArchitecture="x64"/>
<Properties>
<DisplayName>MyApp</DisplayName>
<PublisherDisplayName>CompanyName</PublisherDisplayName>
<Logo>Images\StoreLogo.png</Logo>
</Properties>
<Dependencies>
<TargetDeviceFamily Name="MSIXCore.Desktop" MinVersion="6.1.7601.0" MaxVersionTested="10.0.10240.0" />
<TargetDeviceFamily Name="Windows.Desktop" MinVersion="10.0.14393.0" MaxVersionTested="10.0.18362.0" />
</Dependencies>
<Resources>
<Resource Language="en-us"/>
</Resources>
<Applications>
<Application Id="App"
Executable="MyApp\MyApp.exe"
EntryPoint="Windows.FullTrustApplication">
<uap:VisualElements
DisplayName="MyApp"
Description="MyApp"
BackgroundColor="transparent"
Square150x150Logo="Images\Square150x150Logo.png"
Square44x44Logo="Images\Square44x44Logo.png">
<uap:DefaultTile Wide310x150Logo="Images\Wide310x150Logo.png" />
<uap:SplashScreen Image="Images\SplashScreen.png" />
</uap:VisualElements>
<Extensions>
<uap3:Extension Category="windows.protocol">
<uap3:Protocol Name="myprotocol" Parameters="-s "%1"">
<uap:DisplayName>MyProtocol Scheme</uap:DisplayName>
</uap3:Protocol>
</uap3:Extension>
</Extensions>
</Application>
</Applications>
<Capabilities>
<Capability Name="internetClient" />
<rescap:Capability Name="runFullTrust" />
<Capability Name="privateNetworkClientServer"/>
<uap:Capability Name="userAccountInformation"/>
</Capabilities>
</Package>
myapp.appinstaller
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<AppInstaller Uri="\\someserver\someshare\myapp.appinstaller" Version="1.0.0.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/appinstaller/2018">
<MainPackage Name="MyApp" Version="1.0.0.0" Publisher="CN=CompanyName, O=CompanyName, L=City, S=Province, C=BE" ProcessorArchitecture="x64" Uri="\\someserver\someshare\myapp.msix" />
<UpdateSettings>
<OnLaunch HoursBetweenUpdateChecks="0" ShowPrompt="true" UpdateBlocksActivation="true"/>
<AutomaticBackgroundTask/>
</UpdateSettings>
</AppInstaller>
I am trying to use Visual studio project template for desktop bridge to add to wpf app and it will not build successfully and shows this strange warning that i have attached.
warning when building desktop bridge project template
i had followed this post on official documentation :
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/porting/desktop-to-uwp-packaging-dot-net
and before that i had used this blog post to add winmd and runtime to my project:
https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2017/01/25/calling-windows-10-apis-desktop-application/
and here is the code form Package.appxmanifest file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10" xmlns:mp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/2014/phone/manifest" xmlns:uap="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/uap/windows10" xmlns:rescap="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/foundation/windows10/restrictedcapabilities" xmlns:iot="http://schemas.microsoft.com/appx/manifest/iot/windows10" IgnorableNamespaces="uap mp rescap iot">
<Identity Name="09b95fbd-84cc-426f-9fd2-2c1d3d304fab" Publisher="CN=SO-PC-005" Version="1.0.0.0" />
<Properties>
<DisplayName>WapProjTemplate</DisplayName>
<PublisherDisplayName>SO-PC-005</PublisherDisplayName>
<Logo>Assets\StoreLogo.png</Logo>
</Properties>
<Dependencies>
<TargetDeviceFamily Name="Windows.Universal" MinVersion="10.0.0.0" MaxVersionTested="10.0.0.0" />
<TargetDeviceFamily Name="Windows.Desktop" MinVersion="10.0.14393.0" MaxVersionTested="10.0.14393.0" />
</Dependencies>
<Resources>
<Resource Language="x-generate" />
</Resources>
<Applications>
<Application Id="App" Executable="$targetnametoken$.exe" EntryPoint="$targetentrypoint$">
<uap:VisualElements DisplayName="WapProjTemplate" Description="WapProjTemplate" BackgroundColor="transparent" Square150x150Logo="Assets\Square150x150Logo.png" Square44x44Logo="Assets\Square44x44Logo.png">
<uap:DefaultTile Wide310x150Logo="Assets\Wide310x150Logo.png">
</uap:DefaultTile>
</uap:VisualElements>
</Application>
</Applications>
<Capabilities>
<Capability Name="internetClient" />
<iot:Capability Name="systemManagement" />
<rescap:Capability Name="runFullTrust" />
</Capabilities>
</Package>
I also would like to mention that i am trying to use windows.graphics.display for brightness override in a wpf app and it requires systemManagement capapbility. And also that my project builds successfully without packaging project but when I add packaging project to my wpf solution it will not build.
