I have a Menu page. If a user selects an Menu Item it opens a new IE Window using JavaScript. So user can open different parts of applications in multiple IE Windows. These Windows have the same Session.
My issue is that these pages are accessed synchronously? If one of the child window is waiting for an action to be finished no other request from any other child window is processed. Is it because of using Session variables?
Update: This is only happening to the windows having the same parent. If I have IE child windows from different parent windows then this issue is not there.
Yes, if each page is using the session, then asp.net will serialize activity against it. If one or more of these sub-pages only need read only access, then mark that in your #Page directives (e.g. EnableSessionState="ReadOnly"), or turn it off completely if the session information isn't used.
Generally, it's a bad plan to have long-running activities pending on the server, and as you've found, this is especially true if they're using the session.
Edit
Last FAQ here also describes this serialization.
Edit 2
In response to comment re: closing the child window:
It will eventually process other requests, once the server side process finishes whatever request it's been working on. Closing a child window does not abort the request on the server side. Best you can hope is that the long-running request has a chance to check IsClientConnected every so often, and aborts its processing if it's no longer relevant.
From the server perspective, you have absolutely no way to know how many browser windows the client has open.
So, no, they are not synchronous.
Related
Have PHP/mySQL/JS-JQuery based web site that records finish times for racers, then sends the time back to the server. The server inserts the finish time in the db, Calculates the finish place based on a handicapping formula. Stores that and send the finish place back to the web page and it is updated on the screen.
It uses Jquery Ajax calls so the page doesn't get reloaded at all.
Everything works fine if the data connection is good.
If the data connection is bad my first version of this page would put a message up that the connection was bad.
Now I am trying to make it a bit smarter, so I have started with the HTML5 feature that tells the browser if it is on or offline(i realize this may not be the best way yet but it works for concept testing)
When a new finish time is recorded(or updated) and we are offline the JS just adds a class of notSent to the tag of the finish time. The finish place and all of the finish places would normally come from the sever are greyed out indicating the data is no longer valid(until it can communicate with the server).
When the browser finds itself back online, A simple jQuery each loop on each notSent class starts re-sending the AJAX requests and if they all get completed it processes the return finish place information and display it as up to date.
It also disables all external links on the page when the browser is offline. This keeps the user from losing the data entry page by accident by clicking a link that will give them a page not found button.
So my last issue, is the browsers reload and close buttons, if the user click these when it is offline they will lose the data entry screen and are out of luck until the connection comes back.
Can I disable these functions as well? A quick Stack-overflow search of this indicates it can be done but most answers give the old, "you really shouldn't and if you think you need to you should rethink your design." warning.
So rethinking my design I start learning about;
HTML 5 local storage (decide I don't need it, since my data is stored already in a input box)
App-cache Manifest for controlling the cache of the page so if reloaded in the browser off line if would get that cached version. After much reading came to the conclusion that this could work on a static page but not mine where the data is updated all the time. Then found that most browsers are deprecating this anyways.
Service Workers seems to be the possible future for contorlling offline caching, but not all browsers support it, it is pretty cumbersome to learn and still very new.
Now I am stuck, Leaning towards preventing browser reloads and defering learning service worker till more support and better examples for a dynamic content pages like mine.
Bottom line- am I missing something here? Is there a easy solution?
I think the best option is to use PouchDB to sync between the client and server and use Background Sync to awake a Service Worker when you regain connectivity. If Service Worker is not present in your browser, it can sync the next time your user open the browser.
You have a similar example of deferred requests explained in the Service Worker Cookbook,
I was wondering if there is any way to always run some server side code when a user leaves a page in ASP.NET. The page Unload event is no good because that doesn't get called if someone clicks on a link. Ideally I'd also like the code to run even if the user closes the browser.
I suspect what I'm asking isn't possible, but it doesn't hurt to ask
Problem is, HTTP is a stateless protocol, so when the page has finished being served, you wont know if the user is still on the page or not.
