I started building a app that will automatically download my delicious bookmarks, and save to a database, so they I can view them on my own website in my favoured format.
I am forced to use oAuth, as I have a yahoo id to login to delicious. The problem is I am stuck at the point where oAuth requires a user to manually go and authenticate.
Is there a code/ guidelines available anywhere I can follow? All I want is a way to automatically save my bookmarks to my database.
Any help is appreciated. I can work on java, .net and php. Thanks.
Delicious Provides an API for this already:
https://api.del.icio.us/v1/posts/all?
Returns all posts. Please use sparingly. Call the update function to see if you need to fetch this at all.
Arguments
&tag={TAG}
(optional) Filter by this tag.
&start={#}
(optional) Start returning posts this many results into the set.
&results={#}
(optional) Return this many results.
&fromdt={CCYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ}
(optional) Filter for posts on this date or later
&todt={CCYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ}
(optional) Filter for posts on this date or earlier
&meta=yes
(optional) Include change detection signatures on each item in a 'meta' attribute. Clients wishing to maintain a synchronized local store of bookmarks should retain the value of this attribute - its value will change when any significant field of the bookmark changes.
Example
$ curl https://user:passwd#api.del.icio.us/v1/posts/all
<posts tag="" user="user">
<post href="http://www.weather.com/" description="weather.com"
hash="6cfedbe75f413c56b6ce79e6fa102aba" tag="weather reference"
time="2005-11-29T20:30:47Z" />
...
<post href="http://www.nytimes.com/"
description="The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia"
extended="requires login" hash="ca1e6357399774951eed4628d69eb84b"
tag="news media" time="2005-11-29T20:30:05Z" />
</posts>
There are also public and private RSS feeds for bookmarks, so if you can read and parse XML you don't necessarily need to use the API.
Note however that if you registered with Delicious after December, and therefore use your Yahoo account, the above will not work and you'll need to use OAuth.
There are a number of full examples on the Delicious support site, see for example: http://support.delicious.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=3698
Related
I want to have the same WordPress users in two different databases
For example, if a user registers on SiteA, then he can login to SiteB. And reverse.
Also i want create same cookie for both after login.
mywebsite.com/ (SiteA_DB)
mywebsite.com/blog/ (SiteB_DB)
I've never done this before and maybe Wordpress has hooks to archive this, but I prefer using mysql for such a trick.
You could try ..
.. using 'federated storage' ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/24532395/10362812 )This is my favorite, because you don't even have to share a database or even the mysql serverThe downside is, that it doesn't work with db cache and uses an additional connection.
.. creating a 'view' ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/1890165/10362812 )This should be possible when using the database-name in the query itself and it would be the simplest solution if it works. Downside: The 2 tables have to share the same mysql-server and have to be assigned to the same user as far as I know.
-- **Backup your database before trying!** --
DROP TABLE `second_database`.`wp_users`;
DROP TABLE `second_database`.`wp_usermeta`;
CREATE VIEW `second_database`.`wp_users` AS SELECT * FROM `first_database`.`wp_users`;
CREATE VIEW `second_database`.`wp_usermeta` AS SELECT * FROM `first_database`.`wp_usermeta`;
This should work, according to: Creating view across different databases
.. creating a 'shadow copy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/1890166/10362812 )Works with caching and is a standalone tableDownsides as 2. solution + a bit of setup and I think it might be the worst option in performance
This were answers to this question: How do I create a table alias in MySQL
I merged them together for you and made them fit your use-case.
Please also notice, that solution 1 and 2 will replace your current user-tables auf "second_database" because you write directly into "first_database" when querying the fed. storage or the view. This can lead to problems with user-role plugins. You should take care of syncing the plugin-options too, if you should use one of them and in case it uses different tables or 'wp_options' values.
Let me know if this works, I have to do a similar task next week. While researching I found the linked answers.
EDIT: I was missing the point of "cookie-sharing" in my answer. Your example shows a blog on the same domain - you should be able to change the way wordpress sets its cookies to be domain-wide. What I did once for 2 different domains was, that I hooked into the backend (is_admin) and added a javascript which did a post-request to siteB, receiving a token which is stored but marked as 'invalid' on siteB. This token then was passed back to my plugin on siteA which checked if the user is logged_in and (in my case) have adminrights (current_user_can()) and if so, it was sending this token back to sideB which was marking this token as valid to login. (Make sure only sideA can tell sideB to make this token valid!) Once a user is seen with this token in a cookie on siteB, the user is logged-in automatically in the background. Also I made this bidirectional. I am sorry, that I can't share the code for you. I don't have access to it anymore.
Greetings, Eric!
Whenever I encounter code snippets on the web, I see something like
Meteor.subscribe('posts', 'bob-smith');
The client can then display all posts of "bob-smith".
The subscription returns several documents.
What I need, in contrast, is a single-document subscription in order to show an article's body field. I would like to filter by (article) id:
Meteor.subscribe('articles', articleId);
But I got suspicious when I searched the web for similar examples: I cannot find even one single-document subscription example.
What is the reason for that? Why does nobody use single-document subscriptions?
Oh but people do!
This is not against any best practice that I know of.
For example, here is a code sample from the github repository of Telescope where you can see a publication for retrieving a single user based on his or her id.
Here is another one for retrieving a single post, and here is the subscription for it.
