Is it possible to include the revision number or the name of the tag used for a build on an ASP.NET website when deploying with CruiseControl.net and subversion?
You can use SubWCRev for this. By integrating it into your build script, you can do keyword replacement in your source, replacing with things like the current revision number.
You can also make use of the svn:keywords property for this. The svn:keywords property works on a file-by-file basis, though, and thus expands to the last revision of the file, as opposed to the last revision of the repository as a whole.
Related
I'm using Artifactory Pro with custom repository layouts. I promote my build and move all artifacts to my production repo. But I need to add an article number in this path, so the guys can reference it to their ERP System.
I tried some stuff here, with promoting and moving artifacts to match their needs. It works, but its not nice.
So I added my custom layouts:
For my developement repo:
[org]/[module] ...etc...
For my production repo:
[Articlenr<.*>]/[org]/[module] ...etc...
When I promote my build, my files are stored like this
[Articlenr]/customer/linux ...etc...
The article number is just filled up with [Articlenr], but I'm not able to replace it by the real one, without moving the complete directory.
Anyone here knowing, how to set the article number while promoting this build?
My builds are promoted by JFrog CLI, but using the Artifactory REST API is an option, too.
Thanks a lot!
Currently, there's no way to use the promote command to promote a build with a target path as an argument.
If you are not set on using promotion, consider using the CLI's COPY or MOVE commands, where you can use placeholders in the target path to increment your Articlenr.
The downside of using cp/mv instead of bpr would be the fact that your build will not be flagged as promoted in artifactory (build-info), which may be a problem in some cases (like if you are using build retention for example).
It is not an ideal solution, but it might suffice for what you are trying to accomplish.
HTH, Or
I'm maintaining a webforms application for several different clients in Visual Studio 2008. Each client has their own separate web.config file. We are using config transformation when deploying which works great.
There are many developers currently working on this project, and while developing each developer needs to have the configuration values for a specific client. Right now, what we are doing is that each one of us, has their own version of web.config locally, and we just try to be careful not to check in the web.config file.
This approach of course has several drawbacks. We need to do this manually, which is annoying, we need to be really careful not to check in the config files since it could cause trouble for the rest of the developers, it's cumbersome to add a new value to the config, etc.
I'd like to transform the config files when building from visual studio, so we can chose which file to take the configuration values from, without having to manually edit web.config.
I've been looking in the web for a while, but the best thing i found so far is this:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/399002/Project-Build-Web-config-transformation
Which is not working for me, it gives me a build error saying it can't copy Web.config_output because the file is missing.
By default tools like SlowCheetah and other config transform technologies use the $(Configuration) to figure out the name of the transformation to apply. You could take the slowcheetah.targets file and edit it to take $(username) which will pick up the standard windows logged on user name if you're building inside visual studio. You could use a condition to apply the change specifically when '$(BuildingInsideVisualStudio)'='true'.
This will require you to do some work with MsBuild target files, but the end result would be that your developers can check in a web.jesse.houwing.config (in my case) and that of that file is there, their transformation will be applied instead of the standard release or debug transformation.
As for a good starting point, look at SlowCheetah.
After pre-compiled a ASP.NET web site, I got many files with the names like
App_Web_accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.dll
Do you know the rule for the random chars (in bold) above?
Can we fix the random chars?
The reason to fix it is that if we modify AccountBalance.aspx file later and re-compile the web site, can we just replace App_Web_accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.dll.
Thank you.
The characters are not random, but more in line with hashing. The purpose is to make the file name unique in the bin folder. Although not advisable, you can replace just certain files to update your website. If you modify AccountBalance.aspx and recompile, you need to replace App_Web_accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.dll, accountbalance.aspx.dfa151d5.compiled, and other assemblies and files that your aspx file depends.
I derived the answer from my experience. I was not looking for the file naming rule, but a way to deploy just the assembly of a changed page, same reason as the original post.
The setup:
A web application, deployed non-updateable (updatable=”false” in PrecompileApp.config), pre-compiled assemblies with no fixed names
What I did:
Make the change to the page (say, a.aspx) in development (Visual Studio 2010)
Publish the site with fixed naming to local drive (Build > Publish Web Site, check the box: Use fixed naming and single page assemblies)
Go to the bin folder of the local publish site and look for a.aspx.xxx.compiled
Open the file with Notepad and note any dependency (say, b.aspx, c.master)
Copy all the affected assemblies and the .compiled files to the bin folder in production server. In this example, they are:
a.aspx.xxx.compiled
b.aspx.xxx.compiled
c.master.xxx.compiled
App_Web_a.aspx.xxx.dll
App_Web_b.aspx.xxx.dll
App_Web_c.master.xxx.dll
If you want to know my story, the change was due to a change in a factor in a calculation. The customer knew of the change much earlier, but did not let us know until it became urgent. A proper deployment would involve other parties and much coordination, and would be too late. Plus, I only had the source code of two versions back, and requesting the latest would take time. So, a hot fix on just that calculation change was required as a temporary measure.
