OK I am looping through the properties in an object like so:
private var _propsList:Object = {'Type':'product_type'
,'Kind':'product_type_sub'
,'Stone':'primary_stone'
,'Stone Color':'primary_stone_sub'
,'Metal':'metal_type'
,'Brand':'product_brand'};
for(key in _propsList)
{
val = _propsList[key];
trace(key +" = "+ val);
}
I am expecting the first trace to be Type = property_type since that is the first one defined in the array, however it is coming up random everytime. I guess this is because my keys are strings and not integers, however is there a way to specify the order it loops through them?
Thanks!!
You can't rely on for (v in someObject) ... to return things in a predictable order, no.
Depending on your specific situation, you could just use an array to hold the keys, and just iterate through that:
private var keys:Array = ["Type", "Kind", "Stone", "Stone Color", "Metal", "Brand"];
private function iterate():void
{
for each (var k:String in keys)
{
trace(_propsList[k]);
}
}
Maybe a bit obvious or non-elegant, but it'd get the job done. :)
you could hack it by classing-out your "_propsList" object creating an array inside of the newly created PropsList class that references the properties in order. At that point, you could run a FOR loop on the array and get your properties in order.
OR, you could have a function inside that new class that would return an Array of those properties. like this:
public function getProps():Array {
return [myPropertyOne, myPropertyTwo, myPropertyThree];
}
In general, I think this is a case where you shouldn't depend on a particular behavior from the framework/language you are using. This type of behavior is generally poorly documented and can change from version to version.
If you really need a specific retrieval order, I would create a wrapper class as jevinkones suggested above. Maybe there's even a utility class in the framework somewhere to accomplish this (Dictionary, etc.?)
HTH,
Karthik
I found this link that gives some background:
Subtle Change in for..in Loops for ActionScript 3
This question is actually a dup of this one.
How about using an array representation like this:
var _propsList:Array = [
['Type', 'product_type'],
['Kind', 'product_type_sub'],
['Stone', 'primary_stone'],
['Stone Color', 'primary_stone_sub'],
['Metal', 'metal_type'],
['Brand', 'product_brand']
];
for(var i in _propsList) {
var elem = _propsList[i];
var key = elem[0];
var val = elem[1]
}
Related
I'd like to simulate some keyboard input by dispatching KeyboardEvent objects manually. Creating such events involves passing a key code.
Alas, I only have a given string
const text: String = "Hello";
I can easily get the char code using String::charCodeAt, but how can I get the key code? For any given character (say: "H") there may be just a single key code, a key code plus some modifier (in this case: Shift + keycode_of_h) or even multiple key codes. Is there maybe a way to get the key code for a given char code (possibly by considering the keyboard mapping of the user)?
This isn't too difficult but it will just take a little bit to set up.
First create a dictionary or Object mapping the UTF-8 values to key values like this:
var keyCodes:Dictionary = new Dictionary();
keyCodes[49] = Keyboard.NUMBER_1; //1
// add the rest of the mappings...
Then because you need to specify SHIFT
var shiftedKeyCodes:Dictionary = new Dictionary();
shiftedKeyCodes[33] = Keyboard.NUMBER_1; //!
// add the rest of the shifted mappings
Then create a utility function like this:
public function charCodeToKeyboardEvent(charCode:int):KeyboardEvent{
var event:KeyboardEvent = new KeyboardEvent(KeyboardEvent.KEY_UP);
event.charCode = charCode;
if(keyCodes[charCode]){
event.keyCode = keyCodes[charCode];
} else if (shiftedKeyCodes[charCode]){
event.keyCode = shiftedKeyCodes[charCode];
event.shiftKey = true;
} else {
return null;
}
return event;
}
Then loop through your string and do this:
for(var i:int = 0; i < myString.length; i++){
dispatchEvent(charCodeToKeyboardEvent(myString.charCodeAt(i)));
}
EDIT: I updated this to use the constants on the Keyboard class so that it will work independent of device or operating system.
It turns out that I didn't need a 100% correct KeyboardEvent in the first place. Instead, there were two things I was missing:
A flash.events.TextEvent needs to be dispatched for plain text (like "Hello") input.
The events need to be dispatched to the embedded edit control which can be accessed using the textDisplay property.