It is actually sane to subscribe only to the data that you need at a given moment in your app. If you are writing a single post page, you should make a single post publication/subscription for it, such as:
Meteor.publish('singleArticle', function (articleId) {
return Articles.find({_id: articleId});
});
// Then, from an iron-router route for example:
Meteor.subscribe('singleArticle', this.params.articleId);
A common pattern that uses a single document subscription is a parameterized route, ex: /posts/:_id - you'll see these in many iron:router answers here.
I am in the process of setting up enhanced Ecommerce for GA and have had a few requests of additional of what else the client would like to see in their reports. Once of which is
"Where can i see a report if the locations that a use types in when they use the store locator"
There is already an internal search functionality thats been set up and is tracking the search terms people are typing when looking for products, but i'm not sure if i would need to set this up as a second search terms report or if it's something different?
The URL of the page is different to the internal search results and is www.domain.com/store-locator#wales|GB|0|0|0
Any insight into this would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Roxi
As to me knowledge, you are not able to use bookmarks (#something) in GA for internal site search setup. Only GET and POST parameters are allowed. In your situation I think the best solution is to use GA events to send the data about used location each time the user is using this functionality. You need to include addition ga() function call to track those events. Info about how to set it up you could find here: event tracking. After setting things up, you will see all the info about number and type of called events in Behavior -> Events reports section in GA.
Example code:
<button onlick="var hash_location=window.location.hash;ga('send','event','Locator',has_location)">Click me</button>
With such function new event will be send to GA with Event Category=Locator and Event Action=hash in the url. You have some complicated hash, so most probably you need to extract first some info from this using regular expression. Example to get first item from |-separated list in the hash:
var pattern = new RegExp('[^#|]+');
var hash_location = pattern.exec(window.location.hash)[0];
It seems that youtube are now using ID's for their channels instead of names (part of the V3 api)
However it seems that the embedded iframe playlist player cannot handle these channel ID's
example channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpAOGs57EWRvOPXQhnYHpow
then ID is UCpAOGs57EWRvOPXQhnYHpow
Now try to load this
http://www.youtube.com/embed/?listType=user_uploads&list=UCpAOGs57EWRvOPXQhnYHpow
Can anyone shine a light on this issue ? Or is there some hidden username ?
I also placed this question at the gdata-issues website http://code.google.com/p/gdata-issues/issues/detail?id=6463
The issue here is that a channel is not a playlist; channels can have multiple playlists, yet the listType parameter is designed to look for an actual playlist info object. The documented way around this is to use the data API and call the channel endpoint, looking at the contentDetails part:
GET https://www.googleapis.com/youtube/v3/channels?part=contentDetails&id=UCuo5NTU3pmtPejmlzjCgwdw&key={YOUR_API_KEY}
The result will give you all of the feeds associated with that channel that you can choose from:
"contentDetails": {
"relatedPlaylists": {
"uploads": "UUuo5NTU3pmtPejmlzjCgwdw"
}
}
If available (sometimes with oAuth), there could also be "watch later" lists, "likes" lists, etc.
This may seem like a lot of overhead. In the short term, though, it can be noted that the different feeds are programmatically named; so, for example, if my user channel begins with UC and then a long string, that UC stands for 'user channel' -- and the uploads feed would begin with 'UU' (user uploads) and then have the rest of the same long string. (you'd also have 'LL' for the likes list, 'WL' for the watch later list, 'HL' for the history list, 'FL' for the favorites list, etc. This is NOT documented, and so there's no guarantee that such a naming convention will perpetuate. But at least for now, you could change your ID string from beginning with UC to beginning with UU, like this:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/?listType=user_uploads&list=UUpAOGs57EWRvOPXQhnYHpow
And it embeds nicely.
Just to inform on current state of things -- the change suggested by jlmcdonald doesn't work anymore, but you can still get a proper embed link via videoseries (with the same UC to UU change). I.o.w. link like
http://www.youtube.com/embed/videoseries?list=UUpAOGs57EWRvOPXQhnYHpow
works as of at the moment of writing this.
What method would you use to associate tracking information in Google Analytics with a particular named user?
I want to be able to do custom reports, and ultimately drill down on usage by user.
EDIT
I was thinking that perhaps the EventTracking API would be able to help somehow.
Also, referring to this documentation.
You could add the user's username as a tracking/segmentation) variable...
pageTracker._setVar(username);
You can only use one _setVar per page, though...
http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=57045
http://groups.google.com/group/analytics-help-basics/browse_thread/thread/07e29dc610050971
Since Google Analytics isn't aware of users who are logged into your site you'd have to do that sort of tracking within your site's software itself. If there isn't some sort of plugin or extension out there already you'll probably have to write one yourself that keeps track of what your users do when their logged in.
I think you want Google Analytics - Custom Variables. You can set five variables per page, and there is support for variables you set persisting over session and cookie (aka "visitor") lifetime. Take note of the rules for overwriting previous values based upon slot and scope; the documentation explains this with some examples. You should probably include something in a click-wrapped privacy policy about tracking individual users this way; it's somewhat invasive, depending on the purpose of your website.
_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar',
1, // Slot number: [1-5], inclusive. Required.
'Username', // Custom variable name. Required.
username, // Custom variable value. Required.
2 // Scope:
// 1 = visitor/cookie-level, 2 = session-level, 3 = page-level.
// Optional, default=3.
]);
http://www.highlyrelevant.com/2011/03/25/how-to-add-edit-google-analytics-users-to-your-account/
This post was really helpful for me and my team. Not only does it show how to add users, but it also tells you how to edit existing users that aren't setup correctly.
Thanks!
Phil