CSS to Make 2 Column Content Areas - css

I'm trying to stray away from using tables to form the layout of my content, and I can think of two alternatives that I'd like to better learn: (1) styling list items to be side-by-side, and (2) using div blocks that float onto the same line. Both of these would have their own uses for what I'm working on.
I'm already using div tags to form the entire layout of my three-column template, but what I need to do now is a bit different. In case it helps, my project can be found here.
In short, here's my question; how would I style a div so that the width of it is 50% of the width of the area it occupies, rather than 50% of the width of the page?
As for my other question, what would be the best approach to styling list items so that they are side-by-side? I'm working on a registration script now, and instead of using a table with "Username" on the left and the input text on the right, I can use two list items.
It's late and I've been working on this project of mine for about 8 hours straight now, so I apologize if I'm asking anything confusing. Feel free to ask me any questions about what I'm trying to do.
Thanks, friends. :)

When you use percentage units for widths and heights, it is relative to the first ancestor element which has defined a width or height. Therefore, all you need to do is set up a div which is as wide as two columns:
<div class="columnContainer">
<div class="column">
Column 1
</div>
<div class="column">
Column 2
</div>
</div>
.columnContainer {
width: 800px;
}
.column {
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
There's a lot more fiddling about required than just the code above, but that's the basics. As Gabriel said, you might get a lot of value out of using a CSS framework like 960.gs

ok, so to help you out best I am going to point you to http://960.gs this is a great tool for prototyping this sort of scenario and getting solid reliable code. On to your actual issue, you probably want to set:
width: 50%;
float: left;
display: block;
on the elements you want split. Good luck.

For the width, any relative sizing is relative to the parent, so put it as a child inside the element you want to be half of. For the list items... use display: inline; or float: left;

Inline list are simple but have some drawbacks, you cant set height or width for example.
ul li {
display:inline;
}
If you need block elements you need to float list items and floats can be tedious sometimes, for example you need to take care of clearing [uod]l element.
ul {
overflow:hidden;
}
ul li {
float:left;
display:block;
}
You probably want to remove margins and paddings on list itself in both cases.
ul {
margin:0;
padding:0;
}

Related

CSS position (tabbless) and removing (hiding) empty DIVS

I'm having some trouble getting this done 'right'...
its a two parter. :)
1.) is getting the layout to look like how I need it (without resorting to tables!), but for some reason I can get the divs and nested divs to 'act right'... (surely its my error/mis-understanding)
I am trying to get a layout like so, using only DIVS and display..etc..
http://dmstudios.net/misc/layout.jpg
I have attempted it myself (so you dont think Im just looking for a handout) :)..
but some things like the vertical alignment of the custom div container isnt working..etc
Here is my JSFiddle attempt: http://jsfiddle.net/yeKxU/1/
JSFiddle Code:
<div class="container">
<div class="logo"><img src="http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/images/thumb/5/53/150px-Blue_morpho_butterfly_300x271.jpg" /></div>
<div class="custom">
<div class="president">item1</div>
<div class="mission">item2</div>
<div class="active">item3</div>
</div>
<div class="url">www.nike.com</div>
<div class="freetext">random text</div>
</div>
CSS:
* {
border: 1px dashed blue;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
div{
display: inline-block;
border:2px solid;
border-radius:2px;
border-color:#FF0000;
}
.container{
width:450px;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.logo{
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.custom{
vertical-align:top; /* doesnt work to move the 'custom div' to the top */
/* width:63%;*/ /*needs to auto stretch to fit the rest of the space after image*/
}
.custom div{
display:block;
background-color:#EEEEEE;
}
.url{
width:100%;
}
.freetext{
width:100%;
}
Couple notes: the '3' fields to the right of the image div, will have varying data in them.. (meaning I am not clear if they will need to wrap or not...hopefully not a problem)
The second portion of the question, is about implementing some dynamic capabilities. (jQuery I imagine should work)..
2.) Knowing the general (perfect scenario) layout I am trying to achieve above...
I need to also code things in a way.. that is certain parts of the data are MISSING, then that 'cell' (div) is removed/hidden (or something)
*(I am building this using PHP printed to screen, to spit out the HTML/DIVS..etc and using variables to populate the content of the DIV/image..etc)
So for example..
if the IMAGE was not there (variable is empty).. Id like the the CUSTOM div that has 3 child divs in it 1 for each of the text fields) to expand all thew way to the LEFT.. as the logo/image DIV will have nothing (or be removed/hidden since its empty)
Same goes for the text fields in the CUSTOM DIV container.. if one of those fields are BLANK... its should NOT just have a blank/empty placeholder... it should be removed/hidden.. and the rest of the data butted up to the TOP (under any other fields that may be present)
I've seen examples (sorta) where you have some DIV blocks on the stage.. click on one.. it removes it.. the other DIVS move over...etc... (sorta the same thing, except I cant manually click things to remove them)..
So maybe some jQuery to go through the 'DIVS' see if its empty and then remove itself?
-or-
would just having some sort of layout that is fluid/liquid work? be better? so I dont really need to check if its empty.. if nothing is IN the cell/DIV.. then the other just adjust their WIDTH/POSITION to make-up for it?
Let me know what you guys think? JSFiddle examples are appreciated!
Thanks!
to get the layout in question one you do like this...
#divA {float:left;}
#divB {float:left;}
before divC you can put an empty div (id="empty") like this...
#empty {clear:both;}
this should fix the design, assuming you have your width seth on the divs...
for question 2 i suggest you create the divs dynamically, when you create your content on page... if you want examples, just let me know...
There are a lot of properties you can set on your divs, one is max-width... one risk of not setting any value on width on your divs is that if your total width get wider than your holding container your divB will stack up under divA... and i think you dont want that to happen... :) you can do some experiments with min-width and max-width on your divs to get the behavior you want because i guess you have some values on your pic to play with...
divA {
float:left;
max-width:50px;
}
divB {
float:left;
min-width:400px;
}
as example, you have to find your values, trial and error-way i guess...
there is also a lot of guides on internet if you search on css and positioning... happy hunting!