1) you can generate single assembly per web application if you want. So when you make a change in web application, you only need to deploy just one dll.
for this, you can check option "Use fixed naming and single page assemblies"
2) Reference from MSDN Article: "The assembly names are generated automatically by the compiler and it is therefore not obvious which assemblies map to which source files. The compiler also creates new names each time it runs, so that the names of assemblies might not be the same after each compilation. In addition, if source files have changed, the compiler might batch up source files differently, meaning that the resulting assemblies do not necessarily represent the same source files. If you are maintaining a deployed Web site and want to update only the assemblies for recent changes, the output from batch compilation can make that job more complicated.
To help you in this situation, aspnet_compiler.exe supports an option specifically designed for packaging and release management: the -fixednames option. This option enables you to create compiler output that has two benefits. The first is that the assemblies produced by the compiler have the same names each time you compile. The second is that the assemblies are based on the same input files each time."
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479044.aspx
My web site is a checkouted version of SVN repo. I mean .svn folders are placed on web server. I don't use web publishing.
And I want to display current project revision (whole web site) in footer. How can I do that?
If I were using web publishing, I could determine revision on build/publish and write it as static html.
So how to get revision dynamically? Read .svn files directly? Are there better ways?
I saw other such questions, but answer was using SubWCRev.exe, it isn't unfortunately acceptable.
Edit: Tarn gave interesting idea about SVN hooks on commit. Any other ideas?
use keyword substitution. enable substitution for the files you want to display revision information, and put a keyword, like $Revision: 144 $, there.
note that
$Rev$ expands to show the last
revision in which the file changed,
not the last revision to which it was
updated
(see link above). if you want to show the global repository revision number, you better use svnversion.
also, see Related.
You can write hooks for SVN. You could write a hook to update a file with the current build as part of your checkout process. Then you can read, cache and display that build number on your site.
This previous question on SO has some discussion that might be useful to you: Always Commit the same file with SVN.
I've always done it by running a script that would use sed to replace a comment with the current timestamp in my $Rev$ file. That way, the file contents would change and Subversion would commit it. Somewhat manual, but you could write a script to first do that, and then do the actual svn commit command.
If want to display the latest revision number of your entire/repository or branch, keyword substitution will not help, I think a better solution would be to use a Build Management/Continuous Integration software, like CruiseControl.NET or TeamCity with a good build script.
Duplicate of:
How do I sync the SVN revision number with my ASP.NET web site?
ASP.NET Display SVN Revision Number
The only thing I can think of is to use the svn CLI binaries and call them from the page. That way you can strip out the rest and grab the revision number. To be honest though, its a somewhat ugly solution.
What are the strategies for versioning of a web application/ website?
I notice that here in the Beta there is an svn revision number in the footer and that's ideal for an application that uses svn over one repository. But what if you use externals or a different source control application that versions separate files?
It seems easy for a Desktop app, but I can't seem to find a suitable way of versioning for an asp.net web application.
NB I'm not sure that I have been totally clear with my question.
What I want to know is how to build and auto increment a version number for an asp.net application.
I'm not interested in how to link it with svn.
I think what you are looking for is something like this: How to auto-increment assembly version using a custom MSBuild task. It's a little old but I think it will work.
For my big apps I just use a incrementing version number id (1.0, 1.1, ...) that i store in a comment of the main file (usually index.php).
For just websites I usually just have a revision number (1,2,3,...).
I have a tendency to stick with basic integers at first (1,2,3), moving onto rational numbers (2.1, 3.13) when things get bigger...
Tried using fruit at one point, that works well for a small office. Oh, the 'banana' release? looks over in the corner "yeah... that's getting pretty old now..."
Unfortunately, confusion started to set in when the development team grew, is it an Orange, or Mandarin, or Tangelo? It looks ok. What do you mean "rotten on the inside?"
... but in all honesty. Setup a separate repository as a master, development goes on in various repositories. For every scheduled release everything is checked into the master repository so that you can quickly roll back when something goes wrong.
(I'm assuming dev/test/production are all separate servers, and dev is never allowed to touch production or the master repository....)
I maintain a system of web applications with various components that live in separate SVN repos. To be able to version track the system as a whole, I have another SVN repo which contains all other repos as external references. It also contains install / setup script(s) to deploy the whole thing. With that setup, the SVN revision number of the "metarepository" could possibly be used for versioning the complete system.
In another case, I include the SVN revision via SVN keywords in a class file that serves no other purpose (to avoid the risk of keyword substitution breaking my code). The class in that file contains a string variable that is manipulated by SVN and parsed by a class method.
An inconvenience with both approaches is that the revision number is not automatically updated by changes in the externals (approach 1) or the rest of the code (approach 2).
During internal development, I'm using milestone numbers (M1, M2, M3...). After release, I'll probably just update dates ("the January 2009 update").