Using Visual Studio 2013 Premium.
Goal: I have multiple WCF services defined in a web.config. To keep the web.config file readable and make adding services simpler, I want to use VS2013's XML transforms to add some boilerplate elements to each service definition for my dev/production environments.
Problem: I have multiple <service> tags, but only the first one is transformed properly.
Here's a simplified version of my Web.Config with two services defined:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<services>
<service name="AppName.AccountManagerService">
<endpoint address="AccountManagerService" binding="netTcpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="" contract="Shared.Contracts.IAccountManagerService" />
</service>
<service name="AppName.TicketManagerService">
<endpoint address="TicketManagerService" binding="netTcpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="" contract="Shared.Contracts.ITicketManagerService" />
</service>
</services>
</configuration>
I want to create a Metadata exchange endpoint and do some other things (not shown) to each <service> tag.
Here's a simplified Web.Debug.Config showing only the MetadataExchange endpoint:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<system.serviceModel>
<services>
<service xdt:Locator="XPath(/configuration/system.serviceModel/services/service)">
<endpoint kind="mexEndpoint"
address="mex"
xdt:Transform="Insert()"
/>
</service>
</services>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
I get this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<services>
<service name="AppName.AccountManagerService">
<endpoint address="AccountManagerService" binding="netTcpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="" contract="Shared.Contracts.IAccountManagerService" />
<!-- Yay! -->
<endpoint kind="mexEndpoint"
address="mex"
/>
</service>
<service name="AppName.TicketManagerService">
<endpoint address="TicketManagerService" binding="netTcpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="" contract="Shared.Contracts.ITicketManagerService" />
<!-- Hey, where's the endpoint tag for this one? -->
</service>
</services>
</configuration>
I've tried these variations on the XPath argument in the xdt:Locator attribute of the :
1. /configuration/system.serviceModel/services/service
2. /configuration/system.serviceModel/services//service
3. //service
All of which transform only the 1st <service> section.
I've tried putting the xdt:Locator attribute on the <endpoint> tag, etc. to no avail.
I have multiple XPath visualizers and tools, and all of them match both <service> tags when used with XPath #1 above. Also, this error happens in "Preview Transform" and the web deployment tool preview.
What am I doing wrong?
(My workaround, at this point, is to include the Mex endpoint and the rest of the debugging cruft in my original Web.Config, and then remove it with "RemoveAll()", but that makes my Web.Config really cluttered and hard to read.)
I recently ran into this issue, and it turns out it isn't supported.
My work around was adding a custom transform, and using that instead of Insert. The issue with their implementation is that the default Insert only modifies the first value (even though the XPath expression does retrieve a list).
The XDT source can be found here: http://xdt.codeplex.com/
The article I ran across that got me in the right direction: http://blog.appharbor.com/2012/07/27/custom-web-config-transforms-and-merges
What I did is add a new class to their source, and was able to achieve exactly what you are looking for.
internal class InsertMultiple : Transform
{
public InsertMultiple()
{
//this is the line that allows it to apply the transform for all nodes
//that were located with your XPath expression.
ApplyTransformToAllTargetNodes = true;
}
protected override void Apply()
{
CommonErrors.ExpectNoArguments(Log, TransformNameShort, ArgumentString);
TargetNode.AppendChild(TransformNode);
Log.LogMessage(MessageType.Verbose, SR.XMLTRANSFORMATION_TransformMessageInsert, TransformNode.Name);
}
}
I used the following code in c# to get policies\rules from deployed application in BizTalk server.
