What are the possible module candidates for highlighting the source code shown in a node? Is there any module that does the task using Javascript?
I currently use GeSHi Filter for syntax highlighting for my personal code dumping ground and found it pretty useful. Some more details about this module (from its project page):
The GeShi Filter module provides a filter for source code syntax highlighting for a wide range of languages.
Source code can be entered with for example <code type="java">...</code> or <blockcode language="python">...</blockcode>. Starting from version 5.x-2.0 it is also possible to define your own generic and language specific tags (e.g. <java>) or to work with square bracket style tags (e.g. [python]). Automatically adding line numbers is possible too with for example [ruby linenumbers="normal"].
There is also Chili Highlighter, which allows to highlight code from browser side.
Related
Imagine I have a huge CSS file with e.g. more than 40000 lines, like https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/semantic-ui#2.4.2/dist/semantic.css
I want to explore this file and for example search for class definitions containing "hidden" in their name. How can this be done? The word "hidden" can also appear in the definition of the class, so a normal text search is not sufficient. So I am looking for a tool which is able to interpret the CSS file and then allows me to semantically search in it, understanding the difference between "hidden" in a class name and "hidden" in a class definition.
Any tips on this? Thanks!
Update: I am using Visual Studio Code, if there is a matching extension for it, that would be great. A separate tool would also be fine.
I’m not sure which text editor/IDE you are using but most IDE’s allow you to search for classes by name, in which case you could just use “hidden” as the input. In IntelliJ, the command for this is Ctrl+N. You’ll have to check your editor or IDE for the shortcut but a simple Google search should give you the answer.
I'm trying to get code highlighting to work for a simple blog built with jekyll. I want to be able to do code highlighting within posts written in markdown so I enabled redcarpet as markup language. This works all fine, the code gets formatted in <pre></pre> tags and all the various elements of the code get corresponding classes. e.g.
<span class="n">function</span>
<span class="n">saySomething</span>
<span class="p">()</span>
<span class="p">{</span>
etc.
This is awesome but this doesn't give us of the actual highlighting (color) yet. So I suppose there must be some css ready to copy and paste which actually does the styling of the different code elements. Or am I missing something completely?
I looked into some code highlighting libraries like prettify or prism but these do their own formatting with javascript in the browser. But since redcarpet already does the heavy lifting work of formatting the code it is not necessary doing it again.
Any hints?
You need some CSS magic. Use this one or pick one from here.
You can create the CSS with the highlighter itself
rougify style > rouge.css
Or
coderay stylesheet > coderay.css
I like to share the solution as I faced and it took much time to get rid of this issue. Default syntax highlighting is very poor in Jekyll. Like David said, You really need some CSS magic. Check this gist to solve the syntax highlighting problem.
I've made an Add-on which is a custom field.
The style of the text in the field changes depending on the properties of an issue.
I check which style should the text have in the .java file and I pass the html class in a variable called $indicator to the velocity template:
#if( ${value} )
<span class="$indicator">${value}</span>
#end
It works perfect everywhere but in gadgets. When I add this field to a table showing issues in a dashboard, the html code is correct, but it doesn't find the css resource. This is because gadgets are inside an iframe.
How can I make the iframe have a reference to the stylesheet?
You did not say exactly which gadget you were using, but try adding the following context within your <web-resource> module:
<context>jira.webresources:issue-table</context>
The above should work for at least Assigned to Me, Filter Results, In Progress, Voted, and Watched in JIRA 6.1+.
If that does not work, you might also try:
<context>com.atlassian.jira.gadgets:common-lite</context>
If that general context doesn't work, you can look for which exact contexts are #requireContext'ed by the specific gadget you are trying to use, and then make sure that your web-resource is listed in that context. You can figure this out by looking at the gadget's XML and then searching for the #requireContext. (You can find the gadget XMLs inside $JIRA_DATA/plugins/.osgi-plugins/transformed-plugins/jira-gadgets-plugin-*.jar)
Starting with JIRA 7 the Answer of Scott Dudley is no longer working. #requireContext was replaced with a #requireResource within the Atlassian sources of this gadget.
As it affects our plugin, I created a Improvement Request to make that possible again
In Tridion 2011 ( with UI 2012) I have a component with a field that is a list of Component Links. I'd like to enable inline editing on one of the fields that is being brought in via the Component Link. Is this possible?
I was able to enable inline editing for other non-Component Link fields, but the CL's seem to be an issue. I first tried the tcdl syntax, but that did not generate working SiteEdit Component Field markup. Finally I tried to edit the Start Component Field comment on the page to see if I could find a working syntax, but didn't come up with anything that worked.
Any ideas?
Nick's solution calling RenderComponentPresentation on your linked Components should work fine. Calling RenderComponentPresentations for linked Components should in general be considered a good practice, since you are after all rendering another Component Presentation.
But if you want to take control over the exact tags that are generated, you can do that too. When I needed that level of control, I created some custom functions that output the comments directly instead of fiddling with tcdl.
A DWT snippet that uses these functions:
<div class="ContentArea">
<div class="ContentFull">
##MarkComponentPresentation()##
<h1>##MarkComponentField('Title')####Component.Fields.Title##</h1>
<div>##MarkComponentField('Image')##<img src="##Image.ID##"/></div>
<div class="FullDescription">
<div class="FullDescriptionText">##MarkComponentField('Description')####Component.Fields.Description##</div>
</div>
...
So this uses MarkXxx instead of the regular RenderXxx to output just the comments.
You can find the code for these functions on the Tridion Practice wiki on Google code:
http://code.google.com/p/tridion-practice/wiki/TridionUI2012FunctionsForUseInHtmlTemplates
If you render this linked component using ##RenderComponentPresentation(componentTcmId, comonentTemplateId)## then the Enable Inline Editing for Components TBB will add the proper UI tags and you'll be able to edit your nested component.
The approach you've tried to render the Inline Editing commands manually should work. I suspect that the reason it did not work for you is because of some syntax error or invalid/missing parameter values.
If you share your entire rendered HTML document we may be able to help further.
I receive HTML pages from our creative team, and then use those to build aspx pages. One challenge I frequently face is getting the HTML I spit out to match theirs exactly. I almost always end up screwing up the nesting of <div>s between my page and the master pages.
Does anyone know of a tool that will help in this situation -- something that will compare 2 pages and output the structural differences? I can't use a standard diff tool, because IDs change from what I receive from creative, text replaces lorem ipsum, etc..
You can use HTMLTidy to convert the HTML to well-formed XML so you can use XML Diff, as Gulzar suggested.
tidy -asxml index.html
If out output XML compliant HTML. Or at least translate your HTML product into XML compliancy, you at least could then XSL your output to remove the content and id tags. Apply the same transformation to their html, and then compare.
I was thinking on lines of XML Diff since HTML can be represented as an XML Document.
The challenge with HTML is that it might not be always well formed. Found one more here showing how to use XMLDiff class.
A copy of my own answer from here.
What about DaisyDiff (Java and PHP vesions available).
Following features are really nice:
Works with badly formed HTML that can be found "in the wild".
The diffing is more specialized in HTML than XML tree differs. Changing part of a text node will not cause the entire node to be changed.
In addition to the default visual diff, HTML source can be diffed coherently.
Provides easy to understand descriptions of the changes.
The default GUI allows easy browsing of the modifications through keyboard shortcuts and links.
winmerge is a good visual diff program