What feature(s) of ASP.Net MVC can replace the way events can be used in Webforms to support loosely coupled components?
For example, take a simple pager control in Webforms:
A page number is clicked
Pager fires off a "PageChange" event with the new page number
This subscribing page/control received the event and handles initiating a call to fetch and bind new data.
What tools are available in ASP.Net MVC to similarly support
Loose coupling
Component re-usability
Separation of logic for a single page/view (such a very complex "portal" type page).
ASP.NET MVC, and the Model-View-Controller in general, support loose coupling and separation of concerns by keeping the data and code that supports an application separate from the visual "Presentation-layer" markup that is seen by users.
Designed properly, Controllers and Views in MVC can be reused so that the Edit View for an entity can be "embedded" into a related View with no modification.
For example: an Orders View might include an OrdersDetail partial view. That partial view could be replaced with the OrderDetail Edit View that is also available elsewhere within the application.
Separating the Model from the View makes unit testing more effective and less cumbersome by splitting the code from the context of the presentation layer. You don't want to have to reference System.Web to unit test code that fetches data from a database.
MVC does away with events because events for the most part are just an unnecessary layer between what the client is trying to tell the server to do and the server actually doing it.
In the paging example for webforms the client clicks the button, the browser sends the event/viewstate, and the engine fires the ButtonClicked event. You examine the event, determine the client is intending to page, and you execute the paging logic.
In the MVC paradigm the user clicks a button that makes a request directly to the code that executes the paging logic. Since you know what action the button is supposed to invoke when you put it there why go through all machinations of the event firing? In your controller you certainly could fire an event when you get the command but I honestly can't imagine the use case for doing so.
Both methods accomplish the same thing but MVC just removes a layer of complexity.
Related
I just got started with ASP.NET MVC, and I suddenly asked myself: why does ASP.NET need ViewState in the first place? FormData is actually holding the state across postbacks. ViewState is only needed if the state of the control is changed, and that change is NOT included in FormData. For example, what if the event handler changed the control's font color?
Two questions:
For WebForms, is that the reason for the need of ViewState?
If yes, how can MVC "maintain a control's property which is NOT in FormData"?
MVC and WebForms are very different in this regard. The point of WebForms was to help ease WinFroms developers in to web development. For that reason the infrastructure of WebForms simulates statefullness whenever it can. ViewState is one of the ways this is implemented. Since the browser only posts back form fields, in WebForms the entire page is one big form and the entire page is posted to the server. The ViewState is a hidden field, which holds everything BUT the data in the inputs, selects, etc. which the browser posts by default.
On the other hand MVC does not try to simulate statefullness. It works more directly with HTTP and the basic rules of a stateless system. So when you post a form ONLY the data in the inputs, selects, etc. gets posted. Nothing else makes it back to the server.
This is why, if you want to return the same view after a post with the updated data, you have to refill the ViewModel with data like you did in the original get method. MVC does not take care of this for you like WebForms.
Regarding why View State in first place, your explanation is related. View State is used to persist state across Post Backs and mainly to handle properties updated programmatic for example page with label and button and you have event handler for the button that change the label front color to red , in the page load the controls initiate the label with default color however when the button click it change the label color to red and keep that change in the view state so if anything triggered post back then after loading the controls in the page load it sets the front color to the value already saved inside the viewstate
For more details please check the following link http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972976.aspx#viewstate_topic3
MVC doesn't have viewstate, MVC is based on model binding so when a form is posted MVC framework read the httprequest parameters and try to create strongly typed object from that request and you can create your own model binder that tell the MVC how to read the http request
I have a specific page (sitecore content item) in my web application composed of a sitecore layout and many sublayouts. One of those sublayouts is a user control that I would like to have refreshed once a certain button is clicked. I would like only that sublayout to be refreshed and the rest of the page to remain unchanged (typical ajax situation here). How do I accomplish this with sitecore when all of my sitecore content items are directly related to a full page in my web application (layout with sublayouts)? In my case, I want to use ajax to return the content of a specific, single sublayout only. What is the best practice for this kind of ajax situation with sitecore? I'm using sitecore 6.5.
Since you use the phrase "partial page update", I assume you are using an UpdatePanel. This doesn't really function any different than it would in a traditional ASP.NET application. You will handle the button click in a server-side handler method, modify properties on controls and let the update panel handle the rest.
If you are not using update panel, you have a few options depending on exactly what you want to achieve.
Typically, if you are clicking a button to trigger an ajax request, you are posting some data back to the server. For this case you would usually set up a web service to process the data and return some result. Your service can access Sitecore data, but does not utilize the Sitecore presentation engine.
Another option would be to make the request to a Sitecore page (possibly the same as the original request), but include a querystring parameter to trigger a different device. You could configure this device to render JSON, XML or a fragment of HTML rather than the normal Layout and battery of sublayouts.
Another option would be to use the Sitecore Item Web API. If you go this route, you will have another array of options (and a bit of a learning curve as well). Start by reading the documentation on SDN or some of the many blog posts on the topic.
