I have a web application which has been having a strange issue ever since I moved it to a new server. Users will be able to use the application for some time, but after a few page requests, they will be redirected to the default page and asked to log in again. For some reason, this issue occurs less and less the more the application is used. The issue then starts occurring again over night. The application was formerly running on a windows 2003 server and it worked fine there, so I believe the issue has something to do with the settings on the new server.
I am currently running the application on a windows 2008 server with IIS 7.
I looked through a bunch of different settings in IIS and changed many different things, but none of them seemed to solve the problem. But today, I tried changing the application pool to run under a v4.0 .NET Framework, and that seemed to solve the problem. The application pool formerly ran under a v2.0 .NET Framework.
I do not understand how changing the framework solved my problem. I do not see any connection between the .NET Framework version and my application redirecting to the default page.
Can anybody explain how / why this change in settings solved my issue? Any insight or help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
I am having problems accesing the session after upgrading a web project to .net 4.5
firstly, I had a functional .net 3.5 web forms project which I upgraded to .net 4.5 on my dev machine. This compiled and worked well locally
Secondly I modified the application pools on my dev iis server to use .net 4.0 in preparation for running the new code deployment
Finally I deployed my upgraded project to the dev web server.
The problem is that I am getting an error straight away where I am being told I need to enable session state to access the session variables.
Background:
I have a master page which checks for the existance of a session variable. I have put this code in the page_init event of the master page to ensure it runs before the page_load of the content pages etc.
This technique worked fine under .net 3.5 and works well under 4.5 on the local dev machine. But does not work on the iis server.
I have followed various threads telling me to set enablesessionstate=true in the config all to no avail.
Could it be that there is either a problem with .net sites runnning .net 4.5 on iis with regards to sessions, or am I missing something more obvious.
Please help as this is very frustrating
Well, I have no idea what was causing this?
I have fixed the problem by creating a brand new .net 4.5 project and importing assets / pages from my preexisting site.
Remarkably doing it this way caused no issue with the session after deployment to the web server, Very odd indeed. I can only assume that the project upgrade process that I initially used left some odd configuration in place which upset the server ???
Anyhow, have invested enough time in this now, thanks for taking the time to comment.
This morning after Windows Updates ran and rebooted a pair of web servers, I noticed that one of the sites running there was not responding. After some digging I noticed 100000s of read/write/delete operations in the asp.net temp files folder. Can we do anything to avoid this?
You can tone it down some with precompilation:
How do I prevent IIS from compiling website?
but IIS thought something changed and needed recompiled. Were the updates installed hotfixes to framework components perhaps?
You could consider deploying your website as a precompiled Web Application instead of a website, if this is appropriate to your situation?
After migrating my app to .NET 4 it's not starting. When i'm trying to load it in browser it endlessly loading it and nothing else happening. There is no errors or timeouts, just loading.
Please help. What should i do? What reasons there might be? I'm using IIS6 btw.
Did you register .NET 4 with IIS? Do you need to call aspnet_regiis.exe from the 4.0 directory?
Are you sure the app is using the correct Application Pool? Is the pool set to .NET 4? Is it integrated?
What does your web.config look like? Does the compilation node contain targetFramework="4.0"? Are you referencing 4.0 versions of the assemblies you need?
Unfortunately there is a ton of places to look into.
After some weird combination of IIS restarts, site stops and appPool recycles everything began to work fine.
Currently our dev team set up all the websites they're working on in IIS on their local machine. We're thinking of switching to using the built in ASP.NET development server instead.
Is this a good idea? What are the pros / cons of using the ASP.NET dev Server? Are there any gotchas we should be aware of?
Thanks.
NB: Running on Win XP / IIS 5 / VS2005
Edit:
Didn't realise it was called Cassini.. More answers for Cassini v IIS here.
There is nothing that the ASP.NET Dev WebService can do that IIS can't (You can set breakpoints etc, just attach the VS debugger to the ASP.NET runtime).
However, the ASP.NET Dev WebService does not represent a true production environment, and as such you can get caught by gotchas that you wouldn't expect when you deploy to production.
Because of that, I mandate that all development is done using IIS on a local machine. It doesn't take much work to configure a site in IIS.
It's a very good idea. Here are some reasons for:
You no longer need admin access to your machine for web development (it can still be helpful).
It's much easier to test a quick change and continue work, and faster iteration cycles are good.
It can simplify setup and deployment of your development environments.
The XP version of IIS has limitation that are not present in the Server version that Cassini side-steps.
The only argument I know against is that there are a couple very rare edge cases where the Cassini built-in server doesn't exactly mimic IIS because you're using odd port numbers. I doubt you'll ever run into them, and using Cassini as the primary dev environment does not preclude developers from also having access to IIS on the machine. In fact, my preferred setup is Cassini first for most small work, then deploy to my local IIS for more in-depth testing before moving code back to the shared source repository.
[Edit]
Forgot about url re-writing. You do need IIS for that. And an example of a limitation of the built-in XP IIS is that you are limited to one site in XP (can have multiple applications, but that's a different thing).
I had to switch (back) to IIS for one project, because I needed to set some virtual directories which is not possible on the ASP.NET Development Web Server.
As I stated here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/103785/what-are-the-disadvantages-of-using-cassini-instead-of-iis your developers need to be aware that Cassini runs as the local user, which is typically an admin account for developers. The development will be able to access any file or resource that their account can, which is quite different from what they will see on an IIS 6 server.
The other thing that's a pretty big gotcha is debugging web services is much easier using IIS and vdirs rather than separate Cassini instances.
I know at one point I had an issue with Authentication not working as expected on Cassini (built in development server)
Also, if you need to test things like ISAPI plugins (a re-writer for example) I'm not sure how that's done on Cassini.
The constantly changing port is also rather disconcerting to me. Also, for each web project in your solution it fires up another instance of a Casini server, and each one takes anywhere from 20 to 50 MB of memory.
I use IIS all the time, it's pretty easy to setup, and you guys are already doing that...
I've used both methods and I prefer having IIS locally vs. using the built-in server. At very least you're more consistent with the final deployment setup.
Also, when using IIS 5.1, be sure to get JetStat IIS Admin, it adds functionality that is disabled out of the box on IIS 5, such as being able to setup multiple sites.
I have run into the following limitations with the asp.net dev server:
does not support virtual dirs. If you need them in your app, IIS seems to be your only choice
Classic asp pages dont run in dev server. So if you have a mixed web app (like I have at my client right now), IIS seems to be the solution
If you need an admin UI to configure settings, IIS works better
Of course IIS requires that you be a local admin.
Another distinction I noticed is that Cassini runs as a 32-bit process and you have no control over it, whereas you can control the application pool of your IIS app to disallow 32-bit (assuming your IIS is running on a 64-bit server). This becomes especially important if your web application is going to call APIs in 64-bit processes such as SharePoint Foundation/Server 2010. When you debug your web app with Cassini as your debug server, you'll get "The Web application at url could not be found. Verify that you have typed the URL correctly" type errors when instantiating objects. If you debug using IIS with the app running in an app pool that runs as 64-bit with an identity that allows access to sharepoint database then you'll be able to debug properly.
In VS12 the development server is way slow, takes a few seconds to download a 2kbyte file. This did not happen in vs10. When you have a bunch of jquery files and css this is a real problem. Also every page requeries all the css/js files. Very very slow regression testing.
The main issue I've run into with the dev server is SerializationExceptions with custom security principals stored on the thread context. Details here.