The only way to acheive this would be a hidden piece of Javascript that constantly pings the server with it's session ID, or another similar mechanism. When the ping becomes unresponsive you can reasonably assume the page is not being viewed by the user anymore.
Here is a diagram that explains traditional HTTP message flow.
im not really sure if you can do that but i have a workaround in mind.
There is an event in the DOM called onbeforeunload. it get calls everytime a user leaves a page. you can try sending an ajax request to the server from this function.
The closest thing you can come without creating too messy a solution is to enable ASP sessions. This will create a session on the server for each visitor, who will be identified by a cookie.
After a certain amount of inactivity from the visitor, the session will be closed, and a SessionEnd event will be raised. This you can hook up to in the Global.asax file.
I will not recommend this however, because HTTP is pr. definition a session-less protocol, and using server based sessions violates this fact, and are often problematic. Many solutions that use server based sessions run into problems when the user uses the browser-back button, and resubmits a form. Because the content of the submitted form no longer corresponds the data that exists in the server session.
Also, enabling server based sessions seriously hurts the scalability of the application.
Not that I know of. You'll need to use javascript for that, and call a web service on the server side.
I have an aspx page with a simple form to send emails to pre-defined lists of users. On the longer lists the page usually times out before the emails finish sending but this has never been an issue.
Today something weird happened and each user got four emails. In the log I could see three new threads crank up one at a time and start over sending from the beginning of the list.
Any ideas? I absolutely know I didn't intentionally refresh the Web page myself, and certainly not three times. But could the browser (IE8) have done it? Would it post again trying to re-establish a connection when it timed out? Or when I switched back to the browser window from another app? I have never seen behavior like this before.
First question would be whether there is any reason to do a long-running task syncronously, i.e. lock up a thread that should be serving web requests for something that could be done in the background, while the browser sits and waits for a response that its probably not going to get. I'd look into running this asynchronously unless there's a very deliberate reason not to.
Secondly have you looked into creating some kind of locking mechanism such that the process can't be started more than once? I have processes where I add a token to the application cache (and remove it when I'm done) so that if the token exists the process won't run again (the call to the asynch task isn't made), and that does the job. That way it doesn't matter how many clients call your code, you prevent things happening more than they should.
I am having ASP .Net application which is running perfectly in IE 7.0 but as due to session sharing in IE 8.0 (also in case of new window), application is giving unexpected behavior as session can be modified by other window.
Some quick facts
I know the -NoCache option and open New Session file menu item of IE 8
I just wanted to know that is there any option to disable this session sharing behavior in new window through ASP .Net code (by getting the browser) or any other solution
I also wanted to have your suggestions for future web application development, what we need to take care to avoid session sharing issue
Session sharing has always been there is not unique to Internet Explorer 8. New tabs, Ctrl-N in any browser (IE5,6,7 FF1,2,3 OP6,7,8,9,10 etc) shares the session data of the global process. It just received a fancy name because now tabs can have multiple processes on the computer (not new either), but will still "share" the sessions. And thats' kinda "new".
It is good that you're aware of this, but it's not so good if you're trying to take this "experience" or "feature" away from the user. If you want that, I'd check into JScript/JavaScript solutions instead and issue a warning when a user tries to open several sessions, but I doubt you'd get a good "prohibit sharing sessions across windows" solution. Even notable banks have already given up on this (they never liked this session sharing thing)
From a design perspective: on the server side, it is rather simple. Just always assume that the session is changed. This can, for instance, mean that on one screen, the user is not logged in, on another he is. That's ok. If he refreshes or goes to another page, you'll show him the correct view: logged in user for the same page.
Just make sure that you check for invalidated data as the result of a changed session in another window (i.e., request). But that's a general advice: be liberal in what you accept, but make sure you validate any input.
EDIT: On extra sessions: just treat them like that. It has always been possible that users open up more then one session for the same user (two different browsers). Just as it has always been possible to change a session through another tab, window etc of the same browser.
