I skimmed through the documentation but couldn't find an event handler to intercept activity creation in a workflow instance. I want to be notified whenever a new activity is created / entered.
Thanks.
Yes a tracking service will tell you when an activity started executing and when it is done. The ActivityStateRecord is what you want to be looking at.
I don't believe that this is specifically supported, but I'm trying to find some options for you.
Can you provide a little more about your scenario and what type of work you want to do before each activity executes?
I'm asking if you can speak a little more about the dependencies that you are injecting. What is the business scenario that you are trying to accomplish?
Can you clarify why the following options are not sufficient?
* Rewrite the workflow to inject your custom activities prior to execution
* Embed the logic in your custom activities
Related
Hi All BizTalk Developers,
I need some input and guidance on how to design an Orchestration that can take few parameters as Input and log them in SQL server table (tblTrackingData)
I want to start this orchestration at various points, for example when I am calling a webservice so I want to log the request in DB and when I get the response then I want to log the response xml also in the same table.
In case of any exception I want to log error message and other details in the same table for tracking purpose.
Can some one guide me, direct me to some existing blogs/posts on how to handle this generic tracking / exceptions etc by starting a new Orchestration.
The purpose of a new Orchestration is to call it from anywhere, please suggest if it could be handled in a better way also.
Thanks.
The best advice, don't do this.
The reason? Everything you describe is already done by BizTalk Server automatically by BizTalk Tracking and the Event Log.
I can tell you from experience, you will not need anything else beyond Tracking and the Event Log.
I do recommend you implement proper exception handling within you app and log custom events, but they would also be written to a Windows Event Log only as well.
I'm new to WF4 and I was trying to find a way to unload a workflow in a code activity but all I can get in the code activity is the Workflow Instance ID and I don't know how to use the ID to unload a workflow.
Ideally, the workflow would pause for user intervention (this is where I would persist and unload the workflow) and when the user makes the required changes I would want to load the workflow back and continue it. This is a for a WCF WF Service.
Any suggestions and advice would be appreciated.
Thank you
Inside a workflow unloading doesn't really make sense, after all the result of the action would update the workflow status and thus invalidate the saved status.
Normally you just create bookmarks in a workflow, and optionally persist the state, and let the runtime environment decide if a workflow needs to be unloaded or not. The way this works depends on the runtime, WorkflowApplication versus WorkflowServiceHost, and is either callback based or idle duration based.
Team:
I need to invoke a WF activity (XAML) from a WF service (XAMLX) asynchronously. I am already referencing the Microsoft.Activities.Extensions framework and I'm running on the Platform Update 1 for the state machine -- so if the solution is already in one of those libraries I'm ready!
Now, I need to invoke that activity (XAML) asynchronously -- but it has an output parameter that needs to set a variable in the service (XAMLX). Can somebody please provide me a solution to this?
Thanks!
* UPDATE *
Now I can post pictures, * I think *, because I have enough reputation! Let me put a couple out here and try to better explain my problem. The first picture is the WF Service that has the two entry points for the workflow -- the second is the workflow itself.
This workflow is an orchestration mechanism that constantly restarts itself, and has some failover mechanisms (e.g. exit on error threshold and soft exit) so that we can manage our queue of durable transactions using WF!
Now, we had this workflow working great when it was all one WF Service because we could call the service, get a response back and send the value of that response back into another entry point in a trigger to issue a soft exit. However, a new requirement has arrisen asking us to make the workflow itself a WF activity in another project and have the Receive/Send-Reply sequences in the WF Service Application project.
However, we need to be able to startup this workflow and forget about it -- then let it know somehow that a soft exit is necessary later on down the road -- but since WF executes on a single thread this has become a bit challenging at best.
Strictly speaking in XAML activities Parallel and ParallelForEach are how you perform asynchrony.
The workflow scheduler only uses a single thread (much like UI) so any activity that is running will typically be running on the same thread, unless it implements AsyncCodeActivity, in which case you are simply handing back the scheduler thread to the runtime while waiting for a callback from whichever async code your AsyncCodeActivity implementation is calling.
Therefore are you sure this is what you want to achieve? Do you mean you want to run it after you have sent your initial response? In this case place your activity after the Send Reply.
Please provide more info if these suggestions don't answer your question./
Update:
The original requirement posed (separating implementation from the service Receive/Send activities) may actually be solved by hosting the target activity as a service. See the following link
http://blog.petegoo.com/index.php/2011/09/02/building-an-enterprise-workflow-system-with-wf4/
I need to get the next activities(transitions) what my workflow is being blocked for as soon as workflow entered a new state without relying on workflow persistence service, I found out that workflow persistence start to hit database when workflow instance is idle, which has a time latence when there are more than one instance of workflow running, it pose a serious problem for me, I need the blooking bookmarks to be in Synch with my workflow status, which I will set in code activity when workflow enters its new state, from codeActivityContext and NativityContext, there is no way to get the api to get this information(the next transitions), both the statemachine class and state class are sealed, there is not way to tag into it.I am using the blocking bookmarks to indict how the workflow will flow to U.I, so that I can drive the workflow from U.I, I am hosting the statemachine using workflowserviceHost with IIS. I am wondering why I am the only one run into this issue, I have been struggle with this issue for some time.
Thanks in advance.
Your best options is using a TrackingParticipant where you can see exactly what is going on in a workflow as it is executing. From the TrackingParticipant you can then save the bookmarks and have the UI reuse them.
I'm having some conceptual trouble on figuring out how to best implement this... I want to create a custom Activity class for Windows Workflow. The activity has to call out to a third party library method that itself runs another process asynchronously and may take anywhere from seconds to many hours to complete. This library offers the ability for me to either poll for the method result or to subscribe to an event that indicates its completion. In my non-workflow apps, I typically just subscribe to that event, but that doesn't seem to be reasonable in the workflow case. I'm also not sure exactly how to best implement a polling scheme. Can someone recommend some pointers to similar problems?
Kirk Allen Evans wrote an interesting blog about this with some pretty good code examples.