matching container element width with that of child

I want to have a setup like this:
<div id="block">
<div class="btn">2</div>
<div class="btn">1235e</div>
<div class="btn">really long one</div>
</div>
jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/cutcopypaste/3uu5Q/
Where the btns and block div get their width based on the content. Just like it appears in the fiddle, except that the width of the btns are based on their text rather than their container
I cannot use a table because I need to be able to apply styling to get vastly different appearance, so I need the html markup to stay basically the same. If it's absolutely necessary I could apply some js.
I tried a couple different ways of displaying, but not sure how to acheive this. I don't wish to hard-code any widths as the content will be changing, and I need it to work in older versions of IE (though I can use libraries like IE9.js).
Here's an example of how the #block will be sized to be as wide as its longest button:
#block {
float: left;
}
.btn {
float: left;
clear: both;
}
The floated elements will expand only to their content's width. It's assuming you want each button on its own line.
If you want the buttons to flow together, remove the clear:both from the .btn rule. However if you do want them all on one line you'll have to be aware of float drop. This will happen if the widths of all your buttons added together is greater than the available width. In this case, the rightmost button will drop down below the other buttons.
Update: based on OP's comment, here's the CSS for a table cell style where #block and all .btn elements expand to the widest button's width:
#block {
display: inline-block;
}
.btn {
display: block;
}
Along with an example.
Where the btns and block div get their width based on the content.
I'm not 100% sure whether I get you right, but using display:inline elements like spans instead of <div>s should solve your problem.
make them float or inline, that way they won't act like blocks (wont be 100% width).

CSS Component Flexibility

I've got a css flexibility issue that I'm trying to solve but I'm finding no real solution and I think I'm just not seeing the solution clearly because I'm to close to the issue.
I've built an HTML content component as follows:
<div class="content_cmp">
<div class="info"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
With this CSS:
.content_cmp { width: 100%; }
.content_cmp .info { width: 25%; }
.content_cmp .content { width: 75%; }
Everything does its job as far as the html is concerned but the css flexibility I need seems a bit more tedious to acquire.
I need to define the layout styles once but "content_cmp" needs to take up the full width real estate of any container it sits in while at the same time "info" and "content" need to acquire the same amount of width inside "content_cmp" regardless of the width "content_cmp" takes up.
I, originally, felt that percentage widths were in order but I get some disarray in the content of both "info" and "content" when I have the component placed in a short "column" as opposed to being placed into a wide "column".
Am I just simply overlooking the solution or am I going to have to make some compromises in content display to gain flexibility?
Just looking at your code, it seems that width's alone won't do what you're after.
if info and content need to line up side by side, you're going to have to add floats / positioning too.
try this:
.content_cmp { width:100%; overflow:hidden; }
.content_cmp .info { float:left; width:25%; overflow:hidden; }
.content_cmp .content { float:left; width:75%; overflow:hidden; }
what specific issues are you encountering if its a not a wide container?
also look at sizing in ems for widths instead of percentages as an alternate option
Obviously understanding how to code this yourself is important but you can save a lot of time ironing out issues using YUI Grid CSS. Have a play with the YUI Grid Builder and look at the CSS that it generates as this solves a similar problem to yours.