On the "solving" side: Configure the session as cookieless. This places the session in the URL query params. Any old window not having the SESSIONID in the URL will not be considered part of the session. However, a warning is in place: this approach eventually causes more trouble then it solves (i.e., now you have to worry about with and without session requests from same user, same browser, same ip and it's still possible to "copy" a session by copying the URL or tab).
Moving some of your information from Session to ViewState may help you solve the issues you are having.
I am not able to make more than one request at a time in asp.net while the session is active. Why does this limitation exist? Is there a way to work around it?
This issue can be demonstrated with a WebForms app with just 3 simple aspx pages (although the limitation still applies in asp.net mvc).
Create an asp.net 3.5 web application.
There should be just three pages:
NoWait.aspx, Wait.aspx, and SessionStart.aspx
NoWait.aspx has this single nugget added between the default div tags: <%=DateTime.Now.Ticks %>. The code-behind for this page is the default (empty).
Wait.aspx looks just like NoWait.aspx, but it has one line added to Page_Load in the code-behind: Thread.Sleep(3000); //wait 3 seconds
SessionStart.aspx also looks just like NoWait.aspx, but it has this single line in its code-behind: Session["Whatever"] = "Anything";
Open a browser and go to NoWait.aspx. It properly shows a number in the response, such as: "633937963004391610". Keep refreshing and it keeps changing the number. Great so far! Create a new tab in the same browser and go to Wait.aspx. It sits for 3 seconds, then writes the number to the response. Great so far! No, try this: Go to Wait.aspx and while it's spinning, quickly tab over to NoWait.aspx and refresh. Even while Wait.aspx is sleeping, NoWait.aspx WILL provide a response. Great so far. You can continue to refresh NoWait.aspx while Wait.aspx is spinning, and the server happily sends a response each time. This is the behavior I expect.
Now is where it gets weird.
In a 3rd tab, in the same browser, visit SessionStart.aspx. Next, tab over to Wait.aspx and refresh. While it's spinning, tab over to NoWait.aspx and refresh. NoWait.aspx will NOT send a response until Wait.aspx is done running!
This proves that while a session is active, you can't make concurrent requests with the same user. Requests are all queued up and served synchronously. I do not expect or understand this behavior. I have tested this on Visual Studio 2008's built in web server, and also IIS 7 and IIS 7.5.
So I have a few questions:
1) Am I correct that there is indeed a limitation here, or is my test above invalid because I am doing something wrong?
2) Is there a way to work around this limitation? In my web app, certain things take a long time to execute, and I would like users to be able to do things in other tabs while they wait of a big request to complete. Can I somehow configure the session to allow "dirty reads"? This could prevent it from being locked during the request?
3) Why does this limitation exist? I would like to gain a good understanding of why this limitation is necessary. I think I'd be a better developer if I knew!
Here is a link talking about session state and locking. It does perform and exclusive lock.
The easiest way around this is to make the long running tasks asynchronous. You can make the long running tasks run on a separate thread, or use and asynchronous delegate and return a response to the browser immediately. The client side page can send requests to the server to check and see if it is done (through ajax most likely), and when the server tells the client it's finished, notify the user. That way although the server requests have to be handled one at a time by the server, it doesn't look like that to the user.
This does have it's own set of problems, and you'll have to make sure that account for the HTTP context closing as that will dispose certain functionality in the asp.net session. One example you'll probably have to account for is probably releasing a lock on the session, if that is actually occurring.
This isn't too surprising that this could be a limitation. Each browser would have it's own session, before the advent of ajax, post back requests were synchronous. Making the same session handle concurrent could get really ugly, and I can see how that wouldn't be a priority for the IIS and ASP.NET teams to add in.
For reasons Kevin described, users can't access two pages that might write to their session state at the same time - the framework itself can't exert fine-grained control over the locking of the session store, so it has to lock it for entire requests.
To work around this, pages that only read session data can declare that they do so. ASP.NET won't obtain a session state write lock for them:
// Or false if it doesn't need access to session state at all
EnableSessionState="ReadOnly"