I have a console application that uses Unity. In the app.config, I have 20 or so types registered in the default container.
I find that starting up the application (until I start to see some initial output) is very slow compared to a console application built without Unity.
Is there anyway I can improve this start up time?
It is always worth taking measurements to track down the source of performance problems. Try using the StopWatch class or a profiling tool to help you find what is taking the time. Is it the time taken to load your config? Is it the time to Resolve the first class?
Related
Throughout the process of developing my Application, the first-response time has got worse and worse, It is now taking 10 minutes to load! I am using Web-Deploy to speed up publishing my changes, and from what i've read on MSDN, i understand that this delay is due to compilation and loading assemblies.
It's an ASP.NET MVC3 Application which uses EF CodeFirst, MVC-MiniProfiler etc. Im wondering if its one of these assemblies that is slowing things down.
Is there a way to track down the long running process plaguing my development/testing process?
As a side note, the issue is nowhere near as bad in the Azure Emulator.
Using Windows Azure SDK 1.4 and later, you have the option to enable Profiling for you application (beside the IntelliTrace). You can read about some of the options available (in 1.5) from my blog post here where you will also find a good screenshot showing the option to enable either IntelliTrace or Profiling.
The trick is that you can only have one of them running (either ItelliTrace or Profiling). So I suggest you first run the ItelliTrace and inspect ItelliTrace logs for any exceptions during your application execution. Then do another deployment using Profiling to catch which are the most time consuming methods.
Please note that enabling IntelliTrace /Profiling is only accomplishable during deployment process, and cannot be changed with simple WebDeploy, so you'll have to make at least two deployments for test.
It's hard to say what the slowdown is - as Awais mentioned, IntelliTrace is your friend. However, the delay might be unavoidable (I have seen this a number of times). If this is the case, you can add a startup script that will "prime" IIS, preventing the problem when the first user hits the site.
I've had sporadic performance problems with my website for awhile now. 90% of the time the site is very fast. But occasionally it is just really, really slow. I mean like 5-10 seconds load time kind of slow. I thought I had narrowed it down to the server I was on so I migrated everything to a new dedicated server from a completely different web hosting company. But the problems continue.
I guess what I'm looking for is a good tool that'll help me track down the problem, because it's clearly not the hardware. I'd like to be able to log certain events in my ASP.NET code and have that same logger also track server performance/resources at the time. If I can then look back at the logs then I can see what exactly my website was doing at the time of extreme slowness.
Is there a .NET logging system that'll allow me to make calls into it with code while simultaneously tracking performance? What would you recommend?
Every intermittent performance problem I ever had turn out to be caused by something in the database.
You need to check out my blog post Unexplained-SQL-Server-Timeouts-and-Intermittent-Blocking. No, it's not caused by a heavy INSERT or UPDATE process like you would expect.
I would run a database trace for 1/2 a day. Yes, the trace has to be done on production because the problem doesn't usually happen in a low use environment.
Your trace log rows will have a "Duration" column showing how long an event took. You are looking at the long running ones, and the ones before them that might be holding up the long running ones. Once you find the pattern you need to figure out how things are working.
IIS 7.0 has built-in ETW tracing capability. ETW is the fastest and least overhead logging. It is built into Kernel. With respect to IIS it can log every call. The best part of ETW you can include everything in the system and get a holistic picture of the application and the sever. For example you can include , registry, file system, context switching and get call-stacks along with duration.
Here is the basic overview of ETW and specific to IIS and I also have few posts on ETW
I would start by monitoring ASP.NET related performance counters. You could even add your own counters to your application, if you wanted. Also, look to the number of w3wp.exe processes running at the time of the slow down vs normal. Look at their memory usage. Sounds to me like a memory leak that eventually results in a termination of the worker process, which of course fixes the problem, temporarily.
You don't provide specifics of what your application is doing in terms of the resources (database, networking, files) that it is using. In addition to the steps from the other posters, I would take a look at anything that is happening at "out-of-process" such as:
Databases connections
Files opened
Network shares accessed
...basically anything that is not happening in the ASP.NET process.