BTSTask.exe ListApp -ApplicationName:"EAISolution" -ResourceSpec:"c:\EAISolution.PolicyInf
o.xml" /Server:VHYDTRBELSUP-02 /Database:BizTalkMgmtDb
From above command I got the output as below
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16" ?>
<ResourceSpec xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" ApplicationName="EAISolution" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/ApplicationDeployment/ResourceSpec/2004/12">
<Resources>
<Resource Type="System.BizTalk:BizTalkAssembly" Luid="EAIOrchestration, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=97e0f507fd7fd10d" />
<Resource Type="System.BizTalk:BizTalkAssembly" Luid="EAIServices, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=97e0f507fd7fd10d" />
<Resource Type="System.BizTalk:BizTalkAssembly" Luid="FFSchemasTest, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=97e0f507fd7fd10d" />
<Resource Type="System.BizTalk:Rules" Luid="RULE/ProcessPurchaseOrder/1.0" />
<Resource Type="System.BizTalk:BizTalkBinding" Luid="Application/EAISolution" />
</Resources>
</ResourceSpec>
and from BizTalk server I got the below output using policy export in BizTalk server administration
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<brl xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/businessruleslanguage/2002">
<ruleset name="ProcessPurchaseOrder">
<version major="1" minor="0" description="" modifiedby="username" date="2013-05- 27T12:04:55.6121122+05:30" />
<configuration />
<bindings>
<xmldocument ref="xml_31" doctype="RuleTest.PO" instances="16" selectivity="1" instance="0">
<selector>/*[local-name()='PurchaseOrder' and namespace-uri() ='http://EAISolution.PurchaseOrder']/*[local-name()='Item' and namespace-uri()='']</selector>
<selectoralias>/PurchaseOrder/Item</selectoralias>
<schema>....\PO.xsd</schema>
</xmldocument>
<xmldocument ref="xml_32" doctype="RuleTest.PO" instances="16" selectivity="1" instance="0">
<selector>/*[local-name()='PurchaseOrder' and namespace-uri()='http://EAISolution.PurchaseOrder']
</selector>
<selectoralias>/PurchaseOrder</selectoralias>
<schema>....\PO.xsd</schema>
</xmldocument>
</bindings>
<rule name="ApprovalRule" priority="0" active="true">
<if>
<compare operator="less than or equal to">
<vocabularylink uri="3f0e9bcc-6212-4e6a-853c-e517f157a626" element="d4eb2deb-06d3-42c4-af49-ceb21331b1cc" />
<lhs>
<function>
<xmldocumentmember xmldocumentref="xml_31" type="int" sideeffects="false">
<field>*[local-name()='Quantity' and namespace-uri()='']</field>
<fieldalias>Quantity</fieldalias>
</xmldocumentmember>
</function>
</lhs>
<rhs>
<constant>
<int>500</int>
</constant>
</rhs>
</compare>
</if>
<then>
<function>
<xmldocumentmember xmldocumentref="xml_32" type="string" sideeffects="true">
<field>*[local-name()='Status' and namespace-uri()='']</field>
<fieldalias>Status</fieldalias>
<argument>
<constant>
<string>Approved</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</xmldocumentmember>
</function>
</then>
</rule>
</ruleset>
</brl>
So please let me know how to get the output of second using command line.
BTSTask will only export the policy as part of an MSI (see below).
You could then extract the MSI (see How to extract msu/msp/msi fileds from the command line) to get the policy file.
From How to Import a Policy
BTSTask does not provide a specific command for importing (or exporting) policies; however you can use the ExportApp command of BTSTask to selectively export only the policies in an application that you want, including no other application artifacts. Then you can use the ImportApp command to import the .msi file into an application in a different BizTalk group. This is the approach described in this topic. When you do this, the policy is automatically imported and published in the BizTalk group and added to the specified application.
The below steps will get export the policy, but as part of an MSI.
From How to Export a Policy
Use the BTSTask ListApp command with the /ResourceSpec option to generate an XML file that lists the artifacts in the BizTalk application from which you want to export a policy, as described in ListApp Command.
Edit the XML file generated in the previous step, deleting all of the artifacts except for the policy or policies that you want to export.
Use the BTSTask ExportApp command, and specify the modified XML file for the /ResourceSpec parameter. For more information, see ExportApp Command.
BTSTask exports the specified policies and all of their associated vocabularies into an application .msi file.
I want to recive RemoteObject from my service. Everything works fine but my code looks like this:
<mx:AMFChannel id="myamf" uri="messagebroker/amf"/>
<mx:ChannelSet id="channelSet" channels="{[myamf]}"/>
<mx:RemoteObject id="ro" channelSet="{channelSet}" destination="pServ" result="resultHandler(event);" fault="faultHandler(event);"/>
is there a way to avoid hard typing channel uri in my .mxml file?
i tried with default channels in blazeds xml but without succes.
thats are parts of my configuration:
spring appContext.xml
<context:component-scan base-package="org.flex.test.services"/>
<flex:message-broker>
<flex:remoting-service default-channels="my-amf"/>
</flex:message-broker>
<flex:remoting-destination ref="personService" destination-id="pServ"/>
flex services-config.xml
<services>
<default-channels>
<channel ref="my-amf"/>
</default-channels>
<service id="remoting-service" class="flex.messaging.services.RemotingService">
<adapters>
<adapter-definition id="java-object" class="flex.messaging.services.remoting.adapters.JavaAdapter" default="true"/>
</adapters>
</service>
</services>
<channels >
<channel-definition id="my-amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel">
<endpoint url="http://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/amf" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/>
</channel-definition>
</channels>
Im running flex app from root of aplication file - main.html.
Thank you for answers!
The default channel will work, but you need to add a reference to the services.xml as a compiler argument so that the compiler knows what the default is. Something like this should do the trick...
-services {Your base directory}\src\main\webapp\WEB-INF\flex\services-config.xml