I am trying to build a dynamic Property Accessor. Want something which is like really fast as close to calling the actually Property. Dont want to go the Reflection route as its very slow. So i opted to using DynamicAssembly and inject IL using ILGenerator. Below is the ILGenerator related code which seems to work
Label nulllabel = getIL.DefineLabel();
Label returnlabel = getIL.DefineLabel();
//_type = targetGetMethod.ReturnType;
if (methods.Count > 0)
{
getIL.DeclareLocal(typeof(object));
getIL.DeclareLocal(typeof(bool));
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1); //Load the first argument
//(target object)
//Cast to the source type
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Castclass, this.mTargetType);
//Get the property value
foreach (var methodInfo in methods)
{
getIL.EmitCall(OpCodes.Call, methodInfo, null);
if (methodInfo.ReturnType.IsValueType)
{
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Box, methodInfo.ReturnType);
//Box if necessary
}
}
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0); //Store it
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Br_S,returnlabel);
getIL.MarkLabel(nulllabel);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldnull);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0);
getIL.MarkLabel(returnlabel);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_0);
}
else
{
getIL.ThrowException(typeof(MissingMethodException));
}
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
So above get the first argument which is the object that contains the property. the methods collection contains the nested property if any. for each property i use EmitCall which puts the the value on the stack and then i try to box it. This works like a charm.
The only issue is if you have a property like Order.Instrument.Symbol.Name and assume that Instrument object is null. Then the code will throw an null object exception.
So this what i did, i introduced a null check
foreach (var methodInfo in methods)
{
getIL.EmitCall(OpCodes.Call, methodInfo, null);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_0);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldnull);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ceq);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_1);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_1);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Brtrue_S, nulllabel);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_0);
if (methodInfo.ReturnType.IsValueType)
{
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Box, methodInfo.ReturnType);
//Box if necessary
}
}
Now this code breaks saying That the object/memory is corrupted etc. So what exactly is wrong with this code. Am i missing something here.
Thanks in Advance.
Previously, if you had consecutive properties P returning string and then Q returning int, you would get something like this:
...
call P // returns string
call Q // requires a string on the stack, returns an int
box
...
Now you have something like this:
...
call P // returns string
store // stores to object
... // load, compare to null, etc.
load // loads an *object*
call Q // requires a *string* on the stack
store // stores to object *without boxing*
...
So I see two clear problems:
You are calling methods in such a way that the target is only known to be an object, not a specific type which has that method.
You are not boxing value types before storing them to a local of type object.
These can be solved by reworking your logic slightly. There are also a few other minor details you could clean up:
Rather than ceq followed by brtrue, just use beq.
There's no point in doing Stloc_1 followed by Ldloc_1 rather than just using the value on the stack since that local isn't used anywhere else.
Incorporating these changes, here's what I'd do:
Type finalType = null;
foreach (var methodInfo in methods)
{
finalType = methodInfo.ReturnType;
getIL.EmitCall(OpCodes.Call, methodInfo, null);
if (!finalType.IsValueType)
{
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Dup);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldnull);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Beq_S, nulllabel);
}
}
if (finalType.IsValueType)
{
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Box, methodInfo.ReturnType);
//Box if necessary
}
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Br_S, returnLabel);
getIL.MarkLabel(nulllabel);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Pop);
getIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldnull);
getIL.MarkLabel(returnlabel);
Note that we can get rid of both locals since we now just duplicate the top value on the stack before comparing against null.
I have 2 dynamic objects and I want to build one to contain all the properties:
var o1:Object = {prop1:val1,prop2:val2,prop3:val3};
var o2:Object = {prop3:val3a,prop4:val4};
and I need to obtain a third object that looks like that:
{prop1:val1, prop2:val2, prop3:val3a, prop4:val4};
Basically I need a way to iterate through the object properties and to add new properties to the third object. I have to mention I'm quite new to AS3/Flash/Flex.
First question, do you really mean to have prop3 in both objects? you will need to decide what to do in case of a collision like that, which object has precedence.
Secondly, check out the introspection apis: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=usingas_8.html
something like this should work:
public function mergeDynamicObjects ( objectA:Object, objectB:Object ) : Object
{
var objectC:Object = new Object();
var p:String;
for (p in objectA) {
objectC[p] = objectA[p];
}
for (p in objectB) {
objectC[p] = objectB[p];
}
return objectC;
}
If the property exists in A and B, B's will overwrite A's. Also note that if the values of a property is an object, it will pass a reference, not a copy of the value. You might need to clone the object in those cases, depending on your needs.
Note: I haven't actually tested the above, but it should be close. Let me know if it doesn't work.
Updated to fix the errors. Glad it works for you though.
You can dynamically access/set properties on objects with the index operator. The for loop will itterate over the property names, so if you put it all together, the following test passes:
[Test]
public function merge_objects():void {
var o1:Object = {prop1:"one", prop2:"two", prop3:"three"};
var o2:Object = {prop3:"threeA", prop4:"four"};
var o3:Object = new Object();
for (var prop in o1) o3[prop] = o1[prop];
for (var prop in o2) o3[prop] = o2[prop];
assertThat(o3.prop1, equalTo("one"));
assertThat(o3.prop2, equalTo("two"));
assertThat(o3.prop3, equalTo("threeA"));
assertThat(o3.prop4, equalTo("four"));
}
you can iterate over the object properties like:
var obj1:Object = new Object();
for(var str:String in obj2){
obj1[str] = "any value"; // insert the property from obj2 to obj1
}
Is it possible to clear a Flex flash.utils.Dictionary? I have a Dictionary that I want to clear (remove all elements).
I don't believe there is an explicit clear command.
However, you could write your own that would loop through all the keys and run this
delete dict[key];
Or you can just reassign
dict = new Dictionary()
I think this will work, but I'm not 100% sure, as you're modifying the dictionary while iterating over it:
function clear(d:Dictionary):void {
for(var id:* in d) {
delete d[id];
}
}
However, I generally just create a new Dictionary whenever I need to clear one (though if it's referenced in multiple places then that might not work for you).
To remove all the elements in the Dictionary, loop through each key and use the delete keyword
function clear(dict:Dictionary):void
{
for(var key:Object in dict)
{
delete dict[key];
}
}
If you want to be 100% sure that your deleted keys are garbage collected, you must replace your Dictionary instance with a new Dictionary.
dict = new Dictionary();
I once had a Dictionary object with 3 million Strings as keys. Those Strings would only be garbage collected when the Dictionary instance itself was.
Not only do you need to make sure the key is of type object or * you need to get the keys first then delete them from the dictionary. Otherwise you will end up one key left in the dictionary(the last one).
I remember the above code working before but recently that has changed with the last iteration of flash player.
This code will ensure they are all removed including the last one.
//Clean up the dictionary
var keys:Array = [];
var key:*;
for ( var key:* in dictionary )
keys.push( key );
for each ( var key:* in keys )
delete dictionary[ key ];
Just:
dictionary = new Dictionary()
public static function clear(dict:Dictionary):void {
var key:*
for(key in dict) {
delete dict[key];
}
}
Use the above function as a utility function and you can use it throughout your code base.
I've created an ASP.Net user control that will get placed more than once inside of web page. In this control I've defined a javascript object such as:
function MyObject( options )
{
this.x = options.x;
}
MyObject.prototype.someFunction=function someFunctionF()
{
return this.x + 1;
}
In the code behind I've created MyObject in a startup script --
var opts = { x: 99 };
var myObject = new MyObject( opts );
When a certain button in the control is pressed it will call myObject.someFunction(). Now lets say the value of x will be 99 for one control but 98 for another control. The problem here is that the var myObject will be repeated and only the last instance will matter. Surely there's a way to make the var myObject unique using some concept I've haven't run across yet. Ideas?
Thanks,
Craig
Your Javascript like this:-
function MyObject(options) { this.x = options.x; }
MyObject.prototype.someFunction = function() { return this.x + 1; }
MyObject.create(id, options) {
if (!this._instances) this._instances = {};
return this._instances[id] = new MyObject(options);
}
MyObject.getInstance(id) { return this._instances[id]; }
Your startup javascript like this:-
MyObject.create(ClientID, {x: 99});
Other code that needs to use an instance (say in the client-side onclick event)
String.Format("onclick=\"MyObject.getInstance('{0}').someFunction()\", ClientID);
Note the low impact on the clients global namespace, only the MyObject identifier is added to the global namespace, regardless of how many instances of your control are added to the page.
If it is just one value, why not have the function take it as a parameter and build your onclick handler so that it puts the correct value in for each control. If it is more complex than that, then consider making options an array and, for each control, insert the correct options into the spot in the array that corresponds to each particular control. Then pass the proper index into the array into the function.
I do this by using ScriptManager.RegisterClientScriptBlock to register a string as a JavaScript block on the client side. I can then modify my script string using {0}, {1}..,{n} place holders to inject necessary ids. It depends on the structure of your code as to if this is the most elegant fashion, but it works in a pinch. You could then inject variable names using references to Me.ClientID.
You can make the value of "x" static and access it anywhere in the code, such as:
function MyObject( options ) { MyObject.x = options.x; }
MyObject.x = 99; // static
MyObject.prototype.someFunction = function () { return MyObject.x + 1; }
This way you can access MyObject.x anywhere in your code, even without re-instanciating MyObject.
Excellent solution Anthony. The other solutions offered were as good and I did consider them but I was looking for something a little more elegant like this solution.
Thanks!