I would start off with the following list of items:
Turn on ASP.Net Health Monitoring to start getting some metrics & numbers.
Check the memory utilization on the server. Does re-cycling the IIS periodically remove this issue (memory leak??).
ELMAH is a good tool to start looking at the exceptions. Also, go though the logs your application might be generating.
Then, I would look for anti-virus software running at a particular time or some long running processes which might be slowing down the machine etc., a database backup schedule...
HTH.
Of course ultimately I just want to solve the intermittent slowness issues (and I'm not yet sure if I have). But in my initial question I was asking for a rather specific logger.
I never did find an answer for that so I wrote my own stopwatch threshold logging. It's not quite as detailed as my initial idea but it has the benefit of being very easy to apply globally to a web application.
From my experience performance related issues are almost always IO related and is rarely the CPU.
In order to get a gauge on where things are at without writing instrumentation code or installing software is to use Performance Monitor in Windows to see where the time is being spent.
Another quick way to get a sense of where problems might be is to run a small load test locally on your machine while a code profiler (like the one built into VS) is attached to the process to tell you where all the time is going. I usually find a few "quick wins" with that approach.
I have a web service running and I consume it from my desk application that is written on Compact Framework.
It takes 13 seconds to retrieve 8 results which is kinda slow. I also expect to be retrieving more results in the future. The database query runs fast.
Two questions: how do I detect where the speed slow down occurs? Do I put timers in the Web services code?
I would like to detect whether it is the network or the application code.
This is my first exposure to web services in a real environment so please bear with me.
i used asp.net 2.0 and c# to write a simple web service.
Another good profiler is the EQATEC Profiler. I did a write up on it here: http://elegantcode.com/2009/07/02/eqatec-profiler-and-net-cf-profiling-and-regular-net/
And it works find for .net CF projects. But this will allow you to see if there performance issues in unexpected places.
Your already on the right track of adding event logging, and include timers in them. Note, doing so will add to the over all time it takes, so you'll want to remove them after you track down the culprit. Also look into running the same webservice call multiple-times without re-initiating the connection, that may be cause as well.
-Jay
A starting point is to profile your web service to see where the delay is comming from
Did you know the CLR Profiler? There are some tools you can use to see what is happening
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998579.aspx
The database connectivity from your service to the DB could be a possible cause for slowdown. Adding timers should do the trick. If the code isnt too huge, you can look at the coding constructs to come up with an informed decision of where exactly things can be slow. Then add the timers. You would get a fair idea of where things are slowing down.
Two biggest pain points are going to be instantiating the web service reference and transferring all the data over the network. Pending anything turning up where some obvious blunder was made, I would look at ways of reducing the size of your xml and ways of better handling your web service reference.
All I know about the compact framework is that it is a pain to work in. I've worked on a number of web projects though and profiling your server, putting in logging to record the time taken will be helpful. If all the time is being taking post server response, however, it won't do much more than prove your server is working quickly.
SoapUI is a fantastic java application for consuming web services. It has a lot of functionality, including time metrics. I would start with that and see how long it takes to consume the same thing your client would be. Failing issues there, start with what I recommended above.
I am writing a web application in ASP.NET 3.5 that takes care of some basic data entry scenarios. There is also a component to the application that needs to continuously poll some data and perform actions based on business logic.
What is the best way to implement the "polling" component? It needs to run and check the data every couple of minutes or so.
I have seen a couple of different options in the past:
The web application starts a background thread that will always run while the web application does. (The implementation I saw started the thread in the Application_Start event.)
Create a windows service that is always running
What are the benefits to either of these options? Are there additional options?
I am leaning toward a windows service because it is separated and can run on a different server (more scalable) as well as there is more control over when it is started/stopped, etc. However, I feel like the compactness of having the "background" logic running in the process of the web application might make the entire solution more understandable.
I'd go for the separate Windows service primarily for the reasons you give:
You can run it on a different server if necessary.
You can start and stop it independently of the web site.