There are a number of options available for achieving asynchronous behavior. None of these really relate to Sitecore directly, however, there are some Sitecore specific things to watch out for which I have highlighted below.
UpdatePanel Control
If you are performing something trivial where ultra-fast performance isn't a concern, simply wrap your button (and any other .NET controls that you would
like updated) in an UpdatePanel Control. You will also need to drop
a ScriptManager control into your base layout near the top inside
the <form> element. NOTE: When using this method, you will need to ensure that that your Sublayout does NOT have caching enabled, otherwise your button will not postback properly
Create your own web service
In this scenario, there are many client-side frameworks available for achieving the same result. My preferred method is to hook onto the client-side button click event with jQuery, prepare a request object, and post it to the server (getting back the information you need to update the client).
Here are a number of web service options that work with Sitecore - allowing you to have access to the Sitecore.Context and all of the subsequent Sitecore APIs.
Create an empty ASPX Web Form that accepts parameters as query strings. In the Page_Load method, do some work with the parameters and write directly to the response using Response.Write(). A JavaScriptSerializer comes in handy for serializing to JSON, just be sure to set Response.ContentType = "text/javascript";
Create an ASMX Web Service and decorate your methods with [WebMethod] (or [WebMethod(EnableSession = true)] if you need access to Session data).
Use MVC Controllers (ex: ASP.NET Web Api) to create an API. I believe there are some issues to work around in Sitecore 6.5 as described here.
Since this is all contained within a single Sublayout, you could simply use a standard <asp:UpdatePanel> surrounding your button and the usercontrol. In the code-behind, you can then do whatever databinding / data retrieval necessary to update the content of the usercontrol.
Note, if the button was on a different sublayout to the one where the content needs to be updated, you can use the approach described in this question as long as both controls have their content within <asp:UpdatePanel>.
In answer to your other question:
What is the best practice for this kind of ajax situation with sitecore?
There's not really a Sitecore-specific best practice for this sort of thing. In this case, any approach which works for plain ASP.NET will also work with Sitecore. The approach I described above is probably the simplest and quickest to implement, but you could also do this via jQuery and ajax to call a web service to load updated content.
I'm working on a WebForms application that consists of a number of pages and each page contains a form which the user fills out. Each form corresponds to a part of an entity meaning that the data from one page/form populates a part of the entity's fields or its child entities' fields.
As an example: a Person's name and birth data is filled out on first page, health status on second page, family information on third page etc.
The data should of course be valid before continuing to the next page. My customer doesn't want to deal with jQuery or Javascript so this is ruled out. What is "best practice" for implementing validation in this case?
Entity Framework 4 is being used and most of the GUI controls are implemented in HTML and not by WebForms controls.
If you're using custom HTML for your inputs, then you're probably going to have to use some custom code for your validation. In your server-side form handler you can validate the inputs and render the page back to the user if something was invalid. The input checking could be as simple as:
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(FormCollection["someRequiredInput"])
You can iterate through all of your inputs, check them according to business logic, and perhaps build a list of errors. Then after the input checking, if the list of errors isn't empty, render the page back to the user with the errors added to a placeholder of some kind. If the list is empty, continue processing the form post.
Even if JavaScript wasn't ruled out, you'd still want to perform server-side validation. Never assume that the client-side code worked as intended or was even executed at all. Client-side validation isn't a security measure, it's just a better user experience. Server-side validation is the only real validation.
(So you may still be able to add client-side validation for that added UX touch, and if the client does indeed disallow JavaScript then they wouldn't see that and would just use the server-side validation instead. This is sometimes referred to as "graceful degradation" where you design a web application to still fully function, albeit with slightly less UX goodness, when the user disables client-side technologies.)
My customer don't want to deal with jQuery och[sic] Javascript so this is ruled out.
Good. Javascript is the wrong place to enforce validation. Any validation you do with javascript is merely a performance optimization. The only acceptable place to truly validate data is on the server.
That out of the way, .Net includes some handy Validation controls you can use. One of those controls is a CustomValidator, that is very easy to override and provide your own server-side code to enforce whatever rules you want. If you're using webforms, these controls are an obvious choice.
Since you have a multi-paged approach, you may also want to look into the Wizard control.
I've been watching a video on Scott Hanselmnn teaching MVC 2 tricks/tips. He mentions how MVC 2 by default uses ASP.NET Web Forms view engine to render the output of the views; he mentions that the web forms view engine is a little slower than it could be for MVC 2 since it generates a control tree and then outputs the HTML to the page (I hope I said that right).
I was wondering what he meant by web forms generating a code tree before outputting the HTML to the page. Does anyone have insight on the view engine of Web forms and the steps of the rendering process works for ASP.NET and MVC2?
In Web Forms, the HTML is generated by a hierarchy of controls, each of which needs to be called upon to render its HTML and each of which contributes to the Page ViewState. In addition, a lot of events are fired by Web Forms (Init, PreRender, etc) during its life cycle, and each control in the hierarchy also fires similar events.