Is it there anyway to make a div within a div 'breakout' of the parent div without specifying widths of child, just childs elements

ie I have a div, below is a hidden div, which is wider than the div above. I want to specify the div inside to have elements with greater widths than the div above. these elements right hand side is aligned to the right hand side of the div above, but since it is wider, want the left hand side to break out. The div below is on a diff layer than the div above as it only appears on clicking on trigger element of div above.
Basically its a drop down list, with some random elements are wider than the image element above which, when clicked drops this list. but i want the list underneath to expand to the left breaking out of the parent div, without specifying exact positions. Therefore, the elements are all children of the parent div and right aligned to it, just like parent.
Hmmm, hope you can follow. Really appreciate any help. Thanks in advance.
Negative Margins seems to be the best answer. If anyone knows of cross browser issues, please post here. Perhaps I will but shalln't be testing for them for a week or two.
You should probably just use a select tag (for accessibility's sake) even though it won't look as fancy. But if you're set on it, try something like this (and add your javascript code to hide/show the list):
#wrapper {
width: 500px;
}
#select {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 180px;
float: right;
}
#options {
float: right;
clear: right;
text-align: right;
}
and
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="select">pick one...</div>
<div id="options">
<div class="option">I'm short</div>
<div class="option">I'm a very very very very very long option</div>
</div>
</div>
If you end up using this, change the options div to a ul tag and the option divs to li tags, or something semantically closer to what you're building. I just used divs to cut down on the amount of css in my example.

When doing equal height columns in CSS, is there a way to get internal anchor links to still function correctly?

I've used the last example on this page for equal height columns.
http://www.ejeliot.com/blog/61
The problem is, when you click an internal anchor link, the content is shifted up, and the overflow is making the top part of the page disappear.
For example, click this link
http://www.noosanativeplants.com.au/~new/articles/botany-words/
Then click a letter to jump to that section. You will notice what I am describing.
Is there a way to combat this, or is this a short coming of the technique? Do you recommend I use the background image technique for faux equal height columns? I'd rather not use this, as one page has a different background, and would require a bit of reworking to do the background for this page.
Thanks
I really recommend you to use the fail-safe faux columns method. If you are not a layout expert (no offence, seriously), stay away from the padding/margin/overflow magic and the one true layout technique. The latter is elegant but it can cause unwanted side-effects if you are to do heavy JS/DOM manipulations and all (see the problems listing).
As slink said you have two overflow: hidden rules in your css:
#main-container {
overflow:hidden;
}
And
#content {
overflow:hidden;
}
If you disable/remove these you will able to use your scrollbars again. Unfortunately the padding / negative margin "hack" will be visible. I recommend you to completely remove this solution and use faux columns. Faux columns background can be added to your #main-content or even the #content div (not just like the example in the ALA article that sets the background image to the body tag).
Good luck!
Update: Sorry, let me correct myself: to use faux columns in your case it is better to set the current background to the html element and the faux background to body element.
Assuming your equal height columns are the left menu and right content in that example, you could just use a margin-left property on the right-column and set the background colour of the container to the desired left-column colour. This would assume your right content always has a greater height than the left, but there are other ways round this.
#container {
width: 960px;
background-color: #000;
}
#menu {
float:left;
width: 240px;
}
#content {
float:right:
margin-left: 240px;
background-color: #fff;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="menu">
<ul>
<li>Home</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
stuff goes here
</div>
</div>
The problem is caused by two overflow: hidden; rules defined on elements #content and #main-contaniner.

Resources