I have an image in the header of my website. I'd like to use a CSS property to make it stretch across the width of the browser, so that it reacts to the user adjusting the browser window size, and so that the vertical axis of the image is scaled accordingly. Is this actually something that can be done?
Percentages will keep an image the whole width, and will update the image on browser resizing.
If you want the image to always be stretch, you can use:
img {
width:100%;
}
However, that can easily make the image look like total crap. A safer way might be:
img {
max-width:100%;
}
Either way will get the image changing sizes with browser resizing. However, the second won't stretch the image past it's natural size, so it doesn't look deformed.
You can set the width and height properties to percentages (for example, a width of 100% would cause the image to stretch across your page). This can be done using CSS.
CSS can certainly stretch an image (or, at least, I've used it to do so in Firefox at the folowing url: http://www.davidrhysthomas.co.uk/mindez/borked.html):
img {height: 100%;
width: 100%;
min-height: 600px;
min-width: 800px;
}
for example.
But...I think for it to react to the viewport resizing that JS would be probably your better-friend.
Here, give this a go, just apply this CSS style to the element that contains the image. In this example the image is on the background of the page body:
body
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
background: url(images/YOUR-IMAGE.JPG) no-repeat left top;
background-size: 100%;
}
This will maximise your image across the element. Resizing the window will scale the image to fit the browsers new window size
Related
I want to display a bunch of images stored on a server. The images are taken from a user's phone and the dimensions and aspect ratio are unknown.
I just want to have an image fully fill a DIV while maintaining its aspect ratio. If the image is wider than taller, I want the image scaled so the height is 100% the Div and the sides would be clipped off. Similarly for if the image is taller than wider, I want the image scaled up/down so the width is 100% of the Div
Hopefully this explains it
I thought this would be pretty trivial, but here i am. I can make an image fit tall or wide but not either depending on the aspect ratio. I've tried several different methods and I am at a loss.
I have a Stackblitz Example here.
I have a 2x2 grid, and I would like to get the images to fill those grids. Some images need to be rotated. I'm not sure why they need to be as the look normal on my computer. I have a hardcoded flag to force a rotation on some images, but the rotation appears to screw up the css further on.
CSS:
.img-container {
/* height: 150px; */
width: 100%;
}
.img-container img {
height: 100%;
/* height: -webkit-fill-available; */
width: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
HTML:
<div class="showBorder img-container">
<img #image class="container-img-objfit2"
[ngClass]="{rotateLeft: rotate}"
[src]="imageURL" />
</div>
How can I fill these DIVs regardless of the aspect ratio?
Can I do any of this inside angular? I tried to get the image size and see if I could set custom class that would handle the rotation, but that didn't seem to work either. The dimension for all my pictures was identical. So no way to distinguish which pictures need rotation.
Or am I going about this all wrong? Ultimately I think I will have a process to scale and crop the images on the server so they are prepared for the client app.
Update:
This sample is an attempt to set the image in the background and use a :before selector to rotate the image. It does not work fully as I cannot change the image dynamically to other images.
You can just set the images as background-image for the div and set its size to cover.
So just remove the img tag and keep your div tag only
<div class="showBorder img-container" [style.backgroundImage]="'url(' + imageURL + ' )'">
</div>
In CSS you will have to specify the height and the size
.img-container {
height: 150px;
width: 100%;
background-size:cover;
}
i have portrait image (width: 869px; height: 2853px) which i wanna use as the background image for my website. the image should be responsive and always fill the entire width of the browser window. the image should keep its proportions and should never be cropped. therefor the height needs to adjust to the given width. since the image height is always bigger than the viewport height, you should be able to scroll to the bottom of the image, which should be the bottom of the website as well.
i'd really appreciate if someone would tell me how to do this.
I think the other commenters are ignoring your request for help in not "cropping" the image, when they keep suggesting use of background-size: cover.
Here's what I've gathered are your requirements:
An image to be a background, behind the content of your site.
The background image has a specific aspect ratio and should not be cropped
If the browser window doesn't match the images aspect ratio, it should allow scrolling vertically, but should always fit to the windows width.
