I know that ASP.NET MVC 1.0 is bin-deployable as explained in Phil Haack's article.
Is ASP.NET MVC 2.0 also bin-deployable? Has anyone done this already that can point out potential pitfalls specific to version 2.0 if there are any?
I would like to deploy a relatively simple ASP.NET MVC 2.0 onto a Windows 2008 Web server that does not have ASP.NET MVC 2.0 installed. It is running .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1.
I have deployed a MVC 2 application and it works fine! The release is at RTM and would suggest that its bug-free, with a few child-problems i guess! =)
If your server (IIS7) or similar dont have MCV.dll you have to choose on your .dll (Copy Local: Always)
Related
which version of mvc is using in asp.net core 2.0? is is MVC 6 or use different name ?
What is .net 5?
what is .net standard ?
these questions are from an interview.plz help
The .NET Standard is a formal specification of .NET APIs that are intended to be available on all .NET implementations.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard .ASP.NET5.0 Is Called ASP.NET Core 1.0 and In the ASP.NET Core 1.0 release, Web API is merged with ASP.NET MVC, termed as MVC 6
They're totally unrelated. "MVC 6" was sort of like a codename for Core when it was still in early stages. ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Api are totally separate from ASP.NET Core. Now, it's just "Core". There is no "MVC" or "Web Api", because Core controllers do both functions. ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Api live on and although they will probably eventually be deprecated, they could presumably (though not likely at all) get new releases. At the very least, they'll be patched for the foreseeable future.
ASP.NET Core is a complete rewrite from the ground up. It was originally created simply to be a cross-platform alternative to ASP.NET, and I think the original plan was to keep both ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core as potential development options. However, as ASP.NET Core became more competent, it has pretty fully eclipsed ASP.NET; we now have a cross-platform framework that can run on Windows, Mac and Linux and can do virtually anything the Windows-only framework can. Therefore, why keep the Windows-only framework?
Asp.net Core 2.0 is MVC 6 and The framework is 4.6.1
To start with development you need to have VS-2017 and for 1.X you can start with VS-2015.
Please refer the below link for clear presentation of .NetCore 2.0 so that you can get good knowledge to kick start your development.
Official Asp.Net Core Documentation Url
We have 1 prod and 1 dev server, both running .NET 3.5. I'm trying to build an ASP.NET MVC 4 application, but it requires at least .NET 4.0.
I can't just buy another IIS server and we can't upgrade our existing ones because there are other much larger applications that run on .NET 3.5.
What are my options?
If you cannot upgrade to .NET framework 4.0 then and are tied to .NET framework 3.5 then you will have to downgrade your application to MVC 2.0. Which ought not to be difficult UNLESS your using LOTS of NEW features which are only in MVC 4.0 and not in MVC 2.0 Also having said that, you may even be able to create workarounds to some of them if not all of them.
You can run Asp.Net 2.0 and Asp.Net 4.0 side by side. Find more information here
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/a99txfy5(v=vs.100).aspx
I would like to know if it is at all possible to get an MVC3 solution wrapped in a CWAB (Composite Web Application Block) solution built in 3.5?
I'm aware that in IIS, 2.0/3.5 and 4.0 sites can run next to each other (but in different application pools) but because of the CWAB layer I do not have this luxury. I got MVC2 running successfully before but MVC2 is on the 2.0 runtime if what I've read is true.
I would really like to use Razor as well so going back to MVC2 in this scenario is not really an option.
It should be possible. Just set your application pool runtime to 4.0 instead of 2.0.
.NET 4.0 runtime will be able to handle .NET 3.5 assemblies.
Razor requires features in .NET 4.0. However Tom Clarkson has a post called ASP.NET MVC 3 Razor View in SharePoint that talks about a (not-so-pretty) work-around. Basically, generate the view code from the cshtml files in .NET 4 and you can use them in .NET 3.5 (with a modified RazorEngine).
I'm encountering the same issue. The way I'm going to handle it is to write a WCF "front end" to SharePoint (.Net 3.5) and this will allow me to write the MVC app using MVC 3.
Is a server which returns 2.0.50727.4200 for System.Environment.Version going to support ASP.NET 3.5?
The webhost claims I should ignore the details in the control panel but I get 2.0.50727.4200 when checking the aforementioned system variable.
This article should make things clearer: http://www.west-wind.com/Weblog/posts/289139.aspx
In short, just because it says it's version 2.0, doesn't mean it isn't actually running 3.5. v3.0 and v3.5 are essentially updates to v2.0
The CLR for 3.5 is still 2.0, so no, you're not being screwed, it will be fine.
.NET 4.0 will have a 4.0 CLR, so when you're promised .NET 4.0, you can look for a number higher than 2.0.
The runtime for ASP.NET 3.5 is still 2.0
It will be upgraded to 4.0 when .NET 4 is released.
Don't ask my why that is, but ASP.NET MVC will work.
asp.net is version 2....
the MVC stuff in 3.+ just extends the base of v2....so that is an expected result. as the core of asp.net is still at 2.*... you will be able to run mvc
I would like to upgrade my web projects on an IIS 5 server from .NET 2.0 to .NET 3.5. These web applications live on a server with other web applications that will not be upgraded to .NET 3.5. The server administrator is reluctant to install .NET 3.5 because he is afraid it will break the applications on that machine that are running 2.0 and 1.1.
As far as I know this WON'T be a problem since .NET 3.5 is an addition to 2.0 more than it is a new Framework. I would like the communities help gathering evidence to show him that their concerns are moot and it won't hurt the other applications.
Thanks in advance.
If you have .NET 2 SP1 you shouldn't have a problem.
To be exact .NET 3 & 3.5 are built on top of .NET 2.0 SP 1, we had a problem deploying 3.5 onto a server which only had .NET 2 (not SP1) and it caused the apps on there to break. The reason is your core framework assemblies in .NET 2 are upgraded and have new version numbers which the app wasn't compiled against.
It won't have any problem and you will be able to run your 2.0 and 3.5 application using the same server. This is because the code base for both of the frameworks is the same.
Walk the server administrator through the content of the redistributable for 3.5. It adds a lot of new dlls it doesn't update anything in the 2.0.x directory. You might want to show him how the apps targeting 3.5 are still using System.dll etc from the 2.0.x framework directory.
Both frameworks can run concurrently. In fact, that is the default behavior.
One caveat though, make sure that you don't use the same application pool for apps using different versions of the framework. Otherwise you will get "Server Application Unavailable" errors. Use a different app pool for each set of applications.
Installing 3.5 will modify your .NET 2.0 web.config file and a few others.
This certainly breaks at least 1 application I use. Uninstalling 3.5 will revert the files and fixes the issue.
I've upgraded a couple servers from .net 1.1 to 2.0 & 3.5ץ there haven't been any problems.