In MVC, the process could theoretically be much simpler, as you don't have a deep hierarchy of controls, you don't have ViewState, and you don't have the need to fire events. However, MVC "piggybacks" off of the ASP.NET framework, and so behind the scenes, a lot of the Web Forms stuff is still there, although it's not needed.
ASP.Net WebForms was all built around the idea of "Faking" a persitent, stateful model around the stateless nature of HTTP. The idea was to give WinForms developers a familiar environment to work in, i.e. Controls, Events, Etc...
In order to do this, the markup is parsed into a collection of objects in memory that you can then reference like you would a control in WinForms:
TextBox.Text = "I hate viewstate!";
Each Control is added to a collection of Controls that represent the page to be sent back to the client. When it comes time to build the response, the engine walks through the tree collection of controls and asks each control to Render itself to the output stream. The result is what you get in the form of an HTTP Response.
In MVC this is an unnecessary step because those controls are never referenced. MVC embraces the stateless nature of the web, and instead maps posted form variables directly to Models for use by Controller Actions.
First post so please be gentle :)
When creating user controls in ASP.NET MVC, what is the best way to structure the code so that the controllers that invoke views that use the user controls do not all have to know so much about the controls? I would like to know a good way to maintain DRY while using user controls in ASP.NET MVC.
Please note, this question only pertain to user controls that require special handling and logic on a postback. I have no problem creating nice DRY code for user controls that are either view only (using RenderPartial) or that require some pre-processing to create the appropriate ViewModel (using RenderAction).
Also, this question pertains only to achieving reusable controls within an application. I am not worried about reusability between applications at this point.
To give a specific example, let's say I would like to create a 'Quick Add' user control which contains three entry fields, First Name, Last Name and Company Name and a submit button. When the QuickAdd functionality is used, the following steps should be performed independent of what page the control is on:
Validate that the fields were not empty, if they are, show an indicator.
Perform a lookup to a repository to see if the Company already exists, if not; create it.
Create a new contact associated to either the existing company or the newly created company
Re-render the existing page. If no validation errors, the user would see the exact same page again, otherwise the same page with validation errors.
My main problem with achieving DRY has to do with all the controllers that invoke views that contain the partial view end up having to have an Action Method to process the form submission from the Quick Add. Even if I break out the logic for processing the information into a separate controller and invoke that method from each of the other controllers it seems like a burden that each and every controller that invoke views that have reusable controls have to have that knowledge.
The other option I looked at was to have the reusable control always submit to a specific action method / controller but then there is no way for that controller to know how to re-populate the model appropriately for the specific controller that invoked the view that contained the reusable control (in step 4).
I am aware that there is talk of subcontrollers in MVC 2 (from this question ASP.NET MVC - Contained User Controls) but since it is not there yet, what is the best way to structure the code to achieve maximum reusability while maintaining DRY?
Is there an alternative to having to have all the controllers that invoke views that use a reusable control (with the characteristics of the one described above), having to have an Action Method to process the information from the control?
At the end of your post, you ask "Is there an alternative to having to have all the controllers... having to have an Action Method to process the information from the control"
The answer for that question is to write a custom model binder. Your custom model binder can be responsible for the populating the values from the incoming form control(s) into model or properties used by all of the controllers. Normally, you want to separate the validation from the model binding, but there is no reason that you couldn't combine them as well.
I highly recommend 6 Tips for ASP.NET MVC Model Binding for a deeper discussion of the topic along with some good references.
I'm not sure why you say the Quick Add form has to have an action method in each controller that uses it; if you wrap the Quick add functionality in a Html.BeginForm(); Html.EndForm() combo, you can have the beginform method specify the name of the action and controller, so you only need one controller.
I understand where you are coming from; it's something I have been thinking about to. While I don't know all the answers, I have some ideas for you to consider. Every controller action method is invoked via a ControllerActionInvoker class, which you can customize. This class handles invoking all of the action methods, so here you could embed certain aspects of reusable code across all or certain action methods.
Look into filters too, as there are a variety of filters that you can use or customize that fire for action methods that implement it. This way, code can run before and after the action method execution and result execution.
For validation, there is already validation components built in that will prevent page submission... you could also consider XVAL which has some other nice features. The Unity framework is an IOC container framework, which dynamic injection keeps things loosely coupled and DRY, as you can inject all kinds of references.
Also, you mentioned subcontrollers; the MVC preview has additional features you may be interested in... for instance, it has a RenderAction method that can render an action method within another action's view.
Hopefully that helps... so what am I missing?
Have a look at RenderAction and RenderPartial. Those are the canonical ways to arbitrarily inject a common control into a view.
Use RenderPartial when you want to include the data as part of your ViewData infrastructure.
Use RenderAction when you want the data to be separate from the ViewData infrastructure. The data will come from the controller method you specify in RenderAction.
Check out the NerdDinner tutorials, if you haven't done so already.