A css only solution...
body {
position: relative;
margin: 0;
}
body::before {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
z-index: -1;
height: 0;
/* height / width = ratio% */
/* 2853px / 869px = 328.3084% */
padding-bottom: 328.3084%;
padding-bottom: calc(2853 / 869 * 100%);
background: url('//placekitten.com/869/2853') center top / 100% auto no-repeat;
}
Replace the url with the url of your image, and if the image pixel dimensions change, update those in the way I have commented out how padding-bottom should be calculated.
This creates a separate background element inside the body of the website and still allows you to have whatever content you want inside your site. But keep in mind, if you're on a very small screen, say 320px/480px, and the websites content becomes very tall because of the narrow width of the screen, this background image could be scrolled passed to account for the content. That won't break this code, but I would just suggest adding a background color or texture to your html element, which would show below the image in this case. Good luck.
I have a website that I am trying to make behave decently when a browser window is resized. For instance, I want the banner image to be resized when someone shrinks the browser window. The site is http://www.pfp-consortium.org
The banner on top is specified in CSS as
#rt-showcase .rt-container {
border-bottom: 0px none;
height: 200px;
width: 1200px;
background: transparent url("/images/headerimgs/topimage.jpg") no-repeat scroll center center;
}
So I know the fixed width and height has to go. In reading numerous threads on this site, I tried various recommended approaches. I tried setting width (and max-width) to 100% and height to auto, which seems to be the accepted approach. Strangely, whenever I make height anything other than a px value, the image disappears!
Maybe some other aspect of the site is preventing the resizing happening as I would expect?
Any insights appreciated.
The problem is that .rt-container is empty so when the height is auto (or anything except px) the div defaults to 0 height (empty). If you take that image out of the background image and make it an <img> tag then you can apply width: 100%; height: auto; display: block; and it will scale with the window correctly.
Using a responsive fluid grid and images are 800px x 500px
Problem: When images load, the footer as it the top and is pushed down while the images are loading in.
Setup: Using a div for the images and div for the footer.
Goal: To have the footer always remain in the correct position, not trying to put it in an absolute spot, just looking to have the images spacing accounted for.
Ideas: Perhaps use a transparent png at 800x500 so it loads first before the images.
Concerns: Creating a div placeholder at 800x500 might not work as these images are responsive in a fluid grid so they'll never actually be at that size unless the viewer has a huge monitor..
Final result when images loaded:
Current issue:
Goal for images to load:
When I know the aspect ratio for something is going to stay the same no matter what the width of the elements/screen is, I do something like this:
.image-holder {
display: inline-block;
width: 33.333%;
position: relative;
}
.image-holder:before {
content:"";
display: block;
padding-top: 62.5%;
}
.image-holder img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Here's a full demo: http://jsfiddle.net/serv0m8o/1/
I wrap each image in a div with a class of image-holder (which is styled to give you the 3 per row pattern that you illustrated) and make sure it is position: relative;
I then style the :before pseudo-element of that div to be the proper height of the aspect ratio that is needed. Padding in CSS is an intrinsic property, which means it is based on the width of the element, allowing you to assign a percentage which reflects the ratio. You specified 800x500 images, so (500/800*100) = 62.5% as my padding-top
Then, you can absolutely position your image to fill the full width and height of the container (which is why we set it to be position: relative;)
Doing this means that the div element is the size that the image will be, whether the image is loaded into it or not (the image itself has no bearing on the container size, since it is absolutely positioned)
Given the following CSS rule,
#block1 {
text-indent: -1000em;
background: transparent url(../images/xxx.png) no-repeat scroll center center;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
display: inline-block;
}
Assume the image xxx.png is of dimension 100px by 50px. If I need to make this image displayed on #block1 looks smaller, can I simply change the width and height of #block1 or I have to first re-size the image and then change the width and height of the #block1 accordingly.
thank you
You can't in CSS1 and 2, but CSS3 supports the background-size property, which if you set to 100% should give you what you are looking for.
However, you probably should just resize the background image though, unless you have a compelling reason not to :)
CSS can only position the image, not adjust it. If you absolutely needed to resize the image through CSS, you'd have to have the image actually inserted as an img tag, then position it behind the content. It's best just to edit it.
no, the image will just appear to be cropped.