I'd also add that it could well have some impact on the performance of the web site itself - something you want to avoid.
The buzz-word here is "separation of concerns". The web site is concerned with presenting the data to the user, the service with checking the integrity of the data.
You can also update the web site and service independently of each other should you need to.
I was going to suggest that you look at a scheduled task and let Windows control when the process runs, but I re-read your question and noted that you wanted the checks to run every couple of minutes. The overhead of starting the process might be too great in this case - though some experimentation would probably prove this one way or the other.
If you use a scheduled task there's also the possibility that you could start the next check before the current one has finished - something you can code for if you're in complete control.
Why not just use a console app that has no ui? Can do all that the windows service can and is much easier to debug and maintain. I would not do a windows service unless you absolutely have to.
You might find that the SQL Server job scheduler sufficient for what you want.
Console application does not do well in this case. I wrote a TAPI application which has to stay in the background and intercept incoming calls. But it did it only once because the tapi manager got GCed and was never available for the second incoming call.
I've recently deployed an ASP.NET application to my shiny new VPS and while I'm happy with the general performance increase that a VPS can give over a shared hosting solution, I'm unhappy with the startup time of my application.
My web application takes a fair amount of time to start up when my client first hits it. I'm not running it in debug mode (disabled that in my web.config), and it doesn't have any real work to do on startup - I have no code in my application start event handler, I don't start any extra threads, nothing. The first time my client hits my application it takes a good 15-20 seconds to respond. Subsequent calls take 1-2 seconds, unless I wait a few minutes for my application to shut down. Then it's back to a 15-20 second startup time.
(I'm aware that my timing benchmark is very unscientific, those numbers should just give a feel for the performance on startup of my app).
My understanding of ASP.NET was that IIS (7.0, in this case), compiles a web application the first time it is ever run, and then caches those binaries until such a time as the web application is changed. Is my understanding incorrect?
So, after that book-sized preface, here are my questions:
Is my understanding of ASP.NET's compilation incorrect? How does it actually work?
Is there a way I can force IIS to cache my binaries, or keep my application alive indefinitely?
If it's a bad idea to do either of the things in my previous question, why is it a bad idea, and what can I do instead to increase startup performance?
Thanks!
Edit: it appears my question is a slight duplicate of this question (I thought I did a better job of searching for an answer to this on here, haha). I think, however, that my question is more comprehensive, and I'd appreciate if it wasn't closed as a duplicate unless there are better, already-asked questions on here that address this.
IIS also shuts down your web app after a given time period, depending on its configuration. I'm not as familiar with IIS7 and where to configure this, so you might want to do a little research on how to configure this (starting point?).
Is it bad? Depends on how good your code is. If you're not leaking memory or resources, probably not.
The other solution is to precompile your website. This might be the better option for you. You'll have to check it out and see, however, as it may come with a downside, depending on how you interact with your website.
My understanding of ASP.NET was that IIS (7.0, in this case), compiles a web application the first time it is ever run, and then caches those binaries until such a time as the web application is changed. Is my understanding incorrect?
That is correct. Specifically, the assemblies are built as shadow copies (not to be confused with the volume snapshot service / shadow copy feature). This enables you to replace the code in the folder on the fly without affecting existing running sessions. ASP.NET will detect the change, and compile new versions into the target directory (typically Temporary ASP.NET Files). More on that process: Understanding ASP.NET Dynamic Compilation
If its purely the compilation time then often the most efficient approach is to hit the website yourself after the recycle. Make a call at regular intervals to ensure that it is you who receives the 15 second delay not your client.
I would be surprised if that is all compilation time however (depending on hardware) - do you have a lot of static instances of classes? Do they do a lot of work on start-up?
Either with tracing or profiling you could probably quite quickly work out where the start-up time was spent.
As to why keeping a process around is a bad idea, I believe its due to clear-up. No matter how well we look after our data or how well behaved the GC is, there is a good clear-up performed by restarting the process. Things like fragmentation can go away and any other resource issues that build up over time are cleared down. Therefore it is quite a bad idea to keep a server